Mary Fallin on Jobs Republican

Prohibit cities from increasing the minimum wage

Fallin signed Senate Bill 1023 that prevents the increase. It appears to have shuttered efforts to circulate an initiative petition to increase the rate.

President Barack Obama has advocated for increasing the rate to $10.10 an hour. Fallin issued a statement saying Obama's plan ignores economic reality: "President Obama and the Democratic Party believe that on this issue, like on so many others, the government can just mandate prosperity and growth with no consideration of economic reality. Obama and his Oklahoma surrogates say they want to raise the minimum wage to reduce poverty. They are ignoring the fact that most minimum wage workers are young, single people working part time or entry level jobs." Mandating an increase would result in lost jobs, she said.

Allow citizens to vote no Right-to-Work

The Senate had an amendment on the floor to put the issue of Right to Work to a vote of the people, and the Senate got into a big fight. And I got a phone call from one of the senators, saying, "You know, constitutionally you have the power to go up and sit in the Senate chair and take over the Senate. It's never been done, but you do have that power to do that. We think you should come back and take over the Senate." And it was an opposite political party that was in control, and so I said, "Sure, I'll do that. I believe in what we're trying to accomplish here."

62,400 new jobs in our state; unemployment at 5.1%

We have also restored fiscal stability to state government. In January 2011, we had $2.03 in our Rainy Day Fund. Today, we are approaching a record high of over $600 million. We achieved these results by prioritizing our spending, promoting pro-business policies and lowering taxes. Oklahoma's state government has helped our economy to flourish--setting the stage for the job creation and family income growth that has now finally restored the state's economy to 2008, pre-recession job levels.

Excessive worker's compensation is a barrier to growth

Barriers to growth also include excessive workers compensation costs. For decades, out-of-control workers' compensation costs have been a burden on those doing business in Oklahoma. While recent reforms have effectively worked to reduce the total costs of claims, more needs to be done. I am committed to working with the House and Senate to pursue additional reforms that lower costs for businesses while treating injured workers fairly.

Voted YES on extending unemployment benefits from 39 weeks to 59 weeks.

Proponent's argument to vote Yes:

Rep. CHARLES RANGEL (D, NY-15): The House, for weeks, has attempted to save the free world from a fiscal disaster. We have bailed out the banks and those who held mortgages. At the same time, we provided for energy extensions, we provided tax breaks for those people that tax provisions have expired. We provided for hurricane relief, for mental health. So over $1 trillion is out there for this House to ease the pain of millions of Americans.

While we were dealing with these gigantic powers, we overlooked the fact that over the last 12 months the number of unemployed workers has jumped by over 2 million, leaving 10 million Americans struggling for work. These are hardworking people that have lost their jobs through no fault of their own.

Rep. JERRY WELLER (R, IL-11): This important legislation provides additional needed assistance to the long-term unemployed. It's important that we pass this legislation today as our last act before we leave for the election campaign.

This legislation focuses the most additional benefits on workers and States where the unemployment rate is highest and where jobs are hardest to find. This program continues the requirement that those benefiting from extended unemployment benefits had to have worked at least 20 weeks. Americans were rightly concerned about proposals to eliminate that work requirement and allow 39 weeks or, under the legislation before us today, as many as 59 weeks of total unemployment benefits to be paid to those who have previously only worked for a few weeks.

Opponent's argument to vote No:None voiced.

Voted YES on overriding presidential veto of Farm Bill.

Congressional Summary: Provides for the continuation of agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture through FY2012. Revises agricultural and related programs, including provisions respecting:

1. commodity programs;
2. conservation;
3. trade;
4. nutrition;
5. credit;
6. rural development;
7. research and related matters;
8. forestry;
9. energy;
10. horticulture and organic agriculture;
11. livestock;
12. crop insurance and disaster assistance;
13. socially disadvantaged and limited resource producers; and
14. miscellaneous programs.

This bill lacks fiscal discipline. It continues subsidies for the wealthy and increases farm bill spending by more than $20 billion, while using budget gimmicks to hide much of the increase. It is inconsistent with our trade objectives of securing greater market access for American farmers. [Hence] I must veto H.R. 6124.

Proponents argument for voting YEA: We had a meeting this morning with the Secretary of Agriculture to talk about implementation. So [despite the two vetoes], the work has been going on within the department of agriculture to get ready for implementation.

This is a good bill. It has wide support in the Congress. It does address all of the issues that have been brought to the Agriculture Committee.

Voted NO on restricting employer interference in union organizing.

