OnTheIssuesLogo

Ed Markey on Energy & Oil

Democratic Representative (MA-7)

 


Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion

Markey calls for ramping up renewable energy production and green energy jobs while curbing the impacts of climate change, particularly in vulnerable communities. "The Green New Deal has shifted the whole discussion. The goals have lifted the gaze of Americans and political leaders," he said. "I'm going to continue to advocate for the Green New Deal, which saves all of creation while investing in massive job creation."
Source: Springfield Republican on 2020 Massachusetts Senate debate , Oct 6, 2020

More offshore wind and solar--but no Green New Deal

While Markey and Liss-Riordan agree that the nation must move toward a green economy with sharp increases in offshore wind, solar and geothermal energy, Liss-Riordan argued the Green New Deal and Markey's environmental message contained a good deal of "lofty language" but not much in the way of financial planning.

Markey acknowledged that the Green New Deal does not have "individual prescriptions" on "how to get there," but calls for a "revolution in every city and town and every campus," with aggressive targets in "every sector" including automotive, industrial, agricultural and manufacturing.

"I know if we have a climate bank with billions of dollars, it could unleash trillions of dollars in investment to increase efficiency," said Markey, who also called for raising fuel economy standards and tax incentives for those who buy electric vehicles. "We should strip the tax breaks for gas and coal and oil industry and give those tax breaks to wind and solar--we will have a revolution."

Source: Springfield Republican on 2020 Massachusetts Senate debate , Nov 10, 2019

Simply unneeded to subsidize oil industry

Markey said the nation should end tax breaks for oil companies and other corporations. "Subsidizing the oil industry is like subsidizing a fish to swim and a bird to fly," Markey said. "You simply don't have to do it."

Markey and Gomez split on the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline, which would bring oil from Canada to Texas. Gomez said the project would create jobs, while Markey said the US would end up bearing all the environmental risk while the oil itself is dumped onto the international market.

Source: Boston Herald on 2013 MA Senate debates , Jun 11, 2013

Regulate wholesale electricity & gas prices.

Markey adopted the Progressive Caucus Position Paper:

The Problem

Escalating energy costs have almost no correlation with supply and demand. Adequate capacity to supply our current energy needs is and has always been plentiful within the energy markets. Newly formed deregulated energy companies are creating an artificial shortage and reaping tremendous profits while doing so.

The Progressive Caucus Solution: Wholesale Cost-based Pricing with Refunds

In the 1930s, wholesale electricity prices and wholesale natural gas prices were regulated, and the regulations provided for refunds if unjust or unreasonable rates were found. Since the late 1970s, these laws have been methodically dismantled leaving little federal price regulations to protect consumers. However, energy prices are easily manipulated as production and delivery systems are complex. Cost-based rates for wholesale electricity, natural gas, heating oil should be established to protect consumers from unjust and unfair prices. Cost based rates allow utilities to recover the cost of their investment and operations while also allowing a reasonable profit. This is not a price cap— FERC sets prices based on a specific, professional rationale. Establishing cost-based rates ensure adequate supply is available and removes the profit incentive from shorting the market. The rates should be set retroactively to the beginning of 2000. Refunds will be issued to families and businesses who have racked up incredible debt in 2000 and 2001, paying the unreasonable and unjust charges that the energy producers, generators and wholesalers inflicted.
Source: Progressive Caucus' Consumer Energy Rate Relief Act 01-CPC1 on Mar 16, 2001

Preserve Alaska's ANWR instead of drilling it.

Markey wrote the Morris K. Udall Arctic Wilderness Act:

Title: To preserve the Arctic coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, as wilderness in recognition of its extraordinary natural ecosystems and for the permanent good of present and future generations of Americans.

Summary: Designates specified lands within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as wilderness and components of the National Wilderness Preservation System [which would preclude oil exploration and drilling].

Source: House Resolution Sponsorship 01-HR770 on Feb 28, 2001

Establish greenhouse gas tradeable allowances.

