OnTheIssuesLogo

Ralph Norman on Principles & Values

 

 


Primary liberal "Republicans" who block our agenda

It's simple--if Republicans in Name Only (RINOs) block the reform agenda supported by the vast majority of South Carolina voters, then why should they serve in office? Term Limits will help, but Ralph will also actively help replace the liberal "Republicans" who block the agenda of We the People.
Source: 2026 S.C. Gubernatorial website RalphNormanForGovernor.com , Nov 5, 2025

Don't know how to define antisemitism; it's subjective

Rep. Ralph Norman argued that congressional action isn't needed on antisemitism since most people know it's wrong. "We shouldn't do anything further with antisemitism," Norman said. "I don't know how you define it. It's subjective."
Source: Punchbowl News on 2026 South Carolina Gubernatorial race , May 7, 2025

Empower those who believe in the virtues of faith in God

Why I Am Running for Congress: As your next Congressman, I will be guided by the Tenth Amendment. I will be committed to returning power and decision-making to the states. I will empower middle class families in South Carolina; those frustrated with government, those who understand the value of personal responsibility, and those who believe in the virtues of faith in God.
Source: 2017 S.C. House campaign website, ElectRalphNorman.com , May 16, 2017

Endorsed by Donald Trump/MAGA after presidency.

Norman is endorsed by Trump/MAGA endorsement list

Endorsements by Donald Trump, implying support of Trump's agenda and electoral style. The phrase `Make America Great Again` was popularized in Trump`s 2015 book Time to Get Tough:Making America Great Again. It is the campaign slogan embroidered on the ubiquitous red caps seen at Trump rallies (which after Trump`s presidency, became known as `MAGA rallies`).

Source: Ballotpedia 2016-2022 endorsement list 2022-MAGA on Jan 1, 2022

Overturn presidential election due to pandemic voting rules.

Justice Norman wrote the Court's decision on Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton: "TX v. PA, GA, MI & WI" on Dec 11, 2020:

Summary of lawsuit, Dec. 7:: The 2020 election suffered from significant and unconstitutional irregularities including:

Supreme Court Order, Dec. 11: The State of Texas`s motion is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

Texas Tribune analysis, Dec. 11:: Trump--and Republicans across the country--had pinned their hopes on the Texas suit. In a series of tweets, Trump called it `the big one` and later added, `it is very strong, ALL CRITERIA MET.` If the court had heard the case, Sen. Ted Cruz said he would have argued it, at the request of Trump.

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas indicated they would have allowed Texas to bring the case but said they would `not grant other relief.` In a series of tweets after the ruling, Trump raged against the decision, which he called `a disgraceful miscarriage of justice.`

Source: Supreme Court case 20-SCOTUS argued on Dec 7, 2020

Oppose certification of the 2020 Presidential election.

Norman voted YEA blocking certification of the Electoral vote

Explanation of 1/6/21 Electoral Certification, by Emily Brooks, Washington Examiner:Sen. Ted Cruz and Rep. Paul Gosar led an objection to counting Electoral College votes from the state of Arizona, the first formal objection to state results in a series of moves that will delay the certification of Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 presidential election over President Trump. Cruz is advocating for an `emergency 10-day audit` of election returns in disputed states. The usually ceremonial joint session of Congress that convenes to count and accept Electoral College votes will be put on hold as the House and Senate separately debate the objection.