|
John Kerry on Homeland Security
Jr Senator (MA), Democratic nominee for President
|
Need the best intelligence and cooperation to make us safe
Q: Why do you think that there have been no further terrorist attacks on American soil since 9/11? If elected, what will you do to assure our safety?A: The Bush administration has told you and all of us it's not a question of if, it's a question of
when. Between the World Trade Center bombing in 1993 or so, and the next time was 5 or 7 years. They people wait. They'll plan. They plot. I agree with Bush that we have to go after them and get them wherever they are. I just think I can do that far more
effectively, because the most important weapon in doing that is intelligence. You got to have the best intelligence in the world. In order to have the best intelligence in the world to know who the terrorists are and where they are and what they're
plotting, you've got to have the best cooperation you've ever had in the world. We're not getting the best cooperation in the world today. We got a whole bunch of countries that pay a price for dealing with the US now. I'm going to change that.
Source: Second Bush-Kerry Debate, in St. Louis MO
Oct 8, 2004
Our container ports, bridges, & plants are not secure
KERRY: 95% of our containers coming into this country are not inspected today. When you get on an airplane, your bag is x-rayed but the cargo hold isn't x-rayed. Bush chose a tax cut for the wealthiest Americans over getting that equipment out into the
homeland as fast as possible. We have bridges and tunnels that aren't being secured. Chemical plants, nuclear plants that aren't secured. Hospitals that are overcrowded with their emergency rooms. If we had a disaster today, could they handle it?
BUSH: We've tripled the homeland security budget from $10 to $30 billion. We'll do everything we can to protect the homeland. We need good intelligence. Right after 1993 he voted to cut the intelligence budget by $7.5 billion.
KERRY:
Pres. Bush just said to you that we've added money. The test is not if you've added money. The test is have you done everything possible to make America secure. He chose a tax cut for wealthy Americans over the things that I listed to you.
Source: Second Bush-Kerry Debate, in St. Louis MO
Oct 8, 2004
Isolate the radical Muslims, not have them isolate the US
I have a better plan to be able to fight the war on terror by strengthening our military and our intelligence, by going after the financing more authoritatively, by doing what we need to do to rebuild the alliances, by reaching out to the Muslim
world, which Bush has almost not done, and beginning to isolate the radical Islamic Muslims, not have them isolate the US. I have a plan to have a summit with all of the allies. We can do a better job of training the Iraqi forces to defend themselves.
Source: First Bush-Kerry debate, Miami FL
Sep 30, 2004
Protect loose nuclear materials from the terrorists
Long before Bush and I get a tax cut - and that's who gets it - long before we do, I'm going to invest in homeland security and I'm going to make sure we're not cutting COPS programs in America and we're fully staffed in our firehouses and that we
protect the nuclear and chemical plants. The president also unfortunately gave in to the chemical industry, which didn't want to do some of the things necessary to strengthen our chemical plant exposure.
And there's an enormous undone job to protect the loose nuclear materials in the world that are able to get to terrorists. That's a whole other subject, but I see we still have a little bit more time.
Let me just quickly say, at the current pace, the president will not secure the loose material in the Soviet Union - former Soviet Union for 13 years. I'm going to do it in four years. And we're going to keep it out of the hands of terrorists.
Source: First Bush-Kerry debate, Miami FL
Sep 30, 2004
Double the number of special forces
KERRY: I intend to double the number of special forces so that we can do the job we need to do with respect fighting the terrorists around the world. And if we do that, then we have the ability to be able to respond more rapidly.
If it took American forces to some degree to coalesce the African Union, I'd be prepared to do it because we could never allow another Rwanda.BUSH: I agree with Kerry that we shouldn't be committing troops.
We ought to be working with the African Union to do so-precisely what we did in Liberia. We helped stabilize the situation with some troops, and when the African Union came, we moved them out.
My hope is that the African Union moves rapidly to help save lives. And fortunately the rainy season will be ending shortly, which will make it easier to get aid there and help the long-suffering people there.
Source: First Bush-Kerry debate, Miami FL
Sep 30, 2004
Build the strongest network to prevent nuclear proliferation
KERRY: Right now Bush is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to research bunker-busting nuclear weapons. The United States is pursuing a new set of nuclear weapons. It doesn't make sense. You talk about mixed messages. We're telling other people,
"You can't have nuclear weapons," but we're pursuing a new nuclear weapon that we might even contemplate using. We're going to get the job of containing all of that nuclear material in Russia done in four years. And we're going to build the strongest
international network to prevent nuclear proliferation.BUSH: We've decreased funding for dealing with nuclear proliferation about 35% since I've been the president. The biggest threat facing this country is weapons of mass destruction in the hands of
a terrorist network. And that's why proliferation is one of the centerpieces of a multi-prong strategy to make the country safer. Over 60 nations involved with disrupting the trans-shipment of information and/or weapons of mass destruction materials.
