|
Joe Biden on Drugs
Former Vice President; previously Democratic Senator (DE)
|
|
Beat the opioid epidemic; I believe in recovery
Beat the opioid epidemic. There is so much we can do. Increase funding for prevention, treatment, harm reduction, and recovery. Get rid of outdated rules that stop doctors from prescribing treatments.
And stop the flow of illicit drugs by working with state and local law enforcement to go after traffickers. If you're suffering from addiction, know you are not alone. I believe in recovery, and I celebrate the 23 million Americans in recovery.
Source: 2022 State of the Union address
, Mar 1, 2022
1980s drugs bill, passed by all 100 Senators, was a mistake
Q: Crime bills that you supported in the '80s and '90s contributed to the incarceration of tens of thousands of young Black men who had small amounts of drugs in their possession. Speak to those families, why should they vote for you?BIDEN: One of
the things is that in the '80s we passed 100 percent, all 100 senators voted for a bill on drugs and how to deal with drugs, it was a mistake. I've been trying to change since then particularly the portion on cocaine. That's why I've been arguing that
in fact we should not send anyone to jail for a pure drug offense, they should be going into treatment across the board, that's what we should be spending money. And that's why I set up drug courts which were never funded by our Republican friends.
They should not be going to jail for a drug or an alcohol problem; they should be going into treatment. I think the American people have now seen that it was a mistake to pass those laws relating to drugs, but they were not in the Crime Bill.
Source: Third 2020 Presidential Debate, moderated by Kristen Welker
, Oct 22, 2020
Trump is for more in jail; I am for drug rehab, not jail
BIDEN: This is a guy who said, "The problem with the crime bill, there's not enough people in jail." This is a guy who in the Central Park Five, five innocent black kids, he continued to push for the death penalty [referring to a 1989 case in which
Trump took out a full-page newspaper ad calling for punishment]. He commuted 20 people's sentences. We commuted over 1,000 sentences. The federal prison system was reduced by 38,000 people under our administration.
I'm offering $20 billion to states to change their laws to eliminate minimum mandatories and set up drug courts. No one should be going to jail because they have a drug problem. They should be going to rehabilitation, not to jail.
TRUMP: He's been in
government 47 years, he never did a thing, except in 1994, when he did such harm to the Black community, and he called them super predators. Criminal justice reform, Obama and Joe didn't do it. If you had to see the arms I had to twist to get that done.
Source: Third 2020 Presidential Debate, moderated by Kristen Welker
, Oct 22, 2020
Mental illness causes drug abuse, not other way around
Provide for the ability to bring in social workers and school psychologists. We have one school psychologist in America now for every 1,507 kids. It should be one to
500, not just in schools that are poor, but in all schools, because we learned that, for example, drug abuse doesn't cause mental illness, mental illness causes drug abuse, the failure to get hold of people and deal with their anxieties.
Source: Second 2020 Presidential Debate/ABC Town Hall Philadelphia
, Oct 15, 2020
Rehab but no jail time for drug use; decriminalize marijuana
I don't believe anybody should be going to jail for drug use. They should be going into mandatory rehabilitation. We should be building rehab centers to have these people housed. We should decriminalize marijuana, wipe out the record so you can
actually say honesty, "You ever been arrested for murder for anything?" You can say no, because we're going to pass a law saying there is no background that you have to reveal relative to the use of marijuana.
Source: Second 2020 Presidential Debate/ABC Town Hall Philadelphia
, Oct 15, 2020
No one should be going to jail because they're drug addicts
Q: What will a Biden administration do to truly bring about lasting change?BIDEN: We're going to make sure that we change the entire system in the way in which we deal with criminal justice from punishment to rehabilitate.
No one should be going to jail because they have a drug addiction. They should be going into mandatory drug treatment that's why I set up drug courts.
Source: ABC This Week 2020 National Convention Biden/Harris Q&A
, Aug 23, 2020
Will fight for policy of decriminalizing marijuana
BIDEN: No one should be going to jail because they have a drug addiction. They should be going into mandatory drug treatment that's why I set up drug courts.
