|
John Kerry on Tax Reform
Jr Senator (MA), Democratic nominee for President
|
|
|
Abolishing state income tax would be calamitous
Kerry slammed Beatty's support of Question 1 on the state ballot, the proposal to abolish the state income tax. "My prayer is that Jeff Beatty's position will be soundly rejected by this state. To do what Jeff Beatty says we
should do would be calamitous," he said.But Beatty said the abolition of the state income tax would act as an economic stimulus for families and businesses and would bring more jobs and opportunities to the state.
Source: 2008 MA Senate Debate reported in the Boston Herald
, Oct 20, 2008
The middle class has seen their tax burden go up under Bush
The American middle-class family isn't making it right now. The tax cuts has been wiped out by the increase in health care, the increase in gasoline, the increase in tuitions, the increase in prescription drugs. The take-home pay of a typical American
family as a share of national income is lower since 1929 and that of the richest 0.1% of Americans is the highest since 1928. Under Bush, the middle class has seen their tax burden go up and the wealthiest's tax burden has gone down. That's wrong.
Source: Third Bush-Kerry debate, in Tempe AZ
, Oct 13, 2004
Support the part of Bush's tax cut given to the middle class
Q: Alan Greenspan suggested to cut benefits or to raise the retirement age. You've promised no changes. Does that mean you're just going to leave this as a problem, another problem for our children to solve? A: We put together a $5.6 trillion surplus
in the ‘90s that was for the purpose of saving Social Security. If you take the tax cut that Bush gave to Americans in the top 1 percent of America-just that tax cut that went to the top 1 percent of America would have saved Social Security until the
year 2075. Bush decided to give it to the wealthiest Americans in a tax cut. I support Bush's tax cut for the middle class, not that part of it that goes to people earning more than $200,000 a year. When I roll it back and we invest in the things that
I have talked about to move our economy, we're going to grow sufficiently, it would begin to cut the deficit in half, and we get back to where we were at the end of the 1990s when we balanced the budget and paid down the debt of this country.
Source: Third Bush-Kerry debate, in Tempe AZ
, Oct 13, 2004
Pledges not to raise taxes on earnings under $200,000
Q: Would you be willing to look directly into the camera and, using simple and unequivocal language, give the American people your solemn pledge not to sign any legislation that will increase the tax burden on families earning less than $200,000 a year
during your first term?KERRY: Absolutely. Yes. Right into the camera. Yes. I am not going to raise taxes. Now, I'm going to restore what we did in the 1990s, ladies and gentlemen: pay as you go. We're going to do it like you do it. The president broke
the pay-as-you-go rule. I'm pledging I will not raise taxes; I'm giving a tax cut to the people earning less than $200,000 a year. Now, for the people earning more than $200,000 a year, you're going to see a rollback to the level we were at with Bill
Clinton, when people made a lot of money. And looking around here, at this group here, I suspect there are only three people here who are going to be affected: the president, me, and, Charlie [Gibson, the moderator], I'm sorry, you too.
Source: Second Bush-Kerry debate, St. Louis, MO
, Oct 8, 2004
More tax cut for all people earning less than the $200,000
The highest 1% of income-earners in America got $89 billion of tax cut last year. One percent of America got more than the 80 percent of America that earned from $100,000 down. Bush thinks it's more important to fight for that top
1% than to fight for fiscal responsibility and to fight for you. I want to put money in your pocket. I have a proposal for a tax cut for all people earning less than the $200,000. The only people affected by my plan are the top income-earners of America.
Source: Second Bush-Kerry Debate, in St. Louis MO
, Oct 8, 2004
Enron received $254 million after the Bush tax cut
Q: How will either one of you cut the deficit by a half in four years?BUSH: Well look at the budget. One is to make sure Congress doesn't overspend. But let me talk back about where we've been. The stock market was declining six months prior to my
arrival. It was the largest stock market correction - one of the largest in history, which foretold a recession. Because we cut taxes on everybody - remember, we ran up the child credit by a thousand, we reduced the marriage penalty, we created the
10 percent bracket - everybody who pays taxes got relief.