Markey co-sponsored establishing greenhouse gas tradeable allowances

OFFICIAL CONGRESSIONAL SUMMARY: A bill to provide for a program of scientific research on abrupt climate change, to accelerate the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the US by establishing a market-driven system of greenhouse gas tradeable allowances, to limit greenhouse gas emissions in the US and reduce dependence upon foreign oil, and ensure benefits to consumers from the trading in such allowances.

SPONSOR`S INTRODUCTORY REMARKS: Sen. McCAIN: This bill is designed to begin a meaningful and shared effort among the emission-producing sectors of our country to address the world`s greatest environmental challenge--climate change.

The National Academy of Sciences reported, `temperatures are, in fact, rising.` The overwhelming body of scientific evidence shows that climate change is real, that it is happening as we speak.

Terrible things are happening at the poles, which will have global implications. Amplified global warming, rising sea levels, and potential alterations in ocean circulation patterns are among the global concerns.

The International Climate Change Task Force recommended that `all developed countries introduce mandatory cap-and-trade systems for carbon emissions and construct them to allow for future integration into a single global market.` That is already being done in Europe as we speak, which is the substance of this legislation.

If we do not move on this issue, our children and grandchildren are going to pay an incredibly heavy price because this crisis is upon us, only we do not see its visible aspects in all of its enormity. We have done relatively nothing besides gather additional data and make reports. That is what the US national policy is today: gather information and make reports. I would argue that is a pretty heavy burden to lay on future generations of Americans.

LEGISLATIVE OUTCOME:Referred to Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works; never came to a vote.

Source: Climate Stewardship Act (S.342/H.R.759) 05-S0342 on Feb 10, 2005

Rated 100% by the CAF, indicating support for energy independence.

Markey scores 100% by CAF on energy issues

OnTheIssues.org interprets the 2005-2006 CAF scores as follows:

About the CAF (from their website, www.ourfuture.org):

The Campaign for America`s Future (CAF) is a center for ideas and action that works to build an enduring majority for progressive change. The Campaign advances a progressive economic agenda and a vision of the future that works for the many, not simply the few. The Campaign is leading the fight for America`s priorities--against privatization of Social Security, for investment in energy independence, good jobs and a sustainable economy, for an ethical and accountable Congress and for high quality public education.

About the CAF report, `Energy Independence: Record vs. Rhetoric`:

Energy independence has surfaced as a defining issue in the current elections. Are most candidates and both parties truly committed? To help distinguish the demonstrated level of support for homegrown, clean energy alternatives, we examined the voting records of current U.S. Representatives and Senators on bills vital to promoting those interests. Key pieces of legislation included goals for independence, and subsidies for the development of alternatives compared to subsidies for drilling and digging. We then compared votes on these issues with campaign contributions from major oil interests. The results show strong inverse correlations between political contributions from big oil and votes for energy independence.

Source: CAF "Energy Independence" Report 06n-CAF on Dec 31, 2006

Extend through 2016 the renewable energy tax credit.

Markey co-sponsored American Renewable Energy Production Tax Credit Extension

Congressional Summary:Amends the Internal Revenue Code to extend through 2016 the tax credit for electricity produced from wind, biomass, geothermal or solar energy, landfill gas, trash, hydropower, and marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy facilities.

Proponent`s Comments (Governor`s Wind Energy Coalition letter of Nov. 15, 2011 signed by 23 governors):Although the tax credit for wind energy has long enjoyed bipartisan support, it is scheduled to expire on Dec. 31, 2012. Wind-related manufacturing is beginning to slow in our states because the credit has not yet been extended. If Congress pursues a last minute approach to the extension, the anticipated interruption of the credit`s benefits will result in a significant loss of high-paying jobs in a growing sector of the economy. We strongly urge Congress to adopt a more consistent and longer-term federal tax policy to support wind energy development, such as H.R. 3307.

The leading wind project developers and manufacturers are slowing their plans for 2013 and beyond due to the current uncertainty. The ripple effect of this slow down means reduced orders for turbines and decreased business for the hundreds of manufacturers who have entered the wind industry in our states. When Congress allowed the tax credit to expire in 1999, 2001, and 2003, the development of new wind installations dropped significantly, between 73% and 93%, and thousands of jobs were lost. Providing renewable energy tax credits in order to provide consistency with conventional energy tax credits is the right policy to move the nation forward in an energy sector that offers global export opportunities and the ability to modernize a segment of our electric production infrastructure.