Source: First Bush-Kerry debate, Miami FL
Sep 30, 2004
Expand active duty and Army's forces to security peace
We will expand America's active duty forces by 40,000; double the Army's Special Forces capability within 4 years, while adding a special operations helicopter squadron to the Air Force; increase by 50 percent the number of civil affairs troops trained
in the special responsibilities of reconstruction; increase our military police, because order is critical to establishing the conditions that allow peace to take hold; and add 500 "psychological operations" personnel and augment their language training.
Source: Our Plan For America, p. 19
Aug 10, 2004
Offer a military modernization plan for the troops
We offer a military modernization plan that will create more fully modernized "digital divisions," equipped with the latest communications technology crucial to future military success; create new "anti-proliferation" units trained and equipped to find
and destroy nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, and to secure the facilities that produce them; and provide full support for education and training for our troops, including on how to deal effectively with culturally diverse civilian populations.
Source: Our Plan For America, p. 19
Aug 10, 2004
Ensure Americans in uniform receive benefits they deserve
We will enact a Military Family Bill of Rights that includes a commitment to full, mandatory funding of veterans' health care; a commitment to competitive pay for service members, including special compensations for those in combat zones; up-to-date and
accurate notice to military families about deployments and rotations that send troops away from home or back home; financial help for families affected by extended deployments; a guarantee of adequate housing for military families, beginning with the
accelerated construction by private developers of new housing on or near military bases; full access for all military personnel, whether active duty, National Guard, or Reserves, to TRICARE; full funding for Department of Defense schools serving military
families, which Bush has sought to cut; a new $250,000 gratuity for families of service members killed in a combat zone; and doubling the period during which families of service members killed in action can continue to live in military housing.
Source: Our Plan For America, p. 21
Aug 10, 2004
Make better use of the National Guard
We need to make better use of what should be a key asset in homeland defense - our National Guard. The National Guard has served in every war, and they are serving now. They were the first ones called on to line city streets, guard bridges, and patrol
our airports after September 11th. We will make homeland security one of their primary missions, and assign Guard units to a standing national task force on homeland security commanded by a National Guard general.
Source: Our Plan For America, p. 23
Aug 10, 2004
Keep our promises to American veterans
There are countless veterans who fought our wars who are now fighting year after year for the benefits they earned. Bush refuses to fully fund veterans' health care. While boasting of cutting waitlists for VA health care, the Bush administration has done
so by excluding nearly 500,000 veterans from enrolling. Bush has strongly opposed granting our nation's veterans full disability and retirement pay. We will end the game of playing politics with funding for veterans health care by making it mandatory. We
will end the "disabled veterans tax," under which military retirees who receive both veteran's pensions and disability compensation must surrender a dollar from their military retirement pay for every dollar they get for military compensation. America
deserves a commander-in-chief who will fight for a constant standard of decency and respect for those who serve their country in our armed forces-on active duty and as veterans. It should be no other way and in our administration, it will be no other way
Source: Our Plan For America, p. 22
Aug 10, 2004
Make certain the veterans have benefits
Q: What specific actions would you take to ensure that these soldiers receive the benefits that they deserve? A: Bush has 135,000 veterans waiting six months to get their first visit with the doctor at the VA.
400,000 veterans have had their cutbacks and their accessibility to the VA altogether. He has made our military weaker by overextending them. Our troops deserve a president who's going to keep faith with those who wore the uniform.
Source: CNN "Rock The Vote" Democratic Debate
Nov 5, 2003
Invest billions to secure loose nukes abroad
After spending trillions of dollars to win the cold war, it was worth spending a few billion dollars a year to make sure that a stricken former Soviet industry for the production of weapons of mass destruction does not become the source to a fire sale
for rogue states and terrorists.Instead the Bush administration tried to slash federal funding for these Nunn-Lugar initiatives the moment it took office, an effort it continued well after 9/11 starkly illustrated the potential costs of letting
terrorists get control of weapons of mass destruction. More recently the administration has offered more support for Nunn-Lugar initiatives, but we must match that with broader, multilateral framework for identifying & securing nuclear materials wherever
they may be and in whatever quantity. As Nunn and Lugar have long argued, we must help those in possession of deadly materials who lack the financial and technical means to control them to become responsible stewards under international supervision.
