Jesse Ventura on Government Reform

Former Independent MN Governor

Require paper ballots & hand-counting

All votes should still be paper ballots and hand-counted. Minnesota is still that way, and I hope this never changes.

Would you use an ATM machine that didn't give you a receipt? These electric voting machines don't do that. There's no way to keep a record of whom you voted for, so there can't be a valid recount. When computers can be used to change votes, it challenges the legality of our system. The only way to change that is to go back and make it as primitive as you can, one person one vote.

Source: American Conspiracies, by Jesse Ventura, p.130 , Mar 9, 2010

Electronic voting machines are a GOP conflict of interest

It's obvious that, to avoid the specter of vote fraud always hanging over our elections, we've got to outlaw the electronic voting machines and return to a system where there's a "paper trail." How can we not see the blatant conflict of interest that currently exists, with the computer companies and the vote-counters being dominated by the Republican Party? Give the Democrats enough years in power, and you can bet they'd follow the same pattern. While we're after real reform, let's finally abolish the antiquated Electoral College and allow the popular vote to prevail. And let's open the ballot and the debates to legitimate third-party candidates, and break the stranglehold that big money has on the two-party system.
Source: American Conspiracies, by Jesse Ventura, p.141 , Mar 9, 2010

CIA operatives in every state government

Shortly after becoming Governor, I found out something and it stunned me. There is a CIA operative inside every state government. They are not in executive positions--in other words, not appointed by the governor--but permanent state employees. While governors come and go, they keep working, holding down legitimate jobs but with a dual identity.

I wasn't sworn to secrecy about this, but only my chief of staff and I were allowed to know his identity. I still have no idea what they're doing there. Are they spying? Checking out the state government and reporting back to someone at headquarters? But who and for what purpose? I mean, are they trying to ferret out traitors in the various states? (Or maybe just dissidents--like me!)

Anyhow, I wasn't told the reason and was simply left to ponder how come our Constitution is being violated. And that's another reason why I am writing this book, because I believe it's vital to our democracy to see the hidden pattern that's been undermining this country.

Source: American Conspiracies, by Jesse Ventura, p. xiii , Mar 8, 2010

Kennedy assassination involved CIA, Pentagon, & 2nd gunman

The Incident:
The assassination of President John F, Kennedy, riding in his limousine in Dallas, on November 22, 1963.
The Official Word:
Lee Harvey Oswald, an ex-Marine and Communist sympathizer, shot the president twice from behind, firing a rifle from the sixth-story window of the Texas School Book Depository. He was captured later that day in a theater, and killed two days later by Jack Ruby.
My Take:
The cover-up of what really happened to JFK starts with the Warren Commission's "lone assassin" conclusion, and continues to this day with the help of the big media. A second gunman assassinated the president from the grassy knoll, while Oswald was set up as the fall guy. The perpetrators behind Oswald are tied into the CIA, the Pentagon, and the Mob, along with right-wing extremists who tried to make it look like Cuba was behind it. Oswald himself was part of an intelligence operation that involved a look-alike "double."
Source: American Conspiracies, by Jesse Ventura, p. 22&43 , Mar 8, 2010

Get rid of the antiquated Electoral College

Gore won the 2000 national popular vote from the get-go. How can you get a half million more votes that the other guy & lose? The presidential is the only election where we allow that to happen. We should have gotten rid of the Electoral College long ago It was fine back in the days when everybody was still on horseback. It's time to leave an antiquated system behind. Who's profiting from keeping it going? As a third-party guy, I was hoping 2004 would bring the opposite result: Bush would win the popular vote and Kerry would take the Electoral College. Maybe that would have brought them to the table to abolish the whole thing.

But 2004, it turned out, was even more blatant election theft than in 2000. The exit polls were predicting a huge victory for Kerry. But somehow Bush had taken a decisive lead and Kerry conceded on the day after. There is no evidence of vote theft or errors on a large scale, the NY Times "informed" us. The Washington Post called any talk of vote fraud "conspiracy theories."

Source: American Conspiracies, by Jesse Ventura, p.132 , Mar 8, 2010

Government cites "national security" for too many secrets

We've got to have a more open government. Why can't those 10,000 documents on Able Danger be released? The old excuse of "national security"? Shouldn't there be some elected board that would say, "Okay, tell us why this falls under national security and we'll make the determination whether it truly does, or is this simply a political cover-up?" When the government starts keeping too many secrets for us, that's a big step on the road to losing more of our liberties.

