|
| |
|
Vote number 08-S012 requiring FISA court warrant to monitor US-to-foreign calls
on Feb 7, 2008
regarding bill S.Amdt.3913 to S.2248 Amendment to Protect America Act
Results: Amendment Rejected, 38-57
SUPPORTER'S ARGUMENT FOR VOTING YES:Sen. FEINGOLD: The Protect America Act (PAA) we passed last year was sold repeatedly as a way to allow the Government to collect foreign-to-foreign communications without needing the approval of the FISA Court. Now, this is something all of us support, every one of us. But the PAA actually went much further. It authorized new sweeping intrusions into the privacy of countless Americans. The bill the Senate is considering to replace the PAA does not do nearly enough to safeguard against Government abuse. So this amendment would provide those safeguards.[The PAA allows] acquiring all the calls and e-mails between employees of a US company and a foreign company, with no requirement to get a warrant and no requirement that there be some link to terrorism. So any American who works at a company that does business overseas should think about that. OPPONENT'S ARGUMENT FOR VOTING NO: Sen. BOND: The purpose of this bill is, and always has been, to enable the intelligence community to act to target foreign terrorists and spies overseas. The amendment, as it is drafted, will have a totally unexpected impact. It is difficult to explain, in an unclassified session, why this amendment is unworkable. There are only certain communications which the intelligence community is lawfully permitted to acquire, and which it has any desire to acquire, because to acquire all the communications from all foreigners is an absolutely impossible task. I cannot describe in a public setting how they go about ascertaining which collections are important. But to say that if Osama bin Laden calls somebody in the US, we cannot listen in to that communication, unless we have an independent means of verifying it has some impact or a terrorist threat--That is the most important communication we need to intercept. LEGISLATIVE OUTCOME:Amendment Rejected, 38-57
Voting YES counts for 2 points on VoteMatch question 14: Patriot Act harms civil liberties;
Voting NO counts for -2 points on VoteMatch question 14.
Independents
voting on 08-S012 |
Mel Martinez |
NO | FL Former GOP Senator (resigned 2009); previously HUD Secy. |
Bernie Sanders |
YES | VT Independent Jr Senator, previously Representative |
|