Source: A Call to Service, by John Kerry, p. 57-8
Oct 1, 2003
Supported a federal crime bill that funded 100,000 cops
[In a Senate vote for a crime bill that funded 100,000 cops] I have put more cops on the street in the past two years than Bill Weld has in the past five.
Source: Debate is first Kerry/Weld duel, SouthCoastToday.com
Apr 10, 1996
Need to be smarter about how we wage a war on terror efforts
KERRY: A fresh start, new credibility, a president who can understand what we have to do to reach out to the Muslim world to make it clear that this is not, you know - Osama bin Laden uses the invasion of Iraq in order to go out to people and say that
America has declared war on Islam. We need to be smarter about now we wage a war on terror. We need to deny them the recruits. We need to deny them the safe havens. We need to rebuild our alliances.BUSH: Kerry said Osama bin Laden uses the invasion of
Iraq as an excuse to spread hatred for America. Osama bin Laden isn't going to determine how we defend ourselves. I decided the right action was in Iraq. He said I misled on Iraq. I don't think he was misleading when he called Iraq a grave threat in the
fall of 2002. I don't think he was misleading when he said that it was right to disarm Iraq in the spring of 2003.What is misleading is to say you can lead and succeed in Iraq if you keep changing your positions on this war. And he has.
Source: First Bush-Kerry debate, Miami FL
Sep 30, 2004
Automatic citizenship to immigrants who serves in army
We have about 37,000 people served in the armed forces of the United States who are legal residents. They should automatically become American citizens for having served their country in that way.
Source: Democratic Primary Debate, Albuquerque New Mexico
Sep 4, 2003
John Kerry on Anti-terrorism
Cast a global net for terrorists
Al Qaeda alone is known to operate in more than 60 countries. We need the cooperation of intelligence and law enforcement agencies around the world to cast a global net for terrorists, infiltrate their cells, learn their plans, cut off their funds,
and stop them before they can attack. We will strengthen the effectiveness of intelligence and law enforcement efforts around the world by forging stronger international coalitions and enhancing cooperative relationships.
Source: Our Plan For America, p.225
Aug 10, 2004
Improve intelligence capabilities to counter terrorism
We can more effectively prevent another terrorist attack by: restoring the credibility of our intelligence community by ensuring the basic integrity of the intelligence process. We will make certain that our intelligence agencies are protected from
political pressures and operate in a culture of diversity of thought, dissent, and forceful challenging of assumptions; strengthening accountability & leadership by creating a true Director of National Intelligence with the authority to manage & direct
all of the components of the intelligence community; maximizing coordination and integration by structuring around key threats like terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, and hostile countries; transforming our intelligence services to ensure that they
have sufficient personnel with the skills, languages, training, & orientation needed to meet today's threats. We will make sure that the FBI is fully prepared to perform counter-terrorism intelligence operations and strengthen our capabilities overseas.
Source: Our Plan For America, p. 13
Aug 10, 2004
Cut off terrorists funds
Terrorists need money to operate. We will: impose tough financial sanctions against nations or banks that engage in money laundering or fail to act against it; launch a "name and shame" campaign against those financing terror, and shut out of the US
financial system those nations that fail to respond, end Bush's kid-glove approach to the supply & laundering of terrorist money in Saudi Arabia, and demand Riyadh shut down Saudi-based "charities" that help finance al Qaeda and other terrorist networks.
Source: Our Plan For America, p. 14
Aug 10, 2004
Prevent Afghanistan & others from becoming terrorist havens
Our drive to topple the Taliban regime convincingly demonstrated the courage and skill of our troops, the value of powerful new technologies, and the particular importance of Special Forces units in defeating unconventional enemies.
Unfortunately, we have not followed with a plan or the commitment to win the peace. Bush has all but turned away from Afghanistan, allowing it to become a forgotten front in the war on terror and once again a potential breeding ground for terrorists.
Source: Our Plan For America, p. 15
Aug 10, 2004
Add 40,000 troops and double anti-terrorism special forces
I will never hesitate to use force when it is required. Any attack will be met with a swift & certain response. I will never give any nation or institution a veto over our national security. We need a stronger American military. We will add 40,000 active
duty troops to strengthen American forces now overstretched, overextended, and under pressure. We will double our anti-terrorism special forces. We will provide our troops with the newest weapons and technology to save their lives - and win the battle.