Source: H.R.3307 11-H3307 on Nov 2, 2011

Member of House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Markey is a member of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce has operated continuously--with various name changes and jurisdictional changes--for more than 200 years. The Committee has developed what is arguably the broadest (non-tax-oriented) jurisdiction of any Congressional committee. Today, it maintains principal responsibility for legislative oversight relating to telecommunications, consumer protection, food and drug safety, public health, air quality and environmental health, the supply and delivery of energy, and interstate and foreign commerce in general. This jurisdiction extends over five Cabinet-level departments and seven independent agencies--from the Department of Energy, Health and Human Services, the Transportation Department to the Federal Trade Commission, Food and Drug Administration, and Federal Communications Commission--and sundry quasi-governmental organizations.

Source: U.S. House of Representatives website, www.house.gov 11-HC-Enrg on Feb 3, 2011

Sponsored Green New Deal: 10-year national mobilization.

Markey sponsored the Resolution on Green New Deal

This resolution calls for the creation of a Green New Deal with the goals of:

The resolution calls for accomplishment of these goals through a 10-year national mobilization effort. The resolution also enumerates the goals and projects of the mobilization effort, including:
  • building smart power grids (i.e., power grids that enable customers to reduce their power use during peak demand periods);
  • upgrading all existing buildings and constructing new buildings to achieve maximum energy and water efficiency;
  • removing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation and agricultural sectors;
  • cleaning up existing hazardous waste and abandoned sites;
  • ensuring businesspersons are free from unfair competition; and
  • providing higher education, high-quality health care, and affordable, safe, and adequate housing to all.

    Opposing argument from the Cato Institute, 2/24/2019: While reasonable people can disagree on some aspects of the Green New Deal`s proposals, one fact is uncontroversial: the US cannot afford them. The Green New Deal would likely cost upwards of $6.6 trillion per year. The federal government should look for cheaper ways to address problems like climate change. Instead of the Green New Deal, the federal government could adopt a revenue??neutral carbon tax to decrease emissions without exacerbating the fiscal imbalance. Economists from across the political spectrum support carbon taxation as the most cost??effective way to address climate change. And a carbon tax would be most effective if uniformly adopted by other countries, too.

    Source: H.Res.109/S.Res.59 19-HR0109 on Feb 7, 2019

    Let states define stricter-than-federal emission standards.

    Markey co-sponsored allowing states to define stricter emission standards

    A bill to permit California and other States to effectively control greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles, and for other purposes. Amends the Clean Air Act to approve the application of the state of California for a waiver of federal preemption of its motor vehicle emission standards.

    Source: Reducing Global Warming from Vehicles Act (S.2555&H.R.5560) 2008-S2555 on Jan 24, 2008

    Other candidates on Energy & Oil: Ed Markey on other issues:
    MA Gubernatorial:
    Ben Downing
    Danielle Allen
    Geoff Diehl
    Maura Healey
    Mike Kennealy
    Sonia Chang-Diaz
    MA Senatorial:
    Elizabeth Warren
    John Deaton
    Seth Moulton
    Shiva Ayyadurai

