OnTheIssuesLogo

Seth Moulton on Government Reform

Democratic Presidential Challenger (withdrawn); MA Rep.

 


Eliminate the Electoral College

Moulton on Electoral College: It should be eliminated.

16 CANDIDATES HAVE SIMILAR VIEWS: Michael Bennet; Cory Booker; Peter Buttigieg; Julian Castro; Tulsi Gabbard; Kirsten Gillibrand; Kamala Harris; Jay Inslee; Amy Klobuchar; Wayne Messam; Beto O`Rourke; Tim Ryan; Bernard Sanders; Eric Swalwell; Elizabeth Warren; Marianne Williamson.

12 Democratic presidential candidates have explicitly called for the abolition of the Electoral College, while 5 others have said they are open to the idea.

Source: Politico "2020Dems on the Issues" , Jul 17, 2019

End secret contributions that buy support in Congress

We've got a big problem in America today. Corporations and special interests think they can buy support in Congress with massive secret contributions. The sad thing is, they're right. In the wake of Citizens United, special interests have spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to cheat the system & manipulate Congress. That's not good for democracy, and it's not good for getting things done. If we want to fix Congress, we have to get rid of special interest money and the politicians it has bought.
Source: 2014 House campaign website, SethMoulton.com , Sep 1, 2014

Public financing of federal campaigns by voter vouchers.

Moulton co-sponsored H.R.20 & S.366

Congressional Summary:<

Supporters reasons for voting YEA:Rep. Sarbanes: Big money warps Congress` priorities and erodes the public`s trust in government. This bold new legislation returns voice and power back to the American people:

  1. Empower everyday citizens to fuel Congressional campaigns by providing a My Voice Tax Credit.
  2. Amplify the voices of everyday Americans through a 6-to-1 match.
  3. Prevent Super PACs from drowning out small donor-backed candidates.

Opponents reasons for voting NAY:(Bill Moyers, Feb. 19, 2015): This citizen engagement strategy, particularly when used to court small donors, is not without its critics. Small donors, at least in the current system, often tend to be political ideologues. That trend leaves many asking: won`t moving to small donors just empower extremists? Sarbanes counters, if Congress changes the political fundraising rules, they will also change the calculus for `the rational small donor who right now isn`t going to give $25 because they`ve figured out that it`s not going to matter.` The prospect of a 6-to-1 match might very well impact how those less ideologically extreme potential donors think about political giving.

Source: Government By the People Act 15_H020 on Jan 21, 2015

Statehood for the District of Columbia.

Moulton co-sponsored H.R.317

Congressional Summary: Sets forth procedures for admission into the United States of the state of New Columbia.

Opponents reasons for voting NAY: (DCist.com, Sept. 2014): The Argument Against: Congress does not have the authority to grant statehood to D.C.; the 23rd amendment, which gave D.C. three electoral votes, would have to be repealed before statehood was granted. Washington is a wholly urban, one-industry town, dependent on the federal government far in excess of any other state. Moreover, with Congress no longer having authority over New Columbia but dependent on it, New Columbia could exert influence on the federal government far in excess of any other state.

Supporters reasons for voting YEA: [Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-DC; the District of Columbia has one representative to Congress and no Senators; Rep. Holmes can introduce bills but her vote does not count]: This 51st state would have no jurisdiction over the federal territory or enclave that now consists of the Washington that Members of Congress and visitors associate with the capital of our country. Those would remain under federal jurisdiction. The New Columbia Admission Act was the first bill I introduced in 1991. Statehood is the only alternative for the citizens of the District of Columbia. To be content with less than statehood is to concede the equality of citizenship that is the birthright of our residents as citizens of the United States.

Source: New Columbia Admission Act 15_H317 on Jan 13, 2015

Automatic voter registration for all citizens.

Moulton co-sponsored H.R.12 & S.1088

Congressional Summary:

Supporters reasons for voting YEA: (BrennanCenter.org): Too many Americans go to vote on Election Day only to find their names are not on the voter rolls--often, wrongly deleted. The US is on the verge of a new paradigm for registering voters: automatic, permanent registration of eligible voters, which would add up to 50 million eligible voters to the rolls.