Source: Acceptance speech to the Democratic National Convention
Jul 29, 2004
Will lead a global effort against nuclear proliferation
We need to make America once again a beacon in the world. We need to be looked up to and not just feared. We need to lead a global effort against nuclear proliferation - to keep the most dangerous weapons in the world out of the most dangerous hands in
the world. We need a strong military and we need to lead strong alliances. And then, with confidence and determination, we will be able to tell the terrorists: You will lose and we will win. The future doesn't belong to fear; it belongs to freedom.
Source: Acceptance speech to the Democratic National Convention
Jul 29, 2004
Quickly implement the recommendations of the 9-11 commission
The 9-11 Commission has given us a path to follow, endorsed by Democrats, Republicans, and the 9-11 families. As President, I will not evade or equivocate; I will immediately implement the recommendations of that commission. We shouldn't be letting 95%
of container ships come into our ports without ever being physically inspected. We shouldn't be leaving our nuclear and chemical plants without enough protection. And we shouldn't be opening firehouses in Baghdad and closing them down in America.
Source: Acceptance speech to the Democratic National Convention
Jul 29, 2004
Four new imperatives: alliances, modernize, end Mideast oil
It's time for a new national security policy guided by four new imperatives: First, we must launch and lead a new era of alliances for the post 9-11 world. Second, we must modernize the world's most powerful military to meet the new threats. Third, in
addition to our military might, we must deploy all that is in America's arsenal -- our diplomacy, our intelligence system, our economic power, and the appeal of our values and ideas. Fourth and finally, to secure our full independence and freedom, we
must free America from its dangerous dependence on Mideast oil. These four imperatives are a response to an inescapable reality: War has changed; the enemy is different - and we must think and act anew.
Today, we are waging a global war against a
terrorist movement committed to our destruction. Terrorists like al Qaeda are unlike any adversary our nation has faced. We do not know for certain how they are organized or how many operatives they have. But we know the destruction they can inflict.
Source: Speech on Iraq and foreign policy, Seattle WA
May 27, 2004
Increase military by 40,000 troops-but no draft
Q: You said that in your first 100 days you would move to increase our armed forces by as much as 40,000 troops. You said there was a dire need for two full divisions. People are wondering right now about voluntary versus draft.KERRY:
We don't need a draft now and I wouldn't be in favor of it under the current circumstances. All across this country there are families who are suffering greatly because the Guards and Reserves have been called up. They are overextended.
Their deployments are too long. If we're going to maintain this level of commitment on a global basis, and for the moment we have to because of what's happened, we need an additional two divisions. One's a combat division and one is a support division.
That's the responsible thing to do. That's temporary, because I intend to go back to the UN, rejoin the community of nations, bring other boots on the ground to help us, and reduce the overall need for deployment of American forces in the globe.
Source: Democratic 2004 Primary Debate at St. Anselm College
Jan 22, 2004
Focus more on human intelligence gathering
Q: Do you feel there's a problem with American intelligence-gathering? A: Yes, there is a problem. It's a very serious one. The Bush Administration misled the American people with respect to intelligence related to Iraq.
That's very serious and we need to get to the bottom of the White House intelligence gathering process during the lead-up to the Iraq war. We also need to change how we gather intelligence--to increase the focus on human intelligence gathering.
Source: Concord Monitor / WashingtonPost.com on-line Q&A
Nov 7, 2003
The New War: We are no longer safe at home
On the periphery of the world are dangerous and unstable places, places where terrorists, absolutists, neo-Fascists, and gangsters work to undo the twentieth century and impose a new dark age.
Though these forces are essentially weak and defensive and far less popular even in their home territories than the American values they oppose, they have repeatedly demonstrated the global reach of their ability to do violence.
The proliferation of international criminal gangs and narco-terrorists in the 1990's-a subject I wrote about I my 1997 book, The New War, was a warning that we were no longer safe at home from the dark underside of a global society.
Any lingering doubt about that reality was dramatically dispelled on 9/11.
Source: A Call to Service, by John Kerry, p. 34
Oct 1, 2003
Modernize the Middle East to prevent future terrorism
It isn't only terrorism we are fighting, it's also the beliefs that motivate terrorists and the conditions that make those beliefs possible.There are no full-fledged democracies among the 16 Arab states of the Middle East and North Africa.
More than half of Arab women are still illiterate. These countries are among the most economically isolated in the world, with very little trade & investment and little income apart from the oil royalties. With a landscape marked by political oppression,
economic stagnation, staggering unemployment, lack of education, poverty, and rapid population growth, is it any wonder these Islamic countries are recruiting grounds for terrorists?