We've got to have a more open government. Why can't those 10,000 documents on Able Danger be released? The old excuse of "national security"? Shouldn't there be some elected board that would say, "Okay, tell us why this falls under national security and we'll make the determination whether it truly does, or is this simply a political cover-up?" When the government starts keeping too many secrets for us, that's a big step on the road to losing more of our liberties.

Source: Link , Mar 8, 2010

Release 10,000 documents held under "national security"

We've got to have a more open government. Why can't those 10,000 documents on Able Danger be released? The old excuse of "national security"? Shouldn't there be some elected board that would say, "Okay, tell us why this falls under national security and we'll make the determination whether it truly does, or is this simply a political cover-up?" When the government starts keeping too many secrets for us, that's a big step on the road to losing more of our liberties.

Do you ever think that maybe our country needs a Truth Commission, to understand the crimes that were committed "in our name" over these recent decades? My hope is that some of you will stand with me in calling for accountability. The only way we can truly move forward is to come to grips with a recent past that's brought us to the brink of losing it all.

Source: American Conspiracies, by Jesse Ventura, p.202-203 , Mar 8, 2010

Will not actively fund-raise for re-election: ďNo stringsĒ

Maybe my success is partly about the fact that I have not had a fundraiser since I was sworn into office. No strings attached. Itís great.

I get criticized for making money on weekends. Iím an entertainer and have been all my life and so occasionally I will make a few dollars entertaining on the weekends. But I wonder what my critics would say if I was traveling around every weekend raising money for my campaign chest? That would be okay, Iím sure. No thanks. I donít take bribes. In fact I recommend it to all politicians. You sleep well. And you donít have to go to those God-awful fundraisers, and pretend you are aware of some lobbyistís problem that youíve never heard of.

And you know what? Having no strings attached is so great that if I run for re-election I will promise the people of Minnesota that I will not actively raise a dime. The people of Minnesota will know my record. If they approve, they will re-elect me. If not, they wonít. Win or lose, my conscience will be clear.

Source: Speech to the National Press Club, Washington, DC , Feb 26, 2001

Open up, simplify, & demystify government

A government too complex, too mysterious, is also too inaccessible. It unnecessarily excludes the people who form it. Using the best practices and principles of the ďalready-tried,Ē incorporating vigorous citizen input, and mixing in a whole lot of common sense, the Ventura administration envisions a simpler state government and an involved citizenry.

Weíll bring reform to state departments and agencies, reigning in excessive rule making, clarifying overlapping roles, and bringing greater cooperation between departments to benefit all Minnesotans. Weíll introduce a variety of government systems and services reforms, including a simplified tax system and more one-stop government shopping via technology improvements. And weíll support any effort to demystify government to make it a friend, not a foe.

In addition, existing laws pertaining to campaigns and elections need to be reviewed and amended to allow for full participation by credible third parties.

Source: The Big Plan: Service, not Systems , Dec 10, 2000

Single House Legislature returns power to people

Many state leaders agree that a single house system of government would better serve Minnesotans. A single house would be more open, accountable and responsive. In a more streamlined legislative process, citizens would be able to understand and follow legislation. It would place the responsibility for representation squarely on the shoulders of a single elected legislature rather than on two houses that can hide behind one another to avoid taking responsibility for tough votes. A single house would bring power to the people instead of concentrating power in the hands of a few powerful conference committee members. Every amendment and every bill would be given the respect of a recorded vote. While some powerful leaders may oppose a single house, ultimately we should trust the people to decide this issue.
Source: The Big Plan: Service, not Systems , Dec 10, 2000

Constitution is designed to be interpreted

The Constitution reads more like a mission statement than an instruction manual. Itís full of ďmajestic generalities,Ē; it sketches the broad principles and leaves the details up to us. That way, itís flexible enough to adapt to changing times. And it has: More than 200 years later, itís still working.

Youíll often hear politicians & lawyers talking about interpreting the Constitution in terms of ďgetting back to the Founding Fathersí original intent.Ē But you know what? We canít. The Constitution is such an open-ended framework that even in their time it had to be interpreted. Maybe thatís why they wrote it that way: because even back then, there was a lot of argument over the meaning of lofty principles like ďfree speechĒ and ďdue process.Ē

The Constitution is constantly being interpreted, mostly by the Supreme Court. Weíre always looking to it for answers. But the truth is, it canít answer all of our questions, it can only inform our decisions. Thatís what it was really meant to do.

