Topics in the News: Supreme Court
Tim Walz on Health Care
: Oct 2, 2024
Trump repeatedly tried and failed to repeal ObamaCare
TW: The first thing [Trump said] he was going to do on day one, was to repeal Obamacare. On day one, he tried to sign an executive order to repeal the ACA. He signed onto a lawsuit to repeal the ACA, but lost at the Supreme Court. And he would have
repealed the ACA had it not been for the courage of John McCain to save that bill. So what they're going to do is let insurance companies pick who they insure. That's why the system didn't work. Kamala Harris will protect and enhance the ACA.
JDV: I think you can make a really good argument that it salvaged ObamaCare, which was doing disastrously until Donald Trump came along. I think this is an important point about President Trump. When ObamaCare was crushing under the weight of its
own regulatory burden and healthcare costs, Donald Trump could have destroyed the program. Instead, he worked in a bipartisan way to ensure that Americans had access to affordable care.
Click for Tim Walz on other issues.
Source: 2024 Vice Presidential debate: Tim Walz vs. JD Vance
Kamala Harris on Government Reform
: Sep 9, 2024
Term limits and ethic rules for Supreme Court Justices
Vice President Harris believes that no one is above the law. She'll fight to ensure that no former president has immunity for crimes committed while in the White House. She will also support common-sense Supreme Court reforms--
like requiring Justices to comply with ethics rules that other federal judges are bound by and imposing term limits--to address the crisis of confidence facing the Supreme Court.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: 2024 Presidential campaign website KamalaHarris.com
JD Vance on Health Care
: Aug 2, 2024
Question validity of ObamaCare's individual mandate
2011: Then-Judge Kavanaugh Wrote A Dissent Arguing Against The Affordable Care Act's Individual Mandate: "In a 2011 case, Seven-Sky v. Holder, the appeals court upheld the individual mandate to buy health insurance, a pillar of the Affordable Care Act.
Kavanaugh wrote a dissent, saying the mandate was essentially a tax and thus outside the court's jurisdiction. This argument later became central when the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the ACA." [NBC News, 7/10/18]
An op-ed by JD Vance in the Wall Street Journal: "Judge Kavanaugh has come under fire in some quarters of the right for challenges against ObamaCare--in which he aimed to rule narrowly and fairly rather than politically. In one, he dissented from an
opinion that upheld the individual mandate. He observed that the individual mandate 'is unprecedented in American history' and cast doubt on its validity under either the Commerce or Taxing clause. " [Wall Street Journal, 7/2/18]
Click for JD Vance on other issues.
Source: Wall Street Journal in 2024 Trump Research Book
JD Vance on Jobs
: Aug 2, 2024
Protecting transgender workers betrays traditionalists
2020: "The Supreme Court ruled that a landmark civil rights law protects gay and transgender workers from workplace discrimination, handing the movement for LGBT equality a long-sought and unexpected victory. 'An employer who fires an individual merely
for being gay or transgender defies the law,' Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote for the majority in the 6-to-3 ruling. The decision, the first major case on transgender rights, came amid widespread demonstrations, some protesting violence aimed at
transgender people of color." [New York Times, 6/15/20]Senator J.D. Vance lashed out at the 'conservative legal movement' after the Supreme Court ruled that gay and transgender employees should be protected from job discrimination. "The conservative
legal movement has accomplished two things: libertarian political economy [enforced by judges] and betrayal of social conservatives and traditionalists,' Vance tweeted." [Washington Examiner, 6/15/20]
Click for JD Vance on other issues.
Source: Washington Examiner in 2024 Trump Research Book
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: Jul 29, 2024
18-year term limits for Supreme Court Justices
Mr. Biden's proposed reforms come after the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, issued a series of landmark decisions in recent years. Those decisions, as well as scrutiny over ethics practices at the high court, have made it a target
of Democrats and liberal advocacy groups, who have argued the Supreme Court has undermined public confidence in itself.[One] proposed reform would do away with lifetime appointments for members of the Supreme Court and instead set 18-year term limits.
Under Mr. Biden's plan, the president would appoint a new justice every two years, who would then serve for 18 years.
"Term limits would help ensure that the court's membership changes with some regularity," Mr. Biden wrote. "That would make timing
for court nominations more predictable and less arbitrary. It would reduce the chance that any single presidency radically alters the makeup of the court for generations to come."
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: CBS News on 2024 Presidential hopefuls
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: Jul 29, 2024
Binding code of conduct for the Supreme Court
The president proposes a binding code of conduct for the Supreme Court, which would require justices in part to disclose gifts, refrain from public political activity and step aside from cases in which they or their spouses have financial or other
conflicts of interest. The Supreme Court implemented ethics rules in November, but it does not include an enforcement mechanism. Mr. Biden called its ethics code "weak and self-enforced."
Mr. Biden's proposed reforms come after the Supreme Court,
which has a 6-3 conservative majority, issued a series of landmark decisions in recent years. Those decisions, as well as scrutiny over ethics practices at the high court, have made it a target of Democrats, who have argued the Supreme Court has
undermined public confidence in itself.
Two of Biden's three proposed changes--term limits and a binding code of conduct--would require action from Congress, making it unlikely they will become law before the president leaves office in January 2025.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: CBS News on 2024 Presidential hopefuls
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: Jul 29, 2024
No One is Above the Law Amendment: no presidential immunity
President Biden unveiled a trio of proposals to reform the Supreme Court, calling on Congress to pass legislation setting term limits for justices and establish binding, enforceable ethics rules for the nation's highest court. Mr. Biden's
proposed reforms come after the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, issued a series of landmark decisions in recent years. Mr. Biden's plan for Supreme Court reform [proposes] an amendment to the Constitution called the No One is
Above the Law Amendment, which would state that the Constitution doesn't grant immunity from federal criminal indictment, trial, conviction or sentencing to a former president, according to the White House. "I share our
Founders' belief that the president's power is limited, not absolute. We are a nation of laws--not of kings or dictators," Mr. Biden wrote in an op-ed for the Washington Post about his plan.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: CBS News on 2024 Presidential hopefuls
Donald Trump on Abortion
: Jul 18, 2024
Crowning achievement is overturning Roe; but it's divisive
Overturning Roe is one of the crowning achievements of Donald Trump's presidency. No one at the Republican National Convention is talking about it.Heading into the final day of the Republican Party's first national gathering since the Supreme Court's
landmark decision, which has allowed more than a third of states to ban nearly all abortions, the issue has barely received a passing mention. Main-stage speakers have instead leaned into economic populism, and isolationism.
But most GOP delegates
are fine with abortion not taking center stage, saying they have little interest in divisive social issues that could damage the nominee at a moment when Trump appears on a glidepath to victory. While Democrats and abortion-rights groups stage press
conferences outside the convention and attempt to use GOP vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance's past statements to bring abortion back into the political spotlight, the GOP is choosing not to engage.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: Politico.com on 2024 Presidential hopefuls
JD Vance on Abortion
: Jul 11, 2024
Preserve access to Mifepristone medication abortion
U.S. Sen. JD Vance said he supports last month's U.S. Supreme Court decision that preserves access to medication abortion -- a reversal on Vance's platform when he ran for the Senate as an uncompromising abortion opponent.Vance in an interview on
NBC's Meet the Press [this week] is softening his former anti -abortion stance in the wake of that proposed GOP platform that doesn't call for a national abortion ban. On Meet the Press, he said he supported the Supreme Court decision to allow
Mifepristone access. This is one of the abortion drugs and he says it should be legally accessible.
He says, "Donald Trump supports it and so do I."
But Donald Trump didn't use to support it, and back in 2022, when Vance was running for Senate, he was an abortion hardliner. Vance said he was 100% pro -life. He wanted to end abortion once and for all.
Click for JD Vance on other issues.
Source: Cleveland Plain-Dealer on 2024 Veepstakes
Marco Rubio on Crime
: Jul 7, 2024
Courts are used to persecute and prosecute Donald Trump
I think that what the Supreme Court did is it clarified what the law is, and that is you cannot go after presidents for official acts and there's a presumption of immunity for quasi-official acts or semi-official acts. It is clear that we have reached
an era where there are people in American politics who believe our courts are now a weapon that can be used against their political opponents. You look at their efforts and what they've done in the courts to persecute and prosecute Donald Trump.
Click for Marco Rubio on other issues.
Source: CNN SOTU interview on 2024 Florida Senate race
JD Vance on Government Reform
: Jun 30, 2024
We know the president has to have immunity to do his job
We know that the president has to have immunity to do his job. Should Barack Obama be prosecuted for droning American citizens in Yemen? There are so many examples of presidents Democrats and Republicans who would not be
able to discharge their duties if the Supreme Court does not recognize some broad element of presidential discretion. I'm very confident that they're going to be able to do that.
Click for JD Vance on other issues.
Source: CBS Face the Nation on 2024 Republican Veepstakes
Kamala Harris on Environment
: Jun 28, 2024
Chevron deference: let EPA expertise keep air & water clean
Statement from Vice President Kamala Harris on the Supreme Court Ruling in Loper Bright [which overturned the "Chevron deference," a principle established in 1984 which allowed agencies like the EPA to interpret Congressional laws with their own
expertise]:People throughout our Nation should be able to count on their government to ensure that our air and water are clean, health care is accessible and affordable, financial markets are sound, products are safe, and workers are not exploited on
the job. Courts have long deferred to federal experts to make these ideals a reality.
Unfortunately, today's Supreme Court decision sides with powerful special interests who want to roll back commonsense rules that protect Americans.
President Biden and I will continue to do everything in our power to protect the American people and ensure that every person in our country can thrive.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: White House Vice Presidential 2024 press release: ""
Donald Trump on Abortion
: Jun 27, 2024
I will not block abortion medication: abortion pill ok
Q: As president, would you block abortion medication?TRUMP: First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it.
BIDEN: The fact is that the vast majority of constitutional scholars supported Roe when it was decided. And this is the guy [Trump] who says the states should be able to have it.
We're in a state where in six weeks, you don't even know whether you're pregnant or not, but you cannot see the doctor or have your--and have him decide on what your circumstances are, whether you need help.
The idea that states are able to do this is a little like saying, we're going to turn civil rights back to the states. Let each state have a different rule.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: First Trump-Biden debate, at CNN in Atlanta
Joe Biden on Abortion
: Jun 27, 2024
Leaving abortion to the states turns back rights
Q [ to Trump]: As president, would you block abortion medication?TRUMP: First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it.
BIDEN: The fact is that the vast majority of constitutional scholars supported Roe when it was decided. And this is the guy [Trump] who says the states should be able to have it.
We're in a state where in six weeks, you don't even know whether you're pregnant or not, but you cannot see the doctor or have your--and have him decide on what your circumstances are, whether you need help.
The idea that states are able to do this is a little like saying, we're going to turn civil rights back to the states. Let each state have a different rule.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: First Trump-Biden debate, at CNN in Atlanta
Kamala Harris on Gun Control
: Jun 14, 2024
Common sense reform: immediately ban bump stocks
Statement from Vice President Kamala Harris on the Supreme Court Decision in Garland v. Cargill: Weapons of war have no place on the streets of a civil society. That is why Democrats and Republicans alike supported the federal government banning
bump stocks after they were used to fire over 1,000 rounds into a crowded music festival in Las Vegas, killing 60 people in the deadliest mass shooting in American history.Unfortunately, today's Supreme Court ruling strikes down this important,
commonsense regulation on devices that convert semiautomatic rifles into weapons that can fire hundreds of bullets per minute.
While the Supreme Court has once again rolled back progress, we will not allow the victims and survivors of 1 October to be
forgotten. President Biden and I fought to pass the most significant gun safety legislation in nearly 30 years, but our work is not done. We are calling on Congress to immediately ban bump stocks. We do not have a moment to spare nor a life to spare.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: White House Vice Presidential 2024 press release: "Cargill"
Kamala Harris on Government Reform
: May 23, 2024
Racial gerrymandering harms our democracy
Statement from Vice President Kamala Harris on the Supreme Court Ruling in Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP [allowing partisan and racial gerrymandering]:The sacred right to vote is the fundamental freedom that unlocks all
others. Today's Supreme Court decision deprives Americans of that sacred freedom and further harms our democracy.
Let us be clear: Voters should choose their elected officials--not the other way around. Extremist elected officials' attempt to
dilute the rights of voters based on race is wrong.
South Carolinians and people across America deserve to have their voices heard and their votes counted. President Biden and I will continue fighting to protect
Americans from discrimination at the ballot box, and we once again urge Congress to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and the Freedom to Vote Act.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: White House Vice Presidential 2024 press release: "NAACP"
Nikki Haley on Abortion
: Feb 21, 2024
IVF frozen embryos should be protected like babies
Nikki Haley said that frozen embryos created through in-vitro fertilization are "babies," siding with a recent Alabama Supreme Court decision that raised concerns among doctors and patients about the future of the procedure."Embryos, to me, are
babies," Haley told NBC News in an interview, adding that she used artificial insemination to have her son, a different process than IVF that doesn't present the same complexities around creating embryos in a lab. "When you talk about an embryo, you are
talking about, to me, that's a life. And so I do see where that's coming from when they talk about that."
