Ross Perot on Budget & Economy

1992 & 1996 Reform Party Nominee for President


1992: No experience in running up debt or gridlock

Perot stood beside the Republican incumbent George H.W Bush, who attacked Perot on the audacity of deciding to run for president: "I think one thing that distinguishes us is experience," said the sitting president.

Perot offered a typically forceful, truthful answer that turned the question on its head. Gesturing to the president and Gov. Clinton, Perot shrugged. "Well, they've got a point," he said in his high-pitched Texas twang. "I don't have any experience in running up a $4 trillion. I don't have any experience in gridlocked government where nobody takes responsibility for anything and everybody blames everybody else. I don't have any experience in creating the worst public school system in the industrialized world, the most violent, crime- ridden society in the industrialized world. But I do have a lot of experience in getting thing done. So if it's time for action, I think I have the experience that counts. If it's more time for gridlock and talk and finger-pointing, I'm the wrong man."

Source: A Time for Truth, by Ted Cruz, p.221 , Jun 30, 2015

OpEd: made deficit reduction a proxy for public virtue

Ever since Ross Perot began howling about it, deficit reduction has become a general proxy for public virtue; politicians all across the spectrum feel the need to honor the conventional wisdom, which is repeated endlessly by commentators professing to be ideologically neutral. In fact, the holy grail of smaller government and budget balance is deeply conservative.
Source: Obama`s Challenge, by Robert Kuttner, p. 77 , Aug 25, 2008

Donated land for commercial airport in Fort Worth

In 1988, Perot launched a flock of new companies under the umbrella of the Perot Group, all making money or accumulating real estate. The linchpin was his donation of land for a commercial airport in Fort Worth, which would be built by federal funds; while some executives have praised his maneuver as important economic development, others have sternly criticized the plan as a taxpayer-subsidized boondoggle. It remains the Perot Group's most visible--and speculative--project.
Source: The Man Behind the Myth, by Ken Gross, p.199-200 , Sep 20, 2000

Building new businesses is key to country's future

Creating and building new businesses is vital to our nation's future. Businesses are like people--they are born, mature, grow old, and die. We must create thousands of new businesses each year to provide good jobs for the American people.

The giant companies that make up the Fortune 500 were once just an idea. "From small acorns mighty oak trees grow!" We must keep planting the seeds to create millions of good jobs in the US for the 21st century. This is our highest priority. If our government does everything perfectly, and we don't have a growing, expanding job base:

The future of our great country is in the hands of people who successfully create new companies.
Source: My Life & Principles for Success, by Ross Perotp. v , Sep 25, 1996

Weak dollar means weak America

A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy, and a weak economy leads to a weak nation. Judged by military might, the US is by far the most powerful nation in the world. Judged by economic standards the US is powerful but slipping. A nation that is weakening on the economic front will play a diminished role in the community of nations.

King Solomon wrote in Proverbs: “The borrower is servant to the lender.” So it will be unless the US puts in economic house in order-and soon.

Source: The Dollar Crisis, p. 45 , Jul 2, 1996

Lack of Balanced Budget Amendment caused dollar’s decline

In the 1980s, we ignored our fiscal problems by allowing ourselves to live with an unbalanced federal budget, building a staggering national debt in the process. During the same time period, we became the world’s largest debtor nation. In fact, we are value against other major world currencies. This decline was attributed to the failure in the Senate, by one vote, to pass the Balanced Budget Amendment.

Too much fluctuation in the value of the dollar-in either direction-is not good for the economy of the US or the world. While it is important to all nations that the US maintains a stable currency, it is particularly important to the citizens of this country.

Source: The Dollar Crisis, p. 29-33 , Jul 2, 1996

Idea for Balanced Budget Amendment began in 1787

The long-term solution to the chronic deficit situation remains the constitutional amendment. It is not a new solution to the chronic deficit situation. While Thomas Jefferson was in Paris negotiating for our new government in 1787, James Madison and others were writing the Constitution. After Jefferson returned, he said that if he could add one amendment to the Constitution, it would be to prohibit the federal government from borrowing money. He wrote, “We should consider ourselves unauthorized to saddle posterity with our debts, and morally bound to pay them ourselves.“

The constitutional amendment in 1995 did not absolutely prohibit the federal government from borrowing money, as Jefferson suggested. The authors of this book believe that there are rare occasions, such as a war or a recession, when the federal government may need to spend more than its revenue. But government spending should not exceed revenue for 27 consecutive years, as we have done.

Source: The Dollar Crisis, p. 77 , Jul 2, 1996

Balanced Budget in 1970s equals $15,500 more income now

The bipartisan watchdog organization, Concord Coalition, has analyzed the deficit to determine what it has cost us over the last two decades. The study concluded that income would be $15,500 per family higher each year if we had balanced our budget over the last two decades.

Speaking of balancing the budget, what if a constitutional amendment had been in place in 1980 when our national debt totaled less than $1 trillion? Instead of paying $344 billion in gross interest during fiscal year 1996, we would pay less than $70 billion. Actually the bill would be appreciably less than this amount because interest rates would be much lower. A constitutional restriction would have given us more than $300 billion extra today for education or health care or reducing taxes. Because lower interest rates would have encouraged more industrial investment and home building, our productivity and standard of living would be much higher than they are today.

