|
Brian Fitzpatrick on Environment
|
|
Rated 71% by League of Conservation Voters, highest in GOP
What about the Climate Solutions Caucus in the House, the growing bipartisan caucus whose 70 members are equally divided between Republicans and Democrats? One might expect the caucus Republicans to earn higher scores than their party overall, and
technically they did score a bit better than their House peers. But their average 16 percent score is still a failing grade.[The Climate Solutions Caucus's] critics charge the caucus has expanded its size at the expense of its credibility, providing
Republicans who have been actively hostile to government programs a low-stakes opportunity to "greenwash" their climate credentials without backing meaningful action.
The exception is Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), who earned the highest of any
Republican with 71 percent--a solid C-minus. "It's unfortunately that 71 percent is now such an outlier," one analyst notes, "because it used to be that a number of Republicans voted pro environment."
Source: Rebecca Leber in Mother Jones on LCV Enviro Scorecard
, Feb 27, 2018
Keep restrictive rules for predator control in Alaska.
Fitzpatrick voted NAY Disapprove Subsistence Hunting Rule on ANWR
Library of Congress Summary: This joint resolution nullifies the rule finalized by the Department of the Interior on Aug. 5, 2016, relating to non-subsistence takings of wildlife and public participation and closure procedures on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska.
Case for voting YES by House Republican Policy Committee: The Fish and Wildlife Service rule--which lays claim to more than 20% of Alaska--violates ANILCA (Alaska National Interest Land Conservation Act) and the Alaska Statehood Compact. Not only does [the existing 2016 rule] undermine Alaska's ability to manage fish and wildlife upon refuge lands, it fundamentally destroys a cooperative relationship between Alaska and the federal government.
Case for voting NO by the Sierra Club (April 6, 2017):
- President Trump signed H.J. Res. 69, overturning the rule that banned "predator control" on federal wildlife refuges in Alaska unless "based on sound science in response to
a conservation concern."
- Any rule mentioning "sound science" is in trouble under a Trump administration.
- So what kinds of practices will the Trump administration now allow on our federal wildlife refuges? Activities that include shooting or trapping wolves while in their dens with pups, or hunting for grizzly bears from airplanes.
- It's all about ensuring a maximum yield of prey species like elk, moose, and caribou for the real apex predator: humans. So if having more elk requires killing wolf pups in their dens, then so be it.
- The Obama administration's rule (which Trump revoked) never tried to stop all hunting. Subsistence hunting was still allowed. What's changed is that the predators on federal wildlife refuges are now under the control of the state of Alaska. And that makes them prey.
Legislative outcome: Passed Senate, 52-47-1, March 21; passed House, 225-193-12, Feb. 16; signed by Pres. Trump April 3.
Source: Congressional vote 18-HJR69 on Feb 16, 2017
Page last updated: Jan 20, 2022