|
Gary Johnson on Budget & Economy
Libertarian presidential nominee; former Republican NM Governor
|
|
|
Cut government spending by 20%
Q: Support Federal spending to promote the economy?Martin Heinrich (D): Yes, particularly transportation infrastructure.
Gary Johnson (L): No. Cut government spending by 20%.
Mick Rich (R): Yes. Energy development & infrastructure repair.
Source: 2018 CampusElect.org Issue Guide on New Mexico Senate race
, Oct 9, 2018
Cut taxes and cut spending
Q: Taxes: Support President Trump's tax cuts?Martin Heinrich (D): No. Does little for working families.
Gary Johnson (L):
Yes. But should have also cut spending.
Mick Rich (R): Yes. "Stimulated investment & job creation.
Source: 2018 CampusElect.org Issue Guide on New Mexico Senate race
, Oct 9, 2018
Veto any legislation that will result in deficit spending
Q: On Economy: To grow the economy increase government infrastructure spending? Or reduce taxes?Clinton: More infrastructure investment.
Trump: Both reduced taxes and more infrastructure investment.
Johnson: Eliminate Corporate Taxes and Income Tax, replace with consumption tax on goods and services.
Stein: Infrastructure spending: Green New Deal.
Q: On Economy:
Prioritize deficit reduction or economic stimulus?
Clinton: Prioritize economic stimulus.
Trump: Prioritize economic stimulus but save $ by cutting depts. like EPA.
Johnson: Prioritize balanced budget, "veto any legislation that will result in deficit spending."
Stein: Prioritize stimulus package: Green New Deal.
Source: CampusElect Voter Guide to 2016 Presidential race
, Oct 9, 2016
Cut taxes; cut spending; level the playing field
I cut spending in New Mexico; I cut in half the historical growth rate of government spending. I cut taxes 14 times; Bill Weld cut taxes 21 times. Count on us to support legislation that will simplify and lower taxes. Count on us to provide proposals
on how to actually make that happen. Government can provide a level playing field for everyone.Crony capitalism is alive and well. And crony capitalism has everything to do with government getting involved in everyday affairs.
Count on us to reduce that role of government when it comes to everyday affairs, but count on us to support legislation that makes things more fair, level playing field. In 2012, Rick Perry was beating his chest over the fact that he created more jobs
in Texas than anyone else running for president. Well, they did an analysis and actually it was Gary Johnson. I responded that government does not create jobs; the private sector does, but government can provide a level playing field.
Source: Johnson-Weld interview at National Press Club
, Jul 7, 2016
National debt, approaching $20 trillion, is bankrupting us
The President says that anyone who says the economy is in decline is peddling fiction. We can quibble over economists' numbers, but it doesn't take an economist to know that continuing to add to the national debt is bankrupting us--
and that debt has doubled on his watch, aided and abetted by Congress. My assessment of the State of the Union is quite different than President Obama's, and much simpler. I see a national debt that will hit $20 trillion by the time he leaves office.
Source: Libertarian Party response to 2016 State of the Union speech
, Jan 12, 2016
National debt of $20 trillion is obscene & unsustainable
By the time Barack Obama leaves office, the national debt will be $20 TRILLION. That is not just obscene, it is unsustainable. Responsibility for the years of deficit spending that have created our debt crisis rests squarely with BOTH the Republicans and
the Democrats. The debt doubled under President George W. Bush--and doubled again under President Obama. During that time, both parties enjoyed control of Congress, and the deficit spending just kept piling up.It doesn't have to be that way, despite
what the politicians say. Governor Johnson has pledged that his first major act as President will be to submit to Congress a truly balanced budget. No gimmicks, no imaginary cuts in the distant future. Real reductions to bring spending into line
with revenues, without tax increases. No line in the budget will be immune from scrutiny and reduction. And he pledges to veto any legislation that will result in deficit spending. No excuses. No games. A REAL balanced budget.
Source: 2016 presidential campaign website GaryJohnson2016.com
, Jan 11, 2016
Lay out a process for state bankruptcies
Here's what the National Review had to say, in a January 2011 interview: "If Gary Johnson were president, he would immediately cut all federal spending--entitlements, defense, education, everything--by
43% to rectify our fiscal blunders. And he'd just be getting started. What is [Johnson's] philosophy? In 2 words: limited government.
