|
Barry Loudermilk on Health Care
|
|
Repeal ObamaCare; it's not a government responsibility
Question topic: It is the government's responsibility to be sure everyone has health care and a livable income.Loudermilk: Strongly Disagree
Question topic: The Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) should be repealed by Congress.
Loudermilk: Strongly Agree
Source: Faith2Action iVoterGuide on 2014 House campaign
, Sep 29, 2014
ObamaCare is an albatross on the neck of our economy
In Congress, Barry will work to defund and fully repeal ObamaCare. The Affordable Health Care Act is not affordable, nor does it improve our health care.
This poorly written, but strategically planned, government takeover of the private healthcare industry is an albatross on the neck of our economy.
It has not yet taken full effect, but both large and small businesses are already feeling the financial weight this law is putting on their business. If it isn't stopped, this program could be the final straw that breaks the back of our already fragile
national economy.The immediate solution is to totally defund all aspects of this law. We must then seek a full repeal of Obama care, and introduce patient-centered reforms that put the citizen in total charge of their health care decisions.
Source: 2014 House campaign website, LoudermilkForCongress.com
, Jul 22, 2014
Supports repealing Obamacare, according to Faith2Action.
Loudermilk supports the F2A survey question on repealing ObamaCare
Faith2Action.org is "the nation's largest network of pro-family groups." They provide election resources for each state, including Voter Guides and Congressional Scorecards excerpted here.
The F2A survey summarizes candidate stances on the following topic: 'Health Care: Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act?'
Source: Faith2Action Survey 14-F2A-Q5 on Jul 30, 2014
Supports repealing Obamacare, according to PVS rating.
Loudermilk supports the PVS survey question on repealing ObamaCare
Project VoteSmart infers summary responses from campaign statements and news reports
The PVS survey summarizes candidate stances on the following topic: 'Health Care: Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act?'
Source: Project VoteSmart Inferred Survey 14-PVS-q5 on Sep 30, 2014
Fully repealing ObamaCare is important, but not sufficient.
Loudermilk voted YEA Full Repeal of ObamaCare
Heritage Action Summary: This vote would fully repeal ObamaCare.
Heritage Foundation recommendation to vote YES: (2/3/2015): ObamaCare creates $1.8 trillion in new health care spending and uses cuts to Medicare spending to help pay for some of it. Millions of Americans already have lost, and more likely will lose, their coverage because of ObamaCare. Many Americans have not been able to keep their doctors as insurers try to offset the added costs of ObamaCare by limiting the number of providers in their networks. In spite of the promise, the law increases the cost of health coverage.
Secretary of Labor Robert Reich recommendation to vote NO: (robertreich.org 11/22/2013): Having failed to defeat the Affordable Care Act, Republicans are now hell-bent on destroying the ObamaCare in Americans' minds, using the word "disaster" whenever mentioning the Act, and demand its repeal. Democrats [should] meet the Republican barrage with
three larger truths:
- The wreck of private insurance: Ours has been the only healthcare system in the world designed to avoid sick people. For-profit insurers have spent billions finding and marketing their policies to healthy people--while rejecting people with preexisting conditions, or at high risk.
- We could not continue with this travesty of a healthcare system: ObamaCare is a modest solution. It still relies on private insurers--merely setting minimum standards and "exchanges" where customers can compare policies.
- The moral imperative: Even a clunky compromise like the ACA between a national system of health insurance and a for-profit insurance market depends, fundamentally, on a social compact in which those who are healthier and richer are willing to help those who are sicker and poorer. Such a social compact defines a society.
Legislative outcome: Passed House 239-186-8; never came to a vote in the Senate.
Source: Supreme Court case 15-H0132 argued on Feb 3, 2015
Page last updated: May 14, 2020