|
Joseph Lieberman on Budget & Economy
Democratic Jr Senator (CT), ran for V.P. with Gore, ran for president 2004
|
Fact Check: Implies economy not growing-really it grew 8.2%
FACTCHECK on Economic Growth: Joe Lieberman implied that the economy isn't growing under Bush:LIEBERMAN: We can get the economy going again. We need a Democratic president to make it happen.
FACTCHECK:
In fact, the economy grew at the unexpectedly rapid annual rate of 8.2% in the third quarter (June, July and August) according to the latest official figures from the Department of Commerce. That was the best quarterly growth in 20 years.
Source: FactCheck.org: 2004 Primary Presidential Debate in Durham NH
Dec 9, 2003
7.2% GDP growth isn't a recovery without job creation
Q: What do you say about the 7.2% GDP growth? A: Until middle class Americans and those working hard to get into the middle class get their jobs back, the 3.5 million that they lost under Bush; until they begin to be able to afford
their health insurance or get it back--2 million lost their health insurance under Bush; until they have some sense of ability to send their kids to college without coming out with an enormous burden of debt, then we don't have an economic recovery.
Source: CNN "Rock The Vote" Democratic Debate
Nov 5, 2003
Prosperity won’t go on automatically; don’t change horses
Q: No poll has any separation of more than 3%. Why? A: I think it’s because, as the election gets clearer, people are saying to themselves: Hey, the times have really been good, eight years we’ve gone from the biggest deficits to biggest surpluses,
22 million new jobs, and a good stock market. Why change horses here in mid-stream? Let’s keep going in the same direction. I think that’s going to move people to Al Gore.
Q: Why is it close? Shouldn’t your ticket be way ahead?
A: I think it’s just
because a lot of people maybe have thought that the prosperity goes on automatically. It doesn’t. If Al Gore is elected, we are going to continue to have surpluses in the federal government, which is the most important thing the federal government can
do. Honestly, an American Academy of Actuaries said last week, under George Bush’s economic plan, we are going to go back into annual deficits, won’t pay off the long-term debt, high interest rates, high unemployment, not where we want to go.
Source: Larry King Live, reported on CNN.com
Nov 1, 2000
Democratic administration balanced budget and created growth
“Over the last eight years, we have come to understand that when government balances its books, it not only stops draining capital out of the markets, it creates a sense of confidence, and that is one of the conditions for growth. We’ve gone from the
largest deficits, now to the largest surpluses. The administration said, ‘We’re going to get serious about coming out of debt; here’s our budget proposals.’ It passed without a single Republican vote; Al Gore had to break the tie in the Senate.”
Source: Richard Perez-Pena, NY Times
Oct 21, 2000
$300 billion reserve fund to be insurance policy for surplus
Q: The surplus is not guaranteed, so how will you pay for your programs?LIEBERMAN: We’re not spending any more than is projected by the experts. In fact, unlike our opponents, we’re setting aside $300 billion in a reserve fund just in case those
projections the nonpartisan experts make are not quite right. We understand that balancing the budget, keeping America out of debt is the way to keep interest rates down and the economy growing.
CHENEY: With respect to the surplus, we’ve got to make
some kind of forecast. We can’t make 12 month decisions in this business. We’re talking about the kinds of fundamental changes in programs and government that are going to affect people’s lives for the next 25 or 30 years. And one of the difficulties we
have is that for the last eight years, we ignored a lot these problems. We haven’t moved aggressively on Social Security. There are important issues out there that need to be resolved, and it’s important for us to get on with that business.
Source: Vice-Presidential debate
Oct 5, 2000
Expensive tax cut for rich will lead to high interest rates
Q: What will you do with the surplus?A: The estimates that Dick referred to are the estimates of the Republican staff of the Senate Budget Committee. We use the numbers of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. We agree that the surplus in the
Social Security fund should be locked up. We believe that the surplus in the Medicare fund should be locked up. They raid the Medicare trust to pay for their tax cut. Let me come back to the remaining $1.8 trillion. The numbers show that $1.6 trillion
goes to that big tax cut which sends 43% to the top 1%. But when you add on the other spending programs that our opponents have committed to, plus the cost of their plan to privatize Social Security, they are $1.1 trillion in debt. And that means we go
back to higher interest rates, to higher unemployment, to a kind of stealth tax increase on every American family, because when interest rates go up, so too do the cost of mortgage payments, car payments, credit card transactions.
Source: Vice-Presidential debate
Oct 5, 2000
Now: tap Strategic Reserve; long-term: develop 80 mpg cars
Q: What is your energy policy?A: Vice President Gore and I have a long-term strategy. If this administration had been given the funding it requested from Congress, we’d be further along: developing cleaner sources of energy; giving tax credits to use
energy more efficiently; creating a new generation of vehicles that can get 80 miles per gallon. We also have a short-term strategy to deal with ups and downs of energy prices. I know it was controversial, but we believed it was important to reach into
the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, put it in the market, show the big oil companies and the OPEC oil-producing countries that we’ve got some resources with which we can fight back. We’re not just going to lay back and let them roll over our economy. And we
did it also because gasoline prices were rising and home heating inventories were real low. Since the reserve was opened, the price of oil has dropped $6 a barrel.
