|
Mimi Walters on Foreign Policy
|
|
US directly benefits from military aid to Israel
Military aid to Israel is the most tangible expression of support for the Jewish State, and I stand firmly behind the 10-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that provides Israel with aid necessary to defend herself from increasing threats in the
region. As a member of congress, I will support aid to Israel by voting in favor of the overall foreign aid bill. This is a cost-effective tool that enables both America and Israel to remain safe and secure.
I would also support separate measures aimed at supporting Israel in the development and procurement of systems such as the Iron Dome rocket defense shield, Arrow Weapon System, and David's Sling. These are real solutions to real problems.
The United States directly benefits from this military aid, creating higher paying jobs in the United States while keeping us safer with more advanced defense technology developed by the Israeli's.
Source: 2014 California House campaign website, MimiWalters.com
, Oct 10, 2014
Two-state solution despite Israeli settlements on West Bank.
Walters signed two-state solution despite Israeli settlements on West Bank
Congressional Summary: S.Res.6/H.Res.11 objects to U.N. Security Council Resolution 2334, which characterizes Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem as illegal and demands cessation of settlement activities.
- Calls for such resolution to be repealed or fundamentally altered and allows all final status issues toward a two-state solution to be resolved through direct bilateral negotiations between the parties.
- Notes that granting membership and statehood standing to the Palestinians at the UN, its specialized agencies, and other international institutions outside of the context of a bilateral peace agreement with Israel would cause severe harm to the peace process.
- Urges upholding the U.S. practice of vetoing all Security Council resolutions that recognize unilateral Palestinian actions or dictate terms and a time line for a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
-
Reaffirms that it is U.S. policy to seek a sustainable, just, and secure two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Opposing argument: (Cato Institute, Dec. 19, 2003): In principle, separation seems the best answer to stop the killing. For this reason, a security fence makes sense--if it actually separates Jew from Arab. Unfortunately, to protect a number of disparate Israeli settlements erected in the midst of Palestinian communities, Israel currently is mixing Jew and Arab and separating Arab from Arab. Thus are sown the seeds for conflict. After 36 years of occupation, the land remains almost exclusively Arab. The limited Jewish presence is the result of conscious colonization. The settlements require a pervasive Israeli military occupation, imposing a de facto system of apartheid. Separation offers the only hope, but separation requires dismantling Israeli settlements.
Source: Opposing UN Resolution 2334 17-HRes11 on Jan 3, 2017
Page last updated: Jun 30, 2017