Mary Fallin on Free Trade Republican

Fair trade means don’t fight with one arm behind our back

Voted YES on promoting free trade with Peru.

• enforcement of textile and apparel rules of origin;
• certain textile and apparel safeguard measures; and
• enforcement of export laws governing trade of timber products from Peru.

Proponents support voting YES because:

Rep. RANGEL: It's absolutely ridiculous to believe that we can create jobs without trade. I had the opportunity to travel to Peru recently. I saw firsthand how important this agreement is to Peru and how this agreement will strengthen an important ally of ours in that region. Peru is resisting the efforts of Venezuela's authoritarian President Hugo Chavez to wage a war of words and ideas in Latin America against the US. Congress should acknowledge the support of the people of Peru and pass this legislation by a strong margin.

Opponents recommend voting NO because:

Rep. WU: I regret that I cannot vote for this bill tonight because it does not put human rights on an equal footing with environmental and labor protections.

Rep. KILDEE: All trade agreements suffer from the same fundamental flaw: They are not self-enforcing. Trade agreements depend upon vigorous enforcement, which requires official complaints be made when violations occur. I have no faith in President Bush to show any enthusiasm to enforce this agreement. Congress should not hand this administration yet another trade agreement because past agreements have been more efficient at exporting jobs than goods and services. I appeal to all Members of Congress to vote NO on this. But I appeal especially to my fellow Democrats not to turn their backs on those American workers who suffer from the export of their jobs. They want a paycheck, not an unemployment check.

Voted NO on assisting workers who lose jobs due to globalization.

Proponents support voting YES because:

Rep. RANGEL: In recent years, trade policy has been a dividing force. This legislation develops a new trade policy that more adequately addresses the growing perception that trade is not working for American workers. The Trade and Globalization Assistance Act would expand training and benefits for workers while also helping to encourage investment in communities that have lost jobs to increased trade--particularly in our manufacturing sector. The bill is a comprehensive policy expanding opportunities for American workers, industries, and communities to prepare for and overcome the challenges created by expanded trade.

Opponents recommend voting NO because:

Rep. McCRERY: We should be considering trade adjustment assistance in the context of trade opportunities generally for US workers. That is to say, I think we should be considering modifications to our assistance network in the context of the pending free trade agreements that are before the Congress. Unfortunately, we are not doing that. We are considering TAA in isolation. [We should instead] restructure TAA from a predominantly income support program into a job retraining program. Other problems include that H.R. 3920 would:

• pointlessly keep people in trade adjustment assistance longer.
• increase TAA spending by billions of dollars, but would not require any further accountability on how program funds are spent.
• greatly expand TAA and exacerbate the inefficiencies in the program today.
• extend benefits to public sector workers and submit State and local officials to subpoenas and legal proceedings to comply.

Reauthorize the Ex-Im Bank.

Press release on Letter from 31 Governors to House Republican leaders:

We urge you to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im) before its charter expires this year. In its role as the official export credit agency, Ex-Im is a vital export finance tool for exporters in our states, at no cost to American taxpayers.

Ex-Im allows our companies and workers to compete on a level playing field against our competitors. Without Ex-Im financing, US firms would have lost many sales campaigns to their overseas competitors.

Reauthorizing Ex-Im is the right thing to do for our economy, companies and workers. 41 GOP lawmakers and 865 business organizations have called for the charter's immediate renewal. And, House Democrats have already introduced legislation to reauthorize the bank. Speaker Boehner, it's time to act; quit jeopardizing the nation's economy and American jobs.

Argument in opposition from FreedomWorks:

Top Ten Reasons to Let the Export-Import Bank Expire
1. It Has Outlived Its Purpose: In the 2010s, US exports have been setting record highs--they don't need government help.
2. It Lets Government Pick Winners and Losers
3. Its Risky Loans Put it in Danger of Needing Taxpayer Bailouts
4. It Costs Taxpayers Money Annually, thanks to government accounting gimmicks
5. Most of Its Funding Goes to Big Corporations Who Don't Need the Money
6. It Lets Foreign Corporations Undercut US Competitors
7. It Only Benefits a Few States, but Every State Bears the Costs
8. It Is Prone to Corruption (like whenever you involve the government in handing out money)
9. There Are Better Ways to Help US. Manufacturers: the government should lower and simplify the tax and regulatory burden US companies face.
10. It Is Unnecessary. The Ex-Im Bank cannot justify its continued existence. It's also one of the easiest programs to retire, as its authorization expires in September 2014 if Congress simply does nothing. Source: Letter from 31 Governors 14_Lt_ExIm on Jul 15, 2014

    Support long-term reauthorization of the Export-Import Bank.