Source: Vice-Presidential debate
Oct 5, 2000
New economy will thrive on investment and trained workers
“America cannot afford to have a president in the 21st century who doesn’t understand the terrain of the new economy. We as a nation cannot afford to make Barney Rubble investments in a George Jetson world. Our goal as a nation and a people must be to
help them help themselves. All of us appreciate the vital role immigrants have played and continue to play in America. But America shouldn’t have to go overseas to find trained workers. We should train our own people right here.”
Source: AP Story, NY Times
Aug 29, 2000
Democrats will expand prosperity, GOP will “squander” it
We want to use America’s hard-earned success to preserve the future of Social Security and Medicare, to pay off our national debt, and cut the taxes of middle class families. We
want to make the investments that will keep our economy moving forward. It’s this simple: We Democrats will expand the prosperity. They will squander it.
Source: Speech to the Democrat Convention
Aug 16, 2000
Fund R&D; cut capital gains tax; ban Internet tax
Lieberman’s accomplishments include Expanding Economic Growth:- Fighting for a balanced budget and fiscal discipline to help lower interest rates and keep the economy growing
- Promoting new funding for research and development, a key to
our innovation-oriented economy
- Cutting capital gains taxes to spur new investment
- Creating new skills training initiatives for American workers
- Supporting the development of e-commerce, including a moratorium on Internet taxes.
Source: Lieberman’s Senate.gov web site
Aug 7, 2000
Priorities are debt reduction and balanced budget
Lieberman has worked diligently to bring a more fiscally responsible philosophy to the Democratic party. His economic priorities are to maintain US economic growth through national debt reduction and a balanced budget
and to expand economic opportunity for low-income Americans.
Source: Senate web site, “Issues Focus: Budget & Economy”
Aug 7, 2000
Private sector is the primary engine of economic growth
As a New Democrat, Lieberman believes the private sector - not government - is the primary engine of economic growth. The government’s role, in his view, is to promote growth and equip Americans to succeed in the private sector. The economic boom
of the 1990s demonstrated that the keys to economic prosperity are raising productivity, reducing government borrowing, and expanding private sector job growth. Lieberman urges Congress to apply all on-budget surpluses toward national debt reduction.
Source: Senate web site, “Issues Focus: Budget & Economy”
Aug 7, 2000
Booming economy from private sector plus government help
We New Democrats believe that the booming economy of the 1990s resulted more from private sector innovation, investment, & hard work than from government actions, but the federal government sure can and did help. The Clinton-Gore administration deserves
tremendous credit for their leadership in the 1993 balanced budget proposal, and the NAFTA & GATT agreements that followed. I believe strongly that both these policies shaped the economic environment in which we have enjoyed such unprecedented growth.
Source: Excerpt from “In Praise of Public Life”, p.132
May 2, 2000
Biennial budget makes sense, allows better review
The biennial budget bill “makes eminent sense,” Lieberman said, “for it streamlines what has increasingly become a chaotic and inefficient budget process.” Lieberman is an original co-sponsor of the biennial budget plan. The proposal would convert the
annual budget, appropriations, and authorization process to a two-year cycle. “Congress has done a poor job of passing its annual budget in the last few years,” Lieberman said. “Biennial budgets will force us to be more thoughtful and less erratic.”
Source: Press Release, “Biennial Budget”
Mar 4, 1999
Voted NO on prioritizing national debt reduction below tax cuts.
Vote to table [kill] an amendment that would increase the amount of the budget that would be used to reduce the national debt by $75 billion over 5 year. The debt reduction would be offset by reducing the tax cut in the budget framework from $150 billion
Bill S Con Res 101
; vote number 2000-55
on Apr 5, 2000
Voted YES on 1998 GOP budget.
Approval of the 1998 GOP Budget which would cut spending and taxes.
Status: CR Agreed to Y)78; N)22
Reference: H. Con. Res. 84 as amended;
Bill H. Con. Res. 84
; vote number 1997-92
on May 23, 1997
Voted NO on Balanced-budget constitutional amendment.
Approval of the balanced-budget constitutional amendment.
Status: Joint Resolution Defeated Y)66; N)34
Reference: S. J. Res. 1;
Bill S. J. Res. 1
; vote number 1997-24
on Mar 4, 1997
Balance debt reduction, tax relief, & policy investment.
Lieberman signed the Senate New Democrat Coalition letter to Pres.-Elect Bush:
Dear President-Elect Bush,
Members of the Senate New Democrat Coalition and the House New Democrat Coalition are interested in working with you to develop a responsible fiscal policy. We are proud of our records of fiscal discipline that have helped to produce the unprecedented surpluses for our country. We believe that continuing to use part of the surplus to pay down our national debt is a moral obligation that we owe to future generations. As New Democrats, we believe that a delicate balance can be struck between maintaining fiscal discipline, paying down our national debt, responding to the public’s understandable desire for common-sense tax relief and making important investments in our future. We are convinced that your stated goal of providing an excessive tax cut will lead to less debt reduction.
This in turn would lead to higher interest rates resulting in lower capital investment and productivity growth and ultimately a lower standard of living for all Americans. We are ready, however, to work with you on a smaller package of tax cuts designed specifically to stimulate our slowing economy in the short run while protecting Social Security and Medicare. In the longer term we are eager to work with you on a policy that encourages individual savings and investment, invests in college education tax credits, promotes research and development and bridges the technology gap that exists in our country today.
Source: Senate New Democrat Coalition letter to Pres.-Elect Bush 01-SNDC2 on Jan 11, 2001