|
Joseph Lieberman on Principles & Values
Democratic Jr Senator (CT), ran for V.P. with Gore, ran for president 2004
|
The GOP can't use their normal playbook on me
Pres. Bush said that the Democrat he thought would give him the toughest fight for reelection was Joe Lieberman. Incidentally, this is an opinion on which I agree with President Bush. The reason is that the Republicans can't run their normal playbook
on me that they try to run on Democratic candidates. They can't say I flip-flop because I don't. They can't say I'm weak on defense because I'm not. They can't say I'm weak on values because I'm not. They can't say I'm a big taxer and a big spender.
Source: Democratic 2004 Primary Debate at St. Anselm College
Jan 22, 2004
AdWatch: Fighting extremes of both parties
AD AUDIO: LIEBERMAN: I love America, but I hate the direction in which George Bush is taking us. ANNOUNCER: How do we defeat George Bush's extreme agenda? It'll take more than extreme anger. Joe Lieberman has spent 30 years rejecting the extremes
of both parties. Fighting against discrimination. Taking on corporate polluters. Helping protect children from trash culture. Standing strong against terrorism. Championing tax cuts for the middle class. Joe Lieberman:
the integrity to fight for what's right.
ANALYSIS: This is an anti-Howard Dean ad that doesn't mention Dean's name. Lieberman acknowledged this, and his media advisor says "everyone is quite clear what we're talking about." The Connecticut senator
is seizing on a recent spate of stories about Dean's temperament-and trying to position himself as the moderate alternative to the more liberal Dean-without risking a backlash by suggesting the party's front-runner is extreme as well as angry.
Source: Ad-Watch of SC market, Washington Post, p. A04
Jan 6, 2004
Independent minded center out candidate, like Bill Clinton
Q: Why do you think you have the best chance of beating Bush in a general election? A: It is because I am the most independent minded center out candidate in the Democratic field --
which is to say that I am the most like Bill Clinton was in 1992. That means that I can take Bush on where he is supposed to be strong but really isn't -- defense, security and values.
I can defeat him where he is weak on his failed economic policies and his right wing social agenda. Years ago someone told me that you can't help the people unless you get elected,
and that is important to voters who want to deny Bush a second term to remember. We have to run a candidate who can hold Democrats together, appeal to moderate Republicans and win among independents, and I believe I am that candidate.
Source: Concord Monitor / WashingtonPost.com on-line Q&A
Nov 3, 2003
Very different than Republicans-a good Democrat
Q: Truman said that if a Democrat tries to look like a Republican, the Republican will win every time. How are you very much different from a Republican? A: The fact is that I am very different from the Republican I am running against which is George
Bush. I have a very strong support on social justice and social progress. My positions on civil rights, environmental protection, education, health care, women's right to choose, consumer protection, worker protection, are like day to George Bush's
night. I resent it when some people say just because I am strong on defense and am willing to talk about values in public life that somehow I am not a good Democrat.
To me being strong on defense and talking about values is all about being a good Democrat in the tradition of Kennedy and Clinton and Gore.
Source: Concord Monitor / WashingtonPost.com on-line Q&A
Nov 3, 2003
True to the ideals of Bobby Kennedy, where he got started
Q: You were Robert Kennedy's Connecticut coordinator in his 1968 Presidential campaign. Do you believe the Democratic Party still follows many of the ideals that Bobby Kennedy presented?
A: First, I am impressed that you knew I was active in the Kennedy campaign in 1968. Second, my campaign for president is all about making sure that the Democratic party is true to the ideals of Bobby Kennedy.
That means fighting for social justice and social progress, being able to unite Americans across possible dividing lines like race and nationality and to unite us around the values that we share and the dreams for a better, safer life we all have.
That particularly includes making improvements to our public schools and our healthcare system.
Source: Concord Monitor / WashingtonPost.com on-line Q&A
Nov 3, 2003
Favorite song: Frank Sinatra, "My Way."
This is for the Gen X crowd, and it's very personal. What's your favorite song?- MOSELEY BRAUN: What's my favorite song? "You Gotta Be."