Source: Do I Stand Alone, by Jesse Ventura, p. 90-91 , Jul 2, 2000

Feds leach away statesí rights

I see indications that the federal government is on a campaign to leach away powers from the states. Weíll become a lesser nation if that happens. One of our strengths today is that our states vary somewhat in their modes of thinking, and they can experiment with different solutions to the same problem. That gives us freedom of choice. If we donít like the attitudes prevalent in one state, we can move to another. Weíve got to be on guard against allowing this diversity to slip away from us.
Source: Do I Stand Alone, by Jesse Ventura, p.202 , Jul 2, 2000

Ban campaigning while earning a public paycheck

Incumbents usually take advantage of their government paychecks during campaign time. When I ran for governor, I was made to give up my job as a radio show host in order to campaign. I went without income for six months, yet my two opponents, both public employees, kept their jobs the whole time, even though they were campaigning ten hours a day just as I was.

The taxpayers essentially funded their campaign. They didnít fund mine. Why shouldnít they have had to take a leave of absence if they werenít performing the duties of their office?

I want to try and pass a law that says if youíre in public office, youíre not allowed to campaign from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you want to campaign, you can campaign at nights and on the weekends. This would keep incumbents from forcing taxpayers to pay them salaries for work theyíre not doing.

Source: Do I Stand Alone, by Jesse Ventura, p. 33 , Jul 2, 2000

Ban PAC funding; limit soft money; limit free air time

We need to talk about making PAC contributions illegal. Candidates pay attention to whoever coughs up the cash. If the only sources of funding they have are the people, then candidates will have no choice but to listen to us.

We also need to fix the loopholes in the campaign funding system. Thereís already a cap on donations to an individual candidate, but no limit to the amount you can donate to a party. This so-called soft money is then funneled to individual candidates in the form of ďissue ads.Ē We ought to cap the amount that each candidate is allowed to spend on a given campaign.

Some people have tossed around the idea of providing all candidates with equal chunks of free air time, free print space, and free Internet access, which they could use to state their positions, hold debates, and conduct question-and-answer sessions. We just have to be careful with the term FREE. In some circumstances, FREE may not mean what it appears to. Who exactly will pay for the free air time?

Source: Do I Stand Alone, by Jesse Ventura, p. 37-38 , Jul 2, 2000

Government should get out of the way and let people live

There are a lot of good causes out there, but they canít possibly all be served by government. The Constitution guarantees us our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Thatís all. It doesnít guarantee our rights to charity.

The government is not a parent. We canít expect the government to always be there, ready to bail us out. When we make decisions in life, we have to be willing to live with the consequences. We canít expect the government to help us get back on our feet every time we make a bad decision.

Weíve gotten into the bad habit of overlegislating. I believe in the America peopleís ability to govern themselves. If government would just get out of the way and allow them to lead their lives as they choose, they will succeed. Government only needs to be there to support them in their efforts.

Remember that government doesnít earn one single dollar it spends. In order for you to get money from the government, that money must first be taken from somebody else.

Source: Ainít Got Time to Bleed, p. 16-7 , Jan 1, 1999

Government service should be temporary; not a career

Youíve heard the old saying that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely? Thatís what comes into play when public servants make a career of what they do: They eventually have to shift their focus from serving the public to serving their own careers. Itís not a career if you donít get reelected! So that becomes your objective: winning the election, staying in the game. Raising money. To hell with the ďpublic serviceĒ!

On the other hand, when somebody who isnít a career politician takes office, everybody understands that itís temporary. Theyíll serve one or two terms, then theyíll be out. They have a life and a career somewhere else. Odds are, they themselves will be affected by the legislation they pass or the programs they implement during their term. They probably sought office because they felt strongly enough about one issue or several issues to want to do something about them. That is the mind-set we want in our public servants.

Source: Ainít Got Time to Bleed, p. 18 , Jan 1, 1999

Fought and lost on removing stupid milk regulations

Not everything was smooth sailing in Minnesota this year. I fought hard to get a stupid federal law off the books: the Eau Claire Milk Law, which regulates the prices dairy farmers can charge for their milk in relation to their distance from Eau Claire, Wisconsin. I couldnít get anybody to budge on that one.
Source: Ainít Got Time To Bleed, p.284-5 , Jan 1, 1999

Spend every 4th year removing obsolete laws

Iíd like to work on having every fourth year become a year in which no laws are made, but the old laws are reviewed, updated, or deleted as needed. That way we wonít get endless, obsolete laws piling up on the books.
Source: Ainít Got Time To Bleed, p.304 , Jan 1, 1999

Put political process on TV; exposure beats incumbency

Whenever you take a stand on an issue, people will line up around the block to kick your ass over it. By having an opinion, you make yourself a target. Why do you think Congress likes to hide behind closed doors at decision-making time?

