|
Dick Cheney on Principles & Values
Vice President of the United States; Former Republican Representative (WY)
|
FactCheck: Cheney wrong that he had not met Edwards before
CHENEY: You've got one of the worst attendance records in the United States Senate. Now, in my capacity as vice president, I am the president of Senate, the presiding officer. I'm up in the Senate most Tuesdays when they're in session. The first time I
ever met you was when you walked on the stage tonight.FACT CHECK: There were at least two instances in which Cheney had met Edwards previously. Edwards escorted Elizabeth Dole when she was sworn in as North Carolina's other senator on January 8, 2003,
and Cheney administered the oath. Cheney also was present with Edwards at a National Prayer Breakfast on Feb. 1, 2001, when a transcript shows Cheney acknowledged Edwards among those at the gathering:
CHENEY: (Feb. 1, 2001): Thank you very much.
Congressman Watts, Senator Edwards, friends from across America and distinguished visitors to our country from all over the world, Lynne and I are honored to be with you all this morning.
Source: Edwards-Cheney debate analysis (Ad-Watch by FactCheck.org)
Oct 6, 2004
The charges against Halliburton are false
EDWARDS: I mentioned Halliburton in connection with the $87 billion. This is relevant, because he was pushing for lifting sanctions when he was CEO of Halliburton. Here's why we didn't think Halliburton should have a no-bid contract. While he was CEO of
Halliburton, they paid millions of dollars in fines for providing false information on their company, just like Enron & Ken Lay. They did business with Libya and Iran, two sworn enemies of the US. They're now under investigation for having bribed foreign
officials during that period of time. Not only that, they've gotten a $7.5 billion no-bid contract in Iraq, and instead of part of their money being withheld, which is the way it's normally done, because they're under investigation, they've continued to
get their money.CHENEY: The reason they keep mentioning Halliburton is because they're trying to throw up a smokescreen. They know the charges are false. If you go to factcheck.com, you can get the specific details with respect to Halliburton.
Source: [Xref Edwards] Edwards-Cheney debate: 2004 Vice Presidential
Oct 5, 2004
Kerry sees two Americas; America sees two Kerrys
On Iraq, Kerry has disagreed with many of his fellow Democrats. But Kerry's liveliest disagreement is with himself. His back-and-forth reflects a habit of indecision, and sends a message of confusion. He has, in the last several years,
been for the No Child Left Behind Act and against it. He has spoken in favor of NAFTA and against it. He is for the Patriot Act and against it. Kerry says he sees two Americas. It makes the whole thing mutual - America sees two John Kerrys.
Source: 2004 Republican Convention Keynote speech
Sep 1, 2004
John Dean: Cheney more secretive than Nixon
[Bush & Cheney's secrecy] has given us a presidency that operates on hidden agendas. To protect their secrets, Bush and Cheney dissemble as a matter of policy. In fact, the Bush-Cheney presidency is strikingly Nixonian,
only with regard to secrecy far worse (and no one will ever successfully accuse me of being a Nixon apologist). Dick Cheney, who runs his own secret governmental operations, openly declares that he wants to turn the clock back to the pre-Watergate years
-a time of an unaccountable and extra constitutional imperial presidency. To say that their secret presidency is undemocratic is an understatement. I was initially astonished watching the Bush-Cheney presidency, not certain they realized the
very familiar path (at least to me) that they were taking. Richard Nixon, who resigned his presidency thirty years ago, had many admirable strengths and qualities. His secrecy, which shielded his abuses of presidential power, was not among them.
Source: Worse Than Watergate, by John W. Dean, first chapter
May 2, 2004
John Dean: Cheney's agenda: cut programs to expand military
What clearly distinguishes this presidency is its vice president, a secretive man by nature whose unmatched power is largely veiled but whose secret governmental operations have changed the world-and not for the better. Dick Cheney,
effectively a co-president incognito, works behind closed doors and does not answer to Congress or the public. Time and again, their principal public policies-both foreign and domestic-are laden with hidden agendas. The Bush-Cheney hidden agenda
relates to their national security policies, given their critical importance. Equally worthy of attention is their hidden agenda to end federal entitlement programs by running up budget-busting deficits while hiking military spending, which is bleeding
the federal treasury and will ultimately result in there simply being no money available to pay for social programs after this administration is gone. These, of course, are programs-such as Social Security and Medicare-that they dare not eliminate.
Source: Worse Than Watergate, by John W. Dean, first chapter
May 2, 2004
Gave up any independent political existence from Bush
Bush ordered Cheney to draw up an energy plan. In intense sessions, Cheney would sit at the head of the table, frowning and nodding as he listened, seldom speaking even a single word. His words were all reserved for Bush's ears. There has never been a
vice president like Dick Cheney, and there probably never will be again. He abjured any independent political existence from the president. He had no political operation at all. He shared his sole speechwriter with the president. He built no power base
within the party, and he shunned personal publicity. His strength depended entirely on Bush's trust in him-and he earned that trust by subordinating himself entirely to Bush.
Cheney was certainly a powerful figure with the administration.
But those who identified him as a shadowy shogun who secretly controlled Bush, the weak mikado, could not have been more wrong. Even on energy, Bush made the ultimate decisions-and Cheney's views, authoritative as they were, were often overridden.
Source: The Right Man, by David Frum, p. 61-62
Jun 1, 2003
Media distracts public with focus on trivia
The need to produce for a growing number of news sites may be partially responsible for changing the way journalists cover campaigns. “So you end up with absolutely trivial issues dominating an entire (news) cycle or maybe two cycles -- an entire 24 or
48 hours -- that really have nothing to do with the election or the fate of America or how the campaign ought to be decided. The way that works serves to distract everybody and to take the focus off the basic issues that we ought to be concerned about.”
Source: AP Story, NY Times
Sep 13, 2000
Personal charity is private and not a policy matter
Dick Cheney defended his charitable contributions as “appropriate” and insisted he should be given credit for speaking fees he directed to charity and for corporate gifts that matched his own donations. Neither is a charitable contribution under
the federal tax laws. “I think giving is a choice that individuals have to make in terms of what they want to do with their resources. It’s not a policy question. It’s a private matter. It’s a matter of private choice.”
Source: Adam Clymer, NY Times
Sep 6, 2000
Cheney’s retirement package could be a conflict of interest
The energy services company that Dick Cheney served has agreed to let the Republican vice-presidential candidate, retire with a package worth an estimated $20 million. Mr. Cheney’s retirement package solidifies and expands his
personal stake in the oil industry in general, and Halliburton in particular, while he is on the campaign trail confronting energy policy issues that will affect Halliburton’s performance.
Source: Diana B. Henriques, NY Times
Aug 12, 2000
Praises Bush for decency, integrity, and honor
Cheney spoke to a convention with soaring hopes for the November election as the delegates prepared to nominate George W. Bush for president, formally ratifying a decision that was made months ago by a party that sees the Texas governor
as its best hope of regaining the White House. Calling Bush a “man without pretense and without cynicism, a man of principle, a man of honor,” Cheney said that “on the first hour of the first day, he will restore decency and integrity to the Oval Office.
Source: Edward Walsh, Washington Post
Aug 3, 2000
Opportunity to serve led to acceptance of nomination
In his prepared speech, Cheney told the delegates why he overcame his initial reluctance to accept the vice presidential nomination. “I have been in the company of leaders. I know what it takes.
And I see in our nominee qualities of mind and spirit our nation needs and our history demands. Big changes are coming to Washington. To serve this man, in this cause, is a chance I would not miss.”
Source: Edward Walsh, Washington Post
Aug 3, 2000
Bush will restore decency & integrity to Oval Office
George W. Bush is a man without pretense and without cynicism. A man of principle, a man of honor. On the first hour of the first day he will restore decency and integrity to the Oval Office. He will show us that national leaders can be true to their
word and that they can get things done by reaching across the partisan aisle, and working with political opponents in good faith and common purpose. I know he’ll do these things, because for the last five years I’ve watched him do them in Texas.
Source: Speech accepting nomination for Vice Presidency
Aug 2, 2000
Would vote differently today on ERA, Head Start, not Mandela
Cheney also said he would no longer vote against funding the Head Start preschool program or tuberculosis vaccinations for children. He also said he no longer opposes funding the Department of Education.
On the Equal Rights Amendment, Cheney said he’d support it if the Pentagon was not required to draft women. One former stance Cheney said he would not change was his 1986 vote against a nonbinding House resolution on Nelson Mandela.
Source: Michael Finnegan, LA Times
Jul 31, 2000
One of the most conservative voting records in Congress
As a top Republican in the US House, Dick Cheney outdid the NRA in his opposition to gun control. He was an impassioned backer of aid to the Nicaraguan contras but declined to join a call for South Africa to free Nelson Mandela. And he made no exceptions
in his opposition to federal funding for abortions, even in cases of rape or incest.Cheney, in short, compiled one of the most conservative voting records of any member of Congress in the 1980s. Yet the civility of his personal style and his earlier
service as chief of staff to President Ford lent him moderate credentials that softened his image over the years.
While in the House from 1979 to 1989, Cheney sided with one of the most conservative Washington watchdogs, the American Conservative
Union, 91% of the time. That is 10 to 20 points higher than the average Republican during the period. Moreover, Cheney’s voting record became more conservative the longer he served in Congress, reflecting his rise in the House leadership.
Source: Michael Kranish, Boston Globe, p. A13
Jul 26, 2000
Voting record in Congress consistently conservative
In ten years in the house, Cheney compiled a voting record that was anything but moderate. Elected to the house the same year as a fiery young Republican from Georgia named Newt Gingrich, Cheney repeatedly received higher votes from the
American Conservative Union. Cheney was against the Panama Canal treaties and creation of the Education Department. He opposed abortion and the Equal Rights Amendment, and favored a constitutional amendment to
balance the budget. He voted for virtually all military weapons systems and to cut education spending. He opposed sanctions against the apartheid government of South Africa and in 1986
voted against a resolution calling for the release of Nelson Mandela and other political prisoners.
Source: Edward Walsh, Amy Goldstein in Washington Post
Jul 26, 2000
Persuaded by Bush’s “unique vision” to be his V.P.
Cheney most likely had to be convinced to take the job by Bush, saying that one of Cheney’s preconditions to heading Bush’s V.P. search was that he not be among those considered. Even Cheney admitted he did not expect to be standing on a podium as Bush’s
vice presidential selection. Cheney said, “I heard Gov. Bush talk about his unique vision for our party and for our nation. I saw sincerity as I watched him make decisions, always firm, always fair. In the end, I learned how persuasive he can be.”
Source: Ian Christopher McCaleb, CNN.com
Jul 25, 2000
Lynne Cheney fights political correctness
Cheney argued for changes in standards. She supported teaching a more Western centrist view, believing it allowed Americans to have a more common culture. “Fifth and sixth graders will learn about the devastation of Hiroshima
on children of their age, without ever recommending books that would tell them about why it might have well been a rational decision to use atomic weapons to end the war,” she said during one appropriations committee hearing.
Source: Pat Neal, CNN.com
Jul 25, 2000
Accepts nomination help change tone in Washington
Three months ago, when Governor Bush asked me to head up his search team I honestly did not expect that I would be standing here today. Governor, I’m honored and proud to join your team and I enthusiastically accept the challenge
for this reason: I believe you have the vision and the courage to be a great president.
Governor Bush is seeking not only to win an election, but also to lead our nation. He’s confronting the tough issues: strengthening Social Security and Medicare,
reforming our public schools, cutting taxes and rebuilding America’s military.
I look forward to working with you, governor, to change the tone in Washington, to restore a spirit of civility and respect and cooperation. It’s
time for America’s leaders to stop pointing the finger of blame and to begin sharing the credit for success. Big changes are coming to Washington, and I want to be a part of them.
Source: Statement on Vice Presidential selection
Jul 25, 2000
Exert leadership toward post-nuclear world
The demise of the Soviet Union gives us an unprecedented opportunity to move toward a safer world in which freedom, not tyranny, is the dominant system. But to do it is essential that we actively influence the shape and the
direction of events to come. We must exert leadership when it’s in our interest, where it’s appropriate for the U.S. to lead. There is no one else who can do it.
Source: Speech at Lawrence Technical University
Sep 14, 1992
Prosperity & security go hand in hand
Some critics are calling for cuts in our armed forces that would surely gut our military capability, all in the name of meeting domestic needs. They say that we cannot afford a strong leadership role, that we have to choose between
national security and economic security. That’s a dangerous call based on a false premise. Prosperity and security go hand in hand. A nation that is not secure will not prosper, and America cannot be weak abroad and strong at home.
Source: Speech at Lawrence Technical University
Sep 14, 1992
Constructive personal style belies hard-line voting
Cheney’s voting record places him among the most unyielding members of the Republican right, but many of his colleagues would be surprised to hear that. They know him as a man eager to hear both sides of an issue, constrructive in his suggestions, and
patient in looking for solutions. That personal style has given him a broad following even though he votes as a hard-liner. In 1986, Cheney did not oppose the “conservative coalition” on a single one of the 50 votes in which the bloc coalesced.
Source: Poltics in America, Alan Ehrenhalt, ed., 1987, p. 1682
Jan 1, 1987
Pragmatic conservation insider image in Congress
Cheney has managed to build an image as a pragmatic conservative, one who votes Wyoming’s anti-government sentiments but negotiates with the other side on a friendly basis.
Cheney’s two years as Ford’s White House chief of staff made him something more than an ordinary freshman in 1979, and he took advantage of his reputation to play an insider’s role among House Republicans throughout his first term.
Source: Poltics in America, Alan Ehrenhalt, ed., 1982, p. 1326
Jan 1, 1981