- SHARPTON: My favorite song is James Brown's song on the Republican Party, "Talking Loud, Saying Nothing."
- KERRY: Bruce Springsteen, "No Surrender."
- DEAN: One you've never heard of, Wycliffe Jean, "Jaspora" [Creole for "Diaspora"]
- LIEBERMAN: Well, you know, like a good politician, I'm going to take two.
Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow, remember that one? And the classic Frank Sinatra, "My Way." We're going to do it our way in 2004.
- KUCINICH: John Lennon, "Imagine," as in imagine a new America.
-
GEPHARDT: Bruce Springsteen, "Born In The USA."
- GRAHAM: Jimmy Buffet, "Changes In Attitude, Changes In Latitudes." We're going to change some attitudes and latitudes.
Source: Congressional Black Caucus Institute debate
Sep 9, 2003
He & Gore warned about Bush, and Bush turned out even worse
In 2000, Al Gore and I went all around this country and warned the American people about George W. Bush. We said he would squander our surplus. We said he would compromise civil rights, he would abandon the middle class and he would turn his back on the
poor. Let's be honest about this, the presidency of Bush has been a worse nightmare than even Al and I warned America about. Joblessness, 3.5 million people have lost their jobs, 2.5 million have fallen out of the middle class into poverty, our
schools have been underfunded. So many of our capable lower-income kids are going to have trouble going to college. Civil rights have been eroded. The environment has been plundered today. At home and abroad, America is weaker.
We need a fresh start.
We need a president who will unite America around our shared values and restore security and prosperity to our country and fairness and integrity to the White House. With your help and God's help, I intend to be that president.
Source: Congressional Black Caucus Institute debate
Sep 9, 2003
I know I can beat Bush; I already did
Americans deserve not an either/or choice in 2004 between a president who is strong in the world and a president who is strong here at home. They deserve strength in both, and that's what I offer. I am the one Democrat who can match George Bush in many
areas where he's strong; defense and moral values, and beat him where he is weak; on the economy and his divisive right-wing social agenda. I know I can beat George Bush. Why? Al Gore and I already did it. And with your help, we'll do it again.
Source: Democratic Debate in Columbia SC
May 3, 2003
Takes on the tough battles throughout his career
Q: People think you're too nice to be president and you're just not tough enough to take on President Bush. LIEBERMAN: I'd like to come over there and strangle you, George.
You don't have to be a screamer to be tough.
When I was attorney general of Connecticut, I sued the insurance companies, one of the big interest groups in my state. As a US Senator, I've taken on some of the big interest groups. In my party, I am the only one on stage who has taken on Hollywood,
the entertainment industry, for peddling sex and violence to our kids. I went to the floor of the US Senate and spoke out against a president to whom I was devoted because he did something that I thought was wrong.
I supported the Gulf War. I supported the war against Saddam Hussein. My career shows that I am ready to do the right thing for our country. That's what strength is all about.
Source: Democratic Debate in Columbia SC
May 3, 2003
Bush lacks experience & isn’t ready; Gore has plenty & is
Q: You’ve been hitting Bush on experience. Cheney said today. “If there’s one of the two tickets lacking in experience, it seems to me it’s those guys. They’ve spent virtually their entire careers in elective office, getting paid by the government, never
having met a payroll, living inside the Beltway.” How do you respond? A: Public service is a profession. It doesn’t mean that the only way you come into it is by being in public service. But president of the US is the most important, complicated,
demanding job in the world. And when you look at the relative experience of these two candidates and what their record is, I just think that Al Gore is so much more ready to be a great president. He’s had national and international experience that is
wide. He knows world leaders. He’s worked to balance the budget and keep the economy growing. I think, on balance, Governor Bush is not ready, with all respect, at this point, to be the kind of president that America needs and Al Gore is.
Source: Larry King Live, reported on CNN.com
Nov 1, 2000
Will not drop out of Connecticut Senate race
A day before the deadline to pull out of the Connecticut Senate race, Joseph Lieberman said emphatically Thursday that he would not drop his dual candidacies. “I promised no October
surprises, and there will be none. I really think it would, in many ways, be an act of bad faith if I pulled out at this point.”