HARRIS: That's part of the policy and the platform, that a Biden-Harris administration is going to fight for.
A Department of Justice, unlike what Bill Barr is under Donald Trump, that is actually investigating these cases and enforcing consent decrees.
A policy that is going to be about decriminalizing marijuana. Having a policy that is about looking at having a centralized database in our country that tracks police officers that have been found to break the rules or break the law.
Source: ABC This Week 2020 National Convention Biden/Harris Q&A
, Aug 23, 2020
Drugs don't cause mental health issues; it's the reverse
Social workers and school psychologists can pick up the early signs of distress among students. Generation Z, as you know, is the most--has the greatest anxiety of any generation in the country, for the first time in American history.
We're in a situation where we have now learned that, for example, drug abuse doesn't cause mental health problems. Mental health problems cause drug abuse.
Source: CNN S.C. Town Hall amid 2020 primaries
, Mar 27, 2020
Not nearly enough evidence on marijuana as gateway drug
Biden said, "The truth of the matter is, there's not nearly been enough evidence that has been acquired as to whether or not it is a gateway drug. It's a debate, and I want a lot more before I legalize it nationally. I want to make sure we know a
lot more about the science behind it."Biden said he thinks "states should be able to make a judgment to legalize marijuana." He added that he also supports medical marijuana and possession of the substance "should not be a crime."
Source: BusinessInsider.com on 2019 Democratic primary
, Nov 17, 2019
Addicts should go to rehab & expunge records, not prison
Q: You have a plan to release many nonviolent drug offenders from prison. Sen. Booker says that your plan is not ambitious enough. Your response?BIDEN: We're in a situation now where there are so many people who are in jail and shouldn't be in jail.
The whole means by which this should change is the whole model has to change. We should be talking about rehabilitation. Nobody should be in jail for a nonviolent crime. [Under Obama] we released 36,000 people from the federal prison system.
Nobody should be in jail for a drug problem. They should be going directly to a rehabilitation. We build more rehabilitation centers, not prisons. I'm the guy that put in the drug courts to divert people from the criminal justice system.
And so we have to change the whole way we look at this. [People] who got in prison for marijuana--they shouldn't be in there; that should be a misdemeanor. They should be out and their record should be expunged. Every single right should be returned.
Source: September Democratic Primary debate in Houston
, Sep 12, 2019
People arrested for drugs should go to rehab, not prison
Q: Mr. Vice President, Senator Booker called your new criminal justice reform plan, "an inadequate solution to what is a raging crisis in our country." Why is Senator Booker wrong?BIDEN: I think he is wrong. He has a similar plan. I think that we
should change the way we look at prisons. Right now, we're in a situation where, when someone is convicted of a drug crime, they end up going to jail and to prison. They should be going to rehabilitation. They shouldn't be going to prison.
When in prison, they should be learning to read and write and not just sit in there and learn how to be better criminals. And when they get out of prison, they should be in a situation where they have access to everything they would have had before,
including Pell grants for education, and public housing.
BOOKER: This is a crisis in our country because we have treated issues of race and poverty, mental health and addiction with locking people up and not lifting them up.
Source: July Democratic Primary debate (second night in Detroit)
, Jul 31, 2019
Nobody should be in jail for smoking marijuana
Joe Biden supports decriminalizing marijuana, but isn't going as far as calling for the drug to be legalized on the federal level. "Nobody should be in jail for smoking marijuana," Biden told voters at a house party in NH.Asked by CNN if the former
vice president supports legalizing marijuana, a Biden campaign spokesman said Biden believes the drug should be decriminalized and that decisions on legalization should continue on the state level. "Vice President Biden does not believe anyone should be
in jail simply for smoking or possessing marijuana. He supports decriminalizing marijuana and automatically expunging prior criminal records for marijuana possession, so those affected don't have to figure out how to petition for it or pay for a
lawyer. He would allow states to continue to make their own choices regarding legalization and would seek to make it easier to conduct research on marijuana's positive and negative health impacts by rescheduling it as a schedule 2 drug," he added.