KERRY: Most of the 2001 tax cut went to the wealthiest people in the country. Bush came and asked for a tax cut.
We wanted a tax cut to kick the economy into gear. You know what he presented us with? A $25 billion give-away to the biggest corporations in America, including a $254 million refund check to Enron.
Source: [Xref Bush] Second Bush-Kerry Debate, in St. Louis MO
, Oct 8, 2004
Homeland security should come before tax cut for the wealthy
What kind of mixed message does it send when you have $500 million going over to Iraq to put police officers in the streets of Iraq, and the president is cutting the COPS program in America? What kind of message does it send to be sending money to open
firehouses in Iraq, but we're shutting firehouses who are the first- responders here in America. Bush hasn't put one nickel, not one nickel into the effort to fix some of our tunnels and bridges and most exposed subway systems. That's why they had to
close down the subway in New York when the Republican Convention was there. 95 percent of the containers that come into the ports, right here in Florida, are not inspected. Civilians get onto aircraft, and their luggage is X- rayed, but the cargo
hold is not X-rayed. Does that make you feel safer in America? Bush thought it was more important to give the wealthiest people in America a tax cut rather than invest in homeland security. Those aren't my values. I believe in protecting America first.
Source: First Bush-Kerry debate, Miami FL
, Sep 30, 2004
Offer tax cuts that will help the middle class families
We will provide new tax cuts to help families meet the economic challenges of their everyday lives. We will offer tax credits to help families afford health care, including tax credits for small business; a tax credit to make 4 years of college affordabl
to all Americans. Specifically, we will offer a tax credit on $4,000 of tuition for all 4 years of college; and a tax credit to make child care more affordable, cutting taxes by $800 for a typical middle-class family with 2 children in child care.
Source: Our Plan For America, p. 22
, Aug 10, 2004
More tax cuts for people who make less than $200,000
Let me tell you what we won't do: we won't raise taxes on the middle class. You've heard a lot of false charges about this in recent months. So let me say straight out what I will do as President: I will cut middle class taxes.
I will reduce the tax burden on small business. And I will roll back the tax cuts for the wealthiest individuals who make over $200,000 a year, so we can invest in job creation, health care and education.
Source: Acceptance speech to the Democratic National Convention
, Jul 29, 2004
Keep child tax credit, and new 10% tax bracket
Q: Which of the tax cuts enacted in 2001 would you change, if any?A: I will roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. However, I don't believe that we should be raising taxes on the middle class.
Specifically, I want to protect the increases in the child tax credit, the reduced marriage penalty, and the new 10 percent tax bracket that helps people save $350 on their first level of income.
Source: Associated Press policy Q&A, "Taxes"
, Jan 25, 2004
Kerry vs. Bush on taxes is a fight we deserve to have
Q: In your career, you voted to raise billions of dollars in taxes. What will you say when President Bush says, "Senator Kerry is going to raise your taxes and I am not"?That's a fight I look forward to, because if George W. Bush wants to stand there
beside me and defend raising taxes for people who earn more than $200,000 a year, which are the only people who might be argued will have a tax increase by rolling back the Bush tax cut that they rushed through, instead of giving all of America
health care and education so we truly leave no child behind, that's a fight we deserve to have in this country. That's a fight we will win. I am going to protect the middle class.
And in the course of my career,
I have voted for countless numbers of tax cuts. When I arrived in the US Senate, the highest marginal rate was 72%. We took it down to 28%. I voted for cutting the capital gains tax, I voted for tax incentives for businesses.
Source: Democratic 2004 Primary Debate at St. Anselm College
, Jan 22, 2004
They're not Bush tax cuts, they're Democrat tax cuts
Q: To balance the budget, wouldn't you have to cut Social Security & Medicare?DEAN: I'm a strong supporter of Medicare. The rest of our Social Security is not on the table. I'm a strong supporter of Social Security.