Source: AP Story, NY Times
Oct 26, 2000
Religion fills “vacuum of values” & provides common ground
Returning to one of his most cherished and provocative themes, Joseph Lieberman called today for a greater role for religion in public discourse, as a source of shared moral principles and an antidote to “the vacuum of values” in American culture.
Lamenting that it has become unacceptable in many circles to discuss religion, Lieberman said that “we have gone a long way toward dislodging our values from their natural source in moral truth.”“Without the connection to a higher law,” he said, “it
becomes more and more difficult for people to answer the important day- to-day questions that test us: Why is it wrong to lie or cheat or steal? Why is it wrong to settle conflicts with violence? Why is it wrong to be unfaithful to one’s spouse, or to
exploit children, or to despoil the environment, or defraud a customer, or demean an employee?“ Lieberman said that religion provides a common ground for values - nonviolence, respect for others - that few would find objectionable
Source: Richard Perez-Pena, NY Times
Oct 25, 2000
I requested report, and I said “stop it” to Hollywood
CHENEY: I liked the old Joe Lieberman better. Joe established an outstanding record in his work on violence in the media. There is the view that the depth of conviction isn’t quite as strong as it was. On one hand, he criticizes the activities of the
industry, and at the same time, he participates in fund-raising events with some of the people responsible. LIEBERMAN: Al Gore and I have felt for a long time that we cannot let America’s parents stand alone in this competition that they feel they’re
in with Hollywood to raise their own kids. John McCain and I requested the report that proved conclusively that the entertainment industry is marketing adult-rated products to our children. When that report came out, Al Gore and I said to the
industry, “Stop it. And if you don’t stop it in six months, we’re going to ask the FTC to take action against you.” Al Gore and I agree on most everything. We disagree on some things, and I have not changed a single position since Al Gore nominated me.
Source: (X-ref Cheney) Vice-Presidential debate
Oct 5, 2000
Hollywood deserves reprimands at times, but not censorship
After threatening Hollywood with sanctions, Lieberman softened his tone. “Al and I have tremendous regard for this industry. We’re both fans of the products that come out of the entertainment industry -not all of them but a lot of them. From time to time
we will have been -and will be -critics or nudges. But I promise you this, that we will never, never put the government in the position of telling you by law, through law, what to make. We will nudge you but we will never become censors.”
Source: Terence Hunt, LA Times
Sep 19, 2000
Advocates civil religion, not religiously based policy
Lieberman espouses a greater role for faith, and was rebuked last week for suggesting that belief in God is the basis of true morality. Lieberman later backed away from his comment. Many Christians came to Lieberman’s defense, saying they had been
advocating the same things for years and had been vilified. But Lieberman’s message is substantially different from that of the Christian conservatives. As a Jew, without a sectarian mandate to proselytize, Lieberman bears none of the baggage of the
religious salesman, and thus is more palatable to a wider public than evangelical Christians.
Many religious scholars say that Lieberman recalls an older, non-sectarian spiritual underpinning to government. Lieberman instead advocates what has
been called “civil religion,” the ties that bind America’s majority of believers, of whatever faith. The term encompasses the basic beliefs that led the Founders to proclaim that the Creator had endowed man with certain “inalienable rights.”
Source: David Firestone, NY Times, p. WK-5
Sep 3, 2000
Religion runs deep in US and is source of strength to people
“Religion is a source of unity and strength in America. and the United States is the most religious country in the world.. Sometimes, we try to stifle that fact or hide it,
but the profound, and ultimately most important, reality is that we are not only citizens of this blessed country, we are citizens of the same awesome God.”
