|
Robert Lorge on Government Reform
Republican challenger
|
|
Limit campaign donations to $100 per person
Q: Do you support or oppose the statement: “Stricter limits on political campaign funds”?A: STRONGLY SUPPORT: Make the law $100 per person per campaign (instead of $2100 for the primary and another $2100 for the
General Elections) and make the law the same for PACS (currently $5000, make them $100 also) and allow, because of First Amendment Court decisions, Candidates to donate whatever amounts to their own campaigns but tax any amount in excess
of the current salary for that office at 50% immediate tax withholding tax rates, to even the field and pay for the administration of the Federal Elections Commission and public sponsored televised debates of all
General Election candidates. That would end corruption in the election process overnight. Until then, we play by the odd rules of McCain-Feingold’s FEC law.
Source: Email interview on 2006 Senate race with OnTheIssues.org
, Aug 9, 2006
Limit PACs to $100 and abolish 527 organizations
Q: What do you consider odd about McCain-Feingold?A: It allows PACs (Political Action Committees) to give $5000 but prohibits state & congressional district & local county & other party groups to give a candidate a combined total of just $5000. That
makes any Special Interest Group (like two business people starting a PAC) more powerful than the entire State Party system. It’s Insane. While I would keep the limits on parties, I would limit PACs to $100 and abolish 527 organizations like MoveOn.org.
Source: Email interview on 2006 Senate race with OnTheIssues.org
, Aug 9, 2006
The Pro-Incumbent system is broken
The “Pro-Incumbent” system is broken, when in doubt vote them all out, starting with my opponent. - I would vote NO on allowing some lobbyist gifts to Congress.
- I would vote YES on establishing the Senate Office of Public Integrity.
-
I would vote YES on banning “soft money” contributions and restricting issue ads.
- I would vote YES on banning campaign donations from unions & corporations.
- I would vote YES on banning more types of Congressional gifts, unlike my opponent.
Source: Email interview on 2006 Senate race with OnTheIssues.org
, Aug 9, 2006
$100 per person or PAC per entire campaign
I would vote NO on the McCain-Feingold overhaul of campaign finance, unlike my opponent. This law created more loopholes & corrupt elections practices than existed before, & priced average Americans out of having an equal voice in elections, which is why
I favor a simpler election law: $100 per person or PAC per campaign; tax millionaire’s donations 50%; use the tax for public sponsored TV forum debates. We must prevent elections from being sold to the highest bidder or corrupt lobby special interests.
Source: Email interview on 2006 Senate race with OnTheIssues.org
, Aug 9, 2006
Page last updated: Sep 04, 2017