Asked if legislation and rulings like the one in Alabama could have a chilling effect on families using IVF to become parents, Haley said, "This
is one where we need to be incredibly respectful and sensitive about it." Haley added: "Every woman needs to know, with her partner, what she's looking at. And then when you look at that, then you make the decision that's best for your family."
Click for Nikki Haley on other issues.
Source: NBC News on 2024 Presidential hopefuls
Ron DeSantis on Immigration
: Jan 4, 2024
Children born here to illegal immigrants aren't "anchors"
DeSantis said, "The 14th Amendment obviously applies to U.S. citizens. It was never the intended to say, you come illegally across the border, have a kid, and all of sudden, the kid is an American citizen? That creates an anchor in the society so that
you then can't deport the illegal aliens who came in. It's an incentive to come illegally. When people are coming illegally, they do not have a birthright at that point."[DeSantis is proposing to overturn a Supreme Court precedent from 1898]:
Fact Check by The Guardian, Mar. 16 2020 Children born on US soil can't just immediately safeguard their family members from deportation. A US citizen must be 21 years old before they can sponsor their parents for a green card. Even if parents do
get a green card, they have a five-year holding period before they can finally apply for naturalization. In the end, the so-called "anchor baby" pathway to citizenship is at least a 26-year endeavor, even for those who entered the US legally.
Click for Ron DeSantis on other issues.
Source: Guardian FactCheck on CNN Town Hall 2024 pre-Iowa caucus
Ron DeSantis on Principles &Values
: Jan 4, 2024
Protect religious institutions where marriage is a sacrament
I respect the Supreme Court's decision. We have abided by that in Florida, even though our Constitution defines it as between a man and a woman. I think what we need to recognize is, you are going to have people try to wield power against our religious
institutions and try to marginalize them simply by upholding the biblical definition of marriage. I'm going to protect those religious institutions to be able to do what has always been done in terms of how they consider marriage as a sacrament.
Click for Ron DeSantis on other issues.
Source: CNN Town Hall 2024 pre-Iowa caucus
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Gun Control
: Oct 9, 2023
Common sense gun control, and assault weapons ban
Kennedy has stated that he supports "common sense" gun control, but has also said that he would not "take away anybody's guns." He has explained his position saying "I'm a constitutional absolutist. We can argue about whether the
Second Amendment was intended to protect guns. That argument has now been settled by the Supreme Court." Kennedy also expressed support for a bipartisan assault weapons ban.
Click for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on other issues.
Source: Wikipedia "Riverkeeper" on 2023 Presidential hopefuls
JD Vance on Civil Rights
: Sep 12, 2023
Enforce Court decision ending college affirmative action
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court struck a blow against institutionally-driven racism in the United States. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court found [that colleges with affirmative action admissions] were
impermissibly discriminating against certain applicants based exclusively on their race.While the Court took a big step forward in eliminating racial discrimination in admissions, more work remains to be done. In his remarks in the wake of the
landmark decision, President Biden proposed "a new standard, where colleges take into account the adversity a student has overcome, including racial discrimination that individuals have faced in their own lives."
We call upon the Biden administration
to embrace the Court's holdings: racial discrimination [does not] have any place in schooling. The American people deserve no less than an Executive Branch committed to enforcing the law equally to all people without concern for their race.
Click for JD Vance on other issues.
Source: Ernst.Senate.Gov press release:for 2022 Ohio Senate race
Joe Biden on Civil Rights
: Sep 12, 2023
New standard to reinstate college affirmative action
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court struck a blow against institutionally-driven racism in the United States. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court found [that colleges with affirmative action admissions] were
impermissibly discriminating against certain applicants based exclusively on their race.While the Court took a big step forward in eliminating racial discrimination in admissions, more work remains to be done. In his remarks in the wake of the
landmark decision, President Biden proposed "a new standard, where colleges take into account the adversity a student has overcome, including racial discrimination that individuals have faced in their own lives."
We call upon the Biden administration
to embrace the Court's holdings: racial discrimination [does not] have any place in schooling. The American people deserve no less than an Executive Branch committed to enforcing the law equally to all people without concern for their race.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Presidential 2024 hopefuls: Ernst.Senate.Gov press release
Larry Elder on Abortion
: Aug 10, 2023
Abortion is murder, Roe one of the worst Court decisions
He has called the Roe vs. Wade ruling, which created a legal right to abortion, "one of the worst decisions that the
Supreme Court ever handed down," described abortion as "murder" and said rules governing the procedure should be left to the states.
Click for Larry Elder on other issues.
Source: Los Angeles Times on 2024 Presidential hopefuls
Kamala Harris on Civil Rights
: Jul 19, 2023
Supreme Court trying to get rid of DEI & affirmative action
The Supreme Court just demolished--just basically did away with affirmative action, which was all about access to opportunity. The fight that has been the fight of the people who are the founders of the NAACP was a fight that was about freedom, about
equality, about liberty, and about access to opportunity. And there are people who are intentionally trying to destroy access to opportunity for those who have been left out or overlooked. You look at what's happening with these so-called leaders who
are trying to say that diversity and equity and inclusion is somehow a bad thing. Let us not let them get away with that. They're trying to get rid of DEI programs so that corporations will stop paying attention to who they're hiring and promoting,
will stop paying attention to who gets accepted to schools, thinking about the issue of equity. So, all of these factors are connected. And to care about one is to also have the responsibility to see it in the context of the others.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: Remarks at the NAACP 114th Annual Convention
Cornel West on Civil Rights
: Jul 7, 2023
Focusing on diversity is a very narrow criteria to use
Q: And how about the Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action?WEST: This began with reparations--an attempt to repair some of the damage done
by the barbaric slavery and the vicious Jim and Jane Crow. It shifted to diversity, and that became a very narrow criteria to use. And now that's being called into question.
Click for Cornel West on other issues.
Source: Politico.com on 2023 Presidential hopefuls
Will Hurd on Education
: Jul 2, 2023
Colleges can still consider race without affirmative action
Q: In the Supreme Court's affirmative action decision [SFFA v. Harvard]: Clarence Thomas' opinion said "Individuals are the sum of their unique experiences. And their race is not to blame for everything, good or bad, that happens in their lives."
Ketanji Brown Jackson said: "Deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life. Although formal race-linked legal barriers are gone, race still matters to the lived experiences of all Americans in innumerable ways." Who do you agree with?
HURD: Well, race still does matter. And that's why this case allows race still to be used when adjudicating whether or not a student should be able to go to college.
Q: So, you think that colleges should factor race into their admissions?
HURD:
Colleges still can. The court made it very clear they are able to use that, because it has an impact on who they are and on their life experiences and why they have been successful or the issues that they have been able to deal with.
Click for Will Hurd on other issues.
Source: CNN SOTU interviews on 2023 Presidential primary hopefuls
Mike Pence on Principles & Values
: Jul 2, 2023
The freedom of religion is our first freedom
I would say to every American that the freedom of religion is our first freedom, that's enshrined in the First Amendment for a reason. And from the moment the Supreme Court recognized same-sex marriage, the court had made a commitment that as they
move forward on that decision, that they would still respect the freedom of religion and the freedom of conscience of every American. I believe that every American is entitled to live, to work, to worship according to the dictates of their conscience.
Click for Mike Pence on other issues.
Source: CBS Face the Nation on 2023 Presidential primary hopefuls
Perry Johnson on Civil Rights
: Jun 30, 2023
Leftists drives wedges among us in dealing with race
[On Supreme Court banning racial preference in college applications]: "I applaud today's #SCOTUS ruling on affirmative action. Discrimination based on the color of one's
skin is wrong, period. Leftists in America continue to drive wedges amongst us with inflammatory rhetoric and practices in dealing with race. It is time we stand up against it."
Click for Perry Johnson on other issues.
Source: CNN coverage of 2023 Presidential hopefuls
Asa Hutchinson on Civil Rights
: Jun 29, 2023
Move beyond race-based admissions; fight identity politics
After the historic Supreme Court decision rolling back the use of affirmative action in college admissions, Arkansas politicians and lawmakers gave their reactions. The court's 6-3 decision along ideological lines struck down affirmative action in
college admissions.Former two-term Arkansas governor and candidate for Republican presidential nomination Asa Hutchinson had his reaction in support of the decision up not long after the morning announcement of the decision. "The recent Supreme Court
ruling strikes a blow against identity politics. It's time to move beyond race-based admissions. Colleges are supporting diversity by reducing legacy preferences and increasing financial aid," Hutchinson stated.
Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders
invoked Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.: "People should be judged on the content of their character, not the color of their skin. The Supreme Court affirmed that fundamental truth in today's decision."
Click for Asa Hutchinson on other issues.
Source: KARK News on 2023 Presidential hopefuls
Tim Walz on Abortion
: Jun 14, 2023
Codified abortion rights while surrounded by pro-life states
In January, Minnesota became the first state since the Dobbs decision to further codify reproductive rights with the passage of the Protect Reproductive Options Act, the first bill passed by the legislature. Abortion rights are protected even if the
State Supreme Court moves to the right.Minnesota, surrounded by anti-abortion states, is a refuge in the Upper Midwest for reproductive health care. Reproductive rights groups are planning a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion rights
in the state constitution.
"This incredible progress starkly contrasts with what happened in surrounding states, where politicians banned abortions and gender-affirming care,
attacked drag shows, and invested more tax dollars into deceptive anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers," read a statement by Minnesota Planned Parenthood.
Click for Tim Walz on other issues.
Source: People's World on 2022 Minnesota Gubernatorial race
Marianne Williamson on Corporations
: Jun 6, 2023
Government has become a handmaiden to a new corporate order
When the Supreme Court granted to companies the preposterous notion of "corporate personhood," billions and even trillions of dollars started flowing in the direction of a system deeming itself responsible only to its stockholders.
Its complete disregard for the welfare of the least advantaged and the least powerful among us--even of the planet itself--became inevitable. For all intents and purposes, our government has become a handmaiden to a new corporate order.
Click for Marianne Williamson on other issues.
Source: 2024 Presidential campaign website Marianne2024.com
Asa Hutchinson on Government Reform
: May 7, 2023
Supreme Court needs to be transparent on reporting rules
The Court needs to be transparent. They need to be clear on what their reporting rules are. They need to review those to make sure they're very similar to the other public officials and branches of government, which has broad reporting requirements.
Clearly, they have not been sufficient. They've changed those. But I think they need this step so the American people understand what the rules are, and what is required, and is similar to other public officials.
Click for Asa Hutchinson on other issues.
Source: Meet the Press on 2023 Presidential hopefuls
Mike Pence on Abortion
: Apr 22, 2023
A champion of the right to life throughout my public career
In his speech, he focused on the judicial achievements of the Trump administration that culminated in the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the landmark 1972 Roe v. Wade decision. "I'm pro-life and I don't apologize for it. I think a society can be
judged by how it deals with its most vulnerable," Pence said afterward to reporters. "I've been a champion of the right to life throughout my public career and I will continue to be, but I recognize not every American shares that view at this time."
Click for Mike Pence on other issues.
Source: Iowa Capital Dispatch on 2023 Faith & Freedom Coalition
Joe Biden on Abortion
: Feb 7, 2023
If Congress passes a national abortion ban, I will veto it
Congress must restore the right the Supreme Court took away last year and codify Roe v. Wade to protect every woman's constitutional right to choose. The Vice President and I are doing everything we can to protect access to reproductive
health care and safeguard patient privacy. But already, more than a dozen states are enforcing extreme abortion bans. Make no mistake; if Congress passes a national abortion ban, I will veto it.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: 2023 State of the Union speech as prepared for delivery
Tim Walz on Abortion
: Oct 18, 2022
Abortion is on the ballot with my anti-choice opponent
Walz and GOP challenger Scott Jensen squared off over abortion early in the debate, with Jensen saying he would not ban abortion and Minnesotans should vote on the issue as a constitutional amendment. He also said the state needs to include paid
maternity benefits and a tax credit associated with adoption.Walz stressed that governors can appoint Minnesota Supreme Court justices who interpret cases. "I just want to be absolutely clear, this is on the ballot," Walz said.
Click for Tim Walz on other issues.