Source: Story Posted on CNN.com
Aug 28, 2000
Freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion
Lieberman made a passionate call for Americans to bring faith more prominently into public life, arguing that the nation needs to draw values and strength from religious beliefs “While so much of our economic life is thriving, too much of our moral life
is still stagnating. As a people, we need to reaffirm our faith and renew the dedication of our nation and ourselves to God and God’s purposes.” “Let us reach out to those who may neither believe nor observe, and reassure them that we share with them
the core values of America, that our faith is not inconsistent with their freedom, and that our mission is not one of intolerance, but of love. We know that the Constitution wisely separates church from state. But remember, the Constitution guarantees
freedom of religion. Not freedom from religion. So let us break through some of the inhibitions that have existed to talk together across the flimsy line of separation of faith: to talk together, to study together, and to pray together.“
Source: Matea Gold, LA Times
Aug 28, 2000
The next frontier is within us
Forty years ago, we came to this city and crossed a new frontier. Today, we return with prosperity at home and freedom throughout the world that John F. Kennedy could have only dreamed about. We may wonder where the next frontier really is. Tonight I
believe that the next frontier isn’t just in front of us, but inside of us-to overcome the differences that are still between us, to break down the barriers that remain, and to help every American claim the limitless possibilities of their own lives.
Source: Speech to the Democrat Convention
Aug 16, 2000
Only in America
I try to see this world as my dad saw it from his bakery truck. I know that somewhere in America there is another father loading a bakery truck or a young woman programming a
computer or a parent dreaming of a better future for their daughter or their son. If we keep the faith, then 40 years from now, one of their children will stand before a
gathering like this with a chance to serve and lead this country that we love. So, let them look back to this time, and this place, and this stage and say of us: they kept the faith. Let
them say that we helped them realize their hopes and their dreams. And let them look around at this great and good nation that we are all so blessed to share, and say: Only in America.
Source: Speech to the Democrat Convention
Aug 16, 2000
Christian right leaders call Lieberman an ally
Lieberman [is] an Orthodox Jew whom many Christians, and especially conservative evangelicals, regard as an ally on a number of social and moral issues. Although he frequently wears a yarmulke on his head,
Mr. Lieberman is seen by some Christians as a kindred spirit for his willingness to wear his religion on his sleeve. His talk of the Talmud’s inspiring both his values and his votes has often been cited by those Christians
who believe that the Bible ought to guide public policy. “I think the vice president made an excellent choice,” the Rev. Jerry Falwell, who is supporting Gov. George W. Bush, said in an interview yesterday. “It
is a public acknowledgment that his candidacy has two great needs. One is credibility, which Mr. Lieberman brings to anything he touches. The second is an everlasting divorce from Bill Clinton, and this is that.”
Source: Laurie Goodstein, NY Times, p. A21
Aug 8, 2000
With GOP on defense & social issues; with Dems on budget
Lieberman has often taken positions at odds with the Democratic Party on school vouchers, affirmative action, regulation of managed care, capital gains taxes and product liability. He has sided with the Clinton administration on all important
budget votes, and unlike many other Democrats he has supported the administration’s positions on trade and welfare. Lieberman’s views are completely in tune with the vice president’s on abortion, the environment, gun control, gay
rights and the death penalty. He has usually supported the Clinton administration on foreign policy issues, and in 1991, Lieberman and Gore, who was then a senator, were among only 10 Democratic senators who voted to give President George Bush the
authority to use military force in the Persian Gulf. When he has opposed the Clinton administration, Lieberman has invariably taken a more conservative stance, often the one held by Republicans.
Source: David E. Rosenbaum, NY Times, p. A19
Aug 8, 2000
Clinton’s affair was inappropriate, immoral, & harmful
Lieberman stood up in the Senate to speak about Bill Clinton. They had been friends and Democratic allies for 30 years, but the president had finally admitted having an affair with Monica Lewinsky. “Such behavior is not just inappropriate-it is immoral.
It is harmful, for it sends a message of what is acceptable behavior to the larger American family,” he added. “I fear the president has undercut the efforts of millions of American parents trying to instill in our children the values of honesty.”
Source: Robert D. McFadden, NY Times
Aug 8, 2000
Tries to strike balance between conservative and liberal
“I’m going to do what I think is right on every issue, and not feel obliged to vote a particular way because it’s the party line or because people expect me to.” Lieberman often seems to be striking a balance between conservative and liberal instincts.
On the liberal side, he has voted for abortion rights, gun control, tax increases, welfare reforms, consumer protections and civil rights legislation. On environmental issues, he helped draft clean air laws, wrote the Pollution Prosecution Act of 1990,
exposed lax security measures in nuclear power plants and supported minimum-wage increases and laws to protect whistle-blowers. On the conservative side, he has been far more enthusiastic than most Democrats concerning military spending. Lieberman has
been a staunch Senate supporter of Israel, but has also backed arms sales to Saudi Arabia. In 1991, he was one of 10 Democrats to support American involvement in the Persian Gulf war, and he favored the deployment of American troops in Bosnia.
Source: Robert D. McFadden, NY Times
Aug 8, 2000
Accepts V.P. request; “walks the same path” as Gore
“I believe deeply in Al Gore,” Lieberman told reporters. “I’ve known him for 15 years. I have not met a more honorable, intelligent, hard-working progressive person in public life in America than Al Gore. So it’s not just an
honor to be asked to run for vice president, but it’s a special honor to be asked to run for vice president with a man who I think is ready to be one of America’s great presidents.” Lieberman said he thought Gore wanted to run with someone
with whom he shared “values and policies... And you know, I’m sure people in these few days will point out a couple of the areas where I may have taken different positions but, honestly if you look at our overall record support
for environmental protection, support of the Gulf War, strong support for the economic policies that have brought us such extraordinary growth in the last decade, on and on and on, Al Gore and I have pretty much walked the same path.”
Source: MSNBC.com
Aug 7, 2000
Personal faith is his basis for public service
[My faith] gave me clear answers to life’s most difficult questions. The summary of our aspirations was in the Hebrew phrase tikkun olam, which is translated “to improve the world” or “to complete God’s Creation.” It presumes the inherent
but unfulfilled goodness of people and requires action for the benefit of the community. These beliefs were a powerful force in my upbringing and seem even more profound and true to me today. The ideal of service [is] fundamental to my religious faith.
Source: Excerpt from “In Praise of Public Life”, p. 24-5 & p. 30
May 2, 2000
Good laws protect us from private interests & profit
My consumer and environmental protection enforcement work [as Connecticut Attorney General] reinforced that people need the protection of good laws or they will be cheated, polluted, and otherwise taken advantage of by those who have more interest in
profit or convenience than in doing what is fair & just. There is a relevant insight from the Talmud: “As with fishes, the one that is larger swallows the others. Were it not for the fear of government, everyone greater than his fellow would swallow him.
Source: Excerpt from “In Praise of Public Life”, p. 70
May 2, 2000
Legislating has become campaigning; wrong focus
The problem in Congress today is that campaigns never end. Legislating has become campaigning by another name, which often means not much legislating gets done. Elected officials at the federal level regularly position themselves for the next campaign.
They focus too much on raising the vast sums of money needed for expensive television advertising, and worry too often about the ramifications of a single vote they cast, for fear that it will come back to haunt them in the next election.
Source: Excerpt from “In Praise of Public Life”, p.124-5
May 2, 2000
Senate status: influential & non-partisan
Lieberman has come to occupy a unique place in the Senate, exerting influence out of proportion to his seniority, an influence that comes from respect for his independence of mind, civility of spirit and fidelity to causes in which he believes.
In a bitterly partisan time he is one of the least partisan Democrats on Capitol Hill, one of the very few Democrats not to engage in lockstep White House defense in the Clinton scandals. Yet Lieberman is anything but a political innocent.
Source: Almanac of American Politics 2000 (Barone & Ujifusa)
Jan 1, 2000
Goal should be to protect nation, not punish Clinton
James Madison concluded in the Federalist Papers that leaders had to recognize “the necessity of sacrificing private opinions and partial interests to the public good.” That, in my mind, remains the foremost obligation we have [with regards to] President
Clinton’s misconduct. It is our overarching responsibility to think first of what is in the best interests of the nation. The House proceedings [were] defined by bitter partisanship [and hence] exacerbated the divisions this matter has caused, and
eroded the public’s trust in the fairness and legitimacy of this important process.
As the trial proceeds, we must remember that our goal is not and should not be to punish the President but to protect the nation. I am convinced that the only way to
serve that compelling interest is to resolve this matter not as Republicans and Democrats but as Americans, bound by a common purpose and free of partisan prejudice. The public that we serve, already deeply skeptical of our motives, deserves no less.
