|
Tommy Thompson on Government Reform
Former Secretary of H.H.S.; former Republican Governor (WI)
|
Cheney is honorable individual; doesn’t have too much power
Q: You served in the Cabinet with Vice President Cheney. Do you think that Vice President Cheney has too much power?A: I believe that Vice President Cheney is criticized for a lot of things that he doesn’t do.
I believe that Dick Cheney is an honorable individual. And I think President Bush depends a great deal upon him.
Source: 2007 GOP Iowa Straw Poll debate
Aug 5, 2007
Eliminate CDC stockpiles; they’re wasteful & inefficient
Q: [To Gov. Thompson] Tell me three federal programs you consider wasteful and would eliminate.THOMPSON: There are several programs that need to be cut in Washington, several of those in my former department. I would first make every agency come in
with a budget at 95% of last year’s budget and one at 100%. And you will be able to use that exercise in order to reduce budgets all across the line.
Q: I didn’t hear three programs. Can you tell me one?
THOMPSON: The first one I would eliminate is
a program in the Department of Health and Human Services in CDC that deals with the stockpile. The stockpile does a great job, but there are some inefficiencies there.
Q: [To Paul] Can you do better than that?
PAUL:
I’d start with the departments--the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security. There’s a lot of things that we can cut, but we can’t cut anything until we change our philosophy about what government should do.
Source: 2007 Republican Debate in South Carolina
May 15, 2007
FactCheck: Only improve CDC stockpiles; don’t eliminate them
When pressed to name a single program he would eliminate to rein in federal spending, Thompson offered the CDC stockpile program. A Thompson aide told us later that Thompson was referring to the Strategic National Stockpile program, through which large
quantities of medicine and medical supplies are stored for an emergency like 9/11 or Hurricane Katrina. And it turns out, Thompson wouldn’t really eliminate it. The aide said Thompson meant to say he would manage it more efficiently.
Source: FactCheck.org on 2007 Republican Debate in South Carolina
May 15, 2007
More regional cooperation; more e-government
[I see five] catalysts for modernizing our government for a new century.- Create incentives to collaborate. By engaging in regional collaboration for the delivery of services, governments can reap significant savings without sacrificing quality. Do
neighboring communities really need separate mass transit systems? Or separate waste collection services?
- Demand performance and accountability. Improve harmony and performance by more clearly defining the roles of state and local government.
-
Performance-based education. Get money directly into the classroom by giving greater operating flexibility to every local school building.
- A Top-To-Bottom Scrub of Government. We need to search and destroy regulations and programs that have outlived
their usefulness; and establish performance-based management for state government.
- Expand e-government. Web portals for all levels of government will make it easier for citizens to access services and reduce the cost of goods the government buys.
Source: 2001 State of the State Address
Jan 31, 2001
Limit individual, corporate, & PAC political contributions
Do you support limiting the following types of contributions to state legislative candidates: Individual?A: Yes.
Q: PAC contributions?
A: Yes.
Q: Corporate?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support requiring full and timely disclosure of campaign finance
information?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support imposing spending limits on state level political campaigns?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support partial funding from state taxes for state level political campaigns?
A: Yes.
Q: Would you support an amendment to
the US Constitution requiring an annual balanced federal budget?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support requiring organizations that sponsor issue advocacy commercials to fully disclose their receipts and expenditures?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support requiring
all out-of-state organizations that give money to Wisconsin candidates to obey WI campaign finance laws?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support limiting transfers of money between political action committees or campaign committees to $100?
A: Yes.
Source: WI Gubernatorial 1998 National Political Awareness Test
Nov 1, 1998
Common sense over “government sense”
There is a big difference between common sense and what I call “government sense.” For decades now we have seen the federal government gathering more and more power into its grasp. For 50 years we have seen a federal government who thought it could do a
better job when it came to running our states, to running our schools, to running our businesses, and to running our personal lives. What has happened in those 50 years? We have seen crime go up, respect for authority go down, more families breaking up,
and a government that does not pay its bills. It’s a good thing they have been telling us what to do, right? Perhaps the one good thing to come out of this experiment will be the conviction that it is time to start moving away from government sense back
to common sense. The welfare system is a perfect example of what I refer to as government sense. When you pay people not to work and to have children out of wedlock, guess what happens? People do not work and they have more children out of wedlock.
Source: United We Stand America Conference, p.204-5
Aug 12, 1995
Page last updated: Feb 08, 2010