What you need to do is get rid of every dime of the Bush tax cuts. Some say we should keep the middle-class tax cuts. What middle-class tax cuts? On the average, 60 percent of the people in this country got a $304 tax cut. One percent, which are rapidly
writing $2,000 checks to George Bush, got a $26,300 tax cut.
KERRY: When Dean said, "What middle-class tax cut," let me tell him. The Burnett family earned $70,000. But under his plan, they are going to pay $2,178 more in taxes because they lose the
child credit, they pay a penalty for being married again because he puts it back, and they lose the 10 percent bracket. Those aren't Bush cuts, those are the Democrat cuts that we worked hard to put in place to protect the middle class.
Source: Democratic Presidential 2004 Primary Debate in Detroit
, Oct 27, 2003
GOP tax policy comforts the comfortable
This administration has made its top wartime priority the easing of the tax burden on its wealthiest citizens-the citizens least likely to face sacrifices at home or abroad in a time of war.
The president has all but endorsed the most invidious conservative policy of our time:
that cutting taxes for the people who least need help, turning budget surpluses into deficits, and piling debts on our children are all useful strategies because they will effectively paralyze our own government-
the instrument of our democracy-by denying it the revenues to pay for progress. Using tax dollars to comfort the comfortable while starving the commonwealth has become an item of orthodoxy for the Republican party.
Source: A Call to Service, by John Kerry, p. 14
, Oct 1, 2003
10% bracket in Bush tax cuts was Democrats' idea
The 10% bracket [in the Bush tax plan] wasn't Bush's idea. It was our idea. It was in keeping with the spirit of the Democratic party to try to help the average American get ahead. Increasingly, average Americans are getting stomped on; there's an
unfairness in the workplace; corporate executives are walking away with millions and sticking the average American with the bill. We can cut the deficit in half, we can be fiscally responsible, but we don't have to do it on the backs of the middle class.
Source: Debate at Pace University in Lower Manhattan
, Sep 25, 2003
Bush tax cuts reach 32 million in middle class
Q [to Kerry]: Dean suggested he will roll back the increases in some middle-class tax benefits [in the Bush tax cuts]. You have suggested that anyone who walks away from the middle class is not a true Democrat. KERRY: We Democrats fought hard to put
those tax cuts in place. Those represent trying to reach the middle class of America. I think Governor Dean is absolutely wrong. And he's wrong on his facts. The fact is that 32 million American couples get about $1,000 out of the tax cut.
The fact is that 16 million American families get $1,500 to $3,000 from it.
DEAN: With all due respect to Senator Kerry that voted for these tax cuts, this is exactly why the budget is so far out of balance. The fact of the matter is that 60% of
Americans at the bottom got $325. That is not a tax cut. Tell the truth: We cannot afford all of the tax cuts, [all the programs we want], and balancing the budget. Let's call this one right. Let's be fiscally responsible and balance the budget.
Source: Debate at Pace University in Lower Manhattan
, Sep 25, 2003
We're tired of being trickled on--Middle class tax cuts now
The Republicans promised with their first tax cut a million jobs would be created. A million were lost. Now they come with another tax cut; they accelerate the highest rate cuts for the wealthiest Americans and wait for the trickle down.
Well, a lot of hard working Americans who are tired of getting trickled on. We want to create jobs now by giving a middle class tax cut; by restoring confidence in our economy with fiscal responsibility; and putting Americans back to work now.
Source: Keynote Speech to Massachusetts Democratic Issues Convention
, Jun 7, 2003
Trade a tax cut for the huge cuts in student loans
I'm fighting for Massachusetts working families. Weld stands for those who want to trade a tax cut for the rich for huge cuts in student loans, no minimum wage hike and massive cuts to education programs.