Source: Minneapolis Star-Tribune on 2022 Minnesota Governor race
JD Vance on Abortion
: Oct 10, 2022
Abortion rights should be regulated by state legislatures
[Democratic opponent Rep. Tim] Ryan supports codifying the standard set by Roe v. Wade, which the Supreme Court overturned. Vance contends the issue should be regulated by state legislatures but said he would support a "minimum national standard" for
how far into a pregnancy abortions should be permitted.Vance has previously said he supports abortion when it's necessary to save the pregnant person's life, but he's opposed to exceptions for cases of rape or incest. When asked about the case of a
10-year-old Ohio girl who got an abortion in Indiana, he said she should've been able to get an abortion if she and her family chose to do so. Then he pivoted to the man accused of raping and impregnating the girl, who is believed to be an undocumented
immigrant. "That poor girl was raped by an illegal alien, somebody who should've never been in this state in the first place...if you had done your job, she would've never been raped in the first place," Vance told Ryan. "Do your job on border security."
Click for JD Vance on other issues.
Source: The Columbus Dispatch on 2022 Ohio Senate race
Doug Burgum on Energy & Oil
: Jun 30, 2022
EPA rules infringed on state & Congressional authority
Burgum released a statement regarding the Supreme Court decision affirming the State's role as an equal partner to the federal government in regulating greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants."The Court's ruling is a tremendously
significant decision for State's rights and consumers. This ruling puts a halt to federal overreach, including far reaching EPA proposed rules that infringed not just on State's but congressional authority," Burgum said. "Leading with innovation, not
regulation, and all-of-the-above energy strategies that are responsive to market trends, promote new technologies to boost production and curb emissions is an environmentally sound and common-sense approach."
In 2020, the US Court of Appeals struck
down the EPA's Affordable Clean Energy Rule, which recognized the shift in delegating to the States the primary authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plans. The decision today in North Dakota vs. EPA reversed that ruling.
Click for Doug Burgum on other issues.
Source: Statement on ND v. EPA (Presidential 2024 press release)
Kristi Noem on Abortion
: Jun 26, 2022
Supreme Court gave authority back to the states to decide
GOV. KRISTI NOEM (R-SD): I anticipate there will be more debate and discussion. What was interesting about the Supreme Court decision is that it gave the authority back to the states to make these decisions. So, now that this decision has been made, it
will be up to each of the states and the state legislatures and the people there to talk to their elected representatives about what their laws look like closer to home.SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN (D-MA):
Look, what she's really saying is that when this decision is made, it should be made by the government. That the government should move in and the government should determine whether or not a pregnancy is forced to continue or whether or not a
pregnancy can be terminated. We have never left individual rights to the states. The whole idea is that women are not second-class citizens. And the government is not the one that will decide about the continuation of a pregnancy.
Click for Kristi Noem on other issues.
Source: ABC This Week on 2022 South Dakota Gubernatorial race
JD Vance on Principles & Values
: May 3, 2022
Met wife at Yale Law School as his "Yale spirit guide"
In 2017, Mr Vance moved back to Ohio from California, where he had been working in biotech. He married a Yale Law classmate, Usha Chilukuri (now Vance), who had clerked at the Supreme Court. In Hillbilly Elegy, he described her as his "Yale spirit
guide", who helped him navigate the socially treacherous waters of the Ivy League and the recruitment rounds of the big law firms. The couple now have a son.
Click for JD Vance on other issues.
Source: BBC News commentary on "Hillbilly Elegy"
Kristi Noem on Abortion
: Jan 11, 2022
As soon as Roe is overturned, ready to protect every unborn
Government's most fundamental role is to defend the lives and safety of the people. That includes the rights and the lives of unborn children. I look forward to the day when all unborn lives are protected. The Supreme Court has a historic opportunity to
make that a reality. As soon as Roe v. Wade is overturned, our state laws are ready to protect every unborn South Dakota child. But until then, we can take steps to protect South Dakota children, today.Every human life is unique in a truly beautiful
way from the moment that they are conceived. It isn't long before they have their own unique heartbeat, too. Science tells us that an unborn child's heartbeat starts 6 weeks after conception. And any abortion after that point stops that heartbeat--
stops that life--stops that gift from God. Today, I am asking all of you to protect the heartbeats of these unborn children. I am bringing legislation to ban all abortions once a heartbeat can be detected.
Click for Kristi Noem on other issues.
Source: 2022 State of the State Address to South Dakota legislature
Kamala Harris on Abortion
: Jan 12, 2021
Are there any laws where government controls male bodies?
In 2016, Trump's second Supreme Court nominee was Brett Kavanaugh. Democrats have tried without success to elicit Kavanaugh's view of "Roe vs. Wade," the landmark 1973 abortion case. Harris used her time and skills she learned in the Almeda County
District Attorney's Office to cut through the clutter: "Can you think of any laws that give the government the power to make decisions about the male body?"Kavanaugh tripped over his words: "I'm not aware, I'm not, thinking of any right now, Senator."
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: Kamala's Way, by Dan Morain, p. 30
Kristi Noem on Abortion
: Jan 12, 2021
Ban abortion of preborn diagnosed with Down syndrome
I look forward to the day when the Supreme Court recognizes that all preborn children inherently possess this right to life, too. Until that time comes,
I am asking the South Dakota legislature to pass a law that bans the abortion of a preborn child, just because that child is diagnosed with Down syndrome.
Click for Kristi Noem on other issues.
Source: 2021 State of the State Address to South Dakota legislature
Donald Trump on Principles & Values
: Dec 11, 2020
Lost lawsuit in Supreme Court on overturning election
Trump--and Republicans across the country--had pinned their hopes on the Texas suit. In a series of tweets, Trump called it "the big one" and later added, "it is very strong, ALL CRITERIA MET." If the court had heard the case, Sen. Ted Cruz said he
would have argued it, at the request of Trump.Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas indicated they would have allowed Texas to bring the case but said they would "not grant other relief."
In a series of tweets after the ruling, Trump raged against the decision, which he called "a disgraceful miscarriage of justice."
[The Supreme Court declined to hear the case, filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton,
called "Texas v. Pennsylvania et al", despite an Amicus brief in favor from 126 members of Congress; see details of SCOTUS case]
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: Texas Tribune "2020 election" on Trump Administration
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: Oct 22, 2020
Commission of experts to decide on expanding Supreme Court
PROMISE MADE: (Politico.com, 10/22/2020): "I'll put together a bipartisan commission of scholars, constitutional scholars, Democrats, Republicans, liberal, conservative. And I will ask them to over 180 days come back to me with
recommendations as to how to reform the court system because it's getting out of whack," Biden said.PROMISE KEPT: (White House press release, 4/9/21): President Biden will issue an executive order forming the Presidential Commission on
the Supreme Court, comprised of a bipartisan group of experts on the Court and the Court reform debate. The Commission's purpose is to provide an analysis of Supreme Court reform, including an appraisal of the merits and legality of particular reform
proposals, within 180 days of its first public meeting.
ANALYSIS: The proposed reform, which critics call "court packing," would be to add 4 Supreme Court seats, to change the current 6-3 conservative majority to a 7-6 liberal majority.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Politico.com on Biden Administration promises
Donald Trump on Abortion
: Oct 15, 2020
I won't influence how Justices vote on Roe v Wade
Depending on what happens with Roe v. Wade, I think that perhaps it could get sent down to the states, and the states would decide. I also think perhaps nothing will happen. I have not talked to [Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett] about it. It
would be inappropriate to talk to her about it. And some people would say, "You can talk to about it." I just think it would be inappropriate. How she's going to rule, you're going to find out perhaps. Or you might not find out. We'll see what happens.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: Second 2020 Presidential Debate/NBC Town Hall Miami
Joe Biden on Civil Rights
: Oct 15, 2020
LGBT rights are in jeopardy from Supreme Court
Q: What do you say to LGBTQ Americans who are very worried about erosions of their rights?BIDEN:
I think there's great reason to be concerned for the LGBT community, something I fought very hard for, for a long time to make sure there's equality across the board.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Second 2020 Presidential Debate/ABC Town Hall Philadelphia
Joe Biden on Health Care
: Oct 15, 2020
Pre-existing conditions are in jeopardy from Supreme Court
Q: Does a new conservative Supreme Court Justice put ObamaCare at risk?BIDEN: I think that healthcare overall is very much in jeopardy as a consequence of the President's going to go directly after this election directly to the Supreme Court within a
month to try to get ObamaCare wiped out after 10 million people have already lost their insurance from their employer and wants to take 20 million people out of the system as well, plus 100 million people with pre-existing conditions.
TRUMP: We got rid of the individual mandate on ObamaCare, and now you could actually say it's not ObamaCare because you had to pay a fortune for the privilege of not having to pay for bad health insurance, so we got rid of that. By the way, we're always
protecting people with pre-existing conditions, and I can't say that more strongly. The problem with ObamaCare, it's not good. We'd like to terminate it, and we want a much less expensive healthcare that's a much better healthcare.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Second 2020 Presidential Debate/ABC Town Hall Philadelphia
Kamala Harris on Government Reform
: Oct 7, 2020
Lincoln, before 1864 election, left Supreme Court seat open
PENCE: Your party is actually openly advocating, adding seats to the Supreme court, which has had nine seats for 150 years if you don't get your way. I think the American people would really like to know if Judge Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed at
the Supreme Court of the United States. Are you and Joe Biden, if somehow you win this election, going to pack the Supreme Court to get your way?HARRIS: In 1864, Lincoln was up for reelection and it was 27 days before the election.
And a seat became open on the United States Supreme Court. Abe said, "The people deserve to make the decision about who will be the next president of the United States. And then that person can select who will serve for a lifetime on the highest court
of our land." Joe and I are very clear: the American people are voting right now and it should be their decision about who will serve on this most important body for a lifetime.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: 2020 Vice-Presidential Debate in Utah
Mike Pence on Principles & Values
: Oct 7, 2020
In America, we debate and disagree, but then come together
In America, we believe in a free and open exchange of debate. It's how we've created the freest and most prosperous nation in the history of the world. I look at the relationship between Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia. They were polar
opposites on the Supreme Court. Yet, the two of them were the closest of friends. In America, we can disagree. We can debate vigorously as Senator Harris and I have on this stage tonight. But when the debate is over, we come together as Americans.
Click for Mike Pence on other issues.
Source: 2020 Vice-Presidential Debate in Utah
Mike Pence on Principles & Values
: Oct 7, 2020
Not fair to attack Amy Coney Barrett's faith
PENCE: Amy Coney Barrett will bring a lifetime of experience and a sizeable American family to the Supreme Court. We hope we don't see the kind of attacks on her Christian faith that we saw before.
When Judge Barrett was being confirmed for the court of appeals, Dick Durbin expressed concern that the dogma of her faith was a concern.
Senator, I know one of our judicial nominees you actually attacked, because they were a member of the Catholic Knights of Columbus.
HARRIS: Joe Biden and I are people of faith, and it's insulting to suggest that we would knock anyone for their faith, and in fact, Joe, if elected, will be only the second practicing Catholic as President of the United States.
Click for Mike Pence on other issues.
Source: 2020 Vice-Presidential Debate in Utah
Donald Trump on Government Reform
: Sep 29, 2020
Elections have consequences; I'm elected for four years
TRUMP: Elections have consequences. We have the Senate, we have the White House, and we have a phenomenal nominee respected by all [Amy Coney Barrett for Supreme Court Justice]. Top, top academic; good in every way. Good in every way. We won the election
and therefore we have the right to choose her, and very few people knowingly would say otherwise. The Democrats, they wouldn't even think about not doing it. The only difference is they'd try and do it faster. There's no way they would give it up. They
had Merrick Garland, but the problem is they didn't have the election so they were stopped. A President is elected for four years. I'm not elected for three years.BIDEN: The American people have a right to have a say in who the Supreme Court nominee
is and that say occurs when they vote for United States Senators and when they vote for the President of United States. They're not going to get that chance now because we're in the middle of an election already. The election has already started.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: First 2020 Presidential Debate, moderated by Chris Wallace
Donald Trump on Government Reform
: Sep 29, 2020
Obama left 128 openings for judges; I appointed 300
I'll tell you something, some people say maybe the most important by the end of the first term I'll have approximately 300 Federal judges and Court of Appeals judges, 300 and hopefully three great Supreme Court judges, justices that is a record the
likes of which very few people and one of the reasons I'll have so many judges because President Obama and him left me 128 judges to fill. When you leave office, you don't leave any judges. That's like, you just don't do that.
They left 128 openings and if I were a member of his party, because they have a little different philosophy, I'd say, if you left us 128 openings you can't be a good president. You can't be a good vice president but
I want to thank you because it gives us almost, it'll probably be above that number. By the end of this term, 300 judges. It's a record.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: First 2020 Presidential Debate, moderated by Chris Wallace
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: Sep 29, 2020
Americans express their view by who they elect president
TRUMP: Elections have consequences. They had Merrick Garland [as Obama's Supreme Court nominee in early 2016], but the problem is they didn't have the election [victory in 2016] so they were stopped.BIDEN: The American people have a right to have a
say in who the Supreme Court nominee is, and that say occurs when they vote for United States Senators and when they vote for the President of United States. They're not going to get that chance now [with Amy Coney Barrett nominated last week] because
we're in the middle of an election already. The election has already started. Tens of thousands of people already voted and so the thing that should happen is we should wait.