To enable employees to form & join labor organizations, and to provide for mandatory injunctions for unfair labor practices during organizing efforts. Requires investigation that an employer:
1. discharged or discriminated against an employee to discourage membership in a labor organization;
2. threatened to discharge employees in the exercise of guaranteed collective bargaining rights; and
3. adds to remedies for such violations: back pay plus liquidated damages; and additional civil penalties.

Proponents support voting YES because:

The principle at stake here is the freedom that all workers should have to organize for better working conditions & fair wages. There are many employers around the country who honor this freedom. Unfortunately, there are also many employers who do not. These employers attempt to prevent workers from unionizing by using tactics that amount to harassment, if not outright firing. In fact, one in five people who try to organize unions are fired. These tactics are already illegal, but the penalties are so minor, they are not effective deterrents.

Opponents support voting NO because:

Democracy itself is placed at risk by this bill. The sanctity of the secret ballot is the backbone of our democratic process. Not one voter signed a card to send us here to Congress. None of us sent our campaign workers out to voters' houses armed with candidate information & a stack of authorization cards. No. We trusted democracy. We trusted the voters to cast their ballots like adults, freely, openly, without intimidation, and we live with the results. But here we are, poised to advance legislation to kill a secret ballot process.

Let's be clear. Every American has the right to organize. No one is debating that. This is a right we believe in so strongly we have codified it and made it possible for workers to do so through a secret ballot.

Reference: The Employee Free Choice Act; Bill H R 800 ; vote number 2007-118 on Mar 1, 2007

Voted NO on increasing minimum wage to $7.25.

Increase the federal minimum wage to:
1. $5.85 an hour, beginning on the 60th day after enactment;
2. $6.55 an hour, beginning 12 months after that 60th day; and
3. $7.25 an hour, beginning 24 months after that 60th day.

Proponents support voting YES because:

We have waited for over 10 years to have a clean vote on the minimum wage for the poorest workers in this country Low-wage workers had their wages frozen in time, from 10 years ago, but when they go to the supermarket, the food prices are higher; when they put gasoline in the car, the gasoline prices are higher; when they pay the utility bills, the utility bills are higher; when their kids get sick, the medical bills are higher. All of those things are higher. They are living in 2007, but in their wages they are living in 1997.

Opponents support voting NO because:

This bill is marked more by what is not in the bill than what is in it. Small businesses are the backbone of our economy. They create two-thirds of our Nation's new jobs, and they represent 98% of the new businesses in the US. What protection does this bill provide them? None whatsoever.

We can do better. In the interest of sending the President a final measure that provides consideration for small businesses and their workers, the very men and women who are responsible for our economy's recent growth and strength, we must do better.

Reference: Fair Minimum Wage Act; Bill HR 2 ("First 100 hours") ; vote number 2007-018 on Jan 10, 2007