Source: Denver CBS Local on 2020 Democratic presidential primary
, May 16, 2019
2000s: mandatory minimum for marijuana; 2019: decriminalize
[A Biden spokesman said that Biden believes that marijuana should be] "rescheduled as a schedule 2 drug." Marijuana, along with heroin, is classified as a schedule 1 drug, defined as having "no currently accepted medical use." Schedule 2 drugs, which
include cocaine, do have accepted medical uses.His decriminalization position marks a bit of a shift for Biden. "Focusing significant resources on interdicting or convicting people for smoking marijuana is a waste of our resources," Biden said in
interview with TIME in 2014. "That's different than [legalization]. Our policy for our Administration is still not legalization, and that is [and] continues to be our policy."
While in the Senate, Biden, who over the years expressed opposition to
legalizing marijuana, was an architect or supporter of tough-on-crime legislation, including the creation of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, also known as the "drug czar," and establishing mandatory minimum sentences for marijuana.
Source: Denver CBS Local on 2020 Democratic presidential primary
, May 16, 2019
Supports marijuana decriminalization, not legalization
He has a long history of being anti-marijuana, calling it a "gateway drug."
While vice president, Biden said that he supports decriminalization rather than legalization.
Source: Axios.com "What you need to know about 2020"
, Apr 25, 2019
Harsh sentences for crack were a mistake; worked to rectify
Biden said, "I haven't always been right. I know we haven't always gotten things right, but I've always tried." He highlighted his later work with Pres. Obama to address the sentencing disparity for crack versus powder cocaine, saying, "It was a big
mistake when it was made," he said at the MLK breakfast. "We thought, we were told by the experts, that crack you never go back, it was somehow fundamentally different. It's not different. But it's trapped an entire generation."
Source: CNN KFile, "Predators," on 2020 Democratic primary
, Mar 7, 2019
Long record of opposing marijuana legalization
Biden remains one of very few prominent Democrats who've still failed to endorse cannabis legalization at the federal level. The last time he substantively addressed legalization appears to be 2010, in an ABC News interview: "There's
a difference between sending someone to jail for a few ounces and legalizing it," he said. "The punishment should fit the crime. But I think legalization is a mistake. I still believe [marijuana] is a gateway drug."
Source: David Bienenstock in Leafly.com on 2020 Democratic primary
, Feb 26, 2019
Forbid government study of legalization
In 1996, Biden voted for a bill that required: "The Director shall ensure that no Federal funds appropriated to the Office of National Drug Control Policy shall be expended for any study or contract relating to the legalization
(for a medical use or any other use) of a substance listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of [such] a substance (in any form)."
Source: David Bienenstock in Leafly.com on 2020 Democratic primary
, Feb 26, 2019
Treating crack, powdered cocaine differently was an unjust
Biden highlighted his work with President Barack Obama to address the sentencing disparity for crack versus powder cocaine. "It was a big mistake when it was made," he said. "We thought, we were told by the experts, that crack you never go back,
it was somehow fundamentally different. It's not different. But it's trapped an entire generation."
Source: CNN.com on National Action Network MLK event
, Jan 21, 2019
1989: Bush didn't go far enough in War on Drugs
In September 1989, George H. W. Bush delivered a speech outlining his National Drug Control Strategy, in which he called for harsher punishments for drug dealers, nearly $1.5 billion toward drug-related law enforcement, and "more prisons, more jails,
more courts, more prosecutors" at every level throughout the country. "Quite frankly, the President's plan is not tough enough, bold enough, or imaginative enough to meet the crisis at hand,"
Biden said in a televised response to Bush's speech. "In a nutshell, the President's plan does not include enough police officers to catch the violent thugs, enough prosecutors to convict them,
enough judges to sentence them, or enough prison cells to put them away for a long time."
Source: Jacobin Magazine on 2020 Democratic primary
, Aug 9, 2018
Proud of backing tough drug laws & penalties
Biden would later brag in the Senate that Congress passed a law sending anyone caught with a rock of cocaine the size of a quarter to jail for a minimum of five years. Biden went on to take credit for a legislative change allowing the
government to effectively rob anyone caught dealing drugs, through the policy of civil asset forfeiture, and demanded to know why the Bush administration hadn't sentenced more drug dealers to life in prison or death.
