OnTheIssuesLogo

John Ashcroft on Government Reform


Make government smaller; cut corporate welfare

We need to do more than merely streamline government, or make it more efficient. We need to make the government smaller. This means “right-sizing” the federal workforce, and doing the work with many fewer employees. It means cutting corporate welfare by at least 90 percent. We also should limit overall discretionary spending, rein in entitlements, and reduce unnecessary and wasteful inventories. Ideas like these will save the American taxpayer more than $1 trillion over five years.
Source: Lincoln Institute Journal (Fall 1998) Oct 9, 1998

Govt exists to help people prosper, not to grow govt

Q: Do you have a framework about the proper role of the federal government?

A: Government exists to help maintain an environment in which people prosper, in which people grow, in which their enterprises grow, but not in which government grows. And we ought to ask ourselves, what does this do in a framework of freedom that will provide an opportunity for the growth of individuals, their institutions, for citizens, their corporations...how do they succeed? That ought to be the test of government.

Source: Interview with “Democracy In Action,” Cedar Rapids Jun 12, 1998

Judicial activism means failing to defend the Constitution

Q: What are your feelings about the ‘Hatch Pledge’ that the Free Congress Foundation is asking all Senators to sign saying they won’t vote for judicial activists?

A: It is regrettable that conservatives feel that such a pledge is necessary when every senator has pledged in his oath of office to defend and protect the Constitution. After all, activism is nothing more than failing to defend the Constitution.

Source: TownHall.com, Online Chat Session Mar 6, 1997

Voted NO on continuing funding for the National Endowment for the Arts.

This table motion would end debate on an amendment aimed at funding for the National Endowment for the Arts. Support for the motion to table is a vote for NEA funding. [YES to table means supporting the NEA; NO means defunding the NEA].
Status: Motion to Table Agreed to Y)80; N)16; NV)4
Reference: Motion to table Smith Amdt #1569; Bill H.R. 2466 ; vote number 1999-260 on Aug 5, 1999

Voted NO on favoring 1997 McCain-Feingold overhaul of campaign finance.

Support of the campaign finance bill proposed by Senators McCain (R-AZ) and Feingold (D-WI).
Status: Cloture Motion Rejected Y)53; N)47
Reference: Campaign Finance Reform Bill; Bill S. 25 ; vote number 1997-267 on Oct 7, 1997

Voted YES on Approving the presidential line-item veto.

Approval of the presidential line-item veto authority.
Status: Conf Rpt Agreed to Y)69; N)31
Reference: Conference Report on S. 4; Bill S. 4 ; vote number 1996-56 on Mar 27, 1996

Voted YES on banning more types of Congressional gifts.

To exclude certain items from the Congressional Gift Ban.
Status: Amdt Failed Y)39; N)60; NV)1
Reference: Murkowski Amdt to S. 1061; Bill S. 1061 ; vote number 1995-339 on Jul 28, 1995

  • Click here for definitions & background information on Government Reform.
  • Click here for policy papers on Government Reform.
  • Click here for SenateMatch answers by John Ashcroft.
  • Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Government Reform in The Forum.
Other candidates on Government Reform: John Ashcroft on other issues:
MO Gubernatorial:
Bob Holden
MO Senatorial:
Jean Carnahan
Jim Talent
Kit Bond
Mel Carnahan
Nancy Farmer

Presidential:
George W. Bush
(Republican for President)
V.P.Dick Cheney
(Republican for V.P.)
Sen.John Kerry
(Democratic nominee for Pres.)
Sen.John Edwards
(Democratic nominee for V.P.)
Ralph Nader
(Reform nominee for Pres.)
Peter Camejo
(Reform nominee for V.P.)
David Cobb
(Green nominee for Pres.)
Michael Badnarik
(Libertarian nominee for Pres.)
Michael Peroutka
(Constitution nominee for Pres.)
2004 Senate Races:
(AK)Knowles v.Murkowski v.Sykes
(AR)Holt v.Lincoln
(AZ)McCain v.Starky
(CA)Boxer v.Jones v.Gray
(CO)Coors v.Salazar v.Randall v.Acosta
(CT)Dodd v.Orchulli
(FL)Castor v.Martinez
(GA)Isakson v.Majette v.Buckley
(IA)Grassley v.Small v.Northrop
(IL)Obama v.Keyes
(IN)Bayh v.Scott
(KY)Bunning v.Mongiardo
(LA)John v.Vitter v.Kennedy
(MD)Mikulski v.Pipkin
(MO)Bond v.Farmer
(NC)Bowles v.Burr
(ND)Dorgan v.Liffrig
(NH)Granny D v.Gregg
(NV)Reid v.Ziser
(NY)Schumer v.Mills v.McReynolds
(OH)Fingerhut v.Voinovich
(OK)Carson v.Coburn
(OR)Wyden v.King
(PA)Hoeffel v.Specter v.Summers
(SC)DeMint v.Tenenbaum
(SD)Daschle v.Thune
(UT)Bennett v.Van Dam
(VT)Leahy v.McMullen
(WA)Murray v.Nethercutt
(WI)Feingold v.Michels
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
HouseMatch
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes