This page contains bill sponsorships in the Senate and House.
Bill sponsorships indicate the topics that legislators are most interested in, and spend the most time on.
Bill Sponsorship: North American Wetlands Conservation Extension Act (NAWCA)
Source: S.741 / H.R.2208
Congressional Summary: Extends through 2017 the allocations to carry out approved wetlands conservation projects.Proponent's argument for bill:(US Fish and Wildlife Service statement on NAWCA): The North American Wetlands Conservation Act of 1989 provides matching grants to carry out wetlands conservation projects in the US, Canada, and Mexico for the benefit of wetlands-associated migratory birds and other wildlife. The Standard Grants Program supports projects that involve long-term protection, restoration, and/or enhancement of wetlands and associated uplands habitats. The Small Grants Program supports the same type of projects but project activities are usually smaller in scope, [under] $75,000. Opponent's argument against bill: (Heritage Foundation 2008 statement on wetlands enforcement):
The 2006 Supreme Court ruling in Rapanos v. US restricts the EPA from setting a strict and expansive definition on what classifies as a wetland and what can and can't be regulated. The EPA defines wetlands as "including swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas", but it is more complicated than that. For instance, in the Rapanos case, Rapanos' land was 20 miles away from navigable water, but under the EPA's unrestrained definition, the term "navigable water" was also broadly defined. Having such an expansive definition would allow the EPA to run wild with environmental regulation. A less expansive definition may beget more uncertainty as to how the EPA should regulate wetlands, but it will also lead to more careful deliberation rather than unwarranted regulations.
Also see the related Senate bill S.741
Participating counts on VoteMatch question 8.
Question 8: EPA regulations are too restrictive
Scores: -2=Strongly oppose; -1=Oppose; 0=neutral; 1=Support; 2=Strongly support.
- Topic: Environment
- Headline: Sponsored matching grants for wetlands conservation projects
(Score: -2)
- Headline 2: Matching grants for wetlands conservation projects
(Score: -2)
Participating counts on AmericansElect question 8.
- Headline: Sponsored matching grants for wetlands conservation projects
(Answer: D)
- Headline 2: Matching grants for wetlands conservation projects
(Answer: D)
- AmericansElect Quiz Question 8 on
Environment:
Which of the following statements comes closest to your personal view?
- A: Natural resources exist for the benefit of humanity
- B: Natural resources exist for the benefit of humanity, but should be somewhat protected
- C: Natural resources should be mostly protected, but also exist for the benefit of humanity
- D: Natural resources exist on their own and should be completely protected
- E: Unsure
- Key for participation codes:
- Sponsorships: p=sponsored; o=co-sponsored; s=signed
- Memberships: c=chair; m=member; e=endorsed; f=profiled; s=scored
- Resolutions: i=introduced; w=wrote; a=adopted
- Cases: w=wrote; j=joined; d=dissented; c=concurred
- Surveys: '+' supports; '-' opposes.
Democrats
participating in 13-H2208 |
| John Dingell |
s1o | Michigan Democrat (retiring 2014) | May 23, 2013 |
| Bennie Thompson |
s1o | Mississippi Democrat | May 23, 2013 |
Independents
participating in 13-H2208 |
Total recorded by OnTheIssues:
Democrats:
2
Republicans:
4
Independents:
0 |
|
 |
|
