|
Amy Klobuchar on Principles & Values
DFL Sr Senator (MN); Democratic presidential contender
|
|
President focusing on personal interests risks democracy
Q: You've said that you support the impeachment inquiry but you want to wait for a Senate trial to hear the evidence and make a decision about convicting the president? KLOBUCHAR: I have made it very clear that this is impeachable conduct and I've
called for an impeachment proceeding. I just believe our job as jurors is to look at each count and make a decision. But let me make very clear that what this impeachment proceeding about is really our democracy at stake. This is a president that not
only with regard to his conduct with Ukraine, but every step of the way puts his own private interests, his own partisan interests, his own political interests in front of our country's interest, and this is wrong. This is a pattern with this man.
And it goes to everything from how he has betrayed our farmers, to sucking up to Vladimir Putin every minute of the day. That is what this guy does. And I think it is very, very important that we have a president that's going to put our country first.
Source: November Democratic primary debate, on impeaching Trump
, Nov 20, 2019
This election is a value, decency, and patriotism check
I want us to remember that I have bold ideas. But this is also a patriotism check, a value check, a decency check. And when you look at the people that turned out in Kentucky and turned out in Virginia, people turned out that didn't vote in 2016,
African-Americans are turning out like we didn't see before. Let's get those independents and moderate Republicans who cannot stomach this guy anymore. This is how we build a coalition, so we don't just beat Donald Trump.
Source: November Democratic primary debate in Atlanta
, Nov 20, 2019
Trump's actions make Russia great again, not America
I'm waiting to find out how making that call to the head of Ukraine and trying to get him involved in interfering in our election makes America great again. I'd like to hear how leaving the Kurds for slaughter, where Russia then steps in to protect
them, makes America great again. I would like to hear from him about how coddling up to Vladimir Putin makes America great again. It doesn't make America great again, it makes Russia great again. That is what this President has done.
Source: October Democratic Primary debate on impeaching Trump
, Oct 15, 2019
What unites us is bigger than what divides us
While we have had major debates about policy, we have to remember that what unites us is so much bigger than what divides us.
And we have to remember that our job is to not just change policy, but to change the tone in our politics, to look up from our phones, to look at each other, to start talking to each other.
Source: October Democratic CNN/NYTimes Primary debate
, Oct 15, 2019
I'm the street-fighter from the Iron Range
KLOBUCHAR: I stand before you today as a granddaughter of an iron ore miner, as the first woman elected to the Senate from Minnesota. Yes, I have bold ideas, but they are grounded in reality. Sen. Elizabeth WARREN:
We're not going to solve the urgent problems that we face with small ideas and spinelessness.
Q: Is Senator Warren correct? For example, Medicare-for-All: do you just not lack the will to fight for it?
KLOBUCHAR: That is incorrect.
I just have a better way to do this. In one of my first debates, I was called a street fighter from the Iron Range by my opponent. And when she said it, I said thank you. So this is what I think we need to get done. We need the public option.
That's what Barack Obama wanted, and it would bring health care costs down for everyone.
Source: July Democratic Primary debate (first night in Detroit)
, Jul 30, 2019
I passed over 100 bills because I listen and I act
I listen to people and that's how I get things done. That is my focus. I have a track record of passing over 100 bills where I'm the lead Democrat. And that is because I listened and I acted.
And I think that's important in a president. Everything else just melts away. I am not the establishment party candidate. But I can promise you this. I am going to govern with integrity.
Source: June Democratic Primary debate (first night in Miami)
, Jun 26, 2019
Heartland Amy: an experienced bipartisan pragmatist
Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota defended her presidential candidacy as one that could appeal to both moderate and liberal voters, calling herself a "proven progressive" and casting her record as one of bipartisan accomplishment. Ms. Klobuchar
described herself as "Heartland Amy," an experienced pragmatist who could win over independent voters and, if elected, work with Republicans to break the gridlock in Washington.While she is hardly a conservative, Ms. Klobuchar has distinguished
herself in the campaign by breaking from the new liberal orthodoxy that has dominated the primary. She does not favor a "Medicare for all" health care system, preferring a more graduated approach; she has called the Green New Deal "aspirational"; and
she has said the country cannot afford to fund free tuition for students at public colleges and universities. Ms. Klobuchar said she backed legal marijuana, but would leave the decision to individual states rather than endorsing federal legalization.