"He suggests that to encourage fiscal discipline, the federal
government should pass a law that lays out a process for state bankruptcies--which are impossible under current law and would be hard to square with sovereign immunity--and makes it clear that federal bailouts are
off the table. 'Everybody would scream' if a state went into bankruptcy, Johnson admits, but a federal bailout would only encourage profligacy."
Source: Seven Principles, by Gary Johnson, p.140-141
, Aug 1, 2012
Audit the Fed, or abolish it, to achieve transparency
Q: What about ending the Federal Reserve and returning to gold-backed currency?A: I don't think they're going to end the Federal Reserve, but I would sign legislation banning the Federal Reserve.
But ending the Federal Reserve is not the end-all; the Treasury could still print money without a central bank. What we need to do is stop printing money, because Congress over-authorizes expenditures as opposed to revenue.
Q: Are you in favor of auditing the Federal Reserve?
A: Yes, I'm absolutely in favor of auditing the Federal Reserve--that's this whole notion of 'transparency'--the Federal Reserve should be transparent. Abolishing the Federal Reserve brings about 100% transparency.
Source: YouTube video, "Ending the Fed", transcribed by OnTheIssues
, Jul 13, 2012
No bank bailout; no farm subsidies; no stimulus
Q: Do you agree with President Obama's 2009 Stimulus Plan?A: No, I'm against any type of federal stimulus.
Q: Should the U.S. have bailed out the major banks during the financial crisis of 2008?
A: No.
Q: Should the federal government subsidize U.S. farmers?
A: No.
Source: Presidential comparison website www.iSideWith.com
, May 16, 2012
Cut federal budget by 43% to bring it into balance
I have proposed cutting the federal budget by 43 percent to bring it into balance. It can be done. It requires the will and ability to ignore and even fight the special interests that have a vested interest in more and more government spending.
Our system is corrupted by special-interest campaign contributions. Crony capitalism permeates our government. The result is that, as the Congressional Budget Office reported this week, the deficit for 2012 will once again exceed $1 trillion.
Source: Gary Johnson, "America moving again" in The Washington Times
, Feb 2, 2012
Trillion-dollar stimulus failed; so will another $450B?
I suspect I am not the only American asking, if a trillion dollars' worth of stimulus didn't work, why will another $450 billion do the trick? Whether it be jobs created with borrowed and newly-printed dollars, temporary extensions of tax cuts, or
sending money to the states to postpone layoffs, none of the President's proposals will remove the real obstacles to job creation. Government cannot create jobs. Businesses, entrepreneurs and investors can create jobs, and right now, they are simply
afraid to do so. And they should be. They are looking at a national debt that is consuming the private economy, more deficit spending with no end in sight, and a regulatory environment that promises only new and costly surprises every day.
Government is absolutely a big part of the jobs problem, but it is not the solution--other than by getting out of the way. Congress and the Administration have almost helped us to death.
Source: Response to 2011 Jobs Speech, on www.garyjohnson2012.com
, Sep 8, 2011
We could have avoided default without raising debt ceiling
Q: You've said that you would not have raised the debt ceiling and that it would have still been possible to avoid default. How?A: We would have still brought in $200 billion a month. How we make payments [determines] whether we default on any bills.
But obviously going forward, we have to put the brakes on spending. I just argue that it will never be easier than now. In the bond market, if no one was buying our debt, that would mean the Federal Reserve printing money as opposed to individuals or
countries loaning us money; that's the bond market collapsing--so when that happens, that is a whole lot of money and it has to result in inflation. Russia is the most recent example. As frightening as that scenario is, that's what going to happen.
But we can fix this--there's going to be a lot of hardship and pain, but that's better than killing the patient and, the way we're going, we're going to kill the patient in a monetary collapse. But I am an optimist because I think it can be fixed.
Source: Interview by Scott Holleran on scottholleran.com blog
, Aug 21, 2011
Ending the fed OK, but that's only part of the solution
Q: Is it your position that we should audit, not end, the Federal Reserve--that ending the Fed may be desirable but not immediately realistic?A: I think ending the
Federal Reserve would be positive but if we end the Fed it's important to point out that that's not the end of the solution. A lot of the central banking function would have to be taken up by regional banks.