Opponents reasons for voting NAY: (Gov. Christie`s veto message on the `Democracy Act`, Nov. 2015): Christie called a provision establishing automatic voter registration that requires New Jerseyan to opt out a `government-knows-best, backwards approach that would inconvenience citizens and waste government resources for no justifiable reason.` Automatic voter registration would have added 1.6 million people to the state`s voter rolls.

Source: Voter Empowerment Act 15-H12 on Mar 19, 2015

Replace electoral college with direct election of president.

Moulton co-sponsored the Joint Resolution on abolishing Electoral College

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of the President and Vice President.

Resolved that the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution, which shall be valid when ratified by the legislatures of 3/4 of the States within seven years:
  • The President and Vice President shall be elected by the people of the several States;
  • The pair of candidates having the greatest number of votes for President and Vice President shall be elected

    Opponents` viewpoint by Washington Times 3/28/19: The Founding Fathers dreamed up a way to elect a president by overriding the popular will, and some people want to fix something that ain`t broke. The Founders were not at all confident that voters would pay sufficient attention to the job at hand, studying the men and issues to come to a correct evaluation of the candidates. The genius of the Electoral College is that it guarantees that the states` electors elect the president, as instructed by the people. Without this guarantee, a presidential candidate would spend all his time in CA, TX, and FL, with only grudging nods to the states of flyover country. The guarantee of attention to both large and small states enforces federalism, the sharing of powers between the central government and the states.

    Source: Resolution H.J.Res.7 for Constitutional Amendment 19-HJR7 on Jan 3, 2019

    Holiday on election day; revamp for easier voting access.

    Moulton voted YEA For the People Act of 2019

    Opposing argument from the Heritage Foundation, 2/1/2019: HR1 federalizes and micromanages the election process administered by the states, imposing unnecessary mandates on the states and reversing the decentralization of the American election process. What HR1 Would Do:

    Legislative outcome: Passed House 234-193-5 on 3/8/19; received with no action in Senate thru 12/31/2019

    Source: Congressional vote 19-S949 on Jan 3, 2019

    Sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access.

    Moulton co-sponsored For the People Act

    S.1 and H.R.1: For the People Act: This bill addresses voter access, election integrity and security, campaign finance, and ethics for the three branches of government:

    Sen. John Thune in OPPOSITION (9/22/21): This radical legislation would provide for a massive federal takeover of our electoral system, chill free speech, and turn the Federal Election Commission--the primary enforcer of election law in this country--into a partisan body. This radical legislation would undermine state voter ID laws and make it easier for those here illegally to vote.

    And, most of all, it would put Washington, not state governments, in charge of elections--for no reason at all. There is no systemic problem with state election laws. And state election officials do not need Washington bureaucrats dictating how many days of early voting they should offer, or how they should manage mail-in ballots.

    Biden Administration in SUPPORT (3/1/21): In the wake of an unprecedented assault on our democracy, a never before seen effort to ignore, undermine, and undo the will of the people, and a newly aggressive attack on voting rights taking place right now all across the country, this landmark legislation is urgently needed to protect the fundamental right to vote and the integrity of our elections, and to repair and strengthen American democracy.

    Legislative Outcome: Passed House 220-210-2 on March 3, 2021 (rollcall #62); received in the Senate on March 11; no further Senate action during 2021.

    Source: S.1/H.R.1 21-HR1 on Jan 4, 2021

    Sponsored impeachment of Trump for inciting insurrection.

    Moulton voted YEA impeaching President Trump for inciting insurrection

    GovTrack.us summary of H.Res.24: Article of Impeachment Against Former President Donald John Trump:

    The House impeached President Trump for the second time, charging him with incitement of insurrection. The impeachment resolution accused the President of inciting the violent riot that occurred on January 6, when his supporters invaded the United States Capitol injuring and killing Capitol Police and endangering the safety of members of Congress. It cites statements from President Trump to the rioters such as `if you don`t fight like hell you`re not going to have a country anymore,` as well as persistent lies that he won the 2020 Presidential election.

    Legislative Outcome:

    Bill introduced Jan 11, 2021, with 217 co-sponsors; House rollcall vote #117 passed 232-197-4 on Jan. 13th (a YES vote in the House was to impeach President Trump for inciting insurrection); Senate rollcall vote #59 rejected 57-43-0 on Feb. 13th (2/3 required in Senate to pass; a YES vote in the Senate would have found President Trump guilty, but since he had already left office at that time, a guilty verdict would have barred Trump from running for President in the future)

    Source: Congressional vote 21-HR24 on Jan 11, 2021

    Sponsored bill for statehood for Washington D.C.

