|
Darren Soto on Environment
|
|
Called on EPA to maintain & strengthen Clean Water Act
[Rep. Darren Soto writes]: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has repealed, diluted or otherwise weakened many crucial parts of the Clean Water Act -- often at the behest of big polluters and in opposition to science and the public interest.
Congress has the authority to block these attacks on America's clean water. Reps. Debbie Dingell and Chris Pappas filed a resolution calling on the EPA to maintain and strengthen the Clean Water Act and end ongoing Trump administration efforts to
undermine it.For Floridians, this is a make or break moment for our key environmental protections. From sewage spills to harmful algal outbreaks, we're already all too familiar with the impacts of pollution on our waterways. Not to mention, we know
that impaired waterways and degraded wetlands means canceled hotel reservations, unsold waterfront homes, flooded streets and sick citizens. Clean water affects everyone, no matter your party affiliation, and we know we can't go backwards.
Source: WMUR TV-9 on 2018 Congress FL-9 election
, May 7, 2020
Named Champion of the Everglades by Audubon Florida
Our economy and quality of life depend on keeping Florida clean--and that's not worth sacrificing for the short-term gain of corporate polluters. That's why I'm fighting to pass a statewide ban on fracking and have fought to protect our sensitive eco-
systems. I was named Champion of the Everglades by Audubon Florida because of my record on fighting for our environment. I'll fight to ban fracking on all our public lands and finish the work Pres. Obama started to reduce our reliance on carbon fuels.
Source: 2016 Florida House campaign website DarrenSoto.com
, Nov 8, 2016
Keep restrictive rules for predator control in Alaska.
Soto voted NAY Disapprove Subsistence Hunting Rule on ANWR
Library of Congress Summary: This joint resolution nullifies the rule finalized by the Department of the Interior on Aug. 5, 2016, relating to non-subsistence takings of wildlife and public participation and closure procedures on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska.
Case for voting YES by House Republican Policy Committee: The Fish and Wildlife Service rule--which lays claim to more than 20% of Alaska--violates ANILCA (Alaska National Interest Land Conservation Act) and the Alaska Statehood Compact. Not only does [the existing 2016 rule] undermine Alaska's ability to manage fish and wildlife upon refuge lands, it fundamentally destroys a cooperative relationship between Alaska and the federal government.
Case for voting NO by the Sierra Club (April 6, 2017):
- President Trump signed H.J. Res. 69, overturning the rule that banned "predator control" on federal wildlife refuges in Alaska unless "based on sound science in response to
a conservation concern."
- Any rule mentioning "sound science" is in trouble under a Trump administration.
- So what kinds of practices will the Trump administration now allow on our federal wildlife refuges? Activities that include shooting or trapping wolves while in their dens with pups, or hunting for grizzly bears from airplanes.
- It's all about ensuring a maximum yield of prey species like elk, moose, and caribou for the real apex predator: humans. So if having more elk requires killing wolf pups in their dens, then so be it.
- The Obama administration's rule (which Trump revoked) never tried to stop all hunting. Subsistence hunting was still allowed. What's changed is that the predators on federal wildlife refuges are now under the control of the state of Alaska. And that makes them prey.
Legislative outcome: Passed Senate, 52-47-1, March 21; passed House, 225-193-12, Feb. 16; signed by Pres. Trump April 3.
Source: Congressional vote 18-HJR69 on Feb 16, 2017
Page last updated: Jan 23, 2022