We need more than a one-dimensional war on terror.
We must engage in a smarter, more comprehensive, and more farsighted strategy for modernizing the greater Middle East. It's no more ambitious-and no less necessary-a task than the rebuilding of Europe that we undertook at the end of World War II.
Source: A Call to Service, by John Kerry, p. 44-6
Oct 1, 2003
John Kerry on Bush Policy
Military is overextended and there's a backdoor draft
Our military is overextended under Bush. Our Guard and Reserves have been turned into almost active duty. You've got people doing two and three rotations. You've got stop-loss policies so people can't get out when they were supposed to. You've got a
backdoor draft right now. And a lot of our military are underpaid. These are families that get hurt. It hurts the middle class. It hurts communities, because these are our first responders and they're called up and they're over there, not over here. Now,
I'm going to add 40,000 active duty forces to the military, and I'm going to make people feel good about being safe in our military and not overextended, because I'm going to run a foreign policy that actually does what President Reagan and President
Eisenhower did and others. We're going to build alliances. We're not going to go unilaterally. We're not going alone like this president did.
Source: Second Bush-Kerry Debate, in St. Louis MO
Oct 8, 2004
Bush chose tax cuts for the wealthy over homeland security
BUSH: My administration has tripled the amount of money we're spending on homeland security to $30 billion a year. My administration worked with the Congress to create the Department of Homeland Security so we could better coordinate our borders & ports.
We've got 1,000 extra border patrol on the southern border; want 1,000 on the northern border. We're modernizing our borders. We spent $3.1 billion for fire & police. But the best way to protect this homeland is to stay on the offense.KERRY: We just
read on the front pages of America's papers that there are over 100,000 hours of tapes from the FBI unlistened to. On one of those tapes may be the enemy being right the next time. And the test is not whether you're spending more money. The test is, are
you doing everything possible to make America safe? We didn't need that tax cut. America needed to be safe.
BUSH: Of course we're doing everything we can to protect America. I wake up every day thinking about how best to protect America. That's my job.
Source: [X-ref Bush] First Bush-Kerry debate, Miami FL
Sep 30, 2004
Bush is backdoor drafting our National Guards
Ask the people in the armed forces today. We've got Guards and Reserves who are doing double duties. We've got a backdoor draft taking place in America today: people with stop-loss programs where they're told you can't get out of the military; nine out o
our 10 active duty divisions committed to Iraq one way or the other, either going, coming or preparing. Bush has overextended the US. In my plan, I add two active duty divisions to the US Army, not for Iraq, but for our general demands across the globe.
Source: First Bush-Kerry debate, Miami FL
Sep 30, 2004
Bush has cut funding to stop nuclear proliferation
Nuclear proliferation is the single most serious threat to the national security to the US. There's some 600-plus tons of unsecured material still in the former Soviet Union and Russia. At the rate that Bush is currently securing it, it'll take 13
years to get it. I did a lot of work on this. I wrote a book about it several years ago, which saw the difficulties of this international criminal network. Back then, we intercepted a suitcase in a Middle Eastern country with nuclear materials in it.
And the black market sale price was about $250 million. Now, there are terrorists trying to get their hands on that stuff today. Bush has secured less nuclear material in the last two years since 9/11 than we did in the two years preceding 9/11. We have
to do this job. And to do the job, you can't cut the money for it. Bush actually cut the money for it. You have to put the money into it and the funding and the leadership. Part of that leadership is sending the right message to places like North Korea.
Source: First Bush-Kerry debate, Miami FL
Sep 30, 2004
Individual Ready Reserve call-up is used as a backdoor draft
The vast majority of the Army's active duty combat divisions are committed to Iraq, either currently there, preparing to go, or recently returned. We've called up our Guard and Reserves at historic levels. Some have been on the ground in Iraq for as many
as 15 months - much longer than was promised. And many of these units are stretched far too thin. Bush's answer has just been to stretch further. They are effectively using a stop-loss policy and the Individual Ready Reserve call-up as a back-door draft.
Source: Our Plan For America, p. 18
Aug 10, 2004
End the backdoor draft of reservists, help is on the way
We will end the backdoor draft of National Guard and reservists. To all who serve in our armed forces today, help is on the way. I will fight a smarter, more effective war on terror. We will deploy every tool in our arsenal: our economic as well as our
military might; our principles as well as our firepower. There is a right way and a wrong way to be strong. Strength is more than tough words. After decades of experience in national security, I know the reach of our power and the power of our ideals.