We should wait and see what the outcome of this election is because that's the only way the American people get to express their view is by who they elect as President and who they elect as Vice President.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: First 2020 Presidential Debate, moderated by Chris Wallace
Donald Trump on Health Care
: Sep 29, 2020
My healthcare plan: we got rid of the individual mandate
Q: The Supreme Court will hear a case a week after the election in which the Trump Administration, along with 18 state Attorney Generals are seeking to overturn ObamaCare, to end ObamaCare.TRUMP: That's right, because they want to give good healthcare
Q: Over the last four years, you have promised to repeal and replace ObamaCare, but you have never come up with a comprehensive plan to replace ObamaCare.
TRUMP: Yes, I have. Of course I have. I got rid of the individual mandate, which was a big
chunk of ObamaCare.
Q: That's not a comprehensive place.
TRUMP: That is absolutely a big thing. That was the worst part of ObamaCare. The individual mandate was the most unpopular aspect of ObamaCare. I got rid of it. And we will protect people.
We guaranteed pre-existing conditions, but took away the individual mandate.
BIDEN: He has no plan for healthcare.
TRUMP: Of course we do.
BIDEN: He has none, like almost everything else he talks about. He does not have a plan.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: First 2020 Presidential Debate, moderated by Chris Wallace
Mike Pence on Abortion
: Sep 22, 2020
Roe v. Wade worst Supreme Court decision since Dred Scott
According to Pence's comments at a National March for Life rally, "'It is the 22nd of January again. On this cold anniversary of the worst Supreme Court decision since Dred Scott, all across this land, because of the prayers and compassion of every one
of you, springtime is breaking forth in the battle between choice and life.'" [Press Release--Office of Rep. Pence, 1/22/07]"Pence also touted his policies on abortion, bringing up the legislation he signed in 2013 that banned insurance coverage for
most abortion procedures. 'Life is winning in Indiana, because of the efforts of all of you,' Pence said. 'Life is winning in this state - I truly believe - because compassion is overcoming convenience. Life is defeating despair.'"
[Indianapolis Star, 9/19/14]
"Pence also backs a constitutional amendment to ban abortion, saying he is against the procedure in all cases --including rape and incest -- except when the life of the mother is at stake." [Washington Post, 3/22/05]
Click for Mike Pence on other issues.
Source: Trump Research Book on Mike Pence
Mike Pence on Government Reform
: Sep 22, 2020
Citizens United ruling victory for First Amendment
[On allowing unlimited corporate campaign donations]: "Freedom won today in the Supreme Court. Today's ruling in the Citizens United case takes us one step closer to the Founding Fathers' vision of free speech,
a vision that is cherished by all Americans and one Congress has a responsibility to protect. This decision is a victory on behalf of those who cherish the fundamental freedoms protected by the First Amendment." [Office Of Rep. Mike Pence, 1/21/10]
[As a US.Rep.], Pence introduced H.R. 1316, which would have "amended the Federal Election Campaign Act to repeal the limit on the aggregate amount of campaign contributions that may be made by individuals during an election cycle, to repeal the
limit on the amount of expenditures political parties may make on behalf of their candidates in general elections for federal office." The bill was never considered by the full House. [CRS via Congressional Quarterly, 7/13/05]
Click for Mike Pence on other issues.
Source: Trump Research Book on Mike Pence
Mike Huckabee on Crime
: Sep 8, 2020
Executions are hardest decision because they can't be undone
My dad went on to oversee seventeen executions over his career, more than any governor in the state's history, mainly because the Supreme Court had lifted the prohibition of capital punishment and many of those cases fell on his desk.
When I think back to those dark, painful days, I remember how each decision weighed painfully on my dad.
I was just a kid, and our home--the governor's mansion--was put on lockdown as each death row inmate was administered a lethal injection.
My dad often said that executions were the hardest decisions he made as governor because it's the one thing you can never undo.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: Speaking for Myself, by Sarah Huckabee Sanders, p.28
Kamala Harris on Abortion
: Jul 28, 2020
A staunch supporter of legal protection for abortion
Harris is a staunch supporter of legal protection for abortion. As California attorney general, she drew the ire of the state Catholic conference by sponsoring a bill compelling pro-life pregnancy centers advertise for "free or low-cost" abortion
services. That law was overturned by the Supreme Court in 2018. Harris has confronted Biden over his own record on abortion--challenging the former vice president for not being "pro-choice" enough for the modern Democratic party.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: Catholic World Report e-zine on 2020 Veepstakes
Joe Biden on Immigration
: Jun 18, 2020
Make DACA permanent; much work remains to be done
The Supreme Court blocked the Trump administration's attempt to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, an Obama-era program that protects immigrants brought to the US as children from deportation..After Trump came into office, the administration
announced the program had been created "without proper authority" & that DACA would be phased out, pointing out that it had "legal and constitutional defects. Federal courts said the administration had acted arbitrarily when phasing out the program.
The courts pointed to the administration's thin justification--reasoning Roberts and the Supreme Court eventually agreed with.
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden also celebrated the ruling, calling it a "victory" and again saying
that if elected, he will work "immediately" on legislation that would make the program permanent. "The joy of today's victory does not erase the difficult road ahead," Biden said in a statement. "We know that much work remains to be done."
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: CNN on Trump Cabinet / 2020 SCOTUS rulings
Donald Trump on Immigration
: Jun 18, 2020
DACA phase-out legally correct but politically controversial
The Supreme Court blocked the Trump administration's attempt to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, an Obama-era program that protects immigrants brought to the US as children from deportation. After Trump came into office, the administration
announced the program had been created "without proper authority" and that DACA would be phased out. Federal courts said the administration had acted arbitrarily when phasing out the program. The 5-4 ruling emphasized that the administration failed
to provide an adequate reason to justify ending the DACA program.
After the ruling was handed down, Trump retweeted a tweet featuring Justice Clarence Thomas' dissent. The decision is "an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct
decision," Thomas wrote. Thomas argued in his dissent that "the majority makes the mystifying determination that this rescission of DACA was unlawful. On the contrary, this is anything but a standard administrative law case."
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: CNN on Trump Cabinet / 2020 SCOTUS rulings
Joe Biden on Civil Rights
: Jun 15, 2020
No job discrimination for transgender status
The Supreme Court ruled that existing federal law forbids job discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status, a major victory for advocates of gay rights and for the nascent transgender rights movement.By a vote of 6-3, the
court said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, among other factors, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status.
Joe Biden called the ruling "a momentous
step forward for our country" in a statement, adding that the court had "confirmed the simple but profoundly American idea that every human being should be treated with respect and dignity, that everyone should be able to live openly, proudly, as their
true selves without fear."
The Trump administration had urged the court to rule that Title VII does not cover cases like these, in a reversal from the position the government took during the Obama administration.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: NBC News on BOSTOCK v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA
Donald Trump on Civil Rights
: Jun 15, 2020
Job discrimination rules don't apply to transgender status
The Supreme Court ruled that existing federal law forbids job discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status, a major victory for advocates of gay rights and for the nascent transgender rights movement.By a vote of 6-3, the
court said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, among other factors, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status.
The Trump administration had urged the
court to rule that Title VII does not cover cases like these, in a reversal from the position the government took during the Obama administration. "The ordinary meaning of 'sex' is biologically male or female; it does not include sexual orientation,"
the Justice Department said. "An employer who discriminates against employees in same-sex relationships thus does not violate Title VII as long as it treats men in same-sex relationships the same as women in same-sex relationships."
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: NBC News on BOSTOCK v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: May 5, 2020
Commit to appointing a Black woman to the Supreme Court
National Black civil rights leaders participated in a call with former vice president Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential nominee, a day after the release of Lift Every Voice: The Biden Plan for Black America.Al Sharpton noted, "I urge
Biden to fulfill his commitment to appointing a Black woman to the Supreme Court as well as to prioritize diversity of experience and thought in his administration. The Black community knows that it is essential for a person of color to have the ear of
the president."
The President and CEO of the National Urban League raised the issue of voter protection and voter suppression. "A no-excuse vote-by-mail program with prepaid postage and expanded early voting would go
a long way toward expanding access to the ballot and ensuring that the pandemic is not used as an excuse to trample vulnerable Americans' right to vote," he said.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: National Action Network on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Joe Biden on Principles & Values
: Mar 15, 2020
I commit to nominating a woman as my Vice President
Q: How will your Cabinet ensure the best advice on issues that affect women's physical and financial health?Joe Biden: Number one, I commit it that if I'm elected President and have an opportunity to appoint someone, I'll appoint the first black
woman to the Supreme Court. It's required that they have representation; now it's long overdue. Secondly, my Cabinet & my administration will look like the country. And I commit that I'll pick a woman to be Vice President. There are a number of women
who are qualified to be President tomorrow, I would pick a woman to be my Vice President.
Q: Mr. Vice President, just to be clear, you just committed here tonight that your running mate, if you get the nomination will be a woman?
Joe Biden: Yes.
Q: Senator Sanders, will you make that same statement, committ to picking a woman as your running mate?
Bernie Sanders: In all likelihood, I will. For me, it's not just nominating a woman. It is making sure that we have a progressive woman.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: 11th Democratic primary debate (Biden-Sanders one-on-one)
Joe Biden on Abortion
: Feb 7, 2020
Has guarded right to choose for years with SCOTUS votes
I was part of the reason why Elena Kagan got onto the Supreme Court. I was part of the reason why Ruth Bader Ginsburg is on the Court. I was part of the reason why Sotomayor is on the Court. I'm the reason this right wasn't taken away because
I almost single handedly made sure that Robert Bork did not get on the Court because he did not think there should be enumerated rights. Litmus test on abortion relates to the fundamental value of the Constitution. A woman does have a right to choose.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: 8th Democrat 2020 primary debate, St. Anselm College in NH
Bernie Sanders on Abortion
: Feb 7, 2020
Appoint only justices who support Roe & Planned Parenthood
Look, you asked the simple question, is there a litmus test for those of us up here? For me there is. I will never nominate any person to the Supreme Court or the federal courts in general who was not 100% pro Roe v. Wade.
Number two, we have got a codify Roe v. Wade into legislation. Number three, we have to significantly expand funding for Planned Parenthood.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: 8th Democrat 2020 primary debate, St. Anselm College in NH
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: Oct 15, 2019
Don't pack the Supreme Court
Q: What about adding new Supreme Court seats to create a liberal majority and protect things like abortion rights?BIDEN: Reproductive rights are a constitutional right. In fact every woman should have that right. I would not pack the Court.
What I would do is make sure that the people that I recommended for the Court, from Ruth Bader Ginsburg to Elena Kagan support the right of privacy on which the entire notion of a woman's right to choose is based.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: October Democratic CNN/NYTimes Primary debate
Bernie Sanders on Government Reform
: Jun 29, 2019
Rotate judges on Supreme Court, like term limits
Sanders's "rotating judges" idea actually makes some sense. At the Democratic debate, the moderators never raised how to handle the Supreme Court's emboldened conservative majority.They came closest to tackling the issue in an exchange about Roe v.
Wade and what the candidates would do to protect abortion rights if it were overturned. Sanders replied by saying he opposed adding additional justices to the bench, a solution several other candidates have proposed. "I do not believe in packing the
court," Sanders said. But "I do believe that constitutionally we have the ability to rotate judges to other courts."
At a forum in April, Sanders offered up a similar proposal. "What may make sense is, if not term limits, then rotating judges to the
appeals court as well. Letting them get out of the Supreme Court and bringing in new blood." The proposal is constitutionally dubious and might require an amendment, but it's not without merit if it gets rid of corrosive confirmation battles.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: The New Republic magazine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Bernie Sanders on Abortion
: May 19, 2019
No anti-choice appointments to Supreme Court
The idea that women in this country should not be able to control their own bodies is beyond belief. They have that constitutional right. So if you're asking me, would I ever appoint a Supreme Court justice who does not believe in defending
Roe versus Wade, who does not believe that a woman has the right to control her own body, I will never do that.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: Meet the Press 2019 interview of 2020 presidential hopefuls
Bernie Sanders on Government Reform
: Feb 19, 2019
Require disclosure of campaign expenditures over $10,000
In 2016, Sanders refused corporate donations and relied on small donors to fund his White House campaign. He has proposed a constitutional amendment that would effectively reverse the Supreme Court's Citizen United ruling and ban corporations
and nonprofits from unlimited campaign expenditures. The independent senator would also require any organization to disclose election-related campaign expenditures of $10,000 or more.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Donald Trump on Homeland Security
: Feb 19, 2019
Ban on transgender people serving openly in the US military
Trump, after being elected, also said he was "fine" with same-sex marriage. But since he took office, his administration has scaled back some workplace protections for gay people and has argued in court that a federal anti-discrimination law
doesn't protect gay employees. He has also announced a ban on transgender people serving openly in the U.S. military, which the Supreme Court last month said could be implemented even as lower-court challenges play out.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: Josh Lederman, NBC News, on 2019 Trump administration
Dean Phillips on Government Reform
: Feb 1, 2019
Backing bill to overturn Citizens United
Phillips is backing a bill that would overturn Citizens United, the 2010 Supreme Court ruling that allowed more election spending by corporations, labor unions and wealthy people. Phillips said, "In order to preserve our democracy,
we must come together to end the corrupting influence of money in politics--and we cannot do that until the Citizens United decision has been overturned."
