|
Wesley Clark on Abortion
NATO General; Democratic Candidate for President
|
Partial birth ban ok if exceptions made for woman’s health
Clark said he supports a woman’s right to an abortion within the confines of a Supreme Court ruling that allows states to impose limited restrictions on when the procedure can occur. Clark’s remarks appeared to refine those he made earlier this month,
when he suggested that there should be no time limit imposed on a woman seeking an abortion. In his latest statement, Clark repeated that he supported “Roe v. Wade as modified by Casey,” a reference to a 1992 ruling that allows states to impose limited
restrictions. Asked when Roe v. Wade stipulates that life begins, Clark said: “I’m not going to get into a debate on viability. Viability is a standard determined by a doctor, and I’m not going to get into a specific time frame.”
Clark also said he would support legislation banning partial birth abortions as long as an exception is included based on the health of the woman. Earlier this month, Clark suggested that no time limit should be placed on a woman’s right to an abortion.
Source: Paul Schwartzman, Washington Post, Page A10
Jan 23, 2004
An issue of human rights, not of Catholic doctrine
Q: As a Catholic, can you clarify your pro-choice position on abortion and describe how you reconcile that with Catholic doctrine? CLARK: I reconcile it with my own beliefs. And I do believe in the right of conscience. And I support a woman’s right to
choose protected by law. I fought for human rights in Bosnia. I fought for human rights in Kosovo. And I will fight for human rights in America. And no one is going to take away a woman’s right to choose when I’m president of the United States. It’s that
simple.
Q: Can you clarify how you reconcile that with Catholic doctrine?
CLARK: I understand what the Catholic doctrine is. But I have freedom of conscience. I believe that the right to choose is a right that should be protected by law. I believe
the decision about issues like this are the issues that have to be worked between a woman and her family, her god, her doctor. And as much as I respect the opinion of the Catholic Church, in this case, I don’t support it. It’s that simple.
Source: Democratic 2004 Primary Debate at St. Anselm College
Jan 22, 2004
Let a woman and her doctors decide about reproductive health
On reproductive freedom: Every woman deserves complete information about and access to birth control so that families can be planned and so that every child is a wanted child.
I will oppose measures that interfere with the ability of a woman and her doctors to make choices about her reproductive health.
Source: Campaign website, Clark04.com, “An Agenda for Women”
Nov 25, 2003
Women deserve access to birth control & reproductive choice
Every woman deserves complete information about and access to birth control so that families can be planned and so that every child is a wanted child.
I will oppose measures that interfere with the ability of a woman and her doctors to make choices about her reproductive health.
Source: Campaign website, Clark04.com
Nov 20, 2003
Undecided on partial-birth abortion
Q: Would you sign the partial-birth abortion bill, which is about to be passed by Congress?
CLARK: I don’t know whether I’d sign that bill or not. I’m not into that detail on partial-birth abortion. In general, I’m pro-life--excuse me, I’m pro-abortion rights.
Source: CNN, Crossfire
Aug 1, 2003
I am pro-choice
I am pro-choice.
Source: Interview on CNN Crossfire
Jun 25, 2003
Page last updated: Dec 07, 2008