    MA politicians
    MA Archives
    Senate races 2026:
    AK: Dan Sullivan(R,incumbent)
    vs.Andy Barr(R)
    vs.Mary Peltola(D)
    AL: Tommy Tuberville(R,retiring)
    vs.Barry Moore(R)
    vs.Steve Marshall(R)
    AR: Tom Cotton(R,incumbent)
    vs.Dan Whitfield(I,withdrew)
    vs.Ethan Dunbar(D)
    CO: John Hickenlooper(D,incumbent)
    vs.Janak Joshi(R)
    vs.Julie Gonzales(D)
    vs.Mark Baisley(R)
    DE: Chris Coons(D,incumbent)
    vs.Mike Katz(I)
    FL: Ashley Moody(R,appointee)
    vs.Alan Grayson(D)
    vs.Angie Nixon(D)
    GA: Jon Ossoff(D,incumbent)
    vs.Buddy Carter(R)
    vs.Mike Collins(R)
    vs.John F. King(R,withdrew)
    IA: Joni Ernst(R,retiring)
    vs.Ashley Hinson(R)
    vs.Bob Krause(D)
    vs.Jim Carlin(R)
    vs.J.D. Scholten(D,withdrew)
    ID: Jim Risch(R,incumbent)
    vs.David Roth(D)
    vs.Todd Achilles(I)
    IL: Richard Durbin(D,retiring)
    vs.Juliana Stratton(D)
    vs.Raja Krishnamoorthi(D)
    vs.Robin Kelly(D)
    KS: Roger Marshall(R,incumbent)
    vs.Patrick Schmidt(D)
    KY: Mitch McConnell(R,retiring)
    vs.Charles Booker(D)
    vs.Daniel Cameron(R)
    vs.Pamela Stevenson(D)
    LA: Bill Cassidy(R,incumbent)
    vs.John Fleming(R)
    vs.Julia Letlow(R)
    MA: Ed Markey(D,incumbent)
    vs.Seth Moulton(D)
    vs.John Deaton(R)
    ME: Susan Collins(R,incumbent)
    vs.Janet Mills(D)
    MI: Gary Peters(D,retiring)
    vs.Haley Stevens(D)
    vs.Joe Tate(R,withdrew)
    vs.Mallory McMorrow(D)
    vs.Mike Rogers(R)

    MN: Tina Smith(D,retiring)
    vs.Angie Craig(D)
    vs.David Hann(R)
    vs.Peggy Flanagan(D)
    vs.Royce White(R)
    MS: Cindy Hyde-Smith(R,incumbent)
    vs.Ty Pinkins(D)
    MT: Steve Daines(R,incumbent)
    vs.Reilly Neill(D)
    NC: Thom Tillis(R,retiring)
    vs.Michael Whatley(R)
    vs.Roy Cooper(D)
    NE: Peter Ricketts(R,incumbent)
    vs.Dan Osborn(I)
    NH: Jeanne Shaheen(D,retiring)
    vs.Chris Pappas(D)
    vs.John Sununu(R)
    vs.Scott Brown(R)
    NJ: Cory Booker(D,incumbent)
    vs.Justin Murphy(R)
    NM: Ben Ray Lujan(D,incumbent)
    vs.Matt Dodson(D)
    OH: Jon Husted(R,appointee)
    vs.Sherrod Brown(D)
    OK: Markwayne Mullin(R,incumbent)
    vs.Troy Green(D)
    OR: Jeff Merkley(D,incumbent)
    vs.Jo Rae Perkins(R)
    RI: Jack Reed(D,incumbent)
    vs.Connor Burbridge(D)
    SC: Lindsey Graham(R,incumbent)
    vs.Catherine Fleming Bruce(D)
    vs.Paul Dans(R)
    SD: Mike Rounds(R,incumbent)
    vs.Brian Bengs(I)
    TN: Bill Hagerty(R,incumbent)
    vs.Diana Onyejiaka(D)
    TX: John Cornyn(R,incumbent)
    vs.Ken Paxton(R)
    vs.Wesley Hunt(R)
    vs.James Talarico(D)
    vs.Jasmine Crockett(D)
    VA: Mark Warner(D,incumbent)
    vs.David Williams(R)
    WV: Shelley Moore Capito(R,incumbent)
    vs.Jeff Kessler(D)
    vs.Tom Willis(R)
    WY: Cynthia Lummis(R,retiring)
    vs.Harriet Hageman(R)
    vs.Reid Rasner(R)
    Abortion
    Budget/Economy
    Civil Rights
    Corporations
    Crime
    Drugs
    Education
    Energy/Oil
    Environment
    Families
    Foreign Policy
    Free Trade
    Govt. Reform
    Gun Control
    Health Care
    Homeland Security
    Immigration
    Jobs
    Principles
    Social Security
    Tax Reform
    Technology
    War/Peace
    Welfare

    Other Senators
    Congressional Votes (analysis)
    Congressional Ratings
    Affiliations
    Policy Reports




    Page last updated: Feb 15, 2026; copyright 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org