I put all the city council meetings on public TV, over the good old boysí objections. Exposure creates an educated, involved public, which isnít in the interests of the old-boy network. The smaller the number of people involved, the more power the incumbents have.

Source: Ainít Got Time To Bleed, p.198 & 202 , Jan 1, 1999

To change system, private citizens must get involved

While I was mayor, I learned that government is a system of checks and balances--you canít simply walk in and change things. It takes time. I used to joke that it would be nice if a magic wand came with the job, if I could just wave it and make things work the way theyíre supposed to. But unfortunately itís not that easy. The bureaucracy is so huge that in a lot of situations all I can do is tell people the truth and let the chips fall where they may.

Government protects itself from the top down--state government is reluctant to get involved in local government, and so forth. And since the good old boys are ensconced from the top down, we have to be willing to whittle away at their network from the bottom up. Thatís the only way itís possible: in tiny local victories that eventually lead to bigger victories. The only way the system will ever change is if enough well-meaning private-sector people get involved in their local government for the right reasons.

Source: Ainít Got Time To Bleed, p.197-8 , Jan 1, 1999

Supports a Unicameral Legislature

A unicameral legislature will cut government expense, increase the legislatorsí accountability to their constituents and improve efficiency. Nowhere other than in our government do we pay two groups to perform the identical job. If we eliminated one of the legislative bodies, we would also eliminate the conference committees. A unicameral legislature would limit the amount of vote trading and political protection that legislators currently practice.
Source: 1998 campaign web site, jesseVentura.org/98campaign , Nov 1, 1998

Reforms must respect state's rights to select electors.

Ventura adopted the National Governors Association position paper:

The Issue

In the wake of the United States presidential election in Florida, the Congress and the administration has expressed interest in federal standards for elections. Recognizing that Articles I and II of the United States Constitution grants states, not Congress, the authority to determine the manner of selecting presidential electors and conducting elections generally, most legislative proposals do not mandate federal standards. Rather, current proposals direct federal agencies or commissions to study and make recommendations concerning the election system. Nonetheless, the possibility of legislation in the 107th Congress requiring states to implement federal election standards remains. If enacted without adequate funding by the federal government, such legislation could also result in an unfunded mandate to the states.

NGAís Position

Articles I and II of the United States Constitution grant states the authority to determine the manner of selecting presidential electors and provide that states are responsible for establishing election procedures generally. However, in the wake of the 2000 presidential election, the nationís Governors recognize the need for election reform. NGA will continue to monitor federal legislation addressing this issue, but has not taken a position in support of or opposition to election reform efforts.
Source: National Governors Association "Issues / Positions" 01-NGA11 on Aug 1, 2001

Other governors on Government Reform: Jesse Ventura on other issues:
MN Gubernatorial:
Mark Dayton
MN Senatorial:
Al Franken
Amy Klobuchar

Newly seated 2010:
NJ Chris Christie
VA Bob McDonnell

Term-limited as of Jan. 2011:
AL Bob Riley
CA Arnold Schwarzenegger
GA Sonny Perdue
HI Linda Lingle
ME John Baldacci
MI Jennifer Granholm
NM Bill Richardson
OK Brad Henry
OR Ted Kulongoski
PA Ed Rendell
RI Donald Carcieri
SC Mark Sanford
SD Mike Rounds
TN Phil Bredesen
WY Dave Freudenthal
Newly Elected Nov. 2010:
AL: Robert Bentley (R)
CA: Jerry Brown (D)
CO: John Hickenlooper (D)
CT: Dan Malloy (D)
FL: Rick Scott (R)
GA: Nathan Deal (R)
HI: Neil Abercrombie (D)
IA: Terry Branstad (R)
KS: Sam Brownback (R)
ME: Paul LePage (R)
MI: Rick Snyder (R)
MN: Mark Dayton (D)
ND: Jack Dalrymple (R)
NM: Susana Martinez (R)
NV: Brian Sandoval (R)
NY: Andrew Cuomo (D)
OH: John Kasich (R)
OK: Mary Fallin (R)
PA: Tom Corbett (R)
RI: Lincoln Chafee (I)
SC: Nikki Haley (R)
SD: Dennis Daugaard (R)
TN: Bill Haslam (R)
VT: Peter Shumlin (D)
WI: Scott Walker (R)
WY: Matt Mead (R)
Civil Rights
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Social Security
Tax Reform


Page last updated: Nov 23, 2011