Source: Acceptance speech to the Democratic National Convention
Jul 29, 2004
Bush's foreign policy has not made American safer
Q: A majority of Americans thought that because of the administration policy on Iraq, the chance of a terrorist attack had grown. Do you agree with that?
A: The overall conduct of the Bush administration's foreign policy - the war included, the management of Afghanistan, the diversion from Afghanistan, away from Al Qaeda, the lack of cooperation with other countries,
the lack of adequate attention on homeland security, all together - has not made America as safe as we ought to be given the options available to us in the aftermath of 9/11. There are a whole series of events that have not made America safer.
Source: New York Times, "Bad Iraq Intelligence Cost Lives"
Jul 11, 2004
Exaggeration by the Bush administration should be questioned
Q: Do you believe that Cheney berated middle-level people at the intelligence agency to, in effect, shape the intelligence that he wanted? A: There is a very legitimate question about what the vice president of the US was doing at the CIA. There's an
enormous question about the exaggeration by this administration. But the most important point is the larger issue of how you choose somebody to run and to be president of the US. We deserve leadership that knows how to take a nation to war if you have to
Source: Democratic 2004 primary Debate in Greenville SC
Jan 29, 2004
Bush administration is misleading America in a profound way
Q: Where has the exaggeration been in the threat on terrorism? A: 45 minutes deployment of WMD, number one. Aerial vehicles to be able to deliver materials of mass destruction, number two. Nuclear weapons, number three. I could run a long list of
clear misleading, clear exaggeration. The linkage to Al Qaida, number four. They are really misleading all of America in a profound way. This administration's arrogant and ideological policy is taking America down a more dangerous path.
Source: Democratic 2004 primary Debate in Greenville SC
Jan 29, 2004
Bush misused the authority Congress gave him
Q: Was Dean wrong to oppose the war? A: Certainly not in its current status. But he has had it both ways. On October 6th, five days before we voted in the Senate, Governor Dean took a public position supporting the Biden-Lugar resolution,
which gave authority to the president of the United States to go to war if he found that the diplomatic effort had been exhausted and all he had to do was write a letter. We voted to do it the right way. This president chose to do it the wrong way.
Source: Iowa Brown and Black Presidential Forum
Jan 11, 2004
Color-coded warning system needs to be changed
Q: Do you support the government's threat warning system? A: No, I would change it. I think a lot of Americans are desperately trying to figure out what the codes mean, what the colors mean. They're kind of struggling to figure out what it means.
I think Americans deserve something better. This president is actually playing to the culture of fear in our country. The war on terror is far less of a military operation and far more of an intelligence-gathering, law-enforcement operation.
Source: Iowa Brown and Black Presidential Forum
Jan 11, 2004
Focus on first responders instead of duct tape
The Bush administration denied for a very long time after 9/11 that there was any homeland security challenge at all, beyond the counterterrorism efforts already being performed by the FBI at home and the CIA overseas. Then the administration reversed
course and embraced a Democratic proposal to create a cabinet-level Department of Homeland Security. Yet what Bush has offered is little more than a huge new bureaucracy and a run on duct tape. Funding for homeland security's first responders-
firefighters, paramedics, and law enforcement-was first delayed, then drawn from other law-enforcement funding. I've proposed a First Defenders Initiative to help both firefighters and police staff up against crime and terrorism and give homeland
security forces the same degree of support we've given our armed forces overseas. This initiative includes efforts to bring 21st century technology to the war on terror so that first defenders can communicate and share lifesaving information.
Source: A Call to Service, by John Kerry, p. 59-60
Oct 1, 2003
No new generation of nuclear weapons
[Bush has failed] to understand the world today: the problems of North Korea before they're a crisis, where you need to negotiate; Africa and AIDS before it's a crisis, not a matter of a political stop; the issue of proliferation.
This president wants to build a new generation of nuclear weapons. I don't want another generation of usable nuclear weapons. And we need the president to say no.
Source: Democratic Primary Debate, Albuquerque New Mexico
Sep 4, 2003
John Kerry on Voting Record
FactCheck: No, Kerry voted FOR 16 out of 19 defense packages
BUSH_CHENEY CLAIM: "John Kerry has repeatedly opposed weapons vital to winning the war on terror: Bradley Fighting Vehicles, Patriot missiles, B-2 Stealth bombers, F-18 fighter jets and more."CNN FACT CHECK:This claim is accurate, although it
primarily references his votes on several large spending bills, as opposed to votes on specific programs. It also references old positions that Kerry now disavows. However, throughout his Senate career, Kerry voted to approve 16 of 19 annual Pentagon
spending bills, which authorized spending for many of the systems that the Bush-Cheney campaign says Kerry opposed. It is true that Kerry opposed many weapons systems when running for the Senate in 1984, although as a presidential candidate
he has said that he should not have taken those positions in 1984. In the Senate, he has voted repeatedly to eliminate the B-2 Stealth bomber program, most recently in 1992.