    Fallin signed Letter from 26 Governors to Congressional leadership

    As governors of states whose economies and workforces depend on exports, we strongly urge Congress to support legislation that provides for the long-term reauthorization of the U.S. Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im Bank) before its charter expires on June 30, 2015. The Ex-Im Bank is a crucial tool that both small and large businesses use to compete fairly in the world market, increase their exports, stimulate job creation, and contribute to the growth of our states' economies.

    As the official export credit agency of the United States, the Ex-Im Bank assumes the credit and country risks that private sector lenders are unable or unwilling to accept, and without it, U.S. firms would lose many sales to overseas competitors. The Ex-Im Bank allows our companies and workers to compete on a level playing field against international competitors who receive extensive support from their own export credit agencies.

    In 2014, the Ex-Im Bank supplied more than $20 billion in financing to support approximately $27 billion in exports. In that same fiscal year, the Ex-Im Bank supported more than 160,000 American jobs. And the overwhelming majority of the Ex-Im Bank's transactions--nearly 90 percent--assisted small businesses.

    The Ex-Im Bank is financially self-sustaining, and operates at no cost to hard-working American taxpayers. In fact, in fiscal year 2014 alone, the Ex-Im Bank returned approximately $675 million in deficit-reducing receipts to the U.S. Treasury.

    Last year, Congress reauthorized the Ex-Im Bank [for one year]. It is essential that both chambers act again, this time to pass a long-term, multi-year reauthorization.

    Source: Letter from 26 Governors to Congressional leadership 18LTR-EXIM on Apr 14, 2015