Source: Jacobin Magazine on 2020 Democratic primary
, Aug 9, 2018
1981: Militarized domestic police against drugs
Biden can also take partial credit for the militarization of domestic law enforcement. Biden's vote for the 1981 Military Cooperation with Law Enforcement Officials Act permitted the military to work with police on drug cases.
Biden was also a major proponent of the Byrne grant and Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) programs, which in practice created more heavily armed police forces increasingly focused on locking up people for minor drug crimes.
Source: Jacobin Magazine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
, Aug 2, 2018
Never touched beer, alcohol, cigarettes, or pot
Joe Biden has never had a beer. He has never had a drop of alcohol, not even on Spring Break. And sure, when he's gleefully finger-gunning behind Obama at the State of the Union, you'd be forgiven for thinking that he might be on his third bourbon.
The reason? As a kid, he had noticed that his uncle Boo-Boo drank too much, and he wanted to avoid the same fate. "There are enough alcoholics in my family," he said in 2008. In college
Biden was always the designated driver, making him the darling of the parents.
Biden had the same policy with cigarettes and pot. (In college, he once stopped dating a woman because she smoked--deal breaker.) "I don't use anything that could be a
crutch," he told a reporter in 1970. "I use football as a crutch and motorcycle jumping and skiing--I ski like a madman. But those are crutches over which I have some control. I'm against chemical crutches.
Source: The Book of Joe, by Jeff Wilser, p. 22
, Oct 24, 2017
OpEd: Executive privilege doesn't apply to "Fast & Furious"
Joe Biden, when serving as a senator in 2007, made it clear that executive privilege applies only to communications involving the president himself. So unless the Attorney General was talking "Fast and Furious" with the President, executive privilege
wouldn't apply [as the Obama Administration claims in denying a Congressional subpoena]. Biden was responding to a question posed by the Boston Globe, which asked Biden, "Does executive privilege cover testimony or documents about decision-making
within the executive branch not involving confidential advice communicated to the president himself?"
Biden delivered an unqualified response: "The executive privilege only covers communications between the president and his advisors. Even when the
privilege does apply, it is not absolute; it may be outweighed by the public's interest in the fair administration of justice."
Biden was speaking about Pres. Bush and the issues of warrantless surveillance of terror suspects in his interview.
Source: Tarpon's Swamp (blog)
, Jun 25, 2012
Marijuana is a gateway drug; legalization is a mistake
Leave it to the White House to take a position to the right of Pat Robertson, who questioned the nation's pot laws this week. VP Joe Biden tells ABC, "There's a difference between sending (someone) to jail for a few ounces and legalizing it.
The punishment should fit the crime. But I think legalization is a mistake. I still believe it's a gateway drug. I've spent a lot of my life as chairman of the Judiciary Committee dealing with this. I think it would be a mistake to legalize."
This comment comes on the heels of Robertson's statement: "I just believe that criminalizing marijuana, criminalizing the possession of a few ounces of pot, that kinda thing
(is) costing us a fortune and it's ruining young people. Young people go into prisons - they go in as youths and come out as hardened criminals. That's not a good thing."
Source: CelebStoner.com Entertainment News
, Dec 24, 2010
1988: Crafted new law creating national Drug Czar
In 1988, the major drug bill he had spent years crafting became law. Included was the creation of a national drug czar, a key Biden objective and a job that went to Republican William Bennett. Biden vowed to be Capital Hill's point man in pressing the
new Bush administration on antidrug spending and helping Bennett navigate his way through a thorny bureaucratic thicket of multiple congressional jurisdictions. When Pres. Bush announced his 1989 antidrug plan, Biden showed no hesitation in criticizing
him for not finding initiatives already on the books. He called for higher taxes on cigarettes and tobacco (neither of which he ever used) to pay for them. Biden unleashed his old fire: "Mr. President, you say you want a war on drugs, but if that's what
you want we need another D-Day. Instead you're giving us another Vietnam--a limited war fought on the cheap, financed on the sly, with no clear objectives, and ultimately destined for stalemate and human tragedy."