    Moulton co-sponsored Washington D.C. Admission Act

    Legislative Summary: This bill provides for admission into the United States of the state of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth, composed of most of the territory of the District of Columbia. The commonwealth shall be admitted to the Union on an equal footing with the other states. District territory excluded from the commonwealth shall be known as the Capital and shall be the seat of the federal government. The bill maintains the federal government`s authority over military lands and specified other property. The bill provides for expedited consideration of a joint resolution repealing the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution [the current rule for D.C.].

    WETM 18-Elmira analysis: The House of Representatives passed a bill that would make Washington D.C. into a state. While Democrats say it`s time to make D.C. a state, Republicans say the motivation is purely political.

    D.C. House Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) introduced this bill and says district residents deserve full representation in Congress. `D.C. residents are taxed without representation and cannot consent to the laws under which they as American citizens must live,` Norton said.

    While Democrats say this is about fairness, Republicans say this isn`t about the people, it`s about the politics. As a state, D.C. would likely add two new Democrats to the Senate.

    `This is about a Democrat power grab,` Congressman Fred Keller (R-Penn.) said. Keller and Congressman James Comer (R-Ky.) say Democrats are forcing this issue through for one reason. `HR 51 is not really about voting representation. It`s about Democrats consolidating their power in Washington,` Comer said.

    Legislative Outcome: Passed House 216-208-6 on 4/22/21 (rollcall #132); introduced in Senate with 45 co-sponsors but no further Senate action during 2021.

    Source: H.R.51/S.51 21-HR51 on Jan 4, 2021

    Sponsored "Protecting Our Democracy" to restrict president.

    Moulton co-sponsored Protecting Our Democracy Act

    H.R.5314, `Protecting Our Democracy Act,` addresses issues involving

    1. abuses of presidential power;
    2. checks and balances, accountability, and transparency; and
    3. election integrity and security.
    Specifically, regarding abuses of presidential power, the bill:

    Opinion by Rep. Brooks (R-AL-5) to vote NO, 12/9/21: Brooks voted `No` on H.R. 5314, a bill that perpetuates the now-debunked Russian Collusion claims that have resulted in indictments against the Democrat shills that fabricated it. Brooks said, `Trump Derangement Syndrome does not do justice to the word `obsession`. HR 5314 is a list of grievances against President Trump that go back to 2016.` Brooks concluded, `The American people would be better served if Socialist Democrats spent their time investigating Hunter Biden`s shady art and influence-peddling deals that reek of corruption. The American people would be better served if the House considered border security legislation, welfare give-a-way program rollbacks, or bills aimed at addressing rising prices. Instead, we`re wasting time on partisan, unnecessary legislation that`s going nowhere in the Senate.`

    Legislative Outcome: Passed House 220-208-6 on 12/9/2021, Roll no. 440); introduced in Senate on 12/13/21; no further Senate action during 2021.

    Source: H.R.5314/S.2921 21-HR5314 on Sep 21, 2021

    Other candidates on Government Reform: Seth Moulton on other issues:
    MA Gubernatorial:
    Ben Downing
    Danielle Allen
    Geoff Diehl
    Sonia Chang-Diaz
    MA Senatorial:
    Elizabeth Warren
    Joe Kennedy III
    Kevin O`Connor
    Shannon Liss-Riordan
    Shiva Ayyadurai

    MA politicians
    MA Archives
    Senate races 2026:
    AK: Dan Sullivan(R,incumbent)
    vs.Andy Barr(R)
    vs.Mary Peltola(D)
    AL: Tommy Tuberville(R,retiring)
    vs.Barry Moore(R)
    vs.Steve Marshall(R)
    AR: Tom Cotton(R,incumbent)
    vs.Dan Whitfield(I,withdrew)
    vs.Ethan Dunbar(D)
    CO: John Hickenlooper(D,incumbent)
    vs.Janak Joshi(R)
    vs.Julie Gonzales(D)
    vs.Mark Baisley(R)
    DE: Chris Coons(D,incumbent)
    vs.Mike Katz(I)
    FL: Ashley Moody(R,appointee)
    vs.Alan Grayson(D)
    vs.Angie Nixon(D)
    GA: Jon Ossoff(D,incumbent)
    vs.Buddy Carter(R)
    vs.John F. King(R)
    vs.Mike Collins(R)
    IA: Joni Ernst(R,retiring)
    vs.Ashley Hinson(R)
    vs.Bob Krause(D)
    vs.Jim Carlin(R)
    vs.J.D. Scholten(D,withdrew)
    ID: Jim Risch(R,incumbent)
    vs.David Roth(D)
    vs.Todd Achilles(I)
    IL: Richard Durbin(D,retiring)
    vs.Juliana Stratton(D)
    vs.Raja Krishnamoorthi(D)
    vs.Robin Kelly(D)
    KS: Roger Marshall(R,incumbent)
    vs.Patrick Schmidt(D)
    KY: Mitch McConnell(R,retiring)
    vs.Charles Booker(D)
    vs.Daniel Cameron(R)
    vs.Pamela Stevenson(D)
    LA: Bill Cassidy(R,incumbent)
    vs.John Fleming(R)
    vs.Julia Letlow(R)
    MA: Ed Markey(D,incumbent)
    vs.Seth Moulton(D)
    vs.John Deaton(R)
    ME: Susan Collins(R,incumbent)
    vs.Janet Mills(D)
    MI: Gary Peters(D,retiring)
    vs.Haley Stevens(D)
    vs.Joe Tate(R,withdrew)
    vs.Mallory McMorrow(D)
    vs.Mike Rogers(R)

    MN: Tina Smith(D,retiring)
    vs.Angie Craig(D)
    vs.David Hann(R)
    vs.Peggy Flanagan(D)
    vs.Royce White(R)
    MS: Cindy Hyde-Smith(R,incumbent)
    vs.Ty Pinkins(D)
    MT: Steve Daines(R,incumbent)
    vs.Reilly Neill(D)
    NC: Thom Tillis(R,retiring)
    vs.Michael Whatley(R)
    vs.Roy Cooper(D)
    NE: Peter Ricketts(R,incumbent)
    vs.Dan Osborn(I)
    NH: Jeanne Shaheen(D,retiring)
    vs.Chris Pappas(D)
    vs.John Sununu(R)
    vs.Scott Brown(R)
    NJ: Cory Booker(D,incumbent)
    vs.Justin Murphy(R)
    NM: Ben Ray Lujan(D,incumbent)
    vs.Matt Dodson(D)
    OH: Jon Husted(R,appointee)
    vs.Sherrod Brown(D)
    OK: Markwayne Mullin(R,incumbent)
    vs.Troy Green(D)
    OR: Jeff Merkley(D,incumbent)
    vs.Jo Rae Perkins(R)
    RI: Jack Reed(D,incumbent)
    vs.Connor Burbridge(D)
    SC: Lindsey Graham(R,incumbent)
    vs.Catherine Fleming Bruce(D)
    vs.Paul Dans(R)
    SD: Mike Rounds(R,incumbent)
    vs.Brian Bengs(I)
    TN: Bill Hagerty(R,incumbent)
    vs.Diana Onyejiaka(D)
    TX: John Cornyn(R,incumbent)
    vs.Ken Paxton(R)
    vs.Wesley Hunt(R)
    vs.James Talarico(D)
    vs.Jasmine Crockett(D)
    VA: Mark Warner(D,incumbent)
    vs.David Williams(R)
    WV: Shelley Moore Capito(R,incumbent)
    vs.Jeff Kessler(D)
    vs.Tom Willis(R)
    WY: Cynthia Lummis(R,retiring)
    vs.Harriet Hageman(R)
    vs.Reid Rasner(R)
    Abortion
    Budget/Economy
    Civil Rights
    Corporations
    Crime
    Drugs
    Education
    Energy/Oil
    Environment
    Families
    Foreign Policy
    Free Trade
    Govt. Reform
    Gun Control
    Health Care
    Homeland Security
    Immigration
    Jobs
    Principles
    Social Security
    Tax Reform
    Technology
    War/Peace
    Welfare

    Other Senators
    Senate Votes (analysis)
    Bill Sponsorships
    Affiliations
    Policy Reports
    Group Ratings
    [Title9]





    Page last updated: Feb 14, 2026; copyright 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org