Source: New York Times on 2019-2020 Fox News Town Halls
, May 8, 2019
Hold president accountable with investigations & election
The most-important thing is to hold this president accountable. There are many ways to do that. One is with the process through Congress, which includes these investigations, which the president is already stonewalling.
The second is other investigations that are going on right now, including in the state of New York. And the third is pretty straightforward. That is defeating him in 2020. And that's what I intend to do and will do.
Source: Meet the Press 2019 interview of 2020 presidential hopefuls
, Apr 28, 2019
Minnesota Nice: reliable, calm, aw-shucks bipartisanship
[In 2016], Klobuchar coasted to a third Senate term, clobbering her Republican opponent with 60 percent of the vote in a state that President Trump nearly won in 2016. Now Minnesota's most popular politician is weighing whether her home state appeal--
forged through carefully cultivated bipartisanship in Washington & an aw-shucks-I'm-just-like-you persona--will translate on a national stage.As Democrats look ahead to 2020, do they need a calm, reasoned, reliable (but not flashy) Democrat from the
American heartland to provide a stark contrast to the president--in short, Amy Klobuchar?
"I don't agree with, 'When they go low, we go low,' but I do agree that when they go low, we have to respond," Klobuchar said, referring to the intraparty
debate over Michelle Obama's 2016 mantra: "When they go low, we go high."
"But," she went on, "responding doesn't mean just going down a rabbit hole everywhere Donald Trump goes. I don't think we want to tweet caustic comments every morning."
Source: NY Times on 2020 Democratic primary
, Nov 26, 2018
Nicknamed "The Senator of Small Things," but some are big
In the Senate, Ms. Klobuchar is not in the forefront on divisive issues like immigration, but she has led efforts to curb the skyrocketing cost of prescription drugs, expand voting rights, address sexual harassment and protect online privacy after
revelations of Facebook's data mining.Early in her tenure, she carved out a niche in consumer protection, shepherding passage of bipartisan bills to ban lead in toys and improve swimming pool safety after several highly publicized child deaths,
measures that Republican strategists in Minnesota said have earned Ms. Klobuchar a derisive nickname: "The Senator of Small Things."
Ms. Klobuchar has heard the "small things" criticism, and resents it. "Not for a minute do
I view these as small things," she said sharply. "They're big things for the people whose kids' lives were saved."
Source: NY Times on 2020 Democratic primary
, Nov 26, 2018
Minnesota Nice: Disagree without being disagreeable
Outwardly, Ms. Klobuchar is the embodiment of "Minnesota nice"--polite and intent on being able to "disagree without being disagreeable," as she wrote in her 2015 memoir, "The Senator Next Door." In an era of Twitter rants and senatorial showboats, she
is the worker bee in the background, tallying up how many of her bills get signed into law: 24, she said, since Mr. Trump became president.Although she is hardly a centrist, Ms. Klobuchar departs from progressive orthodoxy on several fronts.
She has not signed onto Mr. Sanders's single-payer health care bill, commonly called Medicare for All; she said it "should be considered," but prefers "a sensible transition" such as allowing people to buy into Medicare, or expanding it to cover those
55 and older. Her push to make college more affordable is not as expansive as the left would like. While she has denounced Mr. Trump's border policies, she has not joined the movement to abolish the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency.
Source: NY Times on Klobuchar's "Senator_Next_Door"
, Nov 26, 2018
From Slovenian immigrants; "Klobuchar" means "hatmaker"
The immigrant experience was central to my dad's life, His grandparents on both sides came to this country from Slovenia--a small country surrounded by Austria, Italy, Croatia, and Hungary--around the turn of the last century. Like so many others from
that part of the world, they made their way to Minnesota to work in the underground mines. Klobuchar means "hatmaker" in Slovene, indicating that at some point in centuries past, my ancestors were in the haberdashery business.Back in the old country,
Slovenians worked as miners and farmers and woodworkers. But for my ancestors, America brought the promise not only of steady work but of better lives for their children. In America, the Austrians (who, for centuries, ruled Slovenia as part of the
Hapsburg Dynasty) would no longer be able to tell them which of their kids could go to school. In America, they would be paying taxes to THEIR country, not foreign monarchs, and every child would get a good education.