Source: A Life of Trial & Redemption, by Jules Witcover, p.241-242
, Oct 5, 2010
1990 crime bill: tougher penalties for drug offenders
From Judiciary, Biden responded to growing reports of police brutality on the one hand and inadequate law enforcement on the other in an era of heavy drug trafficking. Even before he became the
Judiciary chairman, he had called for creation of a national drug czar to cope with the growing flood of narcotics into the American market. For years, Biden had been pushing for the creation of a drug czar, and when
Ronald Reagan appointed William Bennett as his drug czar, Biden worked with him coordinating the various governmental agency budgets dealing with narcotics. And in a pending crime bill in 1990,
Biden fought for tougher penalties for drug offenders, the bill was watered down by Republican opposition.
Source: A Life of Trial & Redemption, by Jules Witcover, p.306-307
, Oct 5, 2010
US should focus on disrupting Afghanistan drug trade
Afghanistan produces 93% of the world's poppy. I believe we should focus on arresting drug kingpins, disrupting supply routes and destroying the labs that convert poppy into heroin. When the administration testified before our committee, I asked:
Has one drug kingpin arrested? And the answer was, no. I have a great deal of experience in this, unfortunately, over the last 30 years and it is absolutely outrageous that not even one single one has been arrested.
Source: Council on Foreign Relations on 2020 candidates
, Feb 25, 2008
Took lead on drug policy & narcotics control
Biden has sought to take the lead on drug policy, spearheading creation of a “Drug Czar” and
crafting laws to control narcotics--measures that are widely viewed as pretty much of a failure.
Source: The Contenders, by Laura Flanders, p.180
, Nov 11, 2007
National ban on smoking would reduce chronic illnesses
Q: Over 400,000 Americans have premature death due to smoking or secondhand smoke. Who would favor a national law to ban smoking in all public places?BIDEN: Yes. I would ban--in all public [places], nationally.
DODD:
3,000 kids start smoking every day in this country.
RICHARDSON: I did it in New Mexico as a national law.
KUCINICH: You bet I’ll go for a national law.
Q: So Biden, Dodd, Richardson, Gravel and Kucinich in favor of a national law.
EDWARDS: Wait, wait, wait, and Edwards.
BIDEN: Let me also add here as well--with 3,000 young people starting to smoke every single day, one of the major causes of the health care issue and Medicare--is because of chronic illnesses associated with
things like smoking. So the idea that we wouldn’t draft a national law to stop this in public places is one of the things you’re going to have to do if you’re going to deal with rising health care costs and the same is true with alcohol.
Source: 2007 Democratic primary debate at Dartmouth College
, Sep 6, 2007
Absolutely do not lower drinking age from 21
Q: Would you as president remove the requirement that a state have a legal drinking age of 21 in order to receive federal highway funds, thereby returning the drinking age back to the states?BIDEN: Absolutely no, I would not. The cost of alcoholism in
America, the cost of accidents that flow from drunkenness, are astronomical. This is a gigantic problem, just like the drug issue. And the idea that we’re going to suggest that it makes good sense to move the age down to 18 I find to be counterproductive
I would not do that.
DODD: No, I agree with Joe on this. The problems associated with alcohol are significant in our country. The evidence is overwhelming.
GRAVEL: I think we should lower it. Anybody that can go fight and die for this country should
be able to drink.
KUCINICH: Of course they should be able to drink at age 18, and they should be able to vote at age 16.
Q: No on 18?
OBAMA: No.
EDWARDS: What was the question?
Q: Lower the drinking age to 18?
EDWARDS: I would not.
Source: 2007 Democratic primary debate at Dartmouth College
, Sep 6, 2007
FactCheck: 40,000 babies with alcohol syndrome, not 300,000
Biden gave a figure many times too high when he claimed that 300,000 babies are born with deformities each year “because of women who are alcoholics while they’re carrying those children.” According to the CDC, roughly 40,000 babies per year suffer from
fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Roughly 120,000 babies suffer from a birth defect of any kind, per year, far below the 300,000 Biden cites as being born specifically to alcoholic mothers. We’re unable to find any support for Biden’s 300,000 figure.