Click for Dean Phillips on other issues.
Source: SW News Media on 2018 Congressional MN-3 election
Bernie Sanders on Government Reform
: Nov 27, 2018
Mainstream media focuses on gossip, lies, & personality
As a result of the disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision, billionaires are now able to spend hundreds of millions of dollars anonymously in ugly TV ads demonizing candidates who dare stand up to them. The internet and social media now
allow for the worldwide transmission of total lies, and the capability of targeting those lies to susceptible populations.
Further, recent studies show what the average American has long known. More and more mainstream media political coverage is
devoted to gossip and issues of personality, and less and less to the major problems facing our country and the world. During the last presidential campaign, for example, there was almost no discussion devoted to climate change, the greatest
environmental crisis facing our planet. There was hardly a mention that in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, 40 million Americans live in poverty, or that we have the highest rate of childhood poverty of nearly any major country.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: Where We Go From Here, by Bernie Sanders, p.6
Ron DeSantis on Abortion
: Oct 9, 2018
Ban abortions after fetal heartbeat detected
Q: Abortion: Mostly ban or mostly legal?Ron DeSantis (R): Ban. Pledges to sign legislation banning abortions after fetal heartbeat detected (roughly 6 weeks) & to appoint constitutionalist justices to FL Supreme Court who will "protect & defend life."
Andrew Gillum (D): Legal. Abortion is a woman's unrestricted right and decision should be made by women & their doctors--not by politicians. Opposes making healthcare harder for women to access.
Q: Allow employers to withhold contraceptive coverage from employees if disagree with it morally?
DeSantis: Yes. Employers should not be required to "pay for abortifacients in violation of their faith."
Gillum: No. Proposes a law to protect women's
access to no-cost contraceptive care under ObamaCare.
Q: Let Planned Parenthood receive public funds for non-abortion healthcare?
DeSantis: No. Voted for a bill to end funding.
Gillum: Yes. Challenged Rick Scott effort to defund Planned Parenthood.
Click for Ron DeSantis on other issues.
Source: 2018 CampusElect.org Issue Guide on Florida Governor race
Tim Walz on Government Reform
: Oct 9, 2018
Limit corporate campaign donations, and disclose all
Q: Require political ads to disclose their largest funders?Jeff Johnson (R): Unknown.
Tim Walz (D): Yes. Co-sponsored 2012 DISCLOSE Act, requiring full disclosure of independent campaign expenditures.
Q: Support Citizens United decision,
allowing unlimited political donations from corporations & unions?
Johnson: Unknown.
Walz: No. Disagrees with Supreme Court decision that lifts limits on corporations' & unions' spending in US elections.
Click for Tim Walz on other issues.
Source: 2018 CampusElect.org Issue Guide on Minnesota Governor race
Donald Trump on Education
: Aug 30, 2018
Skeptical of use of affirmative action in college admissions
[In a case against Harvard University's affirmative action policy, a Justice Department] brief urged that courts should [reduce] consideration of race in admissions. Harvard has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and said the lawsuit is part of an ideological
campaign to overturn Supreme Court rulings that allow affirmative action.The action demonstrated anew the administration's deep skepticism of affirmative action in education. Under President Barack Obama, the Justice Department had made legal
arguments in support of how colleges use race in admissions.
The Justice Department concluded: that Harvard has failed to explain exactly how it weighs race against other factors in an application; that Harvard uses a "personal rating" that may be
biased against Asian Americans; and that "substantial evidence" indicates admissions officers monitor and manipulate the racial makeup of incoming classes, despite court rulings that have found "racial balancing" unconstitutional.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: Chicago Tribune on 2018 Trump Administration
Donald Trump on Gun Control
: Mar 28, 2018
Remove weapons from dangerous individuals, not all Americans
President Donald Trump dismissed retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens' call to repeal the Second Amendment. Stevens, 97, moved by the March for Our Lives last weekend that drew hundreds of thousands of protesters across the country calling
for action to end gun violence, penned an op-ed published in The New York Times.Trump tweeted, "THE SECOND AMENDMENT WILL NEVER BE REPEALED! As much as Democrats would like to see this happen, and despite the words yesterday of former
Supreme Court Justice Stevens, NO WAY. We need more Republicans in 2018 and must ALWAYS hold the Supreme Court!"
When asked if Trump had a reaction to Stevens' call for repeal, Trump's press secretary
said, "We think that the focus has to remain on removing weapons from dangerous individuals, not on blocking all Americans from their constitutional rights."
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: ABC News on Twitter posting by 2018 Trump Administration
Kamala Harris on Health Care
: Aug 10, 2017
Require pharmaceutical companies to allow generics
She filed a friend-of-the-court brief signed by thirty-one other state attorneys general in 2011 in a
Supreme Court case looking to end the practice of drug companies paying competitors to keep generic versions of their drugs off the market.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: Jacobin Magazine on 2018 California Senate race
Tim Walz on Civil Rights
: May 2, 2017
No discrimination because of who they love
According to current law, states may decide whether or not they will recognize or perform same-sex marriages. Many states have passed constitutional amendments defining marriage as between one man and one woman, while others allow same-sex marriages or
civil unions. As you may know, the Supreme Court recently declared Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional. Section 3 used specific language to ensure that only heterosexual couples would receive recognition from the federal
government. The federal government will now recognize same-sex marriages from states that have already passed legislation legalizing these marriages.
I am a strong supporter of marriage equality and legislation that provides civil rights protections for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) community. No one should be discriminated against because of who they love.
Click for Tim Walz on other issues.
Source: 2018 MN gubernatorial campaign website walz.house.gov
Donald Trump on War & Peace
: Feb 28, 2017
Unbreakable alliance with the state of Israel
I have also imposed new sanctions on entities and individuals who support Iran's ballistic missile program, and reaffirmed our unbreakable alliance with the State of Israel.Finally, I have kept my promise to appoint a Justice to the
United States Supreme Court--from my list of 20 judges--who will defend our Constitution. I am honored to have Maureen Scalia with us in the gallery tonight.
Her late, great husband, Antonin Scalia, will forever be a symbol of American justice. To fill his seat, we have chosen Judge Neil Gorsuch, a man of incredible skill, and deep devotion to the law.
He was confirmed unanimously to the Court of Appeals, and I am asking the Senate to swiftly approve his nomination.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: 2017 State of the Union address to Congress
Donald Trump on Gun Control
: Oct 19, 2016
We need Supreme Court to stand up for the 2nd Amendment
We need a Supreme Court that in my opinion is going to uphold the Second Amendment, and all amendments, but the Second Amendment, which is under absolute siege. I believe if my opponent should win this race, which I truly don't think will happen, we
will have a Second Amendment which will be a very, very small replica of what it is right now. But I feel that it's absolutely important that we uphold, because of the fact that it is under such trauma. The justices that I'm going to appoint will be
pro-life. They will have a conservative bent. They will be protecting the Second Amendment. They are great scholars in all cases, and they're people of tremendous respect. They will interpret the Constitution the way the founders wanted it interpreted.
And I believe that's very, very important.I don't think we should have justices appointed that decide what they want to hear. It's all about the Constitution the way it was meant to be. And those are the people that I will appoint.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: Third 2016 Presidential Debate in Las Vegas
Jill Stein on Government Reform
: Oct 10, 2016
Supreme Court needs to be for the people and their rights
Donald Trump: I am looking to appoint judges very much in the mold of Justice Scalia. I'm looking for judges that will respect the Constitution of the United States. And the Second Amendment which is totally under siege.
Jill Stein: We need Supreme Court justices who are ready to stand up for everyday people. That means to end the stranglehold that big money has on our political system.
That means not only overturning Citizens United, but supporting that money is not speech and that corporations are not people. We need strong support for our rights as voters.
The Supreme Court needs to be strongly in support of women's rights, the rights of immigrants, workers' rights and LGBTQ rights.
Click for Jill Stein on other issues.
Source: Democracy Now expanded Second 2016 Presidential Debate
Donald Trump on Gun Control
: Oct 9, 2016
Appoint Supreme Court judges who respect 2nd amendment
Q: What would you prioritize as the most important aspect of selecting a Supreme Court justice?TRUMP: People that will respect the US Constitution. Also, the Second Amendment, which is totally under siege by people like Clinton. They'll respect the
Second Amendment and what it stands for, what it represents.
CLINTON: I respect the Second Amendment. But I believe there should be comprehensive background checks, and we should close the gun show loophole, and close the online loophole.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: Second 2016 Presidential Debate at Washington University
Mike Pence on Abortion
: Jul 20, 2016
Need Supreme Court justices who uphold Constitution
This election will define the Supreme Court for the next 40 years. We all had better think very carefully about what this means for our Constitution and limited government. For the sake of the rule of law, for the sake of the sanctity of life, for the
sake of our Second Amendment, and for the sake of all our other God-given liberties, we must ensure that the next president appointing justices to the Supreme Court is Donald Trump.
Click for Mike Pence on other issues.
Source: Speech at the 2016 Republican National Convention
Donald Trump on Government Reform
: May 31, 2016
Proud to work with McConnell to appoint conservative judges
Mitch and I worked closely on confirming not only Supreme Court Justices but also lower court nominees. With Mitch and the Republican Senator's support, I was proud to appoint 30 judges to the federal appellate courts to my first term-more than any
other president in a comparable period since the federal circuit courts were established, more than 125 years ago. As of mid 2019, I had already named almost one out of every four circuit court judges. A historic judgement in just two and a half years.
The effort to transform the courts is one that will benefit the American people far into the future. It is a legacy I am immensely proud and one for which Mitch McConnell deserves great credit.
Confirming judges has been a key part of making the past two and a half years one of the most productive and conservative periods in our nation's history.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: The Long Game, by Mitch McConnell, p.xv
Bernie Sanders on Government Reform
: Mar 9, 2016
It's oligarchy when billionaires buy elections
I'm running for president because given the crises facing our country, it is just too late for establishment politics and establishment economics. Together we're going to have to overturn this disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision.
Billionaires and Wall Street should not be buying elections. We've got to end this rigged economy where people are working longer hours for low wages, almost all new income and wealth going to the top 1 percent, and of course, we need comprehensive
immigration reform and a path toward citizenship.
We know that we have got to combat climate change, transform our energy system, and leave this planet in a way that is healthy and habitable for our kids and our grandchildren.
Is it acceptable that
Wall Street and billionaires are spending hundreds of millions of dollars trying to buy elections? Is that democracy or this that oligarchy? Which is why I believe we've got to overturn Citizens United and move to public funding of elections.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: 2016 PBS Democratic primary debate in Miami
Marco Rubio on Government Reform
: Mar 1, 2016
Next president should appoint in mold of Justice Scalia
Nominating judges is one of the president's most important responsibilities, and in 2016 the question of whom the next president will choose to defend the Constitution is more important than ever. The next president will probably appoint at least two
Supreme Court justices. These appointments will shape the Court--and our country--for decades to come.As president, Marco will:- Nominate Supreme Court justices and lower-court judges who will apply the Constitution as originally written and
understood, and are committed to enforcing the rights that actually appear in the constitutional text, rather than inventing rights that do not.
- Fight for term limits on federal judges, to restrain the power of any one judge or president to shape
law for decades.
- Appoint well regarded lawyers to lead the Department of Justice who respect these same principles, including a Solicitor General who will argue on behalf of these principles before the Supreme Court.
Click for Marco Rubio on other issues.
Source: 2016 presidential campaign website MarcoRubio.com
Marco Rubio on Principles & Values
: Mar 1, 2016
Next president should appoint in mold of Justice Scalia
The stakes rose higher with the tragic passing of Justice Antonin Scalia, one of the finest judges in American history. Pres. Obama's two Supreme Court appointments have led a disturbing trend of liberal lawlessness, and Marco has made it clear that the
Senate should not confirm any nominee to the Court for the rest of Pres. Obama's term. The next president will have the chance to set the balance of the Court for decades, and Marco will do so by appointing men and women in the mold of Justice Scalia.
Click for Marco Rubio on other issues.
