Jack McMullen on Tax Reform

The Bush tax cuts are working

The economic rejuvenation these tax cuts have fostered is an opportunity for us to embrace policies that encourage creativity and entrepreneurship, and to replace and expand the number of, good paying jobs we've lost. The tax cuts are in place. They are working. And as a state just beginning to recover from the loss of more than 8,000 middle class jobs, we can not afford to send an elected official to Washington who is bitterly dedicated to "turning back the clock." Source: Rutland Herald and Barre-Montpelier Times Argus May 17, 2004

Do not repeal tax cuts: they was working

The tax cuts are in place. They are working. And as a state just beginning to recover from the loss of more than 8,000 middle class jobs, we can not afford to send an elected official to Washington who is bitterly dedicated to "turning back the clock." We need, instead, a senator who will work with this administration and the majorities in the Senate and House, to make a better future in Vermont as the clock moves forward. Source: Campaign website, mcmullenforsenate.com Dec 13, 2003

Click here for definitions & background information on Tax Reform. Click here for policy papers on Tax Reform. Click here for SenateMatch answers by Jack McMullen. Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Tax Reform in The Forum.
*Other candidates on Tax Reform:*		*Jack McMullen on other issues:*
*VT Gubernatorial:* Jim Douglas *VT Senatorial:* Jim Jeffords Patrick Leahy *Presidential:* George W. Bush (Republican for President) V.P.Dick Cheney (Republican for V.P.) Sen.John Kerry (Democratic nominee for Pres.) Sen.John Edwards (Democratic nominee for V.P.) Ralph Nader (Reform nominee for Pres.) Peter Camejo (Reform nominee for V.P.) David Cobb (Green nominee for Pres.) Michael Badnarik (Libertarian nominee for Pres.) Michael Peroutka (Constitution nominee for Pres.)	*2004 Senate Races:* (AK)Knowles v.Murkowski v.Sykes (AR)Holt v.Lincoln (AZ)McCain v.Starky (CA)Boxer v.Jones v.Gray (CO)Coors v.Salazar v.Randall v.Acosta (CT)Dodd v.Orchulli (FL)Castor v.Martinez (GA)Isakson v.Majette v.Buckley (IA)Grassley v.Small v.Northrop (IL)Obama v.Keyes (IN)Bayh v.Scott (KY)Bunning v.Mongiardo (LA)John v.Vitter (MD)Mikulski v.Pipkin (MO)Bond v.Farmer (NC)Bowles v.Burr (ND)Dorgan v.Liffrig (NH)Granny D v.Gregg (NV)Reid v.Ziser (NY)Schumer v.Mills v.McReynolds (OH)Fingerhut v.Voinovich (OK)Carson v.Coburn (OR)Wyden v.King (PA)Hoeffel v.Specter (SC)DeMint v.Tenenbaum (SD)Daschle v.Thune (UT)Bennett v.Van Dam (VT)Leahy v.McMullen (WA)Murray v.Nethercutt (WI)Feingold v.Michels	Abortion Budget/Economy Civil Rights Corporations Crime Drugs Education Energy/Oil Environment Families Foreign Policy Free Trade Govt. Reform Gun Control Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Jobs Principles Social Security Tax Reform Technology War/Peace Welfare Other Senators House of Representatives SenateMatch (matching quiz) HouseMatch Senate Votes (analysis) House Votes