|
Cean Stevens on Government Reform
|
|
Oppose gerrymandering and restrictions on ballot access
We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny the voters their right to consider all legitimate alternatives.
We advocate initiative, referendum, recall and repeal when used as popular checks on government.
Source: 2016 Libertarian Party Platform, adopted in Convention
, May 30, 2016
Individual rights over state's rights
Too many times politicians speak of "State's Rights" while railing at the over reach of larger governmental entities. "State's Rights" is not mentioned in the US or Alaska constitution.
Ultimately, inalienable rights belong to the individual citizen, and no other entity. Not federal government, not state government, nor any business or corporate entity.
Coercion by larger governmental entities is still coercion.
Insomuch as individuals do not infringe on another's life, liberty, or property government at any level does not have the right to interfere.
Source: 2016 Alaska Senate campaign website, CeanStevens.com
, Mar 10, 2016
Signed term limit pledge: 6 years House; 12 years Senate.
Stevens signed pledging 6-year term limit
Organizational Self-Description: U.S. Term Limits, the nation's oldest and largest term limits advocacy group, announced that 14 new signers of its congressional term limits amendment pledge have been elected to the 114th Congress. The group includes five new senators, eight new House members and one House incumbent who signed the pledge for the first time this cycle. The pledge calls for members to co-sponsor and vote for a constitutional amendment limiting House members to three terms (six years) and Senators to two terms (12 years). The USTL President said, "The American people are fed up with career politicians in Washington and strongly embracing term limits as a remedy. Gallup polling shows that 75% of Americans support term limits."
Opposing legal argument: [ACLU, Nov. 7, 2014]: In U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton (May 22, 1995), the Court ended the movement to enact term limits for Congress on a state-by-state basis. The Court held that the
qualifications for Congress established in the Constitution itself could not be amended by the states without a constitutional amendment, and that the notion of congressional term limits violates the "fundamental principle of our representative democracy 'that the people should chose whom they please to govern them.'"
Opposing political argument: [Cato Institute Briefing Paper No. 14, Feb. 18, 1992]: Several considerations may explain political scientists' open hostility to term limitation:
- Political scientists were instrumental in promoting the professionalization of legislators.
- They are cynical about the attentiveness, general knowledge, and judgmental capacity of the average voter.
- They are committed to the conservation of leadership.
- They perceive attacks on professional politicians as a threat to their own self-proclaimed professionalism.
- And political partisanship may encourage them to oppose term limits.
Source: Press release from U.S. Term Limits 16-USTL on Nov 8, 2014
Page last updated: Aug 23, 2017