Source: 2016 presidential campaign website MarcoRubio.com
Donald Trump on Health Care
: Feb 25, 2016
Chief Justice Roberts: a disaster who gave us ObamaCare
Justice Roberts gave us ObamaCare. Might as well be called Roberts-care. Two times of the Supreme Court, Justice Roberts approved something that he should have never raised his hand to approve. And we ended up with ObamaCare.
That judge has been a disaster in terms of everything we stand for because there is no way -- no way that he should have approved ObamaCare.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: 2016 CNN-Telemundo Republican debate on eve of Texas primary
Jill Stein on Abortion
: Feb 22, 2016
Roe shows Supreme Court is amenable to public pressure
Democracy needs values. There's nothing more powerful than a moral compass. We have to bring that moral compass to our democracy And remember what happened under Richard Nixon, one of the most oppressive, regressive, dishonest presidents out there.
Remember what we got because we had a movement in the streets. The power is ours. We got women's right to choose by pushing the Supreme Court, which is an institution that's amenable to public pressure. We brought the troops home from Vietnam.
We got the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act and OSHA, and established workers' health and safety.
People have been systematically disempowered by our media. We're fed this corporate brainwashing many times a day that we are powerless.
And therefore we have to choose between two oppressors. And it's really important to reject that lesser evil-ism and stand up and fight for the greater good. The greater good here has been lost in the battle between the evils.
Click for Jill Stein on other issues.
Source: Interview on teleSUR for 2016 presidential hopefuls
Donald Trump on Government Reform
: Feb 18, 2016
I wouldn't nominate my sister to Supreme Court
Senator Ted CRUZ: Last year, when talking about Supreme Court nominees, Donald said his sister--a judge who was put on the Court of Appeals by Bill Clinton--he said his sister would make a phenomenal Supreme Court Justice. His sister is a radical
pro-abortion judge. She struck down New Jersey's ban on partial-birth abortion as irrational. That's an extreme position.Q: Have you suggested your sister as a Supreme Court justice?
TRUMP: I have not.
Q: You said she would be great...
TRUMP:
She's very smart.
Q: But you'd have to rule that out because she was your sister?
TRUMP: My sister is a brilliant woman. She was appointed by Ronald Reagan. He said appointed by Bill Clinton. She was elevated by Clinton to the Court of Appeals, a
very high position, right under the Supreme Court. The reason she was elevated, she was an outstanding intellect and an outstanding judge. I don't even know what her views are on abortion. She is certainly not a radical anything; that's not her thing
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: 2016 CNN GOP Town Hall in South Carolina
Marco Rubio on Government Reform
: Feb 13, 2016
No to a simple majority to confirm a Supreme Court justice
Q: You were once in favor of dropping the threshold majority -- you were never in favor of that?A: No, I've never [been in favor]. Today, appellate judges can now be appointed by a simple majority, but not Supreme Court justices.
I think today you see the wisdom of why we don't that want to change. Because if that were the case and we were not in charge of the Senate, Harry Reid and Barack Obama would ram down our throat a liberal justice.
Click for Marco Rubio on other issues.
Source: 2016 CBS Republican primary debate in South Carolina
Donald Trump on Government Reform
: Feb 13, 2016
Delay, delay, delay on Supreme Court appointment
Q: The death of Justice Antonin Scalia leaves a vacancy on the Supreme Court. You've said that the President shouldn't nominate anyone in the rest of his term to replace Justice Scalia. If you were President, and had a chance with 11 months left to go in
your term, wouldn't it be an abdication not to name a conservative justice with the rest of your term?TRUMP: If I were President now I would certainly want to try and nominate a justice.
Frankly, I'm absolutely sure that President Obama will try and do it. I hope that our Senate is going to be able to do something about it.
Q: So, just to be clear on this, you're OK with the President nominating somebody?
TRUMP: think he's going
to do it whether or I'm OK with it or not. I think it's up to [Senate Majority Leader] Mitch McConnell, and everybody else to stop it. It's called delay, delay, delay.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: 2016 CBS Republican primary debate in South Carolina
Bernie Sanders on Government Reform
: Feb 4, 2016
Litmus test for Supreme Court on Citizens United
You are not going to accomplish what has to be done for working families and the middle class unless there is campaign finance reform. So long as big money interests control the United States Congress, it is gonna be very hard to do what has to be done
for working families. So let me be very clear. No nominee of mine, if I'm elected president, to the United States Supreme Court will get that nomination unless he or she is loud and clear, and says they will vote to overturn Citizens United.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: MSNBC Democratic primary debate in New Hampshire
Bernie Sanders on Government Reform
: Oct 13, 2015
Citizens United means billionaires donate for THEIR interest
As a result of this disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision, our campaign finance system is corrupt and is undermining American democracy. Millionaires and billionaires are pouring unbelievable sums of money into the political process in order
to fund super PACs and to elect candidates who represent their interests, not the interests of working people.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: 2015 CNN Democratic primary debate in Las Vegas
Marco Rubio on Environment
: Oct 8, 2015
Kelo case was egregiously flawed; limit eminent domain
One of my proudest accomplishments as a public servant was leading the effort in Florida to pass both a law and a constitutional amendment to keep private developers from using eminent domain to take property away from private owners. This effort became
necessary after the egregiously flawed Kelo v. New London Supreme Court decision made private use of eminent domain legal unless states banned it. In the years since, the legislation I passed in the Florida House has become a model for states across the
country.After being founded, in part, to protect these rights, our government has strayed far from this purpose. Compromise after compromise from elected officials in both parties has resulted in a government that believes it has the power to seize
your property and sell it to rent-seeking private interests. When I am president, through the justices I nominate to the Supreme Court and the legislation I sign into law, I will stand firmly against the abuse of eminent domain.
Click for Marco Rubio on other issues.
Source: Guest column by Marco Rubio on HotAir.com
Mike Huckabee on Abortion
: Sep 16, 2015
Litmus test for Supreme Court justices on rights of unborn
Q: Will you have a litmus test when it comes to appointing Supreme Court nominees? HUCKABEE: You better believe I will, because I'm tired of liberals always having a litmus test and conservatives are supposed to pretend we don't. Well let me tell you
what mine would be. Number one, I'd ask do you think that the unborn child is a human being or is it just a blob of tissue? I'd want to know the answer to that. I'd want to know do you believe in the First Amendment, do you believe that religious
liberty is the fundamental liberty around which all the other freedoms of this country are based? And do you believe in the Fifth and the 14th Amendment?
Do you believe that a person, before they're deprived of life and liberty, should in fact have due process and equal protection under the law? Because if you do, you're going to do more than defund Planned Parenthood.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2015 Republican two-tiered primary debate on CNN
Mike Huckabee on Gun Control
: Sep 16, 2015
Litmus test for Supreme Court justices on Second Amendment
Q: Will you have a litmus test when it comes to appointing Supreme Court nominees? HUCKABEE: You better believe I will. . I'd want to know do you believe in the First Amendment? And do you believe in the Fifth and the 14th Amendment?
And I'd want to know do you really believe in the Second Amendment, do you believe that we have an individual right to bear arms to protect ourselves and our family and to protect our country?
I'd make darn sure that we absolutely believe the 10th Amendment. Every governor on this stage would share this much with you. Our biggest fight wasn't always with the legislature or even with the Democrats.
My gosh, half the time, it was with the federal government who apparently never understood that if it's not reserved in the Constitution, then the 10th Amendment says it's left to the states. But somebody forgot to send a memo to Washington.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2015 Republican two-tiered primary debate on CNN
Bernie Sanders on Government Reform
: Sep 5, 2015
Public funding of elections to promote even playing field
The US, in theory, is a democratic republic, where the voices of the many are represented by those whom we elect to political office. But our government no longer represents most of us. Bernie says, "We need people who are ready to take on the handful
of billionaires holding the power, to tell them, 'Enough is enough. This country belongs to us. This government belongs to us.' " Here's how we do it:- Bernie wants to overturn Citizens United, a "disastrous Supreme Court decision" which allows
unlimited sums of money to be funneled into electoral politics.
- DISCLOSE Act: protect the integrity and transparency of federal elections by establishing disclosure requirements for all contributions.
- Public Funding of Elections: Bernie wants to
move towards public funding of elections to promote a more even playing field where all Americans can participate.
- Democracy Day: Bernie wants to celebrate democracy by creating a holiday to encourage voter turnout for elections.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: 2016 grassroots campaign website FeelTheBern.org, "Issues"
Donald Trump on Civil Rights
: Aug 19, 2015
After Supreme Court vote, gay marriage is a reality
Q: You say you would have liked the states, rather than the Supreme Court, to decide on gay marriage.A: Some people have hopes of passing [Constitutional] amendments, but it's not going to happen. Congress can't pass simple things, let alone that.
So anybody that's making that an issue is doing it for political reasons. The Supreme Court ruled on it [and hence only a Constitutional amendment can overrule that].
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: Hollywood Reporter 2015 coverage: 2016 presidential hopefuls
Jill Stein on Civil Rights
: Jul 6, 2015
After marriage equality comes workplace equality
OnTheIssues: What's next for the GLBT community now that the Supreme Court affirmed same-sex marriage?Stein: My sense is that we need to end discrimination in the workplace and housing. There are 28 states that have not enacted protection
in the workplace. Suicides are four times elevated among LGBT youth.
OnTheIssues: You mean you're worried about same-sex couples being "Married on Sunday; fired on Monday?"
Stein: Yes that's right.
Click for Jill Stein on other issues.
Source: Phone interview on 2016 presidential race by OnTheIssues.org
Chris Christie on Government Reform
: Jul 5, 2015
Does not support electing Supreme Court justices
Q: Senator Ted Cruz called for a constitutional amendment which would lead to retention elections for the US Supreme Court justices. Is that something you'd support?CHRISTIE: No. I don't think we should elect Supreme Court Justices. What we do in
New Jersey, which I think is something that folks can consider is we appoint our justices for a seven-year term. And then after seven years, the governor has the opportunity to again consider whether to nominate them then for a lifetime tenure.
I don't want to see judges raising money and running for election. I would, though, trust the executive after seven years, like we do in New Jersey, to decide whether or not to reappoint people. I'm the first governor in New Jersey's
constitutional history to not reappoint two supreme court justices. I wanted to go in another direction. That can work. I've done it in New Jersey. But I don't believe we should be putting judges on the ballot. I just disagree with Senator Cruz.
Click for Chris Christie on other issues.
Source: Fox News Sunday 2015 coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls
Chris Christie on Civil Rights
: Jun 30, 2015
Disagree with Supreme Court, but gay marriage is law of land
Christie said he disagreed with the majority Supreme Court decision to legalize gay marriage in all 50 states, but that he respects the ruling as "the law of the land."
In the past, the governor favored civil unions but not same-sex marriage. He dropped New Jersey's challenge to a court decision legalizing gay marriage in 2013.
Click for Chris Christie on other issues.
Source: PBS News Hour "2016 Candidate Stands" series
Donald Trump on Civil Rights
: Jun 16, 2015
Same-sex marriage is a state issue
What does Donald Trump believe? Social Issues: Marriage is between a man and a woman and should be defined state by state.In a Bloomberg interview in January, the businessman asserted that he personally believes marriage is between a man and a woman.
While he sees it as a state issue, Trump indicated that the Supreme Court could issue a ruling to determine the law.
Click for Donald Trump on other issues.
Source: PBS News Hour "2016 Candidate Stands" series
Mike Huckabee on Government Reform
: May 24, 2015
Opposes "judicial supremacy"; they're just rulings, not law
Q: You said, "Many of our politicians have surrendered to the false god of judicial supremacy, which would allow black robed and unelected judges the power to make law as well as enforce it." You wouldn't necessarily obey court rulings? No principle of
judicial review?A: Judicial review is actually what we've operated under. We have not operated under judicial supremacy. The notion that the Supreme Court comes up with the ruling and that automatically subjects the two other branches to following it
defies everything there is about the three equal branches of government.
Q: Are you saying that it's up in the air as to whether you're going to obey the Supreme Court?