Click here for definitions & background information on Jobs. Click here for a summary of all issue stances of Mary Fallin. Click here for a Wikipedia profile of Mary Fallin. Click here for a Ballotpedia profile of Mary Fallin. Click here for VoteMatch responses by Mary Fallin. Click here for issue positions of other OK politicians. Click here for OK primary archives. Click here for OK secondary archives.
Other governors on Jobs:			Mary Fallin on other issues:
OK Gubernatorial: Brad Henry Chris Powell Connie Johnson Drew Edmondson Ervin Yen Gary Richardson Joe Dorman Joe Maldonado Kevin Stitt Mick Cornett Scott Inman OK Senatorial: Abby Broyles Connie Johnson James Inhofe James Lankford Mike Workman	Gubernatorial Debates 2021: NJ: Incumbent Phil Murphy(D) vs.State Rep. Jack Ciattarelli(R) vs.Candidate Hirsh Singh(R) vs.GOP Hair Doug Steinhardt(R) VA: Incumbent Ralph Northam(D,term-limited) vs.A.G. Mark Herring(D) vs.State Sen. Amanda Chase(R) vs.Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax(D) vs.State Rep. Jennifer Carroll Foy(D) vs.State Rep. Lee Carter(D) vs.Former Governor Terry McAuliffe(D) vs.State Sen. Jennifer McClellan(D) vs.State Rep. Kirk Cox(R) Gubernatorial Debates 2022: AK: Incumbent Mike Dunleavy(R) (no prospective opponents yet) AL: Incumbent Kay Ivey(R) (no prospective opponents yet) AR: Incumbent Asa Hutchinson(R,term-limited) vs.Lt. Gov. Tim Griffin(R) vs.Trump Adviser Sarah Huckabee Sanders(R) vs.A.G. Leslie Rutledge(R) AZ: Incumbent Doug Ducey(R,term-limited) (no prospective opponents yet) CA: Incumbent Gavin Newsom(D) vs.S.D.Mayor Kevin_Faulconer(R) vs.Former Gov. nominee John Cox(R) CO: Incumbent Jared Polis(D) vs.Mayor Greg Lopez(R) CT: Incumbent Ned Lamont(D) (no prospective opponents yet) FL: Incumbent Ron DeSantis(R) vs.U.S.Rep. Val Demings(? D) vs.Former Gov.Charlie Crist(? D) GA: Incumbent Brian Kemp(R) vs.Minority Leader Stacey Abrams(D) vs.Senate candidate Shane Hazel(L) HI: Incumbent David Ige(D,term-limited) vs.State Rep. Andria Tupola(R) IA: Incumbent Kim Reynolds(R) vs.U.S.Rep. Cindy Axne(? R) ID: Incumbent Brad Little(R) (no prospective opponents yet) IL: Incumbent J. B. Pritzker(D) (no prospective opponents yet) KS: Incumbent Laura Kelly(D) (no prospective opponents yet) MA: Incumbent Charlie Baker(R) vs.Harvard Professor Danielle Allen(D) vs.State Sen.Ben Downing(D) MD: Incumbent Larry Hogan(R,term-limited) vs.State Rep. Robin Ficker(R) vs.State Rep. Peter Franchot(D) vs.DNC chair Thomas Perez(D) vs.RNC chair Michael Steele(? R)	Gubernatorial Debates 2022 (continued): ME: Incumbent Janet Mills(D) vs.Former Gov. Paul LePage(R) MI: Incumbent Gretchen Whitmer(D) (no prospective opponents yet) MN: Incumbent Tim Walz(DFL) vs.Mayor Mike Murphy(R) NE: Incumbent Pete Ricketts(R,term-limited) vs.U.S.Senator Bob Krist(R) NH: Incumbent Chris Sununu(R) (no prospective opponents yet) NM: Incumbent Michelle Lujan Grisham(D) (no prospective opponents yet) NV: Incumbent Steve Sisolak(D) vs.A.G.Adam Laxalt(? R) vs.U.S.Rep. Mark Amodei(? R) NY: Incumbent Andrew Cuomo(D) (no prospective opponents yet) OH: Incumbent Mike DeWine(R) vs.Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley(? D) OK: Incumbent Kevin Stitt(R) vs.State Sen. Ervin Yen(R) OR: Incumbent Kate Brown(D,term-limited) vs.Gov. nominee Bud Pierce(R) PA: Incumbent Tom Wolf(D,term-limited) vs.U.S.Rep. Lou Barletta(? R) RI: Incumbent Gina Raimondo(D,term-limited) vs.Lt.Gov. Dan McKee(D) vs.Secy.Matt Brown(? D) SC: Incumbent Henry McMaster(R) vs.State Rep. James Emerson Smith(? D) vs.U.S.Rep. Joe Cunningham(? R) SD: Incumbent Kristi Noem(R) vs.State Rep. Billie Sutton(? D) TN: Incumbent Bill Lee(R) vs.Senate nominee Marquita Bradshaw(? D) TX: Incumbent Greg Abbott(R) vs.U.S.Rep. Allen West(? R) VT: Incumbent Phil Scott(R) (no prospective opponents yet) WI: Incumbent Tony Evers(D) (no prospective opponents yet) WY: Incumbent Mark Gordon(R) vs.Minority Leader Chris Rothfuss(D) Gubernatorial Debates 2023: KY: Incumbent Andy Beshear(D) vs.Former Gov. Matt Bevin(? R) Senator Rand Paul(? R) LA: Incumbent John Bel Edwards(D,term-limited) vs.Biden Adviser Cedric Richmond(? D) vs.Senator John Neely Kennedy(? R) MS: Incumbent Tate Reeves(R) (no prospective opponents yet)	Abortion Budget/Economy Civil Rights Corporations Crime Drugs Education Energy/Oil Environment Families/Children Foreign Policy Free Trade Govt. Reform Gun Control Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Infrastructure/Technology Jobs Local Issues Principles/Values Social Security Tax Reform War/Iraq/Mideast Welfare/Poverty Contact info: Email Contact Form Fax Number: 202-226-1463 Official Website Phone number: (202) 225-2132






Page last updated: Mar 02, 2021