Source: The Dollar Crisis, p. 88-91 , Jul 2, 1996

Tax incentives to encourage corporate & personal savings

The federal government [should alter the tax code because today it] rewards businesses that create debt to finance growth rather than financing growth through savings or equity (stock) financing. A corporation that borrows money can write off the interes payments, [while] stock dividends are not deductible. Tax breaks that encourage savings by individuals can save the federal government more in interest than the cost of the incentive. [Another method] to encourage savings is to require higher down payments for major purchases. “No down payment” is almost uniquely an American phrase.

Unless we, as a nation, do a better job of saving, our currency is destined to continue its downhill slide, and will take our standard of living with it.

Source: The Dollar Crisis, p.119-121 , Jul 2, 1996

Stabilize dollar with central bank intervention

The US should join with Japan and Germany and a few other nations with sound currencies in a statement that the dollar will be permitted to go up or down within certain publicly specified limits. Whenever those limits are exceeded, the central banks will agree to enter the market to stabilize the currency. When an overvalued currency declines in value, it is likely to fall farther than it should, and in that type of situation intervention will be helpful.
Source: The Dollar Crisis, p.127 , Jul 2, 1996

OpEd: Balanced budget mania swept country in 1992

Perot had elevated deficit reduction to topic A. Balancing the federal budget was a matter of common sense and would be simple, Perot claimed. Balanced-budget mania was now sweeping the country. The deficit problem had never been central to Clinton's vision, but the Clinton team now realized they were obliged to include specific deficit reduction goals in their overall plan. Unfortunately, Clinton's campaign pledges--new investments, a middle-class tax cut, a stimulus of fast-track spending to jump-start the economy, and health care reform--were expensive and could increase the deficit.

Promising to balance the federal budget at the end of a 4-year presidential term was standard campaign fare. Someone suggested that Clinton promise instead to cut the deficit in half at the end of 4 years, a more realistic goal. Clinton approved.

Source: The Agenda, by Bob Woodward, p. 41-42 , Jun 6, 1994

United We Stand America: Focus on economy & debt

Source: Save Your Job, by Ross Perot, p. 0 [X-ref Education] , Jan 1, 1993

Limit power to tax; expand power to intervene in market

Source: Strong-Man Politics, by George Grant, p. 88 , Nov 7, 1992

More federal involvement in business

[Perot] advocates a larger role for government in the market apparatus. Perot believes that instead of less government involvement in business, we need more. He has called for something like a federal department of business which would decide which businesses should receive government subsidies and which should not. He has said that he favors government intervention in such things as wages prices, and perks. He believes that free markets and fair trade, though desirable, are not entirely feasible.
Source: Strong-Man Politics, by George Grant, p. 92-93 , Nov 7, 1992

Will balance budget in six years by adding jobs

Q: [to Clinton]: You are promising to create jobs, reduce the deficit, reform health care, rebuild infrastructure, guarantee college education, all with financial pain only for the rich. Is it possible?

CLINTON: I believe we can increase investment and reduce the deficit, if we not only ask the wealthiest Americans to pay their share; we also provide $100 billion in tax relief and $140 billion of spending cuts. Take money from defense cuts and reinvest it in transportation, communications and environmental clean-up systems.

BUSH: I don't like trickle down government. Clinton says grow government. Government doesn't create jobs. If they do, they're make-work jobs. It's the private sector that creates jobs.

PEROT: We still have a significant deficit under each of their plans. There's only one way out of this, and that is to have a growing job base. My plan balances the budget within 6 years. We didn't do it faster than that because we didn't want to disrupt the economy.

Source: The Third Clinton-Bush-Perot Presidential Debate , Oct 19, 1992

Change rules to foster small business investment & growth

Source: United We Stand, by Ross Perot, p. 58-60 , Jul 2, 1992

Congress needs to be held accountable for enormous debt

We were told before the taxing summit and budget summit that our 1991 deficit would be only $63.1 billion. By the next April, they gave us a new forecast of $318 billion, and that's a $255 billion mistake. I say, who's keeping the books here? Folks, nobody's keeping books up there.
Source: The Man Behind the Myth by Ken Gross, p.222 , Jul 1, 1992

Other candidates on Budget & Economy: Ross Perot on other issues:
Former Presidents/Veeps:
George W. Bush (R,2001-2009)
V.P.Dick Cheney
Bill Clinton (D,1993-2001)
V.P.Al Gore
George Bush Sr. (R,1989-1993)
Ronald Reagan (R,1981-1989)
Jimmy Carter (D,1977-1981)
Gerald Ford (R,1974-1977)
Richard Nixon (R,1969-1974)
Lyndon Johnson (D,1963-1969)
John F. Kennedy (D,1961-1963)
Dwight Eisenhower (R,1953-1961)
Harry_S_TrumanHarry S Truman(D,1945-1953)

Religious Leaders:
New Testament
Old Testament
Pope Francis

Political Thinkers:
Noam Chomsky
Milton Friedman
Arianna Huffington
Rush Limbaugh
Tea Party
Ayn Rand
Secy.Robert Reich
Joe Scarborough
Gov.Jesse Ventura
Civil Rights
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Social Security
Tax Reform

Page last updated: Oct 28, 2021