A: Well, the president has to follow whatever the law is. It's a matter of balanc
of power. If the Supreme Court could just make a ruling and everybody has to bow down and fall on their faces and worship that law, it isn't a law because it hasn't been yet passed.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: Fox News Sunday 2015 coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls
Mike Huckabee on Civil Rights
: May 5, 2015
Amendment to overturn Supreme Court decision on gay marriage
Huckabee would push for a Constitutional amendment to reverse the Supreme Court's gay marriage decision. Huckabee voiced sharp opposition to the Supreme Court's June ruling on gay marriage, writing that the prevailing justices acted
as a "judicial tyranny" that must be resisted. The former Arkansas governor is calling for a Constitutional amendment to define marriage as between one man and one woman. He also opposes allowing same-sex couples to adopt children.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: PBS News Hour "2016 Candidate Stands" series
Bernie Sanders on Government Reform
: Apr 30, 2015
Constitutional amendment to reverse Citizen United ruling
On Campaign finance: Limit corporate and interest-group spending in campaigns.Sanders proposes a Constitutional amendment that would effectively reverse the Supreme Court's Citizen United ruling and ban corporations
and nonprofits from unlimited campaign expenditures. The independent senator would also require disclosure of any organizations spending $10,000 or more on an election-related campaign.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: PBS News Hour "2016 Candidate Stands" series
Mike Huckabee on Civil Rights
: Apr 24, 2015
Same-sex marriage leads to criminalization of Christianity
The United States is moving toward "criminalization of Christianity" as a result of legalizing same-sex marriage, Mike Huckabee told a group of conservative pastors: "We are moving rapidly toward the criminalization of Christianity."The former
governor of Arkansas said it is his "biblical duty" to pray for the members of the Supreme Court as they prepare to rule on same-sex marriage this summer.
"If the courts rule that people have a civil right not only to be a homosexual but a civil right
to have a homosexual marriage, then a homosexual couple coming to a pastor who believes in biblical marriage who says 'I can't perform that wedding' will now be breaking the law," he said. "Let me make clear: It's not just saying, 'I'm sorry you have a
preference.' No, you will be breaking the law subject to civil, for sure, and possibly criminal penalties for violating the law, depending on how the law is written in communities, states and in the nation."
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: Politico.com on 2015 Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition summit
Marco Rubio on Civil Rights
: Apr 13, 2015
I oppose gay marriage, but it's the law of the land
Rubio says the Supreme Court decision on gay marriage is the law of the land. Rubio disagreed with the decision legalizing same-sex unions in all fifty states but said that Americans must abide by the ruling. Personally, Rubio says he believes marriage
is between a man and a woman. Holding a nuanced position on Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Rubio believes some kinds of businesses, like wedding photography, should be allowed to turn away gay customers, and others, like hotels, should not.
Click for Marco Rubio on other issues.
Source: PBS News Hour "2016 Candidate Stands" series
Mike Huckabee on Civil Rights
: Oct 9, 2014
Supreme Court can't allow gay marriage all by itself
The Supreme Court refused to hear appeals from five states seeking to preserve their bans on gay marriage, clearing the way for a huge expansion in as many as 30 states. In an interview, Huckabee charged that the GOP "establishment" has waved the "white
flag of surrender" on gay marriage. "I'm utterly exasperated with Republicans and the so-called leadership of the Republicans who have abdicated on this issue."He said that he was most disturbed at the general tenor among Republicans to the
Supreme Court's action was, essentially, "Well, that's settled."
"Of course, it isn't," Huckabee said. "The courts can't MAKE law. Even if one agrees with their ruling, the legislative branch has to pass enabling legislation, and it has to be signed
by the chief executive and carried out. One branch of the three equal branches doesn't get to override the two other branches," Huckabee told Newsmax. "Civics 101."
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: NewsMax 2014 coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls
Bernie Sanders on Government Reform
: Sep 14, 2014
Citizens United opens up the road to oligarchy
Q: Let me ask you on the billionaire front--SANDERS: The Koch brothers and the other billionaires are going to spend hundreds of millions of dollars. That is not a way you bring about change. We've got to mobilize the American people.
Q:
If a billionaire agrees with you on issues are you okay with them participating in the process?
SANDERS: I think Citizens United will go down in history as one of the worst Supreme Court decisions ever.
I think it is opening up the road to oligarchy, where the billionaires, like the Koch brothers--
Q: Left or right?
SANDERS: Left or right, but it's mostly right. It will always be. The Koch brothers are going to spend $400 million.
Do you know what their agenda is? They want to end Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. More tax breaks for the rich and large corporations. Nobody in America wants that except the billionaire class. This is a real danger to American democracy.
Click for Bernie Sanders on other issues.
Source: Meet the Press 2014 interviews of 2016 presidential hopefuls
Kamala Harris on Health Care
: Nov 26, 2013
Companies should provide contraception under ObamaCare
Kamala Harris is attacking company owners whose religious beliefs may be at odds with stipulations found in ObamaCare. Harris' office filed a brief asking the Supreme Court to review whether businesses can be exempt from providing contraception coverage.
Specifically, she's attacking businesses where owners may disagree with specific contraception types for religious reasons:"Under the ACA, all Americans have the right to access affordable, quality healthcare, including contraception.
For-profit companies should not be able to deny women access to healthcare based on the religious beliefs of the company's owners. The 10th circuit ruling should be reversed by the US Supreme Court."
The list of ObamaCare exemptions includes one on
religion: anyone who is "conscientiously opposed to accepting any insurance benefits," which some say includes Muslim groups. This portion of the law was apparently written specifically for the Amish, but it may play a role in the fight over ObamaCare.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: Inquisitr.com coverage of 2015 California Senate race
Marco Rubio on Civil Rights
: Jun 28, 2013
I believe in historical marriage, but ok if states redefine
I believe that marriage is a unique historical institution best defined as the union between one man and one woman. In the U.S., marriage has traditionally been defined by state law, and I believe each state, acting through their elected representatives
or the ballot, should decide their own definition of marriage. For the purposes of federal law, however, Congress had every right to adopt a uniform definition and I regret that the Supreme Court would interfere with that determination.
I appreciate that many Americans' attitude towards same-sex marriage have changed in recent years. I respect the rights of states to allow same-sex marriages, even though I disagree with them. But I also expect that the decisions made by states like
Florida to define marriage as between one man and one woman will also be respected.
I do not believe there exists a federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage. Therefore, I am glad the Supreme Court did not create one in the Proposition 8 case.
Click for Marco Rubio on other issues.
Source: Press release on U.S. Supreme Court rulings on DOMA
Marco Rubio on Civil Rights
: Jun 28, 2013
Defining marriage does not demean a class of people
I believe the Supreme Court made a serious mistake today when it overstepped its important, but limited role. I do not believe that Pres. Clinton and overwhelming bipartisan majorities of both houses of Congress acted with malice or intent to 'demean' a
class of people when they adopted a uniform definition of marriage for the purposes of federal law. The Court should not have second guessed the will of the American people acting through their elected representatives without firm constitutional
justifications. The sweeping language of today's majority opinion is more troubling than the ruling itself as it points to further interference by the Court in the years to come.I recognize that the definition of marriage and the legal status of
same-sex relationships is a deeply personal and emotional issue for Americans of a variety of viewpoints. These types of disagreements should be settled through the democratic process, not through litigation and court pronouncements.
Click for Marco Rubio on other issues.
Source: Press release on U.S. Supreme Court rulings on DOMA
Chris Christie on Civil Rights
: Jun 27, 2013
Supreme Court accepting gay marriage was "a bad decision"
Hours after the Supreme Court's landmark ruling today striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act, Gov. Chris Christie maintained his opposition to same-sex marriage and lambasted the high court. "It's just another example of judicial supremacy
rather than having the government run by the people we actually vote for," he said of the high court's 5-4 vote. "I thought it was a bad decision." Christie noted that DOMA originated with a Republican Congress & Democratic president. "I thought that
Justice (Anthony) Kennedy's opinion in many respects was incredibly insulting to those people, 340-some members of Congress who voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, and Bill Clinton," he said. "They basically said the only reason to pass that bill
was to demean people."
Christie calls for voters to decide the issue in each state [which pleases liberals]. His opposition to gay marriage could maintain his conservative bone fides while pacifying GOP voters in early primary states.
Click for Chris Christie on other issues.
Source: Newark Star-Ledger on 2013 N.J. Governor's debate
Kamala Harris on Families & Children
: Feb 27, 2013
Let same-sex couples marry the person they love
Harris filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional and the initiative's sponsors do not have the right to claim to represent the interests of California."Equal protection under the law is
a bedrock of our Constitution," said Harris. "I look forward to the day when all Californians are granted their full civil rights and can marry the person they love."
In 2010, a court invalidated Proposition 8 on the grounds that it violated the equal
protection guarantee of the 14th Amendment by taking away the right of same-sex couples to marry. Governor Jerry Brown and Attorney General Harris both refused to defend Proposition 8 on the basis that the law is unconstitutional.
"The sole yet
profound effect of Proposition 8 was to take away the right of gay and lesbian couples to call their union a 'marriage' and to strip loving relationships of validation and dignity under law," says the brief.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: Calif. Attorney General press release "Marriage Equality"
Joe Biden on Abortion
: Oct 11, 2012
Romney will appoint pro-life Justice; Obama will not
Q: If the Romney-Ryan ticket is elected, should those who believe that abortion should remain legal be worried?RYAN: We don't think that unelected judges should make this decision; that people, through their elected representatives and reaching a
consensus in society through the democratic process, should make this determination.
BIDEN: The next president will get one or two Supreme Court nominees. That's how close Roe v. Wade is. Just ask yourself: With Robert Bork being the chief adviser on
the court for Mr. Romney, who do you think he's likely to appoint? Do you think he's likely to appoint someone far right, that would outlaw abortion? I suspect that would happen. I guarantee you that will not happen [with Obama].
We picked people who are open-minded. They've been good justices.
RYAN: Was there a litmus test on them?
BIDEN: There was no litmus test. We picked people who had an open mind, did not come with an agenda.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: 2012 Vice Presidential debate
Chris Christie on Civil Rights
: Jun 5, 2012
Marriage is an institution between one man & one woman
Democrats announced at a State House news conference they would introduce in both houses a marriage equality bill. NJ's civil union law was being challenged in court and the feeling was if it made it to the state Supreme Court the civil union law would
\
I believe marriage is an institution between one man and one woman. I think it's special and unique in society. And I think we can have civil unions that can help to give the same type of legal rights to same sex couples that marriage gives them.
But I just think marriage is a special connotation. And I couldn't see myself changing my mind on that. But I am in favor of making sure that homosexual couples have the same type of legal rights that same--that heterosexual couples have."
Click for Chris Christie on other issues.
Source: Rise to Power, by B. Ingle & M. Symons, p.212-213
Chris Christie on Government Reform
: Jun 5, 2012
Judges who legislate from the bench will not be reappointed
Judges who legislate from the bench will not be reappointed
On radio the subject of the state's controversial left-leaning Supreme Court was debated. Lonegan and Merkt said they would replace all justices who came up for lifetime--after 7 years on the bench.
Judges who legislate from the bench will not be reappointed
If in fact you're interpreting the constitution and interpreting the statutes, then you have an opportunity to be reappointed," Christie said.
Click for Chris Christie on other issues.
Source: Rise to Power, by B. Ingle & M. Symons, p.137
Chris Christie on Education
: Jan 17, 2012
Replace Abbott District funds with tenure reform & charters
Let's face it: more money does not necessarily lead to a better education. It is time to admit that the Supreme Court's grand experiment with NJ children is a failure. 63% of state aid over the years has gone to the Abbott Districts and the schools are
still predominantly failing. It isn't working for children in failing districts, it is unfair to the other 557 school districts and to our state's taxpayers. My proposals reflect the intention we should all have: to put children first:- reform
tenure--by taking it away from those whose ratings are unacceptably weak.
- if layoffs are necessary remove the least effective teachers instead of just the most junior ones.
- pay teachers more when they are assigned to a failing school or to teach a
difficult subject.
- end forced placements--teachers should not be assigned to schools without the mutual consent of the teacher and the principal.
- reform our process for authorizing charter schools to focus on our failing school districts
Click for Chris Christie on other issues.
Source: N.J. 2012 State of the State Address
Kamala Harris on Crime
: Oct 31, 2011
Learn from public health model and focus on prevention
On prevention: "There seem to be two positions for DAs and AGs to take: tough on crime and soft on crime. I believe there's a third way forward: smart on crime," Harris told the audience about her efforts to address the state's revolving-door
prison system--a system so dysfunctional that the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the prison population be drastically reduced by 2013. "We need to learn from the public health model and focus on prevention," Harris said.
Click for Kamala Harris on other issues.
Source: Stanford Law School press release on 2019 Democratic Primary
Chris Christie on Government Reform
: Nov 15, 2010
Refused to reappoint activist judge to NJ Supreme Court
Newly elected Republican governor Chris Christie is turning heads in tax-strapped New Jersey by working through the closure of an $11 billion budget gap in 2010. As noted in the "Economist", he has "taken on a notoriously cranky legislature and has stare
down the powerful teachers' union. He has even refused to reappoint a judge to New Jersey's activist Supreme Court." This is how we get things done in states with a little courage and wherewithal.State and local governments are not perfect.
We all have lots of waste we can end, lots of bureaucratic red tape we need to streamline ourselves, and we have laws that could be improved to maximize freedom. But the value proposition offered by state and local governments as compared with the
federal government is, in fact, incomparable. Imagine how strong we could be if the federal government didn't interfere with us and if we didn't often have to do its job.
