|
Joe Sestak on Gun Control
Democratic Senate Challenger; former Navy Admiral
|
|
Reform background checks to keep guns out of wrong hands
Sestak wishes to close the gun show loophole and re-institute the assault weapons ban.
He also wants to make changes to National Instant Criminal Background Check System "to ensure guns stay out of the wrong hands."
Source: Townhall.com on 2020 Democratic primary
, Jul 9, 2019
Improve background checks; keep guns out of wrong hands
Sestak wishes to close the gun show loophole and re-institute the assault weapons ban.
He also wants to make changes to National Instant Criminal Background Check System "to ensure guns stay out of the wrong hands."
Source: Townhall.com, 2019 interview series
, Jul 9, 2019
Strong proponent of common sense gun laws
I believe in the right to bear arms, but I am also a strong proponent of common sense gun laws, such as closing the "gun show loophole" (which allows people to avoid background checks by buying guns at gun shows and conventions or from other "private
sellers"), closing the "gun kit" or "ghost gun" loophole (which allows people to buy portions of guns that are easy to assemble into functioning firearms), and creating a more effective national background check system, including by enabling states
to add felons, domestic abusers, and other violent criminals to the background check database.I also believe we must once again ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines. Having served in the armed forces for over thirty years,
I know what weapons of war are, and I know that they do not belong in American communities. The horrifying mass shootings of recent years should be all the proof our lawmakers need to finally take action.
Source: 2020 presidential campaign website JoeSestak.com
, Jun 23, 2019
Extend the ban on assault weapons
On crime, Specter pointed to his support for bills to toughen sentences for career criminals, while Sestak said he would support an extension of the ban on assault weapons, which Specter opposed.
Source: Lehigh Valley Live coverage of 2010 PA Senate debate
, May 1, 2010
Close the Gun Show Loophole; restrict show sales.
Sestak signed H.R.2324& S.843
Makes it unlawful for any person to operate a gun show unless such person: - has attained 21 years of age;
- is not prohibited from transporting, shipping, or receiving firearms and has not violated any federal firearms requirements;
- has registered with the Attorney General as a gun show operator and has provided a photograph and fingerprints;
- has not concealed material information nor made false statements in connection with a gun show operator registration; and
- notifies the Attorney General of the date, time, and duration of a gun show not later than 30 days before the commencement of such show and verifies the identity of each vendor at the gun show.
Imposes recordkeeping requirements on gun show operators and criminal penalties for failure to register as a gun show operator and maintain required records. Increases criminal penalties for serious recordkeeping violations and violations of criminal background check requirements. Authorizes the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to hire additional investigators to carry out inspections of gun shows.
Source: Gun Show Loophole Closing Act 09-HR2324 on May 7, 2009
Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record.
Sestak scores F by NRA on pro-gun rights policies
While widely recognized today as a major political force and as America's foremost defender of Second Amendment rights, the National Rifle Association (NRA) has, since its inception, been the premier firearms education organization in the world. But our successes would not be possible without the tireless efforts and countless hours of service our nearly three million members have given to champion Second Amendment rights and support NRA programs.
The following ratings are based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionaire sent to all Congressional candidates; the NRA assigned a letter grade (with A+ being the highest and F being the lowest).
What the Grades Mean:- A+: A legislator with not only an excellent voting record on all critical NRA issues, but who has also made a vigorous effort to promote and defend the Second Amendment.
- A: Solidly pro-gun candidate including voting record.
- AQ: A pro-gun candidate whose rating is based solely on the NRA-PVF Candidate Questionnaire and who does not have a voting record.
- B: A generally pro-gun candidate; may have opposed some pro-gun reform in the past.
- C: A candidate with a mixed record or positions on gun related issues, who may oppose some pro-gun positions.
- D: An anti-gun candidate who usually supports restrictive gun control legislation. Regardless of public statements, can usually be counted on to vote wrong on key issues.
- F: True enemy of gun owners' rights. A consistent anti-gun candidate.
- ?: Refused to answer the NRA-PVF Candidate Questionnaire, often an indication of indifference, if not outright hostility, to gun owners' rights.
Source: NRA website 10-NRA on Aug 11, 2010
Page last updated: Dec 16, 2019