Source: Interview by Scott Holleran on scottholleran.com blog
, Aug 21, 2011
Stop incurring more debt; balanced budget by 2013
Q: As president, how will you avoid continually raising the debt ceiling? Gingrich: We don't need Obama's "balanced approach" (code for raise taxes). We need a balanced budget.
Santorum: Pass the Balanced Budget Amendment and work for its
ratification across the country!
Gingrich: When you balance the budget there is no need to raise the debt ceiling. I am the only candidate who has balanced the budget.
Johnson: I'd avoid continually raising the debt ceiling by not incurring more
debt! I'd submit to Congress a balanced budget in 2013, & veto any appropriation that exceeds that budget.
Santorum: DC doesn't work; we need to impose discipline on politicians who want to buy their reelection with your money. BBA is the only way.
Gingrich: We can balance the budget again by growing the economy, cutting spending and reforming government. That's how we did it before. We CAN do it again.
Source: 2011 Republican primary debate on Twitter.com
, Jul 21, 2011
Our debt is greatest threat to our national security
Q: How do you weigh the cost of fighting the war on terror against the exploding debt crisis? Gingrich: The exploding debt crisis is because of exploding politician spending in Washington, not because of national security.
Santorum:
The first priority of the federal government is to keep America safe. I would not cut defense--freeze it; cut waste; and then plow savings back into Defense.
Johnson: The debt is the greatest threat to national security we face today.
Besides, we do not need 60,000 to 100,000 troops in Afghanistan and Iraq to protect ourselves. Nor do we need nation-building.
Gingrich: We spend less on defense today as percentage of GDP than at any time since Pearl Harbor.
Santorum:
The first priority of the federal government is to keep America safe. I would not cut defense--freeze it; cut waste; and then plow savings back into Defense.
Gingrich: Controlling the border and defending America are job #1 under the Constitution.
Source: 2011 Republican primary debate on Twitter.com
, Jul 21, 2011
Opposed TARP, stimulus & Fannie Mae bailout
On federal issues, Governor Johnson says he would have opposed TARP. "Government should not have been involved in this. Why should Goldman and AIG be saved but not Lehman?" He also wants to eliminate government subsidies for Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. He says he would have voted against the stimulus. He has said that he would cut the federal budget by 43%, "Start out with the big four - Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security and defense," Johnson said in New Hampshire in early 2011.
Source: Club for Growth 2012 Presidential White Paper #9: Johnson
, Jul 21, 2011
End the Fed; they've devalued the dollar by printing money
Q: If any corporation misappropriated like the federal government, they would all be in jail. A: And then talking about monetary policy in the country. The fact that the dollars that we have in our bank accounts today, are worth less than they
were yesterday or worth less than they were a week ago, a month ago, a year ago. That's the fact we are printing money to cover all these obligations.
The Federal Reserve has devalued the dollar significantly from a monetary policy standpoint, abolishing the Federal Reserve would bring about this discipline of spending within our means.
We can balance the federal budget, but we need to do that tomorrow. I don't have a plan for getting a quarter of a way there in eight years. I have a plan here or a desire that we do this in 2013.
Source: Sean Hannity 2012 presidential interviews "Hannity Primary"
, May 27, 2011
On verge of financial collapse unless we balance budget
I believe that we're on the verge of a financial collapse unless we balance the Federal budget and I don't see that happening with Obama. Now I do see that happening with the Republican party -- [but] a few short years ago Republicans ran up record
deficits, I'm not so sure, but I'm under the belief that only Republicans are capable of solving the problem that exists right now which is the collapse of our economy. I'm an entrepreneur that ran for governor of New Mexico promising to bring a
common sense business approach to state government that everything was going to be a cost benefit analysis. I got reelected in a state that was 2:1 Democrat. I think we're on the verge of a financial collapse unless we balance the budget and that means
some really tough choices that all doable and they're all doable under the context of a commonsense business approach to the way government does business and a cost benefit analysis that goes along with everything that government is doing.
Source: 2011 GOP primary debate in South Carolina
, May 5, 2011
Balance budget by cutting entitlements AND Defense
Gary Johnson said on ABC's "Top Line" that Republicans should be more aggressive than they've been in cutting federal spending.