    Click here for definitions & background information on Free Trade. Click here for a summary of all issue stances of Mary Fallin. Click here for a Wikipedia profile of Mary Fallin. Click here for a Ballotpedia profile of Mary Fallin. Click here for VoteMatch responses by Mary Fallin. Click here for issue positions of other OK politicians. Click here for OK primary archives. Click here for OK secondary archives.
    Other governors on Free Trade:			Mary Fallin on other issues:
    OK Gubernatorial: Brad Henry Chris Powell Connie Johnson Drew Edmondson Ervin Yen Gary Richardson Joe Dorman Joe Maldonado Kevin Stitt Mick Cornett Scott Inman OK Senatorial: Abby Broyles Connie Johnson James Inhofe James Lankford Mike Workman	Gubernatorial Debates 2021: NJ: Incumbent Phil Murphy(D) vs.State Rep. Jack Ciattarelli(R) vs.Candidate Hirsh Singh(R) vs.GOP Hair Doug Steinhardt(R) VA: Incumbent Ralph Northam(D,term-limited) vs.A.G. Mark Herring(D) vs.State Sen. Amanda Chase(R) vs.Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax(D) vs.State Rep. Jennifer Carroll Foy(D) vs.State Rep. Lee Carter(D) vs.Former Governor Terry McAuliffe(D) vs.State Sen. Jennifer McClellan(D) vs.State Rep. Kirk Cox(R) Gubernatorial Debates 2022: AK: Incumbent Mike Dunleavy(R) (no prospective opponents yet) AL: Incumbent Kay Ivey(R) (no prospective opponents yet) AR: Incumbent Asa Hutchinson(R,term-limited) vs.Lt. Gov. Tim Griffin(R) vs.Trump Adviser Sarah Huckabee Sanders(R) vs.A.G. Leslie Rutledge(R) AZ: Incumbent Doug Ducey(R,term-limited) (no prospective opponents yet) CA: Incumbent Gavin Newsom(D) vs.S.D.Mayor Kevin_Faulconer(R) vs.Former Gov. nominee John Cox(R) CO: Incumbent Jared Polis(D) vs.Mayor Greg Lopez(R) CT: Incumbent Ned Lamont(D) (no prospective opponents yet) FL: Incumbent Ron DeSantis(R) vs.U.S.Rep. Val Demings(? D) vs.Former Gov.Charlie Crist(? D) GA: Incumbent Brian Kemp(R) vs.Minority Leader Stacey Abrams(D) vs.Senate candidate Shane Hazel(L) HI: Incumbent David Ige(D,term-limited) vs.State Rep. Andria Tupola(R) IA: Incumbent Kim Reynolds(R) vs.U.S.Rep. Cindy Axne(? R) ID: Incumbent Brad Little(R) (no prospective opponents yet) IL: Incumbent J. B. Pritzker(D) (no prospective opponents yet) KS: Incumbent Laura Kelly(D) (no prospective opponents yet) MA: Incumbent Charlie Baker(R) vs.Harvard Professor Danielle Allen(D) vs.State Sen.Ben Downing(D) MD: Incumbent Larry Hogan(R,term-limited) vs.State Rep. Robin Ficker(R) vs.State Rep. Peter Franchot(D) vs.DNC chair Thomas Perez(D) vs.RNC chair Michael Steele(? R)	Gubernatorial Debates 2022 (continued): ME: Incumbent Janet Mills(D) vs.Former Gov. Paul LePage(R) MI: Incumbent Gretchen Whitmer(D) (no prospective opponents yet) MN: Incumbent Tim Walz(DFL) vs.Mayor Mike Murphy(R) NE: Incumbent Pete Ricketts(R,term-limited) vs.U.S.Senator Bob Krist(R) NH: Incumbent Chris Sununu(R) (no prospective opponents yet) NM: Incumbent Michelle Lujan Grisham(D) (no prospective opponents yet) NV: Incumbent Steve Sisolak(D) vs.A.G.Adam Laxalt(? R) vs.U.S.Rep. Mark Amodei(? R) NY: Incumbent Andrew Cuomo(D) (no prospective opponents yet) OH: Incumbent Mike DeWine(R) vs.Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley(? D) OK: Incumbent Kevin Stitt(R) vs.State Sen. Ervin Yen(R) OR: Incumbent Kate Brown(D,term-limited) vs.Gov. nominee Bud Pierce(R) PA: Incumbent Tom Wolf(D,term-limited) vs.U.S.Rep. Lou Barletta(? R) RI: Incumbent Gina Raimondo(D,term-limited) vs.Lt.Gov. Dan McKee(D) vs.Secy.Matt Brown(? D) SC: Incumbent Henry McMaster(R) vs.State Rep. James Emerson Smith(? D) vs.U.S.Rep. Joe Cunningham(? R) SD: Incumbent Kristi Noem(R) vs.State Rep. Billie Sutton(? D) TN: Incumbent Bill Lee(R) vs.Senate nominee Marquita Bradshaw(? D) TX: Incumbent Greg Abbott(R) vs.U.S.Rep. Allen West(? R) VT: Incumbent Phil Scott(R) (no prospective opponents yet) WI: Incumbent Tony Evers(D) (no prospective opponents yet) WY: Incumbent Mark Gordon(R) vs.Minority Leader Chris Rothfuss(D) Gubernatorial Debates 2023: KY: Incumbent Andy Beshear(D) vs.Former Gov. Matt Bevin(? R) Senator Rand Paul(? R) LA: Incumbent John Bel Edwards(D,term-limited) vs.Biden Adviser Cedric Richmond(? D) vs.Senator John Neely Kennedy(? R) MS: Incumbent Tate Reeves(R) (no prospective opponents yet)	Abortion Budget/Economy Civil Rights Corporations Crime Drugs Education Energy/Oil Environment Families/Children Foreign Policy Free Trade Govt. Reform Gun Control Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Infrastructure/Technology Jobs Local Issues Principles/Values Social Security Tax Reform War/Iraq/Mideast Welfare/Poverty Contact info: Email Contact Form Fax Number: 202-226-1463 Official Website Phone number: (202) 225-2132

    
    
    
    
    
    Page last updated: Mar 02, 2021