Source: FactCheck on 2007 Democratic primary debate at Dartmouth
, Sep 6, 2007
Increase penalties for dealing drugs near schools
Fighting Drugs: Joe Biden has worked to increase penalties for dealing drugs within 1,000 feet of schools, created the Drug Czar office in the White House, and was an important voice in classifying steroids as drugs and has worked to keep them out of
the hands of students.The Biden Crime Law: Joe Biden wrote the legislation that put 100,000 cops on the streets, and built drug courts to improve rehabilitation treatment for non-violent offenders.
Source: 2008 Senate campaign website, www.joebiden.com, “Issues”
, Sep 1, 2007
Most violent crime is related to drugs
If you count [all the gun crimes], and they’re almost all related to drugs. They’re almost all related to drugs. And the fact of the matter is we have no drug policy in this country. And, secondly, what we do is we, instead of incarcerating our young
blacks and other folks in the inner city who are arrested for a violent crime, instead of separating these juveniles, we put them in with adults. They go ahead and they learn the trade. They learn the trade and they come back out.
Secondly, what we do is we also have a notion here where instead of putting them through this process, we should put them through the drug courts. I’m the guy that authored that drug court policy. We should divert them into treatment.
You want to stop death in your neighborhood, take drugs of the corner. You want to take drugs off the corner, take them out of the prison system and put them into treatment.
Source: 2007 NAACP Presidential Primary Forum
, Jul 12, 2007
Divert drug offenders out of prison system
- The bulk of sentencing inequity is at the state level, not at the federal level.
- We need diversion out of the system. I’m the guy that wrote the drug court legislation that is in the law right now.
- You have to eliminate the disparity
between crack & powdered cocaine. I’ve introduced legislation to do that.
- You have to find a way in which you insist that the states apply the law equally--they don’t.
- 300,000 will come out addicted from the prison this year
Source: 2007 Democratic Primary Debate at Howard University
, Jun 28, 2007
Created nation’s Drug Czar Office & drug courts
As the Co-Chairman of the Senate Drug Caucus, Senator Biden has long been a national voice for effective drug control policies. He created the nation’s Drug Czar Office to oversee the federal government’s anti-drug strategy.
Biden also helped create “drug courts” that combine intensive supervision, drug testing and treatment for non-violent first offenders.
Source: PAC website, www.UniteOurStates.com
, Dec 12, 2006
Joe Biden on Voting Record
I got drug courts signed into law
I'm the guy that set up drug courts. I wrote it into law and it never got funded. On opioids, I'm the guy who's already begun to make a down payment.
In the Cures Act, I put in $1 billion to fight opioid addiction. Here's the deal. Those Chief Executive Officer of drug companies, they should not only be fined, they should go to jail.
Source: 8th Democrat 2020 primary debate, St. Anselm College in NH
, Feb 7, 2020
Black community supports decriminalizing marijuana
I think we should decriminalize marijuana. Anyone who has a record should be let out of jail, their records expunged. I do think it makes sense, based on data, that we should study what the long-term effects are for the use of marijuana.
I come out of a black community, in terms of my support. If you notice, I have more people supporting me in the black community that have announced for me because they know me, they know who I am.
Source: November Democratic primary debate in Atlanta
, Nov 20, 2019
2003 sponsorship: RAVE Act to fight date rape drug
He later sponsored the Reducing Americans Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act
(RAVE) in 2003 and also promoted the disuse and prohibition of "date rape" drugs like ecstasy and ketamine.
Source: The Democrats, by Alexander Moore, p. 26
, Jul 9, 2019
Voted NO on increasing penalties for drug offenses.
Vote to increase penalties on certain drug-related crimes. The amendment would specifically target the manufacturing or trafficking of amphetamines & methamphetamines and possession of powder cocaine, and set stronger penalties for dealing drugs
Reference:
Bill S.625
; vote number 1999-360
on Nov 10, 1999
Voted YES on spending international development funds on drug control.
Vote to add an additional $53 million (raising the total to $213 million) to international narcotics control funding, and pay for it by taking $25 million from international operations funding and $28 million from development assistance.