Source: Press Release, “Nation, not out Private Interest”
Jan 12, 1999
President’s private conduct has public consequences
I was disappointed because the president of the United States had just confessed to engaging in an extramarital affair with a young woman in his employ and to willfully deceiving the nation about his conduct. I was personally angry because President
Clinton had, by his disgraceful behavior, jeopardized his administration’s historic record of accomplishment. After much reflection, my feelings of disappointment and anger have not dissipated, except now these feelings have gone beyond my personal
dismay to a larger, graver sense of loss for our country, a reckoning of the damage that the president’s conduct has done to the proud legacy of his presidency and, ultimately, an accounting of the impact of his actions on our democracy and its moral
foundations.
No matter how much the president or others may wish to compartmentalize the different spheres of his life, the inescapable truth is that the president’s private conduct can and often does have profound public consequences.
Source: Statement on Senate floor
Sep 3, 1998
Joseph Lieberman on Florida Recount
Believes they got more votes & won popular vote & election
Q: Have you ever doubted yourself in fighting this fight after the election?
A: I honestly have not. If we come to that moment, we will know it. But this is not about fighting on regardless. Ever since Election night and the next day, all that we
have asked is that every vote that was cast be counted. And that’s a simple and profound American proposition. It’s not only important to the people who voted, but it’s important to the next president so he takes office without that cloud over his head.
When you’re treated unfairly by the government in America, what do you do? You go to the courts. And that’s what we’re doing. And we’re not going to carry this on to a point where it will hurt this country.
Q: Do you feel that if every vote in Florida
was counted, you would win this election?
A: I believe we would. That’s part of why Al Gore and I are asking for this hand recount. Remember, we won the popular vote. We’re just three electoral votes short of victory.
Source: Lieberman interview on CNN’s “Larry King Live.”
Nov 29, 2000
If every vote counts, then count every vote
From the beginning of this extraordinary period of time, Vice President Gore and I have asked only that the votes that were cast on Election Day be counted. This evening, the secretary of state of Florida has decided to certify what by any
reasonable standard is an incomplete and inaccurate count of the votes cast in the state of Florida. The secretary of state has even refused to accept the results of the count in Palm Beach County, which means that hundreds of votes that have already
been identified for Governor Bush or Vice President Gore are being discarded. In thousands of hours of work by hundreds of citizens of Florida, Republicans and Democrats and independents alike are being ignored. What is at issue here is nothing
less than every American’s simple, sacred right to vote. How can we teach our children that every vote counts if we are not willing to make a good-faith effort to count every vote?
Source: Speech by Lieberman responding to Florida re-certification
Nov 26, 2000
Reconsider overseas military ballots, even if imperfect
Joseph Lieberman said today that Florida election officials should reconsider their rejection of hundreds of military ballots from overseas, even if they might not comply with the law. Lieberman’s comments, a retreat from the position the Democrats had
taken since Friday, came after they were stung by Republican charges that they had made a concerted effort to disenfranchise members of the military. “My own point of view, if I was there, I would give the benefit of the doubt to ballots coming
in from military personnel, generally,“ Lieberman said on NBC’s ”Meet the Press.“ Of the local canvassing boards, he said, ”If they have the capacity, I’d urge them to go back and take another look, because again,
Al Gore and I don’t want to ever be part of anything that would put an extra burden on the military personnel abroad.“
Source: Richard P‚rez-Pe¤a, NY Times
Nov 19, 2000
Religious affiliation: Jewish.
Lieberman : religious affiliation:
The Adherents.com website is an independent project and is not supported by or affiliated with any organization (academic, religious, or otherwise).
What’s an adherent?
The most common definition used in broad compilations of statistical data is somebody who claims to belong to or worship in a religion. This is the self-identification method of determining who is an adherent of what religion, and it is the method used in most national surveys and polls.
Such factors as religious service attendance, belief, practice, familiarity with doctrine, belief in certain creeds, etc., may be important to sociologists, religious leaders, and others. But these are measures of religiosity and are usually not used academically to define a person’s membership in a particular religion. It is important to recognize there are various levels of adherence, or membership within religious traditions or religious bodies. There’s no single definition, and sources of adherent statistics do not always make it clear what definition they are using.
Source: Adherents.com web site 00-ADH6 on Nov 7, 2000
Supports Hyde Park Declaration of "Third Way" centrism.
Lieberman signed the manifesto, "A New Politics for a New America":
As New Democrats, we believe in a Third Way that rejects the old left-right debate and affirms America’s basic bargain: opportunity for all, responsibility from all, and community of all.
We believe:- that government’s proper role in the New Economy is to equip working Americans with new tools for economic success and security.
- in expanding trade and investment because we must be a party of economic progress, not economic reaction.
- that fiscal discipline is fundamental to sustained economic growth as well as responsible government.
- that a progressive tax system is the only fair way to pay for government.
- the Democratic Party’s mission is to expand opportunity, not government.
- that education must be America’s great equalizer, and we will not abandon our public schools or tolerate their failure.
- that all Americans must have access to health insurance.
- in preventing crime and punishing criminals.
- in a new social compact that requires and
rewards work in exchange for public assistance and that ensures that no family with a full-time worker will live in poverty.
- that public policies should reinforce marriage, promote family, demand parental responsibility, and discourage out-of-wedlock births.
- in enhancing the role that civic entrepreneurs, voluntary groups, and religious institutions play in tackling America’s social ills.
- in strengthening environmental protection by giving communities the flexibility to tackle new challenges that cannot be solved with top-down mandates.
- government must combat discrimination on the basis of race, creed, gender, or sexual orientation; defend civil liberties; and stay out of our private lives.
- that abortion should be safe, legal, and rare.
- in progressive internationalism -- the bold exercise of US leadership to foster peace, prosperity, and democracy.
- that the US must maintain a strong, technologically superior defense to protect our interests and values.
Source: The Hyde Park Declaration 00-DLC0 on Aug 1, 2000
Member of Democratic Leadership Council.
Lieberman is the chair of the Democratic Leadership Council:
Mission
The DLC’s mission is to promote public debate within the Democratic Party and the public at large about national and international policy and political issues. Specifically, as the founding organization of the New Democrat movement, the DLC’s goal is to modernize the progressive tradition in American politics for the 21st Century by advancing a set of innovative ideas for governing through a national network of elected officials and community leaders. Who We Are
The Democratic Leadership Council is an idea center, catalyst, and national voice for a reform movement that is reshaping American politics by moving it beyond the old left-right debate. The DLC seeks to define and galvanize popular support for a new public philosophy built on progressive ideals, mainstream values, and innovative, non bureaucratic, market-based solutions. At its heart are three principles: promoting opportunity for all; demanding responsibility from everyone; and fostering a new sense
of community.Since its inception, the DLC has championed policies from spurring private sector economic growth, fiscal discipline and community policing to work based welfare reform, expanded international trade, and national service. Throughout the 90’s, innovative, New Democrat policies implemented by former DLC Chairman President Bill Clinton have helped produce the longest period of sustained economic growth in our history, the lowest unemployment in a generation, 22 million new jobs, cut the welfare rolls in half, reduced the crime rate for seven straight years, balanced the budget and streamlined the federal bureaucracy to its smallest size since the Kennedy administration.
Now, the DLC is promoting new ideas -- such as a second generation of environmental protection and new economy and technology development strategies -- that is distinctly different from traditional liberalism and conservatism to build the next generation of America’s leaders.
Source: Democratic Leadership Council web site 01-DLC0 on Nov 7, 2000
New Democrat: "Third Way" instead of left-right debate.
Lieberman adopted Third Way principles of the Democratic Leadership Council:
America and the world have changed dramatically in the closing decades of the 20th century. The industrial order of the 20th century is rapidly yielding to the networked “New Economy” of the 21st century. Our political and governing systems, however, have lagged behind the rest of society in adapting to these seismic shifts. They remain stuck in the left-right debates and the top-down bureaucracies of the industrial past.