Source: The Senator Next Door, by Amy Klobuchar, p. 18-9
, Aug 24, 2015
Voted with Democratic Party 94.1% of 324 votes.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), was scored by the Washington Post on the percentage of votes on which a lawmaker agrees with the position taken by a majority of his or her party members. The scores do not include missed votes.
Their summary:
Voted with Democratic Party 94.1% of 324 votes.
Overall, Democrats voted with their party 88.4% of the time, and Republicans voted with their party 81.7% of the time (votes Jan. 8 through Sept. 8, 2007).
Source: Washington Post, "Congress Votes Database" on 2008 election
, Sep 8, 2007
This election is about change; crowd in charge won’t do it
Whoever I talk to, they say the same thing. They’re tired of these gas prices. They’re tired of health care premiums up 60% in just the last 6 years. They want fiscal responsibility in Washington. And they want a change of course in Iraq.
That’s not going to happen with this crowd in charge. I believe this election is about change, and together we can do it.
Source: Minnesota 2006 3-way Senate Debate, sponsored by LWV
, Oct 30, 2006
Voted YES on confirming of Sonia Sotomayor to Supreme Court.
Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee kicked off the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Nominee, Judge Sonia Sotomayor. In her opening statement, Judge Sotomayor pledged a "fidelity to the law:"
"In the past month, many Senators have asked me about my judicial philosophy. It is simple: fidelity to the law. The task of a judge is not to make the law--it is to apply the law. And it is clear, I believe, that my record in two courts reflects my rigorous commitment to interpreting the Constitution according to its terms; interpreting statutes according to their terms and Congress's intent; and hewing faithfully to precedents established by the Supreme Court and my Circuit Court. In each case I have heard, I have applied the law to the facts at hand."
Reference: Supreme Court Nomination;
Bill PN506
; vote number 2009-S262
on Aug 6, 2009
Question Trump on Emoluments clause.
Klobuchar signed questioning Trump on Emoluments clause
Excerpts from Letter from 17 Senators to Trump Organization: The Trump Organization's continuing financial relationship with President Trump raises concerns about whether it is a pass-through for income that violates the Constitution's two Emoluments Clauses: Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 on foreign Emoluments; and Article II, Clause 7 on domestic Emoluments. Please answer the following questions to help Congress understand:
- When the Trump Organization receives income from a government agency, how is that income segregated & reported?
- How does the Trump Organization determine if income is derived from foreign governments?
- Trump promised to "donate all profits from foreign government payments made to his hotels to the US Treasury." Has the Trump Organization created a mechanism to make such payments?
- What is the estimated value of the 38 Chinese trademarks recently awarded to the Trump Organization? And the reported 157 pending trademark applications in
36 countries?
Legal Analysis: (Cato Institute, "Emoluments Clause vs. Trump Empire," 11/29/16): The wording of the Emoluments clause points one way to resolution: Congress can give consent, as it did in the early years of the Republic to presents received by Ben Franklin. It can decide what it is willing to live with in the way of Trump conflicts. If it misjudges public opinion, it will pay a political price at the next election.
FOIA argument: (ACLU Center for Democracy, "FOIA Request," 1/19/17): We filed our first Freedom of Information Act request of the Trump Era, seeking documents relating President Trump's conflicts of interest relating to his business connections. When Trump took the oath of office, he didn't take the steps necessary to ensure that he and his family's business interests comply with the Constitution. Some have even argued that upon taking the oath of office, the new president is already violating the Emoluments Clause.
Source: Letter from 17 Senators 17LTR-EMOL on May 18, 2017
Page last updated: Feb 24, 2020