Source: CNN FactCheck on statements by Bush and Kerry:
Oct 29, 2004
Zell: Kerry voted against weapons needed for War on Terror
[Zell Miller says]: Kerry has opposed the very weapons system that won the Cold War and that is now winning the War on Terror.- The B-1 bomber, that Kerry opposed, dropped 40% of the bombs in Operation Enduring Freedom.
- The B-2 bomber
that Kerry opposed, delivered air strikes against the Taliban in Afghanistan and Hussein's command post in Iraq.
- The modernized F-14D, that Kerry opposed, delivered missile strikes against Tora Bora.
- The Apache helicopter, that Kerry opposed,
took out those Republican Guard tanks in Kuwait in the Gulf War.
- The F-15 Eagles, that Kerry opposed, flew cover over our Nation's Capital and this very city after 9/11.
- I could go on and on and on: against the Patriot Missile; against the
Aegis air-defense cruiser; against the Strategic Defense Initiative; against the Trident missile; against, against, against.
This is the man who wants to be the Commander in Chief of our US Armed Forces? US forces armed with what? Spitballs?
Source: Zell Miller's 2004 Republican Keynote Convention speech
Sep 1, 2004
Voted YES on adopting the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.
Adoption of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty would ban nuclear weapons testing six months after ratification by the 44 nations that have nuclear power plants or nucelar research reactors.
Status: Resolution of Ratification Rejected Y)48; N)51; P)1
Reference: Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty;
Bill Treaty Document #105-28
; vote number 1999-325
on Oct 13, 1999
Voted YES on allowing another round of military base closures.
Vote on an amendment to allow one round of military base closures beginning in 2001 as determined by an independent panel.
Bill S.1059
; vote number 1999-147
on May 26, 1999
Voted NO on cutting nuclear weapons below START levels.
The Kerrey (D-NE) amdt would strike bill language requiring that U.S. strategic nuclear forces remain at START I levels through the end of fiscal 2000 unless Russia ratified START II.
Status: Motion to Table Agreed to Y)56; N)44
Reference: Motion to table Kerrey Amdt #395;
Bill S. 1059
; vote number 1999-149
on May 26, 1999
Voted YES on deploying National Missile Defense ASAP.
Vote that the policy of the US is to deploy a National Missile Defense system capable of defending against limited ballistic missile attack as soon as it is technologically possible, and to seek continued negotiated reductions in Russian nuclear forces.
Bill S 257
; vote number 1999-51
on Mar 17, 1999
Voted YES on military pay raise of 4.8%.
Vote to pass a bill to authorize a military pay raise of 4.8% in 2000 and annual pay increases through 2006 of 0.5% above the inflation rate. The bill would also provide additional incentives to certain enlisted personnel who remain on active duty.
Bill S.4
; vote number 1999-26
on Feb 24, 1999
Voted NO on deploying missile defense as soon as possible.
Vote to limit further debate and proceed to a bill that would require the U.S. to deploy as soon as possible an effective National Missile Defense system capable of defending against a limited ballistic missile attack.
Bill S 1873
; vote number 1998-262
on Sep 9, 1998
Voted NO on prohibiting same-sex basic training.
Byrd Amdt (D-WV) that would prohibit same-sex military barracks and basic training.
Status: Amdt Rejected Y)39; N)53; NV)8
Reference: Byrd Amdt #3011;
Bill S. 2057
; vote number 1998-180
on Jun 25, 1998
Voted NO on favoring 36 vetoed military projects.
Overturning line-item vetoes of 36 military projects vetoed by President Clinton.
Status: Bill Passed Y)69; N)30; NV)1
Reference: Line Item Veto Cancellation bill;
Bill S. 1292
; vote number 1997-287
on Oct 30, 1997
Voted YES on banning chemical weapons.
Approval of the chemical weapons ban.
Status: Resolution of Ratification Agreed to Y)74; N)26
Reference: Resolution of ratification of the Chemical (Comprehensive) Weapons (Convention) Ban;
Bill S. Res. 75
; vote number 1997-51
on Apr 24, 1997
Voted NO on considering deploying NMD, and amending ABM Treaty.
