Kweisi Mfume on Crime Democratic Senate Challenger (MD); previously U.S. Representative

Truth in sentencing, but with vocational training

Which of the following proposals will you support to address the problem of crime?
• Impose “truth in sentencing” legislation for violent criminals so they serve a full sentence with no chance of parole.
• Create “boot camps” for juvenile and adult first-time offenders.
• Fund programs to provide prison inmates with vocational and job-related skills.
• Fund programs which provide job training and employment opportunities for at-risk urban youth.

Voted NO on making federal death penalty appeals harder.

Voted YES on replacing death penalty with life imprisonment.

Stricter sentencing for hate crimes.

Congressional Summary:

• To make sentencing guidelines for Federal criminal cases that provide sentencing enhancements for hate crimes.
• Amends the Federal judicial code to require the U.S. Sentencing Commission to:
• promulgate or amend existing guidelines to provide for sentencing enhancements of not less than three offense levels for offenses that the finder of fact at trial determines beyond a reasonable doubt are hate crimes; and
• assure reasonable consistency with other guidelines, avoid duplicative punishments for substantially the same offense, and take into account any mitigating circumstances that might justify exceptions.

Proponents' Argument in Favor:Rep. SENSENBRENNER. This bill does not create a new Federal crime. Nothing that is presently not criminal now would be made criminal as a result of enactment. What enactment of H.R. 1152 will do is provide for enhanced criminal penalties for certain specifically designated hate crimes. As used in the bill, the term hate crime is defined as a Federal crime in which the defendant intentionally selects a victim because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation of the person. Hate crimes are more serious offenses and often result in a greater level of injury to the victim and to society.

Pro-police liability, according to PVS survey.

Project Vote Smart inferred whether candidates agree or disagree with the statement, 'Crime: Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduc PVS self-description: "The Political Courage Test provides voters with positions on key issues. Historically, candidates have failed to complete our test due to the advice they receive from their advisors and out of fear of negative attack ads."