They should take on entitlement programs, too; Medicare and Medicaid could be slashed by 43% and turned into grant programs for the states to distribute."I think we should balance the federal budget tomorrow,"
Johnson said. "I'm optimistic. I think Americans are optimistic. We went to the moon, we can balance the federal budget. We can fix this.
We're not addressing the problems that we face, and that starts with Medicaid, Medicare, reforming Social Security and Defense. And I mean cutting those areas
Source: Rick Klein, ABC News, "Obscurity to Prominence"
, Apr 22, 2011
Uphold commitments to states before other spending.
Johnson adopted the National Governors Association position paper:
The Issue
The major budget issue will be over the surplus and how big of a surplus there will be. How much will be dedicated to paying down the national debt, how much to tax cuts, how much to increase defense spending, what to do about key discretionary spending programs, and whether and how to change key entitlement programs, such as Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security? How these decisions are made could have significant impacts on the federal-state partnership, especially as they affect vital health and human services programs. What will happen to funding for priority state domestic discretionary programs for the federal fiscal year? When will Congress act? NGA’s Position
Before considering new spending initiatives or tax cuts, the federal government must first uphold its current commitments to the states.
Source: National Governors Association "Issues / Positions" 01-NGA8 on Sep 14, 2001
Opposed $1.9 trillion ARPA bill for COVID relief.
Johnson voted NAY American Rescue Plan Act
This bill provides additional relief to address the continued impact of COVID-19 on the economy, public health, state and local governments, individuals, and businesses:
- Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as the food stamp program);
- schools and institutions of higher education;
- child care and programs for older Americans and their families;
- COVID-19 vaccinations, testing, treatment, and prevention;
- emergency rental assistance, homeowner assistance, and other housing programs;
- payments to state and local governments for economic relief;
- small business assistance, including restaurants;
- and state capital projects that enable work, education, and health monitoring in response to COVID-19
Rep. Kevin McCarthy in OPPOSITION (3/11/21): The so-called American Rescue Plan imposed a $1.9 trillion new burden on American families. Despite being branded as `COVID relief,` only 9% of funds in this bill actually goes to
defeating the virus, and almost half of the money, including more than 95% of the education funds, will not be spent until 2022 or later. After a year of struggle and sacrifice, students and parents get no answer to the vital question of when they can expect schools to reopen full time. President Biden wants Americans to believe `help is on the way.` But under this bill, it isn`t; waste is.
Biden Administration in SUPPORT (2/26/21): ARPA provides the tools and support critical to tackle the urgent public health and economic crises the Nation faces as a result of COVID-19. The bill also provides eligible Americans with a $1,400 payment in addition to the $600 payment provided in December of 2020. The bill also extends key emergency unemployment benefits, and raises the minimum wage to $15 per hour.
Legislative Outcome: Passed House 219-212-1 on 2/27/21; passed Senate 50-49-1 on 3/6/21; signed by President on 3/11/21.