Vote to consider establishing a policy requiring the deployment of a national missile defense system by the end of 2003. The bill would also urge discussions with Russia to amend the ABM Treaty to allow deployment of the system.
Bill S 1635
; vote number 1996-157
on Jun 4, 1996
Voted NO on 1996 Defense Appropriations.
Approval of the 1996 Defense Appropriations bill.
Status: Bill Passed Y)62; N)35; NV)3
Reference: Defense Approps Bill FY 96;
Bill S. 1087
; vote number 1995-397
on Sep 5, 1995
Establish Maritime Security grants for ports and vessels.
Kerry sponsored the Port and Maritime Security Act
Directs the Secretary of Transportation to: - identify vessel types and U.S. port facilities that pose a high risk of being involved in a transportation security incident
- assess vulnerability of U.S. port facilities and vessels that may be involved in a transportation security incident.
- Requires owners or operators of vessels or facilities to prepare a vessel or facility security plan for deterring a transportation security incident to the maximum extent practicable.
- Requires such plans to be consistent with the National Maritime Transportation Security Plan.
- Requires transportation security cards for entry into a secured area of a vessel or facility.
- Directs the Secretary of Transportation to establish maritime safety and security teams to protect vessels, harbors, ports, facilities, and cargo in U.S. waters.
- Establishes a grant program for port authorities, facility operators, and State and local agencies required to provide security services.
- Directs the Secretary of Transportation to assess the effectiveness of antiterrorism measures maintained at specified foreign ports and make recommendations for improvements for foreign ports that do not maintain effective antiterrorism measures
Became Public Law No: 107-295.
Source: Bill sponsored by 15 Senators 01-S1214 on Jul 20, 2001
Federalize aviation security.
Kerry sponsored the Aviation Security Act
Establishes the Transportation Security Administration, including: - civil aviation security, and related research and development activities;
- day-to-day Federal security screening operations for passenger air transportation and intrastate air transportation;
- policies, strategies, and plans for dealing with threats to transportation;
- domestic transportation during a national emergency, including aviation, rail, and other surface transportation
- management of security information, including notifying airport or airline security officers of the identity of individuals known to pose a risk of air piracy or terrorism or a threat to airline or passenger safety.
H.R. 2951 is the corresponding House bill. Became Public Law No: 107-71.
Source: Bill sponsored by 31 Senators and 25 Reps 01-S1447 on Sep 21, 2001
Small business in developing homeland security technologies.
Kerry introduced a resolution on small businesses
Expresses the sense of the Senate that: (1) small business participation is vital to U.S. defense and should play an active role in assisting the military, Federal intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and State and local police to combat terrorism through the design and development of innovative products; and (2) Federal, State, and local governments should aggressively seek out and purchase innovative technologies and services from, and promote research opportunities for, American small businesses to help in homeland defense and the fight against terrorism. Passed/agreed to in Senate.
Source: Resolution sponsored by 26 Senators 02-SR264 on May 8, 2002
Rated 20% by SANE, indicating a pro-military voting record.
Kerry scores 20% by SANE on peace issues
Peace Action, the merger of The Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE) and The Freeze, has effectively mobilized for peace and disarmament for over forty years. As the nation's largest grassroots peace group we get results: from the 1963 treaty to ban above ground nuclear testing, to the 1996 signing of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, from ending the war in Vietnam, to blocking weapons sales to human rights abusing countries. We are proof that ordinary people can change the world. At Peace Action we believe...
- That every person has the right to live without the threat of nuclear weapons.
- That war is not a suitable response to conflict.
- That America has the resources to both protect and provide for its citizens.
As the Pentagon’s budget soars to $400 billion, 17% of American children live in poverty. For what the US will spend on Missile Defense in one year we could: put over a million children through Head Start OR provide healthcare for over 3.5 million children OR create over 100,000 units of affordable housing OR hire over 160,000 elementary school teachers. At Peace Action our priorities are clear.The ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.
Source: SANE website 03n-SANE on Dec 31, 2003
School assistance to survivors of injured federal police.
Kerry sponsored the Federal Law Enforcement Dependents Assistance Act
A bill to provide educational assistance to the dependents of Federal law enforcement officials who are killed or disabled in the performance of their duties.
Amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to provide educational assistance to the dependents of civilian Federal law enforcement officers who are killed or are permanently and totally disabled in the line of duty.
Corresponding House bill is H.R.4111. Became Public Law No: 104-238.
Source: Bill sponsored by 12 Senators and 11 Reps 96-S2101 on Sep 20, 1996