Search for...
OnTheIssuesLogo

Tony Knowles on Tax Reform

Democratic Challenger for Senate (AK; previously served as Governor)


Oppose the $143 billion corporate tax bill as a tax giveaway

MURKOWSKI: Murkowski also asked Knowles if he would have voted against the corporate tax bill, which she called the "jobs" bill, even with the gas line incentives.

KNOWLES: Knowles said the gas line provisions were noncontroversial and were merely "parked" on the bill because it would become law. "That doesn't address the merits of the jobs bill," Knowles said. "It's a $143 billion tax giveaway. That is a bill that, yes, I would not have supported."

Source: AK Senate Debate, Fairbanks Daily News-Miner Oct 20, 2004

Offer a tax credit for the industry to build a gas pipeline

KNOWLES: Knowles counts the proposed natural gas pipeline among Murkowski's failures because he said he believes the recently approved federal incentive package didn't go far enough. The government needs to offer a tax credit that kicks in at low prices, he said. "Without that provision, industry leaders and other participants say it's going to be very difficult to collect the $20 billion necessary to provide the right kind of economic environment. I will continue to pursue that."

MURKOWSKI: "We got over $700 million worth of tax credits to whoever is going to build this line. If you don't think that's an incentive that gets people to look at the project, you need to look again." Another provision offers an 80 percent loan guarantee from the federal government. Other language streamlines permitting and judicial reviews. "We made it happen and it's news that all Alaskans should be celebrating," she said. "It's real results; it's not just talking about it."

Source: AK Senate Debate, in Fairbanks Daily News-Miner Oct 20, 2004

Support permanent tax cuts for most wage earners

Q. Is it appropriate to continue cutting taxes in the face of the nation's growing deficit?

KNOWLES: The best way to fix our budget problems is to create jobs. I support permanent tax cuts for most wage earners but would roll back cuts for the top 1% who average $1 million a year or more. This would generate $194.5 billion that should be invested in infrastructure, health care for seniors, children and veterans, and education.

MURKOWSKI: Federal tax cuts are a means to spur economic growth. I firmly believe individuals know how to better spend their money than the government does. This means more private investment instead of inefficient government-run programs. In the long run, that leads to greater prosperity and a reduced deficit for the nation as a whole.

Source: AK Senate Debate, Q&A by Fairbanks Daily News-Miner Oct 10, 2004

Support tax cuts for lower and middle-class

Knowles supports tax cuts for lower- and middle-class that will get the economy moving. He supports tax incentives for businesses that rebuild infrastructure and create jobs that stay in Alaska and the US. He strongly opposes tax holidays for companies that export jobs to other countries and the extremely wealthy that have cost the country trillions in lost revenue while burdening working families of this and future generations. He believes in tax fairness and that tax cuts benefit work and not wealth.
Source: Campaign website, TonyKnowles.com Jun 30, 2004

No national sales tax or VAT.

Knowles adopted the National Governors Association policy:

Source: NGA Executive Committee Policy Statement EC-9 00-NGA1 on Feb 15, 2000

Let states independently determine estate taxes.

Knowles adopted a letter to Congressional leaders from 37 Governors:

We are writing to request equal treatment between states and the federal government on estate tax changes. Regardless of oneís view about phasing out the federal estate tax, the Governors are absolutely united in opposing any action that would discriminate against states in the phase-out of the state and federal estate taxes. This issue needs to be addressed before the Senate goes to conference with the House.

Governors believe that the ability of states to independently determine their own tax revenue policy is a basic tenet of federalism. Moreover, no federal tax bill should be enacted without close consultation with the states.

At the very least, there must be equity in the treatment of the state death tax credit in the tax bill the Congress considers with the proposed phase-out of the federal estate tax. Governors oppose provisions that impose disproportionate impacts on state revenue systems. The changes proposed by the Senate would have abrupt, significant adverse impacts on state revenues at a particularly onerous time for many states. The potential impact on states would begin next year and have a potential impact of between $50 and $100 billion over the next ten years.

We urge the leaders to respect those rights and to restore fairness.

Source: National Governor's Association letter to Congress 01-NGA19 on May 23, 2001

  • Click here for definitions & background information on Tax Reform.
  • Click here for policy papers on Tax Reform.
  • Click here for SenateMatch answers by Tony Knowles.
  • Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Tax Reform in The Forum.
Other candidates on Tax Reform: Tony Knowles on other issues:
AK Gubernatorial:
Frank Murkowski
AK Senatorial:
Frank Murkowski
Frank Vondersaar
Jim Sykes
Lisa Murkowski
Ted Stevens

Presidential:
George W. Bush
(Republican for President)
V.P.Dick Cheney
(Republican for V.P.)
Sen.John Kerry
(Democratic nominee for Pres.)
Sen.John Edwards
(Democratic nominee for V.P.)
Ralph Nader
(Reform nominee for Pres.)
Peter Camejo
(Reform nominee for V.P.)
David Cobb
(Green nominee for Pres.)
Michael Badnarik
(Libertarian nominee for Pres.)
Michael Peroutka
(Constitution nominee for Pres.)
2004 Senate Races:
(AK)Knowles v.Murkowski v.Sykes
(AR)Holt v.Lincoln
(AZ)McCain v.Starky
(CA)Boxer v.Jones v.Gray
(CO)Coors v.Salazar v.Randall v.Acosta
(CT)Dodd v.Orchulli
(FL)Castor v.Martinez
(GA)Isakson v.Majette v.Buckley
(IA)Grassley v.Small v.Northrop
(IL)Obama v.Keyes
(IN)Bayh v.Scott
(KY)Bunning v.Mongiardo
(LA)John v.Vitter v.Kennedy
(MD)Mikulski v.Pipkin
(MO)Bond v.Farmer
(NC)Bowles v.Burr
(ND)Dorgan v.Liffrig
(NH)Granny D v.Gregg
(NV)Reid v.Ziser
(NY)Schumer v.Mills v.McReynolds
(OH)Fingerhut v.Voinovich
(OK)Carson v.Coburn
(OR)Wyden v.King
(PA)Hoeffel v.Specter v.Summers
(SC)DeMint v.Tenenbaum
(SD)Daschle v.Thune
(UT)Bennett v.Van Dam
(VT)Leahy v.McMullen
(WA)Murray v.Nethercutt
(WI)Feingold v.Michels
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
HouseMatch
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes