Search for...
OnTheIssuesLogo

Tony Knowles on Education

Democratic Challenger for Senate (AK; previously served as Governor)


No Child Left Behind made our education dream a nightmare

Q: How should Congress and the administration address the challenges created in Alaska by the No Child Left Behind Act?

KNOWLES: The federal No Child Left Behind law turned our education dream into a nightmare. Alaska's Quality Schools Initiative was working-raising student scores and teacher standards-until the federal government imposed its one-size-fits-all approach that doesn't fit Alaska. We need to repeal these 1,200 pages of micro-management and return education decisions to our teachers, parents and school boards.

MURKOWSKI: Alaska needs flexibility from burdensome federal regulations that do nothing to improve education and threaten local control of schools. I support the goals of NCLB, but states need room to adapt NCLB to local needs-to consider growth-based models to measure yearly progress, to appropriately include disabled students in education, and flexibility in implementing the "highly qualified" teacher provisions.

Source: AK Senate Debate, Q&A by Fairbanks Daily News-Miner Oct 10, 2004

Fully fund No Child Left Behind

Knowles believes the No Child Left Behind law gives Washington DC too much control over Alaska's schools - and he will fight to restore that control to the parents, teachers, and students of Alaska. Knowles will go to Washington and eliminate the 1,200 pages of micromanagement in No Child Left Behind and make sure the law is fully funded. Knowles believes that each state should submit a responsible plan for standards, assessment and accountability for all students and schools.
Source: Campaign website, TonyKnowles.com Jun 30, 2004

3 R's of ed policy: Reform, Resources, and Responsibility

Knowles called on Congress to learn the 3 R's of education, not the Reading, 'Riting, and 'Rithmatic we teach our children, but Reform, Resources, and Responsibility that is needed to bring control of Alaska's schools back to Alaska. "Alaska's schools are facing a crisis largely because the federal government has wrestled away control of our schools yet is failing to provide its share of support," Knowles said.

Knowles said the federal "No Child Left Behind" law has undermined the best efforts of Alaskans to provide a quality education. The law is punitive to schools, degrading to teachers and puts undue stress on kids who are constantly preparing for standardized tests. The federal rules impose additional costs on schools already struggling with tight budgets. "These requirements and standards don't work but end up costing Alaska school districts more than $1 million each year, money better spent educating kids instead of filling out federal paperwork," Knowles said.

Source: Press release, "Take Back Education" Mar 3, 2004

Improve and invest in public schools.

Knowles is a member of the Democratic Governors Association:

Principles of the Democratic Governors Association:

IMPROVING PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND INVESTING IN OUR YOUNGEST CHILDREN

Democratic Governors are leading the way with highly-trained teachers, strong standards and accountability, increased funding to repair and modernize public school facilities, access to technology and computers, and more discipline and safety in the classrooms. Democratic Governors believe the most important aspect to insure a child’s education is to have the best possible teachers in the classroom. They believe that we must value teachers as professionals, encourage their development to be the best teachers they can be for our children and compensate them accordingly. Democratic Governors favor greater parental choice, but oppose measures that weaken public schools diverting taxpayer dollars to private schools with no accountability for results. Democratic Governors around the country are also forming innovative public-private partnerships to create programs to provide early childhood education, nutrition and health care services to ensure that our children have the best possible start in life.

Source: DGA website, www.DemocraticGovernors.org/ 01-DGA2 on Aug 15, 2001

  • Click here for definitions & background information on Education.
  • Click here for policy papers on Education.
  • Click here for SenateMatch answers by Tony Knowles.
  • Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Education in The Forum.
Other candidates on Education: Tony Knowles on other issues:
AK Gubernatorial:
Frank Murkowski
AK Senatorial:
Frank Murkowski
Frank Vondersaar
Jim Sykes
Lisa Murkowski
Ted Stevens

Presidential:
George W. Bush
(Republican for President)
V.P.Dick Cheney
(Republican for V.P.)
Sen.John Kerry
(Democratic nominee for Pres.)
Sen.John Edwards
(Democratic nominee for V.P.)
Ralph Nader
(Reform nominee for Pres.)
Peter Camejo
(Reform nominee for V.P.)
David Cobb
(Green nominee for Pres.)
Michael Badnarik
(Libertarian nominee for Pres.)
Michael Peroutka
(Constitution nominee for Pres.)
2004 Senate Races:
(AK)Knowles v.Murkowski v.Sykes
(AR)Holt v.Lincoln
(AZ)McCain v.Starky
(CA)Boxer v.Jones v.Gray
(CO)Coors v.Salazar v.Randall v.Acosta
(CT)Dodd v.Orchulli
(FL)Castor v.Martinez
(GA)Isakson v.Majette v.Buckley
(IA)Grassley v.Small v.Northrop
(IL)Obama v.Keyes
(IN)Bayh v.Scott
(KY)Bunning v.Mongiardo
(LA)John v.Vitter v.Kennedy
(MD)Mikulski v.Pipkin
(MO)Bond v.Farmer
(NC)Bowles v.Burr
(ND)Dorgan v.Liffrig
(NH)Granny D v.Gregg
(NV)Reid v.Ziser
(NY)Schumer v.Mills v.McReynolds
(OH)Fingerhut v.Voinovich
(OK)Carson v.Coburn
(OR)Wyden v.King
(PA)Hoeffel v.Specter v.Summers
(SC)DeMint v.Tenenbaum
(SD)Daschle v.Thune
(UT)Bennett v.Van Dam
(VT)Leahy v.McMullen
(WA)Murray v.Nethercutt
(WI)Feingold v.Michels
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
HouseMatch
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes