OnTheIssuesLogo

Roger Wicker on Crime

Republican Jr Senator; previously Republican Representative (MS-1)

 


Broaden use of the federal death penalty

Source: Congressional 1998 National Political Awareness Test , Nov 1, 1998

More prisons & more mandatory jail sentences

Source: Congressional 1998 National Political Awareness Test , Nov 1, 1998

Rated 33% by CURE, indicating anti-rehabilitation crime votes.

Wicker scores 33% by CURE on rehabilitation issues

CURE (Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants) is a membership organization of families of prisoners, prisoners, former prisoners and other concerned citizens. CURE`s two goals are

  1. to use prisons only for those who have to be in them; and
  2. for those who have to be in them, to provide them all the rehabilitative opportunities they need to turn their lives around.
The ratings indicate the legislator’s percentage score on CURE’s preferred votes.
Source: CURE website 00n-CURE on Dec 31, 2000

First step: reduce recidivism & mass incarceration.

Wicker voted YEA First Step Act

Congressional Summary:

Opposing press release from Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-CA-1):: The reform sentencing laws in this bill may compromise the safety of our communities. Criminals convicted of violent crimes would have the opportunity to achieve `low risk` status and become eligible for early release. California already has similar laws in place--Propositions 47 and 57--which have hamstrung law enforcement and caused a significant uptick in crime.

Supporting press release from Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY-10):: S. 756 establishes a new system to reduce the risk that [federal prisoners] will commit crimes once they are released. Critically, S. 756 would not only implement these reforms to our prison system, but it also takes a crucial first step toward addressing grave concerns about our sentencing laws, which have for years fed a national crisis of mass incarceration. The bill is a `first step` that demonstrates that we can work together to make the system fairer in ways that will also reduce crime and victimization.

Legislative outcome: Concurrence Passed Senate, 87-12-1, on Dec. 18, 2018; Concurrence Passed House 358-36-28, Dec. 20, 2018; President Trump signed, Dec. 21, 2018

Source: Congressional vote 18-S756 on Dec 20, 2018

Rated 73% by the NAPO, indicating a moderate stance on police issues.

Wicker scores 73% by the NAPO on crime & police issues

Ratings by the National Association of Police Organizations indicate support or opposition to issues of importance to police and crime. The organization`s self-description: `The National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO) is a coalition of police units and associations from across the United States. NAPO was organized for the purpose of advancing the interests of America`s law enforcement officers through legislative advocacy, political action, and education.

`Increasingly, the rights and interests of law enforcement officers have been the subject of legislative, executive, and judicial action in the nation’s capital. NAPO works to influence the course of national affairs where law enforcement interests are concerned. The following list includes examples of NAPO’s accomplishments:

VoteMatch scoring for the NAPO ratings is as follows:

Source: NAPO ratings on Congress and politicians 2014_NAPO on Dec 31, 2014

More prisons, more enforcement, effective death penalty.

Wicker signed the Contract with America:

[As part of the Contract with America, within 100 days we pledge to bring to the House Floor the following bill]:

The Taking Back Our Streets Act:
An anti-crime package including stronger truth in sentencing, “good faith” exclusionary rule exemptions, effective death penalty provisions, and cuts in social spending from this summer’s crime bill to fund prison construction and additional law enforcement to keep people secure in their neighborhoods and kids safe in their schools.
Source: Contract with America 93-CWA4 on Sep 27, 1994

Prevent luxurious conditions in prisons.

Wicker co-sponsored preventing luxurious conditions in prisons

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to prevent luxurious conditions in prisons. The `No Frills Prison Act` requires each State, to be eligible for truth in sentencing incentive grants, to demonstrate that it:

  1. provides living conditions and opportunities within its prisons that are not more luxurious than those that the average prisoner would have experienced if not incarcerated;
  2. does not provide to any such prisoner specified benefits or privileges, including earned good time credits, less than 40 hours a week of work that either offsets or reduces the expenses of keeping the prisoner or provides resources toward restitution of victims, unmonitored phone calls (with exceptions), in-cell television viewing, possession of pornographic materials, instruction or training equipment for any martial art or bodybuilding or weightlifting equipment, or dress or hygiene other than as is uniform or standard in the prison; and
  3. in the case of a prisoner serving a sentence for a crime of violence which resulted in serious bodily injury to another, does not provide housing other than in separate cell blocks intended for violent prisoners, less than nine hours a day of physical labor (with exceptions), any release from the prison for any purpose unless under physical or mechanical restraint and under constant supervision of at least one armed correctional officer, or any viewing of television.
    Source: No Frills Prison Act (H.R.663) 95-HR663 on Jan 24, 1995

    Other candidates on Crime: Roger Wicker on other issues:
    MS Gubernatorial:
    Bill Waller
    Brandon Presley
    Tate Reeves
    MS Senatorial:
    Cindy Hyde-Smith
    Dan Eubanks
    Jensen Bohren
    Mike Espy
    Ty Pinkins

    MS politicians
    MS Archives
    Senate races 2024:
    AZ: Kyrsten Sinema(I,incumbent)
    vs.Ruben Gallego(D)
    vs.Kari Lake(R)
    vs.Mark Lamb(R)
    CA: Laphonza Butler(D,retiring)
    vs.Adam Schiff(D nominee)
    vs.Steve Garvey(R nominee)
    vs.Gail Lightfoot(L)
    vs.Barbara Lee(D, lost primary)
    vs.Katie Porter(D, lost primary)
    CT: Chris Murphy(D,incumbent)
    vs.John Flynn(R)
    vs.Robert Hyde(R)
    DE: Tom Carper(D,retiring)
    vs.Eric Hansen(R)
    vs.Michael Katz(I)
    vs.Lisa Blunt Rochester(D)
    FL: Rick Scott(R,incumbent)
    vs.Debbie Mucarsel-Powell(D)
    HI: Mazie Hirono(D,incumbent)
    vs.Bob McDermott(R)
    IN: Mike Braun(R,retiring)
    vs.Jim Banks(R nominee)
    vs.Valerie McCray(D nominee)
    vs.Marc Carmichael(D, lost primary)
    MA: Elizabeth Warren(D,incumbent)
    vs.Shiva Ayyadurai(R)
    vs.John Deaton(R)
    MD: Ben Cardin(D,retiring)
    vs.Larry Hogan(R)
    vs.Robin Ficker(R)
    vs.Angela Alsobrooks(D)
    vs.David Trone(D)
    ME: Angus King(I,incumbent)
    vs.Demi Kouzounas(R)
    vs.David Costello(D)
    MI: Debbie Stabenow(D,retiring)
    vs.Leslie Love(D)
    vs.Peter Meijer(R)
    vs.James Craig(R)
    vs.Mike Rogers(R)
    vs.Elissa Slotkin(D)
    MN: Amy Klobuchar(DFL,incumbent)
    vs.Royce White(R)
    vs.Steve Carlson(DFL)
    MO: Josh Hawley(R,incumbent)
    vs.Karla May(D)
    vs.Lucas Kunce(D)
    MS: Roger Wicker(R,incumbent)
    vs.Dan Eubanks(R)
    vs.Ty Pinkins(D)
    MT: Jon Tester(D,incumbent)
    vs.Tim Sheehy(R)
    vs.Brad Johnson(R,lost primary)
    ND: Kevin Cramer(R,incumbent)
    vs.Katrina Christiansen(D)

    NE: Peter Ricketts(R,incumbent,2-year seat)
    vs.Preston Love(D)
    Deb Fischer(D,incumbent,6-year seat)
    vs.Dan Osborn(I)
    NJ: Bob Menendez(I,incumbent)
    vs.Andy Kim(D)
    vs.Curtis Bashaw(R)
    vs.Tammy Murphy(D,withdrew)
    NM: Martin Heinrich(D,incumbent)
    vs.Nella Domenici(R)
    NV: Jacky Rosen(D,incumbent)
    vs.Jim Marchant (R)
    vs.Sam Brown(R)
    NY: Kirsten Gillibrand(D,incumbent)
    vs.Mike Sapraicone(R)
    vs.Josh Eisen(R,withdrew May 1)
    OH: Sherrod Brown(D,incumbent)
    vs.Bernie Moreno(R nominee)
    vs.Frank LaRose(R, lost primary)
    vs.Matt Dolan(R, lost primary)
    PA: Bob Casey(D,incumbent)
    vs.David McCormick(R)
    RI: Sheldon Whitehouse(D,incumbent)
    vs.Patricia Morgan(R)
    vs.Allen Waters(R,withdrew)
    TN: Marsha Blackburn(R,incumbent)
    vs.Gloria Johnson(D)
    vs.Marquita Bradshaw(D)
    TX: Ted Cruz(R,incumbent)
    vs.Colin Allred(D)
    vs.Roland Gutierrez(D,lost primary)
    vs.Carl Sherman(D,lost primary)
    UT: Mitt Romney(R,retiring)
    vs.John Curtis(R)
    vs.Trent Staggs(R)
    vs.Brad Wilson(R)
    vs.Caroline Gleich(D)
    VA: Tim Kaine(D,incumbent)
    vs.Scott Parkinson(R)
    VT: Bernie Sanders(I,incumbent)
    vs.Gerald Malloy(R)
    WA: Maria Cantwell(D,incumbent)
    vs.Raul Garcia(R)
    WI: Tammy Baldwin(D,incumbent)
    vs.Eric Hovde(R)
    vs.Phil Anderson(L)
    WV: Joe Manchin III(D,retiring)
    vs.Don Blankenship(D)
    vs.Jim Justice(R)
    vs.Alex Mooney(R)
    vs.Glenn Elliott(D)
    WY: John Barrasso(R,incumbent)
    vs.Reid Rasner(R)
    vs.Scott Morrow(D)
    Abortion
    Budget/Economy
    Civil Rights
    Corporations
    Crime
    Drugs
    Education
    Energy/Oil
    Environment
    Families
    Foreign Policy
    Free Trade
    Govt. Reform
    Gun Control
    Health Care
    Homeland Security
    Immigration
    Jobs
    Principles
    Social Security
    Tax Reform
    Technology
    War/Peace
    Welfare

    Other Senators
    Senate Votes (analysis)
    Bill Sponsorships
    Affiliations
    Policy Reports
    Group Ratings
    [Title9]





    Page last updated: Sep 08, 2024; copyright 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org