Source: Dust settles hard on Kerry/Weld debate, s-t.com
, Sep 18, 1996
John Kerry on Voting Record
FactCheck: No, Kerry did not vote 350 times to raise taxes
BUSH_CHENEY CLAIM: "Kerry supported higher taxes over 350 times."CNN FACT CHECK:Kerry has not cast 350 votes in the Senate to actually increase taxes. Many of the votes were to leave taxes unchanged (in opposition to Republican-proposed cuts),
or in support of Democratic tax cut packages instead of larger Republican packages. This could be characterized as "supporting higher taxes," but it's more accurate to say that he opposed lowering taxes, or supported the smaller of two tax cut proposals.
Source: CNN FactCheck on 2004 statements by Bush and Kerry
, Oct 29, 2004
I supported or voted for tax cuts over 600 times
BUSH: I believe the role of government is to stand side by side with our citizens to help them realize their dreams, not tell citizens how to live their lives. Kerry talks about fiscal sanity. His record in the United States Senate does not match his
rhetoric. He voted to increase taxes 98 times and to bust the budget 277 times. KERRY: I have supported or voted for tax cuts over 600 times. I broke with my party in order to balance the budget, and Ronald Reagan signed into law the tax cut that
we voted for. I voted for IRA tax cuts. I voted for small-business tax cuts.
BUSH: Kerry voted to violate the budget cap 277 times. You know, there's a main stream in American politics and you sit right on the far left bank.
As a matter of fact, your record is such that Ted Kennedy, your colleague, is the conservative senator from Massachusetts.
Source: [Xref Bush[ Third Bush-Kerry debate, in Tempe AZ
, Oct 13, 2004
Rated 14% by NTU, indicating a "Big Spender" on tax votes.
Kerry scores 14% by NTU on tax-lowering policies
Every year National Taxpayers Union (NTU) rates U.S. Representatives and Senators on their actual votes—every vote that significantly affects taxes, spending, debt, and regulatory burdens on consumers and taxpayers. NTU assigned weights to the votes, reflecting the importance of each vote’s effect. NTU has no partisan axe to grind. All Members of Congress are treated the same regardless of political affiliation. Our only constituency is the overburdened American taxpayer. Grades are given impartially, based on the Taxpayer Score. The Taxpayer Score measures the strength of support for reducing spending and regulation and opposing higher taxes. In general, a higher score is better because it means a Member of Congress voted to lessen or limit the burden on taxpayers.
The Taxpayer Score can range between zero and 100. We do not expect anyone to score a 100, nor has any legislator ever scored a perfect 100 in the multi-year history of the comprehensive NTU scoring system. A high score does not mean that the Member of Congress was opposed to all spending or all programs. High-scoring Members have indicated that they would vote for many programs if the amount of spending were lower. A Member who wants to increase spending on some programs can achieve a high score if he or she votes for offsetting cuts in other programs. A zero score would indicate that the Member of Congress approved every spending proposal and opposed every pro-taxpayer reform.
Source: NTU website 03n-NTU on Dec 31, 2003
Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.
Kerry scores 100% by the CTJ on taxationissues
OnTheIssues.org interprets the 2005-2006 CTJ scores as follows:
- 0% - 20%: opposes progressive taxation (approx. 235 members)
- 21% - 79%: mixed record on progressive taxation (approx. 39 members)
- 80%-100%: favors progressive taxation (approx. 190 members)
About CTJ (from their website, www.ctj.org): Citizens for Tax Justice, founded in 1979, is not-for-profit public interest research and advocacy organization focusing on federal, state and local tax policies and their impact upon our nation. CTJ`s mission is to give ordinary people a greater voice in the development of tax laws.
Against the armies of special interest lobbyists for corporations and the wealthy, CTJ fights for:
- Fair taxes for middle and low-income families
- Requiring the wealthy to pay their fair share
- Closing corporate tax loopholes
- Adequately funding important government services
- Reducing the federal debt
- Taxation that minimizes distortion of economic markets
Source: CTJ website 06n-CTJ on Dec 31, 2006
Page last updated: Nov 22, 2024; copyright 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org