Reference:
Bill HR 3540
; vote number 1996-244
on Jul 25, 1996
Rename "Drug Abuse" institute as "Diseases of Addiction".
Biden introduced renaming "Drug Abuse" institute as "Diseases of Addiction"
A bill to change the name of the National Institute on Drug Abuse to the National Institute on Diseases of Addiction; and to change the name of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism to the National Institute on Alcohol Disorders and Health. Congress makes the following findings:
- Addiction is a chronic, relapsing brain disease that is characterized by compulsive drug seeking and use, despite harmful consequences. It is considered a brain disease because drugs change the brain's structure and manner in which it functions. These brain changes can be long lasting, and can lead to the harmful behaviors seen in people who abuse drugs. The disease of addiction affects both brain and behavior, and scientists have identified many of the biological and environmental factors that contribute to the development and progression of the disease.
-
The pejorative term 'abuse' used in connection with diseases of addiction has the adverse effect of increasing social stigma and personal shame, both of which are so often barriers to an individual's decision to seek treatment.
- NAME CHANGE: Any reference in any law, regulation, order, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the 'National Institute on Drug Abuse', the 'National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism', the 'National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism', and the 'National Advisory Council on Drug Abuse' shall be deemed to be a reference to the 'National Institute on Diseases of Addiction', the 'National Institute on Alcohol Disorders and Health', the 'National Advisory Council on Alcohol Disorders and Health', and the 'National Advisory Council on Diseases of Addiction', respectively.
Source: Recognizing Addiction as a Disease Act (S.1011) 07-S1011 on Mar 28, 2007
End harsher sentencing for crack vs. powder cocaine.
Biden introduced ending harsher sentencing for crack vs. powder cocaine
A bill to target cocaine kingpins and address sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine.
Sponsor's introductory remarks: Sen. Biden: My bill will eliminate the current 100-to-1 disparity [between sentencing for crack vs. powder cocaine] by increasing the 5-year mandatory minimum threshold quantity for crack cocaine to 500 grams, from 5 grams, and the 10-year threshold quantity to 5,000 grams, from 50 grams, while maintaining the current statutory mandatory minimum threshold quantities for powder cocaine. It will also eliminate the current 5-year mandatory minimum penalty for simple possession of crack cocaine, the only mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession of a drug by a first time offender.
Drug use is a serious problem, and I have long supported strong antidrug legislation. But in addition to being tough, our drug laws should be rational and fair. My bill achieves the right balance. We have talked about the need to address this cocaine sentencing disparity for long enough. It is time to act.
Congressional Summary:
Increases the amount of a controlled substance or mixture containing a cocaine base (i.e., crack cocaine) required for the imposition of mandatory minimum prison terms for crack cocaine trafficking to eliminate the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine.- Eliminates the five-year mandatory minimum prison term for first-time possession of crack cocaine.
- Increases monetary penalties for drug trafficking and for the importation and exportation of controlled substances.
Related bills: H.R.79, H.R.460, H.R.4545, S.1383, S.1685.
Source: Drug Sentencing Reform & Kingpin Trafficking Act (S.1711) 07-S1711 on Jun 27, 2007
Enhance interdiction by criminalizing unflagged submarines.
Biden introduced enhancing interdiction by criminalizing unflagged submarines
Legislative Summary:A bill to enhance drug trafficking interdiction by creating a Federal felony for operating or embarking in a submersible or semi-submersible vessel without nationality and on an international voyage.
Cogressional Findings:- Congress finds that operating or embarking in a submersible or semi-submersible vessel without nationality and on an international voyage is a serious international problem, facilitates transnational crime, including drug trafficking, and terrorism, and presents a specific threat to the safety of maritime navigation and the security of the United States.
- Whoever knowingly operates in any submersible vessel that is without nationality and that is navigating waters beyond the outer limit of the territorial sea of a single country, with the intent to evade detection, shall be punished as prescribed
- House version is H.R.6295; related Senate bill S.3198.
Source: S.3351 08-S3351 on Jul 28, 2008
Page last updated: Mar 05, 2022