Click for Chris Christie on other issues.
Source: Fed Up!, by Gov. Rick Perry, p.160
Joe Biden on Civil Rights
: Oct 5, 2010
Inalienable rights cannot be denied by any majority
[At the Supreme Court hearings in 1987, Biden challenged Bork's basic argument tof enumerated rights in the Constitution, saying, "I believe all Americans are born with certain inalienable rights. As a child of God, I believe my rights are not derived
from the Constitution. My rights are not denied by any majority. My rights are because I exist. They were given to me and each of my fellow citizens by our creator, and they represent the essence of human dignity."His concerns [about Bork] touched
on "the relationship of people of different races in our land; whether it was wrong for state courts to enforce covenants that prohibited black couples from buying homes in white neighborhoods; whether the court was wrong in allowing literacy tests in
voting; and whether in the future the Court will intervene to protect the rights of the races.." Biden listed other privacy rights: in marriage, in child-raising, in having private schools; above all in freedom of expression in politics and the arts.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: A Life of Trial & Redemption, by Jules Witcover, p.199-200
Joe Biden on Families & Children
: Oct 5, 2010
1991: VAWA is about civil rights, not divorce law
Biden understood "the lack of control that is experienced not only by women who are themselves victims but by all the women who have to constrain their daily activities to avoid being a victim." He showed the basic insight of the civil rights provision--
that violence against women deprives women of equality."In 1991 Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist appointed a four-judge committee to appraise the push for a Violence Against Women Act. It challenged classifying such violence as a civil
rights offense and warned that the federal caseload might be so increased as to cause "major state-federal jurisdictional problems and disruptions."
Biden angrily wrote to the committee: "The bill does not federalize divorce law or domestic relations
cases any more than any other civil rights law does." But Rehnquist wrote that the bill "is so open-ended and the new private right of action so sweeping that the legislation would involve the federal courts in a host of domestic relations disputes."
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: A Life of Trial & Redemption, by Jules Witcover, p.312-313
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: Oct 5, 2010
1987: Bork fight changed rules of nomination process
In the 1987 Bork nomination, Biden wrote later, "I had to reset the table on the nomination process, which had focused almost solely on character and qualifications. Robert Bork was a bona fide scholar. The way to stop was on the question of his
outside-the-mainstream judicial philosophy--or ideology--and that was a long shot, too."The basic understanding was that as long as a Supreme Court nominee had the intellectual capacity, a breadth of experience in constitutional law, and a reasonable
judicial temperament, the Senate was bound to confirm a nominee. Ideology was the third rail of Supreme Court nominations.
Biden wrote that in the toughest confirmation cases in the 1960s, the nominees "were rejected for personal shortcomings, but the
clear and unspoken reason was ideology. I thought it was time to take up ideology in the open and avoid personal attacks." In a major speech on the Senate floor, Biden cited specific precedents in which ideology had been the deciding factor.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: A Life of Trial & Redemption, by Jules Witcover, p.181-182
Joe Biden on Civil Rights
: Nov 17, 2009
1987 Biden Report: Reject Bork; he'd roll back civil rights
A brief [on Bork's Supreme Court nomination] was prepared for Joe Biden, head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, called the Biden Report. Bork later said in his best-selling book The Tempting of America that the report "so thoroughly misrepresented a
plain record that it easily qualifies as world class in the category of scurrility."A hotly contested United States Senate debate over Bork's nomination ensued, partly fueled by strong opposition by civil and women's rights groups concerned with what
they claimed was Bork's desire to roll back civil rights decisions of the Warren and Burger courts. Bork is one of only three Supreme Court nominees to ever be opposed by the American Civil Liberties Union, along with William Rehnquist and Samuel Alito.
Bork was also criticized for being an "advocate of disproportionate powers for the executive branch of Government, almost executive supremacy," as allegedly demonstrated by his role in the Saturday Night Massacre.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Wikipedia.org, "Robert Bork", re: Slouching Towards Gomorrah
Joe Biden on Crime
: Oct 1, 2008
Supreme Court wrong to deny federalization of wife-beating
Q: Are there Supreme Court decisions you disagree with? A: You know, I'm the guy who wrote the Violence Against Women Act. And I said that every woman in America, if they are beaten and abused by a man, should be able to take that person to
court--meaning you should be able to go to federal court and sue in federal court the man who abused you if you can prove that abuse. But they said, "No, for a woman, there's no federal jurisdiction." And I held, they acknowledged, I held about
1,000 hours of hearings proving that there's an effect in interstate commerce.
Women who are abused and beaten and beaten are women who are not able to be in the work force. And the
Supreme Court said, "Well, there is an impact on commerce, but this is federalizing a private crime and we're not going to allow it." I think the Supreme Court was wrong about that decision.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: 2008 CBS News presidential interview with Katie Couric
Mike Pence on Abortion
: Feb 8, 2008
Commit to unalienable right to life, including the unborn
The future of conservatism begins with a commitment to the unalienable right to life. Without the right to life there is no right to liberty or property.Our candidate must be willing to stand for the unborn and commit to appointing justices to the
Supreme Court who will consign Roe v. Wade to the ash heap of history.
And our candidates must be willing to deny federal funding to any organization that promotes abortion at home and abroad. It is time to end all federal funding to Planned Parenthood
Click for Mike Pence on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2008 Conservative Political Action Conference
Mike Huckabee on Immigration
: Jan 30, 2008
Build a border fence within 18 months of taking office
Q: In order to curb illegal immigration, do you support making changes in the law that would give citizenship only to children who are born to parents who are legally in this country at the time the child is born?A: The Supreme Court has already ruled
on that. The real issue is, that doesn't fix the problem. What we've got to do is to have a secure border fence, something I have proposed that we do within 18 months of taking office. If we don't have a secure fence and have just this open door that
people can come in and out at will, we're never going to deal with this issue effectively and responsibly. And today, many Americans are angry not that people want to come here -- and I'm going to say it again -- people in this country are grateful to
God they're in a land that people are trying to break into and not one they're trying to break out of. So it's not that we're building a fence so we can keep our people in or keep people out, but that people who do come here would have to come legally.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2008 Republican debate at Reagan Library in Simi Valley
Mike Huckabee on Tax Reform
: Jan 13, 2008
Net change as governor: same income tax; 1› more sales tax
Q: Mitt Romney said about you, "Time and again, he was asked, Didn't you raise taxes more than you cut them? And after many attempts, he finally admitted that, in fact, he had raised taxes $500 million more than he cut them." Do you want to respond?A:
I turned a $200 million deficit into an $850 million surplus. We built roads. We improved our schools. With the support of the business community, as well as with the Supreme Court order, meant that what I did was exactly what governors are supposed to
do, and that's govern. You know, Ronald Reagan, today, would be attacked by Romney, because Reagan raised taxes $1 billion his first year as governor of California.
Q: He says you raised taxes $500 million more than you cut taxes. On that narrow point,
is he right?
A: Well, only if you understand that some of those were gasoline taxes. At the end of my governorship, the income tax was exactly the same, and the sales tax was a penny higher. The net result was we had a better base of overall revenue.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: FOX News Sunday tag
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: Nov 11, 2007
As Judiciary Chair, rejected Bork and supported Thomas
Biden became a nationally-recognized face while chairing the Senate Judiciary Committee from 1987 to 1995, when presiding over televised hearings on controversial Supreme Court nominations of Robert Bork--a lone triumphant moment from liberal
Democrats--and Clarence Thomas. Many women's groups complained about what they felt was Biden's harsh treatment of Anita Hill, and many progressives have never forgiven him for his vote to confirm Thomas.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: The Contenders, by Laura Flanders, p.178-179
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: Jul 31, 2007
1988: led fight against nomination of Robert Bork
[In 1988, Pres. Reagan nominated Robert Bork for Supreme Court Justice. As Judiciary Committee chair, Biden ran the confirmation hearings.] I had serious doubts about Bork. If there was an argument to be made against him, it would have to be made to
Republicans and Democrats in the political center. If we tried to make this a referendum on abortion rights, for example, we'd lose. At a meeting, I said, "If I lead this fight, it will not be a single issue campaign." The NY Times called my staff to
confirm that I'd promised to "lead the fight" against Bork. The president's spokesman said his boss found it "regrettable" that I had "chosen to politicize the hearings in this kind of partisan fashion."
Bork was a bona fide scholar.
He had been solicitor general, acting attorney general, professor of law at Yale, and a judge. The way to stop Bork was on a question of his outside-the-mainstream judicial ideology. I thought it was time to avoid personal attacks. [Bork was defeated.]
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Promises to Keep, by Joe Biden, p.170-173
Joe Biden on Principles & Values
: Jul 15, 2007
His book "Promises to Keep" written before presidential race
Q: Tell us a little bit about your book, "Promises to Keep," that's coming out. A: Well, I wrote a book back when I thought I was going to be working with John Kerry in a Kerry administration. It had nothing to do with presidential politics.
I was encouraged to write it by a guy named Richard Ben Cramer, who wrote the book "What it Takes," and asked how my personal values inform my public policy. And I talk about everything from the Supreme Court to the Balkans to Iraq, and how
I think that the most significant thing about what we need in leadership is people who are willing to get back up. My dad used to have an expression. He used to say, "The measure of success is not whether you get knocked down; it's how rapidly you get
back up." And the American people always get back up. And I think what they're doing is looking for somebody who is going to give them the opportunity to be able to take on the tough issues that are out there and just tell them the truth.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: CNN Late Edition: 2007 presidential series with Wolf Blitzer
Joe Biden on Abortion
: Apr 29, 2007
Supports partial-birth abortion ban, but not undoing Roe
Q: You supported the ban on partial-birth abortions or late-term abortions. A: I did and I do.
And the Supreme Court came and basically upheld that ban, and you criticized the Supreme Court.
Q: They upheld the ban, and then they engaged in what we
lawyers call dicta that is frightening. You had an intellectually dishonest rationale for an honest justification for upholding the ban. I know this is going to sound arcane--they blurred the distinction between the government's role in being involved
in the first day and the ninth month. They became paternalistic, talking about the court could consider the impact on the mother and keeping her from making a mistake. This is all code for saying, "Here we come to undo Roe v. Wade." What they did is not
so much the decision, the actual outcome of the decision, it's what attended the decision that portends for a real hard move on the court to undo the right of privacy. That's what I'm criticizing about the court's decision.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series
Joe Biden on Abortion
: Apr 26, 2007
Nominees should agree on constitutional right to privacy
Q: As president would you have a specific litmus test question on Roe v. Wade that you would ask of your nominees for the high court? A: I strongly support Roe v. Wade. I wouldn't have a specific question but I would make sure that the people
I sent to be nominated for the Supreme Court shared my values; and understood that there is a right to privacy in the United States Constitution. That's why I led the fight to defeat Bork, Roberts Alito, and Thomas.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: 2007 South Carolina Democratic primary debate, on MSNBC
Mike Huckabee on Tax Reform
: Jan 28, 2007
First governor in Arkansas history to ever lower taxes
I was the first governor in the history of my state to ever lower taxes. We lowered a total of 94 different taxes and fees. We did things that streamlined and made government more efficient. But we were under a Supreme Court order to raise revenue for
our schools. We did it, but with the insistence that we wouldn't just raise money, we would raise standards and expectations. Did we raise taxes on fuel? Yes, but 80% of the people voted on improving what was the worst road system in the country.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series
Joe Biden on Government Reform
: Feb 11, 2003
Disallowed bringing pornography issues into Thomas hearing
The 1991 campaign against Clarence Thomas's nomination to the Supreme Court was far more personal and extreme than the campaign against Robert Bork had been. Members of the civil rights establishment set the tone by calling Thomas a variety of despicable
names because he disagreed with the prevailing wisdom about affirmative action. Then the feminists had their moment with the belated appearance of Anita Hill, who accused Thomas of offensive ribaldry when he was boss at the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission; she was questioned intensely and skeptically by Alan Simpson and several other Republicans on the Judiciary Committee. A delegation of feminists visited Joseph Biden, just as Ralph Nader had done four years earlier. "They wanted the
committee to expose the fact that Thomas watched pornographic films," Biden recalled. "But I told them that if he did, it wasn't material. It was private." (The media were happy to provide all the relevant details to a soap opera-loving public.)
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: The Natural, by Joe Klein, p.104
Mike Huckabee on Abortion
: Jan 9, 2001
Pro-life, but respects choice as mandated law
I'm pro life, but I know not everyone agrees with me on that particular topic, and I respect that. I'll probably never change my conviction on that, and some of you won't change yours.
But in this day in which we talk about choice and the importance of it, surely we can agree that if under the Supreme Court choice is mandated, that choice should be as educated a choice as is humanly possible.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2001 State of the State address to the Arkansas legislature
Page last updated: Dec 08, 2024
Error processing SSI file