The Democratic Leadership Council, and its affiliated think tank the Progressive Policy Institute, have been catalysts for modernizing politics and government. The core principles and ideas of this “Third Way” movement [began with] Bill Clinton’s Presidential campaign in 1992, Tony Blair’s Labour Party in Britain in 1997, and Gerhard Shroeder’s Social Democrats in Germany in 1998.
The Third Way philosophy seeks to adapt enduring progressive values to the new challenges of he information age. It rests on three cornerstones: - the idea that government
should promote equal opportunity for all while granting special privilege for none;
- an ethic of mutual responsibility that equally rejects the politics of entitlement and the politics of social abandonment;
- and, a new approach to governing that empowers citizens to act for themselves.
The Third Way approach to economic opportunity and security stresses technological innovation, competitive enterprise, and education rather than top- down redistribution or laissez faire. On questions of values, it embraces “tolerant traditionalism,” honoring traditional moral and family values while resisting attempts to impose them on others. It favors an enabling rather than a bureaucratic government, expanding choices for citizens, using market means to achieve public ends and encouraging civic and community institutions to play a larger role in public life. The Third Way works to build inclusive, multiethnic societies based on common allegiance to democratic values.
Source: Democratic Leadership Council web site 01-DLC1 on Nov 7, 2000
Profiled in "Jews in American Politics".
Lieberman is profiled in the book "Jews in American Politics":
When one reads accounts of Jews in American politics, the common theme is that Jews have achieved prominence in art, literature, academia, certain businesses, and entertainment, but not in politics or government. The Jewish politician was the exception, not the rule.
In the last third of the 20th century, however, that pattern changed. By 2000, Jews had become as prominent in the political realm as they have been in other aspects of American life. And Jewish participation is accepted for the contributions these activists make, not because of their Jewishness. Nothing could symbolize this trend more cogently than the nomination of Joseph Lieberman for vice president in 2000 and the national reaction to his candidacy. [Lieberman says]:
Although politics was not exactly a Jewish profession, individual Jews did throw themsleves into the democratic process. Some were traditional politicians; others machine politicians. Many more, such as Emma Goldman and the radicals of the
early 20th century, were inspired by the ideal that they had a duty to repair the world—Tikkun Olam. Many reasons account for the broader representation of Jews in American civic life today. The forces of antisemitism have been relegated to the extreme margins of society, the principle of meritocracy has increasingly opened the doors of opportunity. Moreover, the idealism and purpose that were spawned by the movements for civil rights, opposition to the war in Vietnam, environmentalism, and other causes drew many Jewish Americans into the political arena. Jews are admonished tp help perfect the world by the ancient wisdom of Rabbi Tarfon, who tells us, “You are not required to complete the task, yet you are not free to withdaw from it.”
[This book] provides brief biographical sketches for more than 400 Jews who have played prominent roles in American political life. The roster provides much of the basic information that we felt was previously lacking in one place.
Source: Jews in American Politics, Sandy Maisels, ed., pp. xii-xxiii 01-JIAP0 on Jan 1, 2001
Member of the Senate New Democrat Coalition.
Lieberman is a member of the Senate New Democrat Coalition:
The Senate New Democrat Coalition (SNDC) [is analogous to] the New Democrat Coalition (NDC) in the House. Members of both groups are moderate Democrats who advocate a new centrist, progressive approach to governing and who often reach across party lines to get things done.
Established in 1997, the House New Democrat Coalition (NDC) grew to 64 members between 1998 and 2000, making it the largest caucus in the House. With the success of NDN’s top House candidates on Election Day, the NDC has grown to 72 members in the 107th Congress. The Senate New Democrat Coalition (SNDC), established in 2000, is already 20 members.
In announcing the establishment of the SNDC in February 2000, Sen. Landrieu stated, “The American people are tired of the same old proposals and are demanding that we work together in a more creative way on the many problems facing our nation. Too often here in Washington, the loudest voices are the ones on the far left and far right. That is why this group was formed, to give voice to those in the sensible center.” The SNDC has already made its voice heard on critical issues ranging from education to trade to health care and, with the Senate evenly divided, the Senate New Dems are increasingly determining the balance of power.
Source: Senate New Democrat Coalition web site 01-SNDC0 on Jan 1, 2001