Source: Congressional vote 21-HR1319 on Feb 27, 2021
|
|
|
Other candidates on Budget & Economy: |
Gary Johnson on other issues: |
NM Gubernatorial: Deb Haaland Gregg Hull Jay Block Mark Ronchetti Michelle Lujan-Grisham Rebecca Dow Steve Lanier NM Senatorial: Ben Ray Lujan Martin Heinrich Matt Dodson Nella Domenici
NM politicians
NM Archives
|
Senate races 2026:
AK:
Dan Sullivan(R,incumbent)
vs.Andy Barr(R)
vs.Mary Peltola(D)
AL:
Tommy Tuberville(R,retiring)
vs.Barry Moore(R)
vs.Steve Marshall(R)
vs.Kyle Sweetser(R)
AR:
Tom Cotton(R,incumbent)
vs.Dan Whitfield(I,withdrew)
vs.Hallie Shoffner(D)
vs.Ethan Dunbar(D,lost primary)
CO:
John Hickenlooper(D,incumbent)
vs.Janak Joshi(R)
vs.Julie Gonzales(D)
vs.Mark Baisley(R)
DE:
Chris Coons(D,incumbent)
vs.Mike Katz(I)
FL:
Ashley Moody(R,appointee)
vs.Alan Grayson(D)
vs.Angie Nixon(D)
vs.Alex Vindman(D)
GA:
Jon Ossoff(D,incumbent)
vs.Buddy Carter(R)
vs.Mike Collins(R)
vs.John F. King(R,withdrew)
IA:
Joni Ernst(R,retiring)
vs.Ashley Hinson(R)
vs.Jim Carlin(R)
vs.Bob Krause(D)
vs.Josh Turek(D)
vs.Zach Wahls(D)
vs.J.D. Scholten(D,withdrew)
ID:
Jim Risch(R,incumbent)
vs.David Roth(D)
vs.Todd Achilles(I)
IL:
Richard Durbin(D,retiring)
vs.Juliana Stratton(D)
vs.Raja Krishnamoorthi(D)
vs.Robin Kelly(D)
vs.Don Tracy(R)
KS:
Roger Marshall(R,incumbent)
vs.Patrick Schmidt(D)
KY:
Mitch McConnell(R,retiring)
vs.Andy Barr(R)
vs.Nate Morris(R)
vs.Daniel Cameron(R)
vs.Charles Booker(D)
vs.Pamela Stevenson(D)
LA:
Bill Cassidy(R,incumbent)
vs.John Fleming(R)
vs.Julia Letlow(R)
vs.Jamie Davis(D)
MA:
Ed Markey(D,incumbent)
vs.Seth Moulton(D)
vs.John Deaton(R)
ME:
Susan Collins(R,incumbent)
vs.Janet Mills(D)
vs.Graham Platner(D)
MI:
Gary Peters(D,retiring)
vs.Haley Stevens(D)
vs.Mallory McMorrow(D)
vs.Mike Rogers(R)
vs.Abdul El-Sayed(D)
vs.Joe Tate(R,withdrew)
|
MN:
Tina Smith(D,retiring)
vs.Angie Craig(D)
vs.David Hann(R)
vs.Peggy Flanagan(D)
vs.Royce White(R)
vs.Michele Tafoya(R)
MS:
Cindy Hyde-Smith(R,incumbent)
vs.Scott Colom(D)
vs.Ty Pinkins(D then I)
MT:
Steve Daines(R,retiring)
vs.Kurt Alme(R)
vs.Reilly Neill(D)
vs.Seth Bodnar(I)
NC:
Thom Tillis(R,retiring)
vs.Michael Whatley(R)
vs.Roy Cooper(D)
vs.Wiley Nickel(D,running for D.A.)
NE:
Peter Ricketts(R,incumbent)
vs.Dan Osborn(I)
NH:
Jeanne Shaheen(D,retiring)
vs.Chris Pappas(D)
vs.John Sununu(R)
vs.Scott Brown(R)
NJ:
Cory Booker(D,incumbent)
vs.Justin Murphy(R)
NM:
Ben Ray Lujan(D,incumbent)
vs.Matt Dodson(D)
OH:
Jon Husted(R,appointee)
vs.Sherrod Brown(D)
OK:
Markwayne Mullin(R,appointed to Cabinet)
vs.Troy Green(D)
OR:
Jeff Merkley(D,incumbent)
vs.Jo Rae Perkins(R)
RI:
Jack Reed(D,incumbent)
vs.Connor Burbridge(D)
SC:
Lindsey Graham(R,incumbent)
vs.Catherine Fleming Bruce(D)
vs.Paul Dans(R)
vs.Annie Andrews(D)
SD:
Mike Rounds(R,incumbent)
vs.Julian Beaudion(D)
vs.Brian Bengs(I)
TN:
Bill Hagerty(R,incumbent)
vs.Diana Onyejiaka(D)
TX:
John Cornyn(R,incumbent)
vs.Ken Paxton(R)
vs.James Talarico(D)
vs.Wesley Hunt(R,lost primary)
vs.Jasmine Crockett(D,lost primary)
VA:
Mark Warner(D,incumbent)
vs.David Williams(R)
WV:
Shelley Moore Capito(R,incumbent)
vs.Tom Willis(R)
vs.Jeff Kessler(D)
vs.Zach Shrewsbury(D)
WY:
Cynthia Lummis(R,retiring)
vs.Harriet Hageman(R)
vs.Reid Rasner(R)
vs.James Byrd(D)
|
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare
Other Senators
Congressional Votes (analysis)
Congressional Ratings
Affiliations
Policy Reports
Page last